scholarly journals Analisis Multikriteria dalam Pemilihan Sistem Pemrosesan Sampah di Kabupaten Klungkung, Provinsi Bali

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Mochammad Chaerul ◽  
Elprida Agustina ◽  
I Made Wahyu Widyarsana

ABSTRACTIn order to create a city clean, efforts are taken by the government, including the provision of waste processing system facilities as part of a waste management system. Recently, Klungkung Regency, Bali Province, has three alternatives waste processing systems to be applied, namely: utilizing the existing regional final disposal site (TPA) of Bangli, building a new TPA facility dedicated to Klungkung area only, and communal waste processing facility. The study aims to determine the most optimal waste processing system by considering four criteria (multicriteria) with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) from 35 respondents representing five local government institutions. Among the criteria, environment (weight of 0.543) was more prioritized than social (0.181), financial (0.146) and technical (0.130) aspects. Respondents preferred to put environmental pollution prevention (weight of 0.16) as the most important among 13 sub-criteria. Other results showed that TOSS (total value of 0.47) was more preferred than the existing TPA of Bangli (0.28) and new the TPA of Klungkung (0.25). An alternative waste processing with its advantages and disadvantages should be chosen and acceptable by the related stakeholders. Thus, the facility becomes part of a sustainable waste management system in a city.Keywords: multicriteria analysis, pair wise comparison, analytical hierarcy process, waste processing systemABSTRAKBerbagai macam upaya dilakukan oleh pemerintah untuk menciptakan lingkungan suatu kota yang bersih, diantaranya melalui penyediaan fasilitas sistem pemrosesan sampah sebagai tahapan akhir dalam pengelolaan sampah. Saat ini, Kabupaten Klungkung, Propinsi Bali, memiliki 3 alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah yang dapat diaplikasikan, yaitu: menggunakan tempat pemrosesan akhir sampah (TPA) eksisting Regional Bangli, membangun TPA baru tersendiri untuk Klungkung, dan pemrosesan skala komunal (misalnya berupa Tempat Olah Sampah Setempat/TOSS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memilih sistem pemrosesan sampah yang paling optimal dengan mempertimbangkan 4 kriteria (multicriteria) dengan menggunakan pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dari 35 orang responden yang mewakili 5 institusi pemerintahan daerah. Urutan kriteria yang dianggap lebih penting adalah lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,543), sosial (0,181), finansial (0,146) dan teknis (0,130). Responden lebih memilih pencegahan pencemaran lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,16) sebagai subkriteria terpenting dari total 13 subkriteria. Sedangkan alternatif pemrosesan sampah skala komunal dianggap yang paling optimal (total nilai 0,47) disusul TPA Regional Bangli (0,28), terakhir TPA baru (0,25). Suatu alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah dengan kelebihan dan kekurangan masing-masing harus dipilih yang paling dapat diterima oleh berbagai stakeholders terkait sehingga diharapkan dapat menjadi bagian dari suatu sistem pengelolaan sampah yang berkelanjutan dari suatu kota.Kata Kunci: analisis multikriteria, perbandingan berpasangan, analytical hierarchy process, sistem pemrosesan sampah

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Mochammad Chaerul ◽  
Elprida Agustina ◽  
I Made Wahyu Widyarsana

