scholarly journals COMBINING THE SUITABILITY-FEASIBILITY-ACCEPTABILITY (SFA) STRATEGY WITH THE MCDM APPROACH

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 579
Author(s):  
Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani ◽  
Ramin Bazrafshan ◽  
Parnian Akaberi ◽  
Morteza Yazdani ◽  
Fatih Ecer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Target Market ◽  
Fish Market ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Cost Of Transportation ◽  
Selection Of

Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability (SFA) is a fundamental tool for the development and selection of strategy. Any type of decision-making problem can be resolved by Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. In this research, we explore the complexity of determining the proper goal market for the Chilean fish market. This study proposed a combined approach of SFA with MCDM methods in a real case study. The proposed structure helps to assign the best market for Chilean export fish to West Asia. Three countries (Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman) are selected as a target market in this region, and then related criteria are obtained from various sources. In order to develop a new market for the Chilean fishery industry, five major criteria, including the potential of a target market, region's economic attractiveness, consumption of the seafood, location, cost of transportation, and country risks, were selected based on the SFA framework. Calculating the criteria weights is performed by the Best-Worst (BWM) method, and ordering the alternatives is operated by Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to compromise Solution (MARCOS) methods. The results showed that Oman is the best destination (importer) for the Chilean fish market (Salmon fish as the case).

scholarly journals Cold Chain Logistics Management of Medicine with an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (23) ◽  
pp. 4843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Wen ◽  
Huchang Liao ◽  
Ruxue Ren ◽  
Chunguang Bai ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Cold Chain ◽  
Solution Methods ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Ranking Of Alternatives ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Selection Of

Medicine is the main means to reduce cancer mortality. However, some medicines face various risks during transportation and storage due to the particularity of medicines, which must be kept at a low temperature to ensure their quality. In this regard, it is of great significance to evaluate and select drug cold chain logistics suppliers from different perspectives to ensure the quality of medicines and reduce the risks of transportation and storage. To solve such a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, this paper proposes an integrated model based on the combination of the SWARA (stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis) and CoCoSo (combined compromise solution) methods under the probabilistic linguistic environment. An adjustment coefficient is introduced to the SWARA method to derive criteria weights, and an improved CoCoSo method is proposed to determine the ranking of alternatives. The two methods are extended to the probabilistic linguistic environment to enhance the applicability of the two methods. A case study on the selection of drug cold chain logistics suppliers is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed integrated MCDM model. The advantages of the proposed methods are highlighted through comparative analyses.

scholarly journals INTEGRATING BWM AND ARAS UNDER HESITANT LINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENT FOR DIGITAL SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE SUPPLIER SECTION

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1188-1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huchang Liao ◽  
Zhi Wen ◽  
Lili Liu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supply Chain ◽  
Gradual Increase ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Supply Chain Finance ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Fuzzy Linguistic ◽  
Selection Of

In the era of intelligence and informatization, digital supply chain finance (DSCF) has become one of the important trends in the development of supply chain finance. With the gradual increase of DSCF suppliers and various requirements of small and medium-sized enterprises for suppliers in providing financing services, selecting the most suitable DSCF supplier is of great significance for most small and medium-sized enterprises to expand reproduction and improve competitiveness. To address such a decision-making problem, this paper proposes a new multi-expert multiple criteria decision-making model by integrating the Best Worst Method (BWM) and Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) method under the hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment, in which the hesitant fuzzy linguistic BWM method is applied to determine the weights of criteria while the hesitant fuzzy linguistic ARAS method is proposed to rank the candidate suppliers. A case study is given to demonstrate the procedure of the proposed method for the selection of optimal DSCF suppliers, which shows the feasibility of the proposed method. Finally, sensitivity analysis and comparative analyses are provided to testify the applicability and superiority of the proposed method.

scholarly journals Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Selection of the Optimal Mining Design Solution—A Case Study on Quarry “Tambura”

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3200
Author(s):  
Branimir Farkaš ◽  
Ana Hrastov
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Open Pit ◽  
Design Solution ◽  
Mine Design ◽  
Promethee Ii ◽  
Mining Design ◽  
Quarry Mine ◽  
Selection Of

Mining design is usually evaluated with different multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods when it comes to large open pit or underground ore mines, but it is not used on quarry sites. Since Croatia is mostly mining stone, the implementation of such methods in decision making of the quarry mine design is imperative but left out. In this paper, the PROMETHEE II and AHP decision-making methods are implemented on the quarry site to find out the best final quarry design contour. By implementing the MCDM methods, the best quarry model was chosen based on 22 different criteria parameters out of three final quarry designs. The chosen model is not only financially sound but also has the least environmental impact.

