scholarly journals The dispute on the language norm in A.P. Sumarokov’s article “To typographers”

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-480
Author(s):  
Yulia V. Slozhenikina ◽  
Andrey V. Rastyagaev
Keyword(s):  
18Th Century ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Theoretical Development ◽  
Original Text ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Historical Sources ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of

The actuality of the undertaken research is conditioned by the necessity to study the role of Russian literature and journalism, separate linguistic programs of the middle of the 18th century in assertion of the main characteristics of the literary standard, which began to take shape in 80 years of this century. The aim of the scientific study is to analyze the similarities and differences between the linguistic theories of A. Sumarokov and V. Trediakovsky, to establish the place of this polemic in the history of Russian literary language of the 18th century, its significance for the formation of the literary standard. The language material is the original text of Sumarokov's article To typographers (K tipografskim naborshhikam), published in the May issue of the journal Trudolyubivaya pchela (1759). The system of views of scholars and writers of the mid-18th century on the Russian language are presented by means of descriptive and comparative methods with revealing the specifics of each language concept. An integral part of the methodology was the observation of the word usage in the texts by A. Sumarokov and V. Trediakovsky. The use of methods of linguoculturology made it possible to present linguistic polemics as a phenomenon of Russian culture. The extra-linguistic method and the method of reconstruction from historical sources were used to establish the phenomena of extra-linguistic reality that influenced the problems of the philological discussion. The results of the research showed that the extra-linguistic reason for writing the article was determined, the tradition of the writers' appealing to the typesetters in the history of domestic printing of the first half of the 18th century was traced, the group of works with which Sumarokov-philologist enters polemics was determined, the main concepts of the article were identified, the position of Sumarokov from the point of view of normalization of graphic, morphological, orthographic practice in the middle of the 18th century was fixed; the article by Sumarokov was considered in accordance with the concept of metatextual unity in the world. The prospects of the research relate to the fundamental theoretical development of the role of 18th century Russian literature in the formation of the Russian literary language standard.

scholarly journals INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
I. B. Ignatova ◽  
E. N. Legochkina ◽  
A. V. Goncharova
Keyword(s):  
Intercultural Communication ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Education Development ◽  
Culture Teaching ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of ◽  
Strategic Policy ◽  
History Of Literature ◽  
The Russian Language

The article deals with intercultural communication in the process of teaching the Russian language. It is currently the strategic policy of modern education. The use of intercultural communication between modern youth and the culture of the past in classrooms of the Russian language and Russian literature is an urgent problem of the modern stage of education development. The implementation of intergenerational intercultural communication in the process of teaching the Russian language and literature in modern Russia presupposes a purposeful appeal to the history of our state, to the history of the Russian literary language, the history of literature and culture. Teaching the Russian language and Russian literature based on the principle of national specificity offers infinite opportunities for educating students.

scholarly journals Spirituality concept in Russian language worldview: profane and religious components (according to materials of explanatory dictionaries of contemporary Russian language)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
O.N. Yemelyanova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Method ◽  
Value Orientations ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Unified Approach ◽  
Language Research ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Language ◽  
Modern Russian

Statement of the problem. The article examines the content of the spirituality concept, formed by the explanatory dictionaries of the modern Russian literary language; the change in its (concept) functional-stylistic lexicographic qualifications as a reflection of the change in value orientations in society. The purpose of the article is to study the lexicographic history of the spirituality concept in a comparative analysis of different dictionaries. The research methodology is based on the comparative method, contextual and, above all, lexicographic analysis of the main explanatory dictionaries of the Russian language. Research results. The study showed that there is no strict unification in the interpretation and functional-stylistic qualifications of the concept under study in the explanatory dictionaries of the Russian language. Conclusions. In modern domestic explanatory lexicography, there is no unified approach both to understanding the content (interpretation) of the spirituality concept, and in its functional and stylistic qualifications. The author’s contribution consists in a large-format (all the main explanatory dictionaries of the modern Russian language) and a very detailed study, which has not been carried out earlier in relation to this very concept.

scholarly journals Russian neophylology issues: to the history of military terms (on the example of the word batman)

Neophilology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 587-595
Author(s):  
Dmitry A. Volotov
Keyword(s):  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Military Operations ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of ◽  
The New Period ◽  
The Moment ◽  
The Military ◽  
The Russian Language

