scholarly journals ANALISIS MULTIKRITERIA DALAM PEMILIHAN SISTEM PEMROSESAN SAMPAH DI KABUPATEN KLUNGKUNG, PROVINSI BALI (Multicriteria Analysis for Selecting Waste Processing System in Klungkung Regency, Bali Province)

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Mochammad Chaerul ◽  
Elprida Agustina ◽  
I Made Wahyu Widyarsana

AbstrakBerbagai macam upaya dilakukan oleh pemerintah untuk menciptakan lingkungan suatu kota yang bersih, diantaranya melalui penyediaan fasilitas sistem pemrosesan sampah sebagai tahapan akhir dalam pengelolaan sampah. Saat ini, Kabupaten Klungkung, Provinsi Bali memiliki 3 alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah yang dapat diaplikasikan, yaitu: menggunakan tempat pemrosesan akhir sampah (TPA) eksisting Regional Bangli, membangun TPA baru tersendiri untuk Klungkung, dan pemrosesan akhir di Tempat Olah Sampah Setempat (TOSS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memilih sistem pemrosesan sampah yang paling optimal dengan mempertimbangkan 4 kriteria, yaitu lingkungan, ekonomi, sosial dan teknis (analisis multikriteria) dengan menggunakan pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Setiap kriteria memiliki beberapa sub kriteria yang dimintakan kepada 35 orang responden yang mewakili 5 institusi pemerintahan daerah terkait untuk dilakukan penilaian perbandingan berpasangan. Penilaian juga dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi setiap alternatif terhadap semua sub kriteria dan kriteria. Secara global, responden lebih memilih pencegahan pencemaran lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,16) sebagai sub kriteria terpenting dari total 13 sub kriteria yang tersedia. Urutan kriteria yang dianggap lebih penting adalah lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,543), sosial (0,181), ekonomi (0,146) dan teknis (0,130). Untuk alternatif pengolahan sampah di fasilitas TOSS dianggap yang paling optimal (total nilai 0,47) disusul TPA Regional Bangli (0,28), terakhir TPA baru (0,25). Suatu alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah dengan kelebihan dan kekurangan masing-masing harus dipilih yang paling dapat diterima oleh berbagai stakeholder terkait sehingga diharapkan dapat menjadi bagian dari suatu sistem pengelolaan sampah yang berkelanjutan dari suatu kota.AbstractIn order to create a city clean, efforts are taken by government including provision of waste processing system facility as part of waste management system. Recently, Klungkung Regency, Bali Province has 3 alternatives of waste processing system to be applied, namely: utilizing the existing regional final disposal site (TPA) of Bangli, building a new TPA facility dedicated for Klungkung area only, and on-site waste processing facility (TOSS). The study aims to determine the most optimal of waste processing system by considering 4 criteria, namely environment, economic, social and technical (multicriteria analysis) with the help of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Each criterion having several sub criterions were assessed by 35 respondents representing 5 local government’s institutions by applying pair wise comparison. The asessement were also performed to evaluate the alternatives to the given criteria and sub criterion. In global, respondents preferred to put environmental pollution prevention (weight of 0.16) as the most important among total 13 sub criterions available. Among the criteria, environment (weight of 0.543) was more prioritized than social (0.181), economic (0.146) and technical (0.130) aspects. Other result showed that TOSS (total value of 0.47) was more preferred than existing TPA of Bangli (0.28), and new TPA of Klungkung (0.25). An alternative of waste processing with its advantages and disadvantages should be chosen and acceptable by the related stakeholders, thus the facility becomes part of sustainable waste management system in a city.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Mochammad Chaerul ◽  
Elprida Agustina ◽  
I Made Wahyu Widyarsana