An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy MCDM Approach to Select Cloud-Based ERP System for SMEs

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (06) ◽  
pp. 1875-1908
Author(s):  
Akshay Hinduja ◽  
Manju Pandey
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Managerial Decision ◽  
Erp System ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Fuzzy Preference Relations ◽  
Priority Method ◽  
Selection Of

ERP system is a software package that integrates and manages all the facets of the business and deeply influences the success of a business endeavor. The increasing competition in the market, rapidly changing demands, and increasing intricacy of business procedures induce enterprises to adopt ERP solutions. Adopting an ERP solution increases synchronization between business activities and reinforces managerial decision-making. However, it also involves a large investment, a significant amount of human resources and time, and risk of failure. Therefore, the selection of an ERP solution is a crucial decision for enterprises. To address this decision-making problem, we propose a four-stage multi-criteria decision-making approach in this paper. Three prevalent MCDM techniques, DEMATEL, IF-ANP, and IF-AHP, are used in different stages of the methodology to achieve better outcomes. The methodology incorporates the intuitionistic fuzzy sets to capture uncertainty and hesitancy involved in decision makers’ judgments. In addition, we develop a novel priority method to derive weights from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. To validate the feasibility of the proposed approach, a case study is carried out on the selection of cloud-based ERP system for SMEs in the Chhattisgarh state of India, which indicates that the proposed four-stage approach effectively handles the ERP selection problem.

scholarly journals FINDING A PROMISING VENTURE CAPITAL PROJECT WITH TODIM UNDER PROBABILISTIC HESITANT FUZZY CIRCUMSTANCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 2026-2044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weike Zhang ◽  
Jiang Du ◽  
Xiaoli Tian
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Fuzzy Information ◽  
Investment Environment ◽  
Limited Ability ◽  
Risk Seeking ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Criteria Weights

Considering the risk aversion for gains and the risk seeking for losses of venture capitalists, the TODIM has been chosen as the decision-making method. Moreover, group decision is an available way to avoid the limited ability and knowledge etc. of venture capitalists. Simultaneously, venture capitalists may be hesitant among several assessed values with different probabilities to express their real perception because of the uncertain decision-making environment. However, the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information can solve such problems effectively. Therefore, the TODIM has been extended to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy circumstance for the sake of settling the decision-making problem of venture capitalists in this paper. Moreover, due to the uncertain investment environment, the criteria weights are considered as probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information as well. Then, a case study has been used to verify the feasibility and validity of the proposed TODIM. Also, the TODIM with hesitant fuzzy information has been carried out to analysis the same case. From the comparative analysis, the superiority of the proposed TODIM in this paper has already appeared.

New Method for Solving a General Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Problem Under Risk in Fuzzy Environment

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (05) ◽  
pp. 1157-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Thillaigovindan ◽  
S. Anita Shanthi ◽  
J. Vadivel Naidu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Multiple Criteria ◽  
Fuzzy Soft Set ◽  
Score Functions ◽  
Fuzzy Environment ◽  
Criterion Weight ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Interval Valued

This paper considers a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem under risk in fuzzy environment in its general form. There are m alternatives which need to be ranked on the basis of a set of n criteria. The alternatives and the criteria are evaluated based on a set of l characteristics. The entire data is presented in the form of interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft set of root type. In addition each criterion is assigned a subjective criterion weight based on expert’s evaluation and each characteristic is assigned a probability weight on the basis of decision maker’s knowlege and understanding of the importance of the characteristic. This problem may be called as a MCDM problem under risk in fuzzy environment in its general form. A method for ranking the alternatives using the new score functions, prospect theory and method of determining the optimum criteria weights is explained. An algorithm is developed for this purpose and its working illustrated with a suitable example.

scholarly journals Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method for Selection the Superior Cattle

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilik Sumaryanti ◽  
Nurcholis Nurcholis
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Priority Ranking ◽  
Increase Productivity ◽  
Mcdm Method ◽  
Female Cattle ◽  
Selection Of