We analyze the semantics, structure and use of French military borrowing batman from the moment of its entry into Russian at the turn of the 17–18th centuries to the present. We give an etymological and historical analysis of the word, we consider the evolution of its semantics in Russian due to the functional diversity of its use in the recipient language. We trace the history of the terminological development of the lexeme and its derivatives in the Russian literary language of the new period, the peculiarities of its functioning as a representative of the military vocabulary in contact with other spheres of the Russian language, while the provision we emphasize for the complete borrowing of a word from the French language into the Russian literary language from its form (phonetics, grammar, features of word usage) and meaning. We indicate and analyze in detail sources of the word study in the synchronous-diachronic aspect, lexicographic, documenta-ry-historical and artistic-text, both on the material of the modern Russian literary language and in the previous periods of its formation, which helps to identify the gradual transformation of its se-mantic structure. We pay particular attention to the disclosure of the voluminous meaning of the word in the text of the novel-epic by L.N. Tolstoy “War and Peace”, which is a valuable source for studying the lexico-semantic system of the Russian language after Pushkin era. A number of ex-amples of different spheres of the modern usus of the Russian language show a change in the functional-stylistic color of the word and the acquisition of other additional shades by the word. We conclude about the inevitability of fading the activity of its use in modern conditions of conducting military operations, turning it into historicism, which leads to the correlation of its place in the literary Russian language and the transfer to passive vocabulary.

Some special aspects of the use modal-temporal forms in amatory syllabic poetry of Peter the Great’s era

Neophilology ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Petr A. Semenov
Keyword(s):  
Transition Period ◽  
Deep Understanding ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Sharp Change ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Candidate Dissertation ◽  
Peter The Great ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Right

The research is aimed at revealing the nature of the grammatical norm of the literary language of the transition period and is dedicated to the memory of Nadezhda Gainullina, my favorite teacher and friend. Nadezhda Ivanovna research interests focused on the literary language of the Peter the Great’s era. The development of loanword vocabulary on the material of “letters and papers of Peter the Great” was devoted to her candidate dissertation and doctoral research, articles and monographs containing a deep understanding of the role and place of Peter the Great in the history of the Russian literary language and revealing the deep meaning of the processes taking place during this period in the literary language and, in particular, the state of the language norm. We comprehend this far from us period of the history of the Russian literary language, which has a special theoretical significance, since it is a literary language of the transition period. We have established that such historical periods provide an opportunity to understand the dialectic development of the literary language, the right to raise the question of the relationship between the critical categories of historical styles as a norm, language usage, style. It is approved that findings, which comes to N.I. Gainullina, have important theoretical value. It is concluded that the proposed N.I. Gainullina understanding of the norms of the transition period can be of theoretical importance not only for the Peter the Great's era, but also for any transition period in the history of any literary language, in particular, for understanding the language situation of our time, which is characterized by a sharp change of cultural and historical paradigms, definitely reflected in the modern Russian language, in the language of our days in the form of multilayered innovative layering on the relatively traditional forms of expression.

The fate of borrowings in Russian language (to the history of the word partisan)

Neophilology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 653-659
Author(s):  
Dmitry A. Volotov
Keyword(s):  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
French Language ◽  
Semantic Structure ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
War And Peace ◽  
Word Study ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Moment

We analyze the semantics and usage of French borrowing of military partisan themes from the moment it entered Russian at the turn of the XVII–XVIII centuries to the present time. We give an etymological and historical analysis of the word, and consider the evolution of its semantics in Russian language due to the functional diversity of its use both in the donor language and in the recipient language. The study of lexeme history in cultural and historical terms helps to trace the development of the form and meaning of the word partisans and its derivatives, the peculiarities of its functioning as a representative of battle vocabulary sphere in Russian language. We conclude that the sememe is completely borrowed from the French language into the Russian lite-rary language in terms of its form (phonetics, grammar, peculiarities of word usage) and meaning. We indicate and analyze in detail the sources of word study in the synchronous-diachronic aspect, lexicographic, documentary-historical, and artistic-textual sources both on the material of the modern Russian literary language and in the previous periods of its development, and we identify the transformation of its semantic structure. We pay attention to the disclosure of the extensional value of the word in the text of Leo Tolstoy’s epic novel “War and Peace”, which is the most valu-able source for studying the lexical and semantic system of Russian language of the pre-Pushkin era. A number of examples from different spheres of the modern usus of Russian language show changes in the functional and stylistic coloration of the word and the acquisition of enantiosemici-ty features and other additional shades by the word. We conclude that the word partisan is adapted as an element of the battle term system of Russian language and that its use in modern conditions of conducting combat operations is inevitably fading away, turning it into historicism.