ABSTRACTIn order to create a city clean, efforts are taken by the government, including the provision of waste processing system facilities as part of a waste management system. Recently, Klungkung Regency, Bali Province, has three alternatives waste processing systems to be applied, namely: utilizing the existing regional final disposal site (TPA) of Bangli, building a new TPA facility dedicated to Klungkung area only, and communal waste processing facility. The study aims to determine the most optimal waste processing system by considering four criteria (multicriteria) with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) from 35 respondents representing five local government institutions. Among the criteria, environment (weight of 0.543) was more prioritized than social (0.181), financial (0.146) and technical (0.130) aspects. Respondents preferred to put environmental pollution prevention (weight of 0.16) as the most important among 13 sub-criteria. Other results showed that TOSS (total value of 0.47) was more preferred than the existing TPA of Bangli (0.28) and new the TPA of Klungkung (0.25). An alternative waste processing with its advantages and disadvantages should be chosen and acceptable by the related stakeholders. Thus, the facility becomes part of a sustainable waste management system in a city.Keywords: multicriteria analysis, pair wise comparison, analytical hierarcy process, waste processing systemABSTRAKBerbagai macam upaya dilakukan oleh pemerintah untuk menciptakan lingkungan suatu kota yang bersih, diantaranya melalui penyediaan fasilitas sistem pemrosesan sampah sebagai tahapan akhir dalam pengelolaan sampah. Saat ini, Kabupaten Klungkung, Propinsi Bali, memiliki 3 alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah yang dapat diaplikasikan, yaitu: menggunakan tempat pemrosesan akhir sampah (TPA) eksisting Regional Bangli, membangun TPA baru tersendiri untuk Klungkung, dan pemrosesan skala komunal (misalnya berupa Tempat Olah Sampah Setempat/TOSS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memilih sistem pemrosesan sampah yang paling optimal dengan mempertimbangkan 4 kriteria (multicriteria) dengan menggunakan pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dari 35 orang responden yang mewakili 5 institusi pemerintahan daerah. Urutan kriteria yang dianggap lebih penting adalah lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,543), sosial (0,181), finansial (0,146) dan teknis (0,130). Responden lebih memilih pencegahan pencemaran lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,16) sebagai subkriteria terpenting dari total 13 subkriteria. Sedangkan alternatif pemrosesan sampah skala komunal dianggap yang paling optimal (total nilai 0,47) disusul TPA Regional Bangli (0,28), terakhir TPA baru (0,25). Suatu alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah dengan kelebihan dan kekurangan masing-masing harus dipilih yang paling dapat diterima oleh berbagai stakeholders terkait sehingga diharapkan dapat menjadi bagian dari suatu sistem pengelolaan sampah yang berkelanjutan dari suatu kota.Kata Kunci: analisis multikriteria, perbandingan berpasangan, analytical hierarchy process, sistem pemrosesan sampah



2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 04007
Author(s):  
Sumiani Yusoff

With the escalated increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation in Malaysia reaching a shocking 38,000 ton/day in 2017, a sustainable waste management system is much desired. Nationwide, there are 176 landfills but only 8 are sanitary landfill with the rest are open dumpsites. In the campus of University of Malaya, UM Zero Waste Campaign (UM ZWC) was introduced in 2011 to start a long-term campaign to achieve an integrated and sustainable waste management model and ultimately a zero-waste campus. Since year 2015, UM ZWC is fully funded by Sustainability Science Research Cluster of UM (Susci) as one of the living labs of UM as well as by JPPHB under the RMK-11 budget. UM ZWC operating projects including in house composting center, food waste segregation scheme, research composting emission and waste characterization, anaerobic digestion (AD), used clothes collection program, wood waste separate collection, e-waste collection and drop-off recycling collection were initiated under the campaign. Since the inception of the project in 2011 until December 2017, almost over 620 tons of solid waste has been diverted from disposal in landfill with composting, AD, recycling, re-use and energy recovery. A roadmap of UM ZWC was drawn up in 2013, with a goal to achieve 60% landfill diversion by year 2040. In the next 5-10 years, UM ZWC plays a vital role to formalize the recycling collection in UM and further increase the organic waste recycling with green waste shredding and composting. Besides environmental benefits (pollution prevention and carbon emission reduction), UM ZWC brings various benefits such as academic research opportunities for UM, contribute in UM LCCF (Low carbon city framework) target and serve as platform to improve students soft skills and entrepreneur skill. Multi stakeholders participation, support form top management and industrial collaboration are the key factors that are able to drive the development of a sustainable waste management model in UM campus.



