scholarly journals Perbandingan Performa Refrigeran Propana dan Amonia pada Siklus Refrigerasi Dew Point Control Unit (DPCU)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Mochammad Syahrir Isdiawan ◽  
Aditya Nurfebriartanto ◽  
Rafitri Rusmala
Keyword(s):  
Low Temperature ◽  
Control Unit ◽  
Dew Point ◽  
Simple Cycle ◽  
Refrigeration Cycle ◽  
Evaporator Temperature ◽  
Gas Condensation ◽  
Aspen Hysys ◽  
Condenser Temperature ◽  
Point Control

Natural gas, that has been processed and met certain specifications, is sent to consumers through pipeline. Gas condensation within the pipeline should be avoided because it has negative impacts. Hydrocarbon dew point is a measure of the easiness of gas condensation. To meet the hydrocarbon dew point, heavy hydrocarbon should be extracted in dew point control unit (DPCU). The extraction is done by gas cooling in gas chiller followed by separating the liquid formed in low temperature separator (LTS). The gas chiller functions as an evaporator in the DPCU refrigeration cycle. Propane is a common refrigerant in the DPCU. In addition, ammonia is also a potential refrigerant due to its normal boiling point being close to the hydrocarbon dew point. Refrigeration cycle performance depends on evaporator temperature, condensor temperature, and the inherent pressure-enthalpy (PH) characteristic of the selected refrigerant. This study aimed to compare the performance from ammonia and propane against the change of evaporator and condenser temperature. This study was a dry research using Aspen Hysys V11.0 simulation software (academic license). The refrigeration cycle was a simple cycle with fixed variables in the form of evaporator load, saturated liquid at outlet condenser, and saturated vapour at outlet evaporator. This study indicated that at the same evaporator load, evaporator temperature, and condenser temperature, ammonia refrigeration cycle was better than the propane because coefficient of performance (COP) of ammonia was higher than propane. This study also modeled COP changes of propane and ammonia as mathematical equation. Quantitatively, it appeared that COP of propane was more sensitive than ammonia against both evaporator and condenser temperature changes.Keywords: ammonia; condenser; evaporator; propane; refrigeration cycle; simulationA B S T R A KGas alam yang telah diolah dan sesuai spesifikasinya dikirim ke konsumen melalui pipa. Kondensasi gas dalam pipa harus dihindari karena menimbulkan dampak negatif. Titik embun hidrokarbon menjadi ukuran kemudahan proses kondensasi gas. Untuk mencapai titik embun hidrokarbon yang diinginkan, maka hidrokarbon berat harus diekstraksi di dew point control unit (DPCU). Ekstraksi dilakukan dengan cara mendinginkan gas di gas chiller lalu memisahkan cairan yang terbentuk di low temperature separator (LTS). Gas chiller tersebut berfungsi sebagai evaporator pada siklus refrigerasi DPCU. Propana adalah refrigeran yang umum digunakan di DPCU. Selain itu, amonia juga menjadi refrigeran yang potensial karena kedekatan titik didih normalnya terhadap titik embun hidrokarbon yang diinginkan. Performa siklus refrigerasi dipengaruhi oleh temperatur evaporator, temperatur kondensor, dan karakteristik tekanan-entalpi (PH) yang melekat pada refrigeran yang dipilih. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan performa siklus refrigerasi propana dan amonia terhadap perubahan temperatur evaporator dan kondensor. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kering yang menggunakan perangkat lunak simulasi Aspen Hysys V11.0 (lisensi akademik). Siklus refrigerasi yang digunakan adalah simple cycle dengan variabel tetap berupa beban evaporator, kondisi cair jenuh outlet kondensor, dan kondisi uap jenuh outlet evaporator. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pada beban evaporator, temperatur evaporator, dan temperatur kondensor yang sama, maka siklus refrigerasi amonia lebih baik dari propana karena COP amonia lebih tinggi dari propana. Penelitian ini juga memodelkan nilai COP propana dan amonia sebagai persamaan matematika. Secara kuantitatif, terlihat bahwa COP amonia lebih stabil dari propana terhadap perubahan temperatur evaporator dan kondensor.Kata kunci: amonia; evaporator; kondensor; propana; siklus refrigerasi; simulasi

scholarly journals Studi Penambahan Etilena Glikol dalam Menghambat Pembentukan Metana Hidrat pada Proses Pemurnian Gas Alam