Lexicographic Activity of S. I. Ozhegov in 1926–1936. (Leningrad Period)

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 85-91
Author(s):  
E. G. Stukova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Language ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Graduate Studies ◽  
Revolutionary Era ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of ◽  
Card Index ◽  
The City ◽  
The Russian Language

The article is dedicated to theLeningradperiod of S. I. Ozhegov’s activity (1926–1936), which is insufficiently described in biographical works devoted to the scholar. The period of his post-graduate studies and work at theInstituteofLanguagesand Literature of the West and the East is briefly described. Based on archival materials, interesting facts are presented about the graduate studies of S. I. Ozhegov: the study of Russian participles in the context of the history of the Russian literary language, the development of the question of the first South Slavic influence on the literary language, the work in a research group on compiling Russian dialectology bibliography, and the participation in the compilation of a card index on the article and bibliographic material of the “Russian Philological Bulletin” journal, a joint work with B. A. Larin on the study of vernacular and the city language, etc. The article discusses little known lexicographic projects, on which S. I. Ozhegov worked in 1920–1930s: the vocabulary for “Woe from Wit” by A. S. Griboedov (edited by L. V. Shcherba) and “Draft Dictionary of the Revolutionary Era”. Particular attention is paid to the academic explanatory «Dictionary of the Russian language», edited by N. S. Derzhavin, in which S. I. Ozhegov was the compiler of the issue “D – Dayatelny” (1937). The vocabulary, semantic development of words, illustrative material, etc., of this dictionary are briefly reviewed. Work on this issue was an important stage in the formation of S. I. Ozhegov’s lexicographic experience and presents particular interest, since it was carried out in parallel with the work on the first volume of the “Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language” edited by D. N. Ushakov.

scholarly journals About the history of indefinite pronouns: Quasi-relative constructions with ni budi and ni jest’ in 17th–18th century Russian language

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-137
Author(s):  
Yana A. Penkova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Free Choice ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Limited Range ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
History Of ◽  
Everyday Communication ◽  
National Corpus ◽  
Modern Russian

The article deals with quasi-relative constructions with ni budi/ ni jest’ , which were competing in 17th-18th century Russian language and claiming the role of an unspecific indefinite marker. This competition resulted in the victory of the ni budi- construction and grammaticalization of the formant nibud’ in modern Russian. The research was carried out on data taken from the historical module of the Russian National Corpus, as well as from a subcorpus of 18th century texts within the main corpus. Quasi-relative constructions are compared according to the following parameters: frequency, semantic distribution, degree of phraseologization and stylistic features. In the 17th century texts, both constructions show low frequency and occur in a limited range of sources: mainly in documents, as well as in some chronicles and everyday communication. In this period, the grammaticalization process was not complete for both constructions. In 18th century texts, the frequency of quasi-relative constructions with ni budi , unlike ni jest’ , sharply increases. Constructions with ni budi ( nibud’ ) penetrate into various functional domains of literary language, including church literature. Constructions with ni jest’ , on the contrary, were preserved in the 18th century language only as marginal archaisms. The semantics of quasi-relative constructions with ni budi in the period in question differed from nibud’ pronouns in modern Russian. The latter significantly narrowed their semantic scope, having lost the ability to be used as free-choice markers.

ITALIAN PRIMITIVE AND CRITICAL REVIVAL IN RUSSIAN MODERNISM

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-120
Author(s):  
A. V. Markov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Production ◽  
Art Criticism ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Artistic Process ◽  
Emotional Culture ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
Russian Modernism

The word primitive as applied to art is a lexical Gallicism, requiring special critical contexts for correct use, and therefore the word was not frequently used in Russian literature. This concept was part not so much of academic research as of art criticism, which argued against academic standard. At the same time, Russian modernism legalized the concept of the Italian primitive as a special mode of optics, as a form of fantasy shared by the artist and the viewer. The article proves that the primitive in Russian culture was not a stylistic, but a plot characteristic of the image, revealed in the proximity of icon-painting images (icon border scenes, altar predellas) to genre scenes, which made it possible to embed the primitive not in the order of canonical veneration, but in the order of a new emotional culture that updated the Russian literary language. Moreover, many characteristics of the primitive, such as color, lighting and compositional solutions directly inherited from European criticism, that stood against classicism and defended the values of national cultural production. Thus, the admiration of Italian primitives was a way to strengthen the role of criticism in the literary and artistic process, that can only coordinate the position of the artist and the audience.

Literary language of the Peter the Great’s era in scientific works of professor N.I. Gainullina

Neophilology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 417-424
Author(s):  
Elmira R. Kogay
Keyword(s):  
Deep Understanding ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Literary Language ◽  
Doctoral Research ◽  
Language History ◽  
Peter The Great ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
History Of

The study is dedicated to the memory of Professor Nadezhda Gainullina. The aim is to show the role of professor N. Gainullina in the study of the Russian literary language history. N. Gainullina’s research interests focused on the literary language of the Peter the Great’s era. Her Ph.D. thesis and doctoral research, articles and monographs contain a deep understanding of the role and place of Peter the Great in the history of the Russian literary language. N. Gainullina defined the term “creative linguistic personality” and introduced it into science. She established the place, role and significance of the epistolary genre in the history of the Russian literary language. She described the nature of the epistolary genre evolution under the influence of extra-linguistic and intralinguistic factors. It is approved that conclusions reached by N. Gainullina, have important theoretical value. The results of N. Gainullina’s scientific activity differ because of their novelty, theoretical and practical relevance in researches on the history of the Russian literary language.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document