The results of decision making play an important role in achieving a goal in solving certain problems. In the decision making process requires data or supporting evidence that can be used as a guide for the selection of solutions based on available alternatives, so as to produce choices that can increase productivity. MCDM method for the analysis of research data namely AHP, TOPSIS and SMART, the three methods are tested, because each MCDM method has a different way of working or algorithm, so it is necessary to experiment with certain cases. This study aims to determine the performance of the AHP, TOPSIS, and SMART methods with a case study of selecting superior female cattle breeds. The application of three MCDM methods for alternative analysts of prospective superior beef cattle based on testing to determine the accuracy of comparing the results/output of the system with expert recommendation solutions using a sample of 15 female cows that produce priority/ranking for superior beef cattle, shows that the performance of the three methods produces priority selection results the same, with 80% priority accuracy.

scholarly journals A NEW ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) METHOD IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION‐MAKING / NAUJAS ADITYVINIS KRITERIJŲ SANTYKIŲ ĮVERTINIMO METODAS (ARAS) DAUGIAKRITERINIAMS UŽDAVINIAMS SPRĘSTI

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ◽  
Zenonas Turskis
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Dew Point ◽  
Air Flow Rate ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Office Rooms

Multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) methods are used in many areas of human activities. Each alternative in a multicriteria decision‐making problem can be described by a set of criteria. Criteria can be qualitative and quantitative. They usually have different units of measurement and a different optimization direction. The normalization aims at obtaining comparable scales of criteria values. The paper introduces a new Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) method. In order to illustrate the described ARAS method a real case study of evaluation of microclimate in office rooms is presented. The case study aims to determine the inside climate of the premises, where people work, and to define measures to be taken to improve their environment. Based on the analysis, the following criteria for inside climate evaluation are suggested: air turnover inside the premises, air humidity, air temperature, illumination intensity, air flow rate, and dew point. The criteria weights were determined by the method of pairwise comparison based on the estimates of experts. Santrauka Daugiakriteriniai sprendimų metodai taikomi daugelyje žmogaus veiklos sričių. Kiekviena alternatyva, sprendžiant daugiakriterinius uždavinius, gali būti apibūdinta kriteriju aibe. Kriterijai gali būti kokybiniai ir kiekybiniai. Jie paprastai turi skirtingus matavimo vienetus ir įvairią optimizavimo kryptį. Kriterijų vertės yra normalizuojamos lyginamos skalės vertėms gauti. Straipsnyje pateikiamas naujas adityvinis kriterijų santykių įvertinimo metodas (ARAS) daugiakriteriniams uždaviniams spręsti. ARAS metodo taikymui pavaizduoti pateiktas realus mikroklimato biuro patalpose vertinimo tyrimas. Tyrimo tikslas ‐ įvertinti patalpų, kurioje žmonės dirba, mikroklimata ir nustatyti priemones, kurių reikia imtis aplinkai pagerinti. Remiantis uždavinio tikslų analize, siūlomi šie kriterijai vidaus klimatui įvertinti: oro pasikeitimas, patalpų oro santykinė dregmė, oro temperatūra, apšvietimo intensyvumas, oro srautas ir rasos taškas. Kriterijų svoriai nustatomi porinio lyginimo metodu, remiantis ekspertų vertinimais. Kriterijų reikšmės nustatytos sertifikuotu prietaisu.

scholarly journals Selection of subcontractors using ordinal ranking methods based on Condorcet approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 033-040
Author(s):  
Sławomir Biruk ◽  
Piotr Jaśkowski
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Choice Theory ◽  
Condorcet Winner ◽  
Social Choice Theory ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Selection Methods ◽  
Ranking Methods ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Selection Of

A choice of a subcontractor may have critical impact on realization of the project, it has influence on the cost, duration, and quality. Selection of the best sucontractor can be defined as multiple criteria decision making problem (MCDM) of choosing a proper offer from set of alternatives evaluated by using set of criteria. Decision maker should determine the criteria as objective and measurable. Significance of decision making problem is presented by large amount of theories and methods developed for solving MCDM problems and number of criteria considered in these problems. A Condorcet method (formulated over two centuries ago) is commonly accepted for democratic (majority of criteria determines the winner) and fair election – a Condorcet winner is the alternative which is preferred in all pair-wise comparisons. According to social choice theory where a Condorcet winner cannot be obtained from a set of alternatives, the best solution is close to being a Condorcet winner. The paper presents four selection methods of the best alternative that is as close as possible to being a Condorcet winner and contains examples of a subcontractor selection using only ordinal scales of evaluation of alternatives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document