EVALUATION METHOD FOR FISHESFOCUSING ON HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE OF PHISYCAL HABITAT

Evaluation Method of DEA Efficiency Values Based on Hierarchical Structure

IEEJ Transactions on Electronics Information and Systems ◽

10.1541/ieejeiss.132.206 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 132 (2) ◽

pp. 206-213 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Kazushige Inoue ◽

Shingo Aoki ◽

Hiroshi Tsuji

Keyword(s):

Hierarchical Structure ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Dea Efficiency

Download Full-text

Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Multi-meter Integrated Energy Metering Operating State Based on Hierarchical Structure

2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT) ◽

10.1109/icct50939.2020.9295890 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Huang Rui ◽

Liu Mouhai ◽

Chen Xiangqun ◽

Lu Jun ◽

Lin Weiwei ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hierarchical Structure ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Comprehensive Evaluation ◽

Comprehensive Evaluation Method ◽

Energy Metering

Download Full-text

Relationships between hierarchical structure and properties in macromolecular systems

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100126950 ◽

1987 ◽

Vol 45 ◽

pp. 440-443

Author(s):

E. Baer

Keyword(s):

Uniaxial Tension ◽

Hierarchical Structure ◽

Inorganic Material ◽

Hierarchical Structures ◽

Bone Collagen ◽

Structure And Properties ◽

Connective Tissues ◽

Scale Level ◽

Fibrous Protein ◽

Macromolecular Systems

The most advanced macromolecular materials are found in plants and animals, and certainly the connective tissues in mammals are amongst the most advanced macromolecular composites known to mankind. The efficient use of collagen, a fibrous protein, in the design of both soft and hard connective tissues is worthy of comment. Very crudely, in bone collagen serves as a highly efficient binder for the inorganic hydroxyappatite which stiffens the structure. The interactions between the organic fiber of collagen and the inorganic material seem to occur at the nano (scale) level of organization. Epitatic crystallization of the inorganic phase on the fibers has been reported to give a highly anisotropic, stress responsive, structure. Soft connective tissues also have sophisticated oriented hierarchical structures. The collagen fibers are “glued” together by a highly hydrated gel-like proteoglycan matrix. One of the simplest structures of this type is tendon which functions primarily in uniaxial tension as a reinforced elastomeric cable between muscle and bone.

Download Full-text

Evaluation method for imaging plate resolution by means of phase contrast transfer function

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100139688 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 53 ◽

pp. 662-663 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

T. Oikawa ◽

H. Kosugi ◽

F. Hosokawa ◽

D. Shindo ◽

M. Kersker

Keyword(s):

Transfer Function ◽

Phase Contrast ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Amorphous Film ◽

Imaging Plate ◽

X Rays ◽

Special Shape ◽

Contrast Transfer Function ◽

Contrast Image ◽

Specimen Shape

Evaluation of the resolution of the Imaging Plate (IP) has been attempted by some methods. An evaluation method for IP resolution, which is not influenced by hard X-rays at higher accelerating voltages, was proposed previously by the present authors. This method, however, requires truoblesome experimental preperations partly because specially synthesized hematite was used as a specimen, and partly because a special shape of the specimen was used as a standard image. In this paper, a convenient evaluation method which is not infuenced by the specimen shape and image direction, is newly proposed. In this method, phase contrast images of thin amorphous film are used.Several diffraction rings are obtained by the Fourier transformation of a phase contrast image of thin amorphous film, taken at a large under focus. The rings show the spatial-frequency spectrum corresponding to the phase contrast transfer function (PCTF). The envelope function is obtained by connecting the peak intensities of the rings. The evelope function is offten used for evaluation of the instrument, because the function shows the performance of the electron microscope (EM).

Download Full-text

Combining Values

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2002.marapr01 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 1-4, 12 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Christopher R. Brigham

Keyword(s):

Lower Extremity ◽

Upper Extremity ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Proximal Phalanx ◽

Common Error ◽

The Third ◽

Whole Person ◽

Impairment Ratings ◽

Upper Extremity Impairment ◽

The Individual

Abstract To account for the effects of multiple impairments, evaluating physicians must provide a summary value that combines multiple impairments so the whole person impairment is equal to or less than the sum of all the individual impairment values. A common error is to add values that should be combined and typically results in an inflated rating. The Combined Values Chart in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition, includes instructions that guide physicians about combining impairment ratings. For example, impairment values within a region generally are combined and converted to a whole person permanent impairment before combination with the results from other regions (exceptions include certain impairments of the spine and extremities). When they combine three or more values, physicians should select and combine the two lowest values; this value is combined with the third value to yield the total value. Upper extremity impairment ratings are combined based on the principle that a second and each succeeding impairment applies not to the whole unit (eg, whole finger) but only to the part that remains (eg, proximal phalanx). Physicians who combine lower extremity impairments usually use only one evaluation method, but, if more than one method is used, the physician should use the Combined Values Chart.

Download Full-text