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Muslikhin Hidayat ◽  
Danang Tri Hartanto ◽  
Muhammad Mufti Azis ◽  
Sutijan Sutijan
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Low Temperature ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Operating Temperature ◽  
Hydrate Formation ◽  
Control Unit ◽  
Dew Point ◽  
Heavy Hydrocarbon ◽  
Aspen Hysys ◽  
Point Control

The gas processing facilities are designed to significantly reduce the impurities such as water vapor, heavy hydrocarbon, carbon dioxide, carbonyl sulfide (COS), benzene-toluene-xylene (BTX), mercaptane, and the sulfur compounds. A small amount of those compounds in natural gas is not preferable since they disturb the next processes.  It was proposed to decrease natural gas's operating temperature to -20 ⁰F to remove the impurities from natural gas. The decrease of the natural gas's operating temperature has some consequences to the gas mixers such as hydrate formation at high pressure and low temperature, solidification of ethylene glycol (EG) solution, and the icing of the surface due to low temperature on the surface of chiller (three constraints). The Aspen Hysys 8.8 was used to obtain the suitable flowrate and concentration of the EG solution injected into the natural gas. Peng-Robinson's model was considered the most appropriate thermodynamic property model, and thus it has been applied for this research. The calculation results showed that the EG solution injection would reduce the hydrate formation due to water vapor absorption in the natural gas by EG. The EG solution's flowrate and concentration were varied from 20,000-2,000,000 lb/hr and 80-90 wt.%. When the separation was carried out at the operating temperature of -20 ⁰F, the EG solution's concentration fulfilling the requirement was of 80-84 wt.% with the flowrate of EG solution of 900,000 lb/hr and even more. This amount is not operable. More focused investigation was done for the variation of the operating temperature. Increasing operating temperature significantly reduced the flowrate of EG solution to about 200,000 lb/hr. An alternative process was proposed by focusing on two concentration cases of 80 and 85 % of weight at the low flow rate of EG solution, respectively. These simulations were intended to predict impurities' concentration in the effluent of Dew Point Control Unit (DPCU). The concentrations of BTX, heavy hydrocarbon, mercaptane, and COS flowing out of DPCU were 428.1 ppm, 378.4 ppm, 104 ppm, and 13.3 ppm, respectively. The concentrations of BTX and heavy hydrocarbon are greater than the minimum standard required. It is needed to install an absorber to absorb BTX and heavy hydrocarbon. However, the absorber capacity will be much smaller than if the temperature of natural gas is not decreased and not injected by the EG solution.Keywords: DPCU gas treatment; ethylene glycol solution; hydrate formation; simulationA B S T R A KUnit pengolahan gas dirancang untuk mengurangi sebagian besar senyawa pengotor seperti uap air, hidrokarbon berat, karbon dioksida, karbonil sulfida (COS), benzena-toluena-xilena (BTX), merkaptan, dan senyawa sulfur lainnya. Keberadaan senyawa tersebut dalam gas alam berbahaya karena mengganggu proses selanjutnya walaupun dalam jumlah sedikit. Untuk membersihkan gas alam dari senyawa pengotor, maka suhu operasi gas diturunkan menjadi -20 °F. Penurunan suhu operasi gas dapat menyebabkan pembentukan hidrat pada tekanan tinggi dan suhu rendah, pembekuan larutan etilena glikol (EG), dan pembentukan lapisan es pada permukaan chiller. Aspen Hysys 8.8 digunakan untuk memperkirakan berapa kecepatan alir dan konsentrasi larutan EG yang diinjeksikan ke gas alam. Model Peng-Robinson adalah model termodinamika yang diterapkan untuk penelitian ini. Hasil simulasi menunjukkan bahwa injeksi larutan EG dapat mengurangi pembentukan hidrat karena larutan EG menyerap uap air dalam gas alam. Kecepatan alir dan konsentrasi larutan EG divariasikan dari 20.000-2.000.000 lb/jam dan 80-90 % (%b/b). Saat pemisahan dilakukan pada suhu operasi -20 °F, konsentrasi larutan EG yang memenuhi syarat adalah 80-84 % (%b/b) dengan kecepatan alir larutan EG 900.000 lb/jam atau lebih. Jumlah ini sangat banyak dan kurang layak untuk dioperasikan. Penelitian difokuskan pada variasi suhu operasi. Peningkatan suhu operasi diikuti dengan pengurangan kecepatan aliran larutan EG secara signifikan yaitu menjadi sekitar 200.000 lb/jam. Alternatif proses diusulkan dengan berfokus pada penggunaan kecepatan alir larutan EG yang rendah dengan konsentrasi larutan EG sebesar 80 dan 85 % (%b/b). Simulasi dapat memprediksi konsentrasi pengotor yang keluar dari Dew Point Control Unit (DPCU). Konsentrasi BTX, hidrokarbon berat, merkaptan, dan COS yang mengalir keluar dari DPCU berturut-turut adalah 428,1 ppm, 378,4 ppm, 104 ppm, dan 13,3 ppm. Konsentrasi BTX dan hidrokarbon berat tersebut lebih besar dari standar minimum yang disyaratkan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pemasangan absorber untuk menyerap BTX dan hidrokarbon berat. Namun, kapasitas absorber akan jauh lebih kecil apabila dibandingkan dengan kondisi tanpa menurunkan suhu dan menginjeksikan oleh larutan EG.Kata kunci: DPCU; larutan etilena glikol; pembentukan hidrat; simulasi 