AbstrakBerbagai macam upaya dilakukan oleh pemerintah untuk menciptakan lingkungan suatu kota yang bersih, diantaranya melalui penyediaan fasilitas sistem pemrosesan sampah sebagai tahapan akhir dalam pengelolaan sampah. Saat ini, Kabupaten Klungkung, Provinsi Bali memiliki 3 alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah yang dapat diaplikasikan, yaitu: menggunakan tempat pemrosesan akhir sampah (TPA) eksisting Regional Bangli, membangun TPA baru tersendiri untuk Klungkung, dan pemrosesan akhir di Tempat Olah Sampah Setempat (TOSS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memilih sistem pemrosesan sampah yang paling optimal dengan mempertimbangkan 4 kriteria, yaitu lingkungan, ekonomi, sosial dan teknis (analisis multikriteria) dengan menggunakan pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Setiap kriteria memiliki beberapa sub kriteria yang dimintakan kepada 35 orang responden yang mewakili 5 institusi pemerintahan daerah terkait untuk dilakukan penilaian perbandingan berpasangan. Penilaian juga dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi setiap alternatif terhadap semua sub kriteria dan kriteria. Secara global, responden lebih memilih pencegahan pencemaran lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,16) sebagai sub kriteria terpenting dari total 13 sub kriteria yang tersedia. Urutan kriteria yang dianggap lebih penting adalah lingkungan (nilai bobot 0,543), sosial (0,181), ekonomi (0,146) dan teknis (0,130). Untuk alternatif pengolahan sampah di fasilitas TOSS dianggap yang paling optimal (total nilai 0,47) disusul TPA Regional Bangli (0,28), terakhir TPA baru (0,25). Suatu alternatif sistem pemrosesan sampah dengan kelebihan dan kekurangan masing-masing harus dipilih yang paling dapat diterima oleh berbagai stakeholder terkait sehingga diharapkan dapat menjadi bagian dari suatu sistem pengelolaan sampah yang berkelanjutan dari suatu kota.AbstractIn order to create a city clean, efforts are taken by government including provision of waste processing system facility as part of waste management system. Recently, Klungkung Regency, Bali Province has 3 alternatives of waste processing system to be applied, namely: utilizing the existing regional final disposal site (TPA) of Bangli, building a new TPA facility dedicated for Klungkung area only, and on-site waste processing facility (TOSS). The study aims to determine the most optimal of waste processing system by considering 4 criteria, namely environment, economic, social and technical (multicriteria analysis) with the help of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Each criterion having several sub criterions were assessed by 35 respondents representing 5 local government’s institutions by applying pair wise comparison. The asessement were also performed to evaluate the alternatives to the given criteria and sub criterion. In global, respondents preferred to put environmental pollution prevention (weight of 0.16) as the most important among total 13 sub criterions available. Among the criteria, environment (weight of 0.543) was more prioritized than social (0.181), economic (0.146) and technical (0.130) aspects. Other result showed that TOSS (total value of 0.47) was more preferred than existing TPA of Bangli (0.28), and new TPA of Klungkung (0.25). An alternative of waste processing with its advantages and disadvantages should be chosen and acceptable by the related stakeholders, thus the facility becomes part of sustainable waste management system in a city.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 04007
Author(s):  
Sumiani Yusoff

With the escalated increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation in Malaysia reaching a shocking 38,000 ton/day in 2017, a sustainable waste management system is much desired. Nationwide, there are 176 landfills but only 8 are sanitary landfill with the rest are open dumpsites. In the campus of University of Malaya, UM Zero Waste Campaign (UM ZWC) was introduced in 2011 to start a long-term campaign to achieve an integrated and sustainable waste management model and ultimately a zero-waste campus. Since year 2015, UM ZWC is fully funded by Sustainability Science Research Cluster of UM (Susci) as one of the living labs of UM as well as by JPPHB under the RMK-11 budget. UM ZWC operating projects including in house composting center, food waste segregation scheme, research composting emission and waste characterization, anaerobic digestion (AD), used clothes collection program, wood waste separate collection, e-waste collection and drop-off recycling collection were initiated under the campaign. Since the inception of the project in 2011 until December 2017, almost over 620 tons of solid waste has been diverted from disposal in landfill with composting, AD, recycling, re-use and energy recovery. A roadmap of UM ZWC was drawn up in 2013, with a goal to achieve 60% landfill diversion by year 2040. In the next 5-10 years, UM ZWC plays a vital role to formalize the recycling collection in UM and further increase the organic waste recycling with green waste shredding and composting. Besides environmental benefits (pollution prevention and carbon emission reduction), UM ZWC brings various benefits such as academic research opportunities for UM, contribute in UM LCCF (Low carbon city framework) target and serve as platform to improve students soft skills and entrepreneur skill. Multi stakeholders participation, support form top management and industrial collaboration are the key factors that are able to drive the development of a sustainable waste management model in UM campus.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Baidya ◽  
Biswajit Debnath ◽  
Sadhan Kumar Ghosh ◽  
Seung-Whee Rhee

