scholarly journals Study of incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing major lower limb surgery: A prospective clinical study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1119-1122
Author(s):  
Dr. Narendra Singh ◽  
Dr. Mohit Kumar ◽  
Dr. SP Gupta ◽  
Dr. Ashwani Mathur ◽  
Dr. Pramod Sunda
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe Wang ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Mao Ye ◽  
Guang-Hui Shi ◽  
Bo Zhang

2017 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. e191-e196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Mistry ◽  
Amit Chandratreya ◽  
Paul Lee

Introduction Currently there are no consensuses in the national guidance on thromboprophylaxis following major elective lower limb surgery. Emerging clinical evidence suggests that aspirin could be just as effective as anticoagulants with a lower cost. The aim of this study was to provide an update based on literature of the past 3 years for the use of aspirin as thromboprophylaxis after knee and hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods MEDLINE/EMBASE search was performed with appropriate terms for original articles from 2014 to 2017. Results Eight articles were found. Five articles concluded that aspirin was an effective prophylactic. The collation of results on the deep vein thrombosis rate involved 43,012 patients who were prescribed aspirin, of which 283 (0.66%) suffered from symptomatic deep vein thromboses. Aspirin was noted for its good side effect profile and cost effectiveness. It was noted that anticoagulants had a higher rate of complications, including bleeding and wound-oozing. Conclusion Aspirin is an effective and safe prophylactic against deep vein thrombosis following major elective lower limb arthroplasty surgery.


1974 ◽  
Vol 32 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 468-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Storm ◽  
P Ollendorff ◽  
E Drewsen ◽  
P Tang

SummaryThe thrombolytic effect of pig plasmin was tested in a double blind trial on patients with deep venous thrombosis in the lower limb. Only patients with not more than three days old thrombi were selected for this study. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was made clinically and confirmed by phlebography. Lysofibrin Novo (porcine plasmin) or placebo (porcine plasminogen) was administered intravenously to the patients. The enzyme and the placebo were delivered as lyophilized powder in labelled bottles - the contents of the bottles were unknown to the doctor in charge of the clinical administration of the trial. An initial dose of plasmin/plasminogen of 30 unit per kg body weight given slowly intravenously (1-1% hours infusion) was followed by a maintenance dosis of 15 per cent the initial dose per hour for the following 5-7 hours. In most cases a similar maintenance dosis was given the next day. In all patients heparin was administered after ending the plasmin/plasminogen infusion. The results of the treatment was evaluated clinically as well as by control phlebo- grams the following days.A statistically significant improvement was found in the plasmin treated group compared with the placebo (plasminogen) treated group. Thrombolysis was obtained clinically and phlebographically in 65 per cent of the plasmin treated group, but only in 15 per cent of the control patients were improvements found.This study has thus demonstrated that plasmin treatment according to a standard scheme was able to induce thrombolysis. There were only a few and insignificant side effects. Allergic reactions have not been seen and only very simple tests are required.


1977 ◽  
Vol 37 (02) ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A Tibbutt ◽  
C. N Chesterman ◽  
E. W Williams ◽  
T Faulkner ◽  
A. A Sharp

SummaryTreatment with streptokinase (‘Kabikinase’) was given to 26 patients with venographically confirmed deep vein thrombosis extending into the popliteal vein or above. Treatment was continued for 4 days and the patients were allocated randomly to oral anticoagulant therapy or a course of treatment with ancrod (‘Arvin’) for 6 days followed by oral anticoagulant therapy. The degree of thrombolysis as judged by further venographic examination at 10 days was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The majority of patients showed clinical improvement but there was no appreciable difference between the groups at 3 and 6 months. Haemorrhagic complications were a more serious problem during the period of treatment with ancrod than during the equivalent period in the control group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-273
Author(s):  
Vedran Pazur ◽  
Inga Dakovic Bacalja ◽  
Ivan Cvjetko ◽  
Ana Borovecki

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 512-516
Author(s):  
Vijay Bahadur Singh ◽  
Punya Pratap Singh ◽  
Rajesh Malik ◽  
Lovely Kaushal ◽  
Vijay Verma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document