2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Baidya ◽  
Biswajit Debnath ◽  
Sadhan Kumar Ghosh ◽  
Seung-Whee Rhee

e-Waste is generated at the staggering rate of 6.1 kg per person. In 2016, 44.7 million tonnes was generated globally, and the amount is estimated to reach 52 million tonnes annually by 2021. The management of this huge quantity of e-waste is a major problem across the world, primarily in developing countries. An effective e-waste management system is linked to the sustainability of e-waste processing plants, and currently it is plagued with different supply chain network (SCN) issues. To address the issues and challenges of SCN, there is a need to prioritize and address the constructs. The study thus combines two multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) tools, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and quality function deployment, to prioritize the constructs identified from literature and supported by field studies. The house of quality (HOQ) has been used for analyzing different stakeholders’ requirements. The degree of importance for HOQ-1 has been derived using the AHP tool. The study revealed the most intriguing issues and challenges of e-waste processing plants considering the requirements of different stakeholders. The results showed formal collection, storage, semi-informal collection, and e-waste quality to be the major issues of processing plants. The findings obtained from MCDM analysis have been validated though two case studies in India and China. If the results obtained are applied to the existing e-waste SCN, a holistic e-waste management system can be achieved for developing countries.



2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deskrianti Tanaem

Waste management is a systematic, comprehensive, sustainable activity that includes waste reduction and handling. The existence of waste can have a health effect on the environment and society if it is not handled seriously. The influence of waste on the environment that can damage the aesthetics of the environment and for health can indirectly be in the form of vector-borne diseases that breed in the waste. This study was conducted to determine the description of the waste management system in Soe City. The research method used is a descriptive survey where the research is carried out with the main aim of making a picture or description of a situation objectively. The number of samples in this study were 26 TPS and 1 TPA and the managers of each TPS and TPA. The analysis used is univariate analysis. Based on the results of the study, it showed that of the total 26 TPS in Soe City, 3 (11.5%) were in the good category, while 23 (88.5%) were in the bad category. The waste management system that starts from waste sorting is 26 (100.0%) TPS is bad in sorting waste, bad waste collection is 17 (65.4%) while good is 9 TPS (34.6%). The process of transporting waste from TPS to TPA is still bad at 17 (65.4%) TPS and 9 (34.6%) TPS have good category, for waste processing from 26 TPS no one does waste processing, and final waste processing Soe City TPA is still bad at destroying waste. The Soe City Government is expected to pay attention to waste management issues as well as support and facilitate the solid waste management system in Soe City, in order to reduce the negative impact on environmental health and public health





2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Generowicz

Introduction. The implementation of the European Union regulations into Polish law resulted in the establishment of such methods of dealing with waste in order to comply with the requirements of environmental protection and waste management plans. Each time the construction of another plant is a social and economic problem, therefore, the enhancement of the form and shape of such a system requires justification. The basic task of municipal waste management is to create technical conditions for the collection, transport, recovery, recycling and disposal of waste. The technical correctness of the system and the scope of the adverse impact resulting in lowering ecological, aesthetic and cultural values ​​will decide about its capital expenditure and operating costs. The large number of imposed, overlapping, and often conflicting goals means that finding a favourable solution and decisively accepting it is a very difficult task, often requiring a compromise. The solution will be based on searching for the shape of a waste management system that, under existing restrictions, will ensure the best possible implementation of specific objectives under the specific conditions of the region. Aim and tasks. The aim of the article is to present the multicriteria analysis method as a tool for analysis and selection of the waste management system in the region. In the multicriteria analysis for the selection of the most beneficial solution, it is necessary to find a function integrating individual objectives into one overall assessment. However, it is possible to choose only one solution - a compromise, and then a consistent implementation of the tasks of the chosen scenario. The presented analysis presents an example for a large city in Poland - Krakow. Research results. The result of the presented calculations is the presentation of the assessment method for various waste management scenarios in the technical, socio-political and economic aspects. Such an assessment allows for an objective comparison between the presented waste management scenarios. Conclusions. The result of the presented methodology of multi-criteria evaluation and analysis is the selection of the most advantageous solution of the waste management system. The presented system was assessed in a multi-aspect manner and the result allows to indicate the best solution in the presented assumptions and limitations. The method is universal and can be used for other waste management and environmental management systems.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document