e-Waste is generated at the staggering rate of 6.1 kg per person. In 2016, 44.7 million tonnes was generated globally, and the amount is estimated to reach 52 million tonnes annually by 2021. The management of this huge quantity of e-waste is a major problem across the world, primarily in developing countries. An effective e-waste management system is linked to the sustainability of e-waste processing plants, and currently it is plagued with different supply chain network (SCN) issues. To address the issues and challenges of SCN, there is a need to prioritize and address the constructs. The study thus combines two multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) tools, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and quality function deployment, to prioritize the constructs identified from literature and supported by field studies. The house of quality (HOQ) has been used for analyzing different stakeholders’ requirements. The degree of importance for HOQ-1 has been derived using the AHP tool. The study revealed the most intriguing issues and challenges of e-waste processing plants considering the requirements of different stakeholders. The results showed formal collection, storage, semi-informal collection, and e-waste quality to be the major issues of processing plants. The findings obtained from MCDM analysis have been validated though two case studies in India and China. If the results obtained are applied to the existing e-waste SCN, a holistic e-waste management system can be achieved for developing countries.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deskrianti Tanaem

Waste management is a systematic, comprehensive, sustainable activity that includes waste reduction and handling. The existence of waste can have a health effect on the environment and society if it is not handled seriously. The influence of waste on the environment that can damage the aesthetics of the environment and for health can indirectly be in the form of vector-borne diseases that breed in the waste. This study was conducted to determine the description of the waste management system in Soe City. The research method used is a descriptive survey where the research is carried out with the main aim of making a picture or description of a situation objectively. The number of samples in this study were 26 TPS and 1 TPA and the managers of each TPS and TPA. The analysis used is univariate analysis. Based on the results of the study, it showed that of the total 26 TPS in Soe City, 3 (11.5%) were in the good category, while 23 (88.5%) were in the bad category. The waste management system that starts from waste sorting is 26 (100.0%) TPS is bad in sorting waste, bad waste collection is 17 (65.4%) while good is 9 TPS (34.6%). The process of transporting waste from TPS to TPA is still bad at 17 (65.4%) TPS and 9 (34.6%) TPS have good category, for waste processing from 26 TPS no one does waste processing, and final waste processing Soe City TPA is still bad at destroying waste. The Soe City Government is expected to pay attention to waste management issues as well as support and facilitate the solid waste management system in Soe City, in order to reduce the negative impact on environmental health and public health


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sattar Yunus ◽  
Ramdiana Muis ◽  
Nani Anggraini ◽  
Fitri Ariani ◽  
Zulkifli

The city of Makassar is in a coastal area. Cambayya village in Makassar is densely populated and has complex waste problems. Limited land access and narrow road access make it difficult to transport waste. People’s habit of throwing garbage into the sea leads to the accumulation of garbage on the coast of Cambayya and causes various forms of environmental pollution. A form of waste management that uses composting methods is needed to handle organic waste. This study aims to find an alternative piece of composting technology to handle waste coastal area conditions. This study uses qualitative methods, namely Analytical Hierarchy Process which is descriptive, refers to data and utilizes theory as a support. The sample is chosen using the purposive sampling method. Furthermore, the analytical hierarchy process approach and a comparison matrix involving four criteria are used, namely, economic, social, environmental and technical criteria. Thirteen sub-criteria are also used. Stakeholders from the government, community, and academia are interviewed, and direct observation and documentation (evidence in data collection during interviews) are used. This study found that communal composting technology is the most appropriate type of composting for coastal areas such as Cambayya, Makassar, because the amount of waste processed is higher than other technologies such as individual and hallway composter. This reduces the amount of waste disposed at the final waste disposal site, transforming community waste management habits, saving time, increasing the community’s income from the sale of compost.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document