scholarly journals Peran Kepemimpinan Indonesia dalam Pengelolaan Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Peggy Puspa Haffsari ◽  
Yandry Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
South China Sea ◽  
South China ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Active Role ◽  
Leadership Role ◽  
Regional Security ◽  
Regional Powers ◽  
Limited Impact ◽  
China Sea

AbstrakPenelitian ini akan membahas peran kepemimpinan Indonesia dalam upaya pengelolaan sengketa Laut Cina Selatan (LCS). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memahami peran negara dalam kawasan dan pengaruhnya pada dinamika keamanan di tingkat regional secara komprehensif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan model deduktif. Kerangka analisis menggunakan konsep kepemimpinan dalam pendekatan kekuatan regional dan kerangka keamanan (Regional Powers and Security Freamwork-RPSF). Terdapat lima komponen yang menjelaskan perilaku pemimpin regional antara lain keterlibatan dalam proses inisiasi (prosess-initiation), keterlibatan dalam pembingkaian isu (issue framing), pertimbangan kepentingan (interest consideration), membangun institusi (institutional development) dan penyebaran kekuatan (deployment of power). Hasil penelitian secara umum mendapatkan bahwa peran Indonesia dalam upaya pengelolaan sengketa LCS cukup aktif namun berdampak terbatas. Peran Indonesia dikatakan aktif terlihat dari telah banyak kerja sama dan diplomasi yang dilakukan Indonesia selama dua puluh enam tahun. Peran Indonesia berdampak terbatas karena ditemukan kendala pada tiap praktek peran kepemimpinan Indonesia dalam mendorong dan mendukung terciptanya solusi internal penyelesaian sengketa LCS dari pihak-pihak yang bersengketa.Kata Kunci:  Kawasan, Keamanan, LCS, Peran, Sengketa AbstractThis research discusses the role of Indonesian leadership in the effort of managing the South China Sea (LCS) disputes. The purpose of this study is to understand the role of the state in the region and its influence on the dynamics of regional security. This study is a qualitative reseacrh with the deductive model. the analytical framework uses the concept of leadership in regional and security approaches (Regional Powers and Security Framework-RPSF). There are five components that explain the role of initiation, initiation proceedings, discussions in framing issues, considerations of interests, institutional development, and power dissemination.  This research finds out that Indonesian role in LCS dispute is quite active but limited impact. The active role of the Indonesian leadership wants to create and maintain an environment that is fulfilled the absence of open conflict in the LCS. The role of Indonesia has limited impact because it finds obstacles in every practice of Indonesia's leadership role in encouraging and supporting the creation of internal dispute solution of LCS from the parties.Key words: Dispute, Regional, Role, Security, South China Sea

scholarly journals «China-Vietnam-India» format in the South-China sea in the context of regional security

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-371
Author(s):  
Tatyana I. Ponka ◽  
Nikita S. Kuklin ◽  
Ivan R. Dubrovsky
Keyword(s):  
South China Sea ◽  
South China ◽  
The South China Sea ◽  
Regional Security ◽  
Territorial Dispute ◽  
The South ◽  
China Sea ◽  
Military Presence ◽  
Energy Plane

This article is devoted to the role of the territorial dispute in the South China sea in relations between China, Vietnam and India in the regional subsystem of Southeast Asia. The regional space under consideration is characterized by high economic dynamism and active integration processes, including participation of non-regional actors. Particular importance is attached to the positions of the three States on fundamental aspects that have a destructive impact on the development of regional processes. Attention is paid to the conceptualization of the policy of the three States in the waters of this sea. Following consideration of the problems the authors conclude that the intersection of the interests of the three countries in this sea threatens to exacerbate the fragility of the political and strategic landscape of the regional subsystem, registration open, but citizenries order on the space of the SCS. The article notes that the confrontational tone in relations between China, Vietnam and India brings with it many threats, in particular the clash of state interests in the energy plane, the arms race between the three nuclear powers (USA, India, China), which was accompanied by increased military presence of non-regional player (USA) in the region, complicated by territorial and historical conflicts.

scholarly journals The role of synoptic-scale waves in the onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. e858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingliang Huangfu ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Ronghui Huang
Keyword(s):  
South China Sea ◽  
Summer Monsoon ◽  
South China ◽  
The South China Sea ◽  
Synoptic Scale ◽  
The South ◽  
China Sea

scholarly journals Naval Diplomacy: Upaya Defensif Indonesia dalam Konflik Laut Tiongkok Selatan di Era Joko Widodo

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Satwika Paramasatya ◽  
Wing Witjahyo Poespojoedho
Keyword(s):  
South China Sea ◽  
South China ◽  
Member Country ◽  
Active Role ◽  
The South China Sea ◽  
The South ◽  
Regional Stability ◽  
China Sea ◽  
Asean Member ◽  
Do So

The conflict involving many countries in the South China Sea has notended nor subsided. Regional tension and claims between countries areincreasing and Indonesia participates in this round of conflict. As theworld’s largest archipelagic country and an ASEAN member country thatupholds peace, security and regional stability, Indonesia then has to playan active role in the conflict. In order to do so, Indonesia is using navaldiplomacy as a way to achieve effective conflict resolution within theregion. Regarding the phenomenon, this study used the concept of seapower and naval diplomacy to explain measures that have been taken bythe Indonesian government under Joko Widodo’s presidency in resolvingthe conflicts involving its territories in the South China Sea. The author’sanalysis showed that Indonesia’s policies of using naval diplomacy in theSouth China Sea conflict have a positive and effective outcome in achievingconflict resolution and peace condition that has been confined by longtermobstacles and challenges.

scholarly journals Territorial Disputes and Nationalism: A Comparative Case Study of China and Vietnam

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Cotillon
Keyword(s):  
South China Sea ◽  
South China ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
The South China Sea ◽  
Comparative Case Study ◽  
Territorial Disputes ◽  
The South ◽  
China Sea ◽  
Maritime Territory

In autocracies, nationalism appears to have merged with geopolitical thinking. In light of this geopoliticisation of nationalism, it is surprising that the literature has paid virtually no attention to the role of territorial disputes as a conditioning factor. The present study seeks to further enhance the field by factoring in the role of territorial disputes in triggering different expressions of nationalism. It develops an analytical framework for typologies of nationalism according to four territorial disputes: China's dispute with Vietnam over maritime territory in the South China Sea, China's dispute with Japan over maritime territory in the East China Sea, Vietnam's dispute with Cambodia over territorial border demarcations, and Vietnam's dispute with China over maritime territory in the South China Sea. The respective disputes of China and Vietnam are analysed and tested against criteria of expressions of nationalism in autocracies. We find that territorial disputes and therefore external context are important conditioning factors of nationalism in autocracies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document