Irreversibility Analysis of a Vapor Compression Cascade Refrigeration Cycle

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Kilicarslan ◽  
Norbert Mu¨ller
Keyword(s):  
Low Temperature ◽  
Alternative Energy ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Energy Sources ◽  
Temperature Cycle ◽  
Refrigeration Cycle ◽  
Evaporator Temperature ◽  
Temperature Cycles ◽  
Condenser Temperature ◽  
Cascade Refrigeration

Hydrocarbon based energy sources such as coal, oil and natural gas have been diminishing in an increasing speed. Instead of finding alternative energy sources, we have to use the available sources more effectively. By means of the irreversibility analysis, we can determine the factors or conditions that cause the inefficiencies in any energy system. In this study, irreversibility analysis of a compression cascade refrigeration cycle that consists of a high and low temperature cycles is presented. In the high temperature cycle, the refrigerants from different classes, namely R12 (CFC), R22 (HCFC), R134a (HFC) and R404a (Azeotropic) are selected as working fluids. In the low temperature cycle, R13 is only used as a working fluid. Irreversibility analysis of refrigerant pairs, namely R12-R13, R22-R13, R134a-R13, and R404a-R13 are carried out in a compression cascade refrigeration cycle by a computer code developed. The effects of evaporator temperature, condenser temperature, and the temperature difference between the saturation temperatures of the lower and higher temperature cycles in the heat exchanger (ΔT) and the polytropic efficiency on irreversibility of the system are investigated. The irreversibility of the cascade refrigeration cycle decreases as the evaporator temperature and polytropic efficiency increase for all of the refrigerant couples considered while the irreversibility increases with the increasing values of the condenser temperature and ΔT. In the whole ranges of evaporator temperature (−65°C / −45°C), condenser temperature (30–50°C), ΔT (2–16K) and polytropic efficiency (%50/%100), the refrigerant pair R12-R13 has the lowest values of irreversibilities while the pair R404a-R13 has the highest ones. At the lower condenser temperature (<30°C) and higher polytropic efficiencies (85%–95%), the refrigerant couples except for R404a-R13 have approximately the same values of irreversibility.

Comparison of Subcooling Effect of Water as a Refrigerant With the Current Refrigerants

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Kilicarslan ◽  
Norbert Mu¨ller
Keyword(s):  
Computer Program ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
The Other ◽  
Refrigeration Cycle ◽  
Vapor Compression ◽  
Evaporator Temperature ◽  
Vapor Compression Refrigeration Cycle ◽  
Condenser Temperature ◽  
Vapor Compression Refrigeration ◽  
Compressor Efficiency

The performance comparison of water as a refrigerant (R718) with some prevailing refrigerants including R717, R290, R134a, R12, R22, and R152a is presented. A computer program simulating an actual vapor compression refrigeration cycle including subcooling was developed to calculate the coefficient of performances (COPs) for the different refrigerants. Evaporator temperatures above which water yields a better COP over the other refrigerants are investigated for subcooling case. The effect of degree of subcooling on the COPs is elaborated. For most of the refrigerants (R290, R134a, R12, R22, and R152a) the COP increases by around one percent (1%) per one Kelvin (1K) subcooling, while the COP for R718 and R717 increases by around 0.2 % and 0.5 % per one Kelvin (1K) subcooling. At constant evaporator temperature, increasing the degree of subcooling results in decrease of the relative COP gain of R718. R718 gives the highest relative COP increase at constant condenser temperature and polytropic efficiency. The effect of polytropic efficiency on the performance is also investigated. It is observed that the evaporator temperature range at which R718 presents a better COP than other refrigerants increases with increasing values of polytropic compressor efficiency if the degree of subcooling is kept constant.

scholarly journals Design of an Ejector Working in Combined Ejector - Vapor Compressor Refrigeration Cycle

2021 ◽  
Vol 31.2 (149) ◽  
pp. 141-146
Keyword(s):  
Cooling Capacity ◽  
Area Ratio ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Refrigeration Cycle ◽  
Vapor Compression ◽  
Evaporator Temperature ◽  
Vapor Compression Refrigeration Cycle ◽  
Condenser Temperature ◽  
Vapor Compression Refrigeration

In this paper, a calculation program is developed to design ejector working in a combined ejector – vapor compression refrigeration cycle. R134a is selected as the refrigerant for the ejector sub-cycle, and R410A is selected for the compressor sub-cycle. The effect of operating conditions and cooling capacity are examined. The results show that the area ratio increases with the increasing of generator temperature and intercooler temperature; and decreases with the increasing of condenser temperature and evaporator temperature. When the generator temperature, condenser temperature, intercooler temperature and evaporator temperature are 80°C, 34°C, 15°C, 0°C respectively, the area ratio is 8.55 and independent with cooling capacity. The design equations of significant dimensions based on operating conditions and cooling capacity are also introduced. The results show that R134a ejetor which is designed for simple ejector cycle is not suitable for combined cycle.

Parametric Analysis and Comparison of Ejector Expansion Refrigeration Cycles With Constant Area and Constant Pressure Ejectors

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Candeniz Seckin
Keyword(s):  
Parametric Analysis ◽  
Constant Pressure ◽  
Cooling Capacity ◽  
Coefficient Of Performance ◽  
Refrigeration Cycle ◽  
Operational Parameters ◽  
Entrainment Ratio ◽  
Evaporator Temperature ◽  
Constant Area ◽  
Condenser Temperature

In this work, parametric analysis of ejector expansion refrigeration cycles (EERC) with two different types of ejectors (constant area (CA) ejector and constant pressure (CP) ejector) is performed, and comparison of the results is presented. Effects of variation in operational parameters (condenser temperature, evaporator temperature, and cooling capacity) on coefficient of performance (COP), entrainment ratio (w), and pressure lift factor (Plf) are investigated. The range of variation for evaporator temperature, condenser temperature, and cooling capacity are −5 to 15 °C, 50–70 °C, and 10–80 kW, respectively. The ejector refrigeration cycle is simulated by ees software. The obtained results are validated by the experimental data available in the literature. The refrigerant R134a is selected based on the merit of its environmental and performance characteristics. The results show that the effect of evaporator temperature is much higher than that of condenser temperature on Plf. In contrast, the influence of condenser temperature on COP is much stronger than that of evaporator temperature. It is seen that COP and Plf of ejector expansion refrigeration cycle with constant pressure ejector (CP-EERC) are higher than those of refrigeration cycle with constant area ejector.

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of a CO2 Refrigeration System Enhanced with a Dew Point Cooler

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Belusko ◽  
Raymond Liddle ◽  
Alemu Alemu ◽  
Edward Halawa ◽  
Frank Bruno
Keyword(s):  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Dew Point ◽  
Coefficient Of Performance ◽  
Experimental Program ◽  
Refrigeration System ◽  
Conventional System ◽  
Ambient Temperatures ◽  
Air Temperatures ◽  
Condenser Temperature

Dew point cooling (DPC) is a novel indirect evaporative cooling concept capable of delivering air temperatures approaching the dew point. Coupling this technology with CO2 refrigeration is well suited to minimising transcritical operation when the coefficient of performance (COP) is dramatically reduced in hot climates. A substantial experimental program was conducted to characterise this combination by testing a 20 kW CO2 refrigeration system subject to ambient temperatures above 40 °C. It was demonstrated that DPC operation not only avoided transcritical operation during such weather conditions, but also increased the COP by up to 140% compared to the conventional system. The combination of these technologies was successfully mathematically modelled, from which the optimum condenser inlet air temperature was identified for each condenser temperature. Using this optimum condition, it was possible to maximise the COP for a range of conditions applicable to the psychometric chart. An annual case study for Adelaide, Australia was conducted which demonstrated that optimally coupling DPC with CO2 refrigeration can reduce the annual energy consumption and peak demand by 16% and 47%, respectively, compared to a conventional CO2 booster system. Furthermore, the number of hours of transcritical operation was reduced from 3278 to 27.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document