scholarly journals Matching 25% of Medical Students in Family Medicine by 2030: Realistic or Beyond Our Reach?

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-255
Author(s):  
Alan K. David

ABSTRACT: This article examines the America Needs More Family Doctors: 25x2030 Collaborative goal of “25x30”—that 25% of all medical students will enter family medicine residency programs by the year 2030. Filling 25% of all available postgraduate year-1 positions in the match is an important consideration in creating a strong primary care workforce. Data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) matches for 2010 and 2020 are reviewed to examine trends not only in the US MD and DO categories, but also US international medical school graduates (IMGs) and non-US IMG categories over the last 10 years. If the total number of all programs and of all positions offered were held constant in 2030, what shifts in student choices would be required to reach the 25x30 goal in each applicant category as well as for all four categories combined? This discussion explores resources, power, physician income, and other factors that affect student numbers. Until a national health system is developed with national goals and priorities, it is unlikely that 25x30 will become a reality.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humairah Zainal ◽  
Helen Elizabeth Smith

Abstract Background: Singapore needs more family doctors to care for its ageing population and their chronic conditions. To boost the recruitment of doctors within primary care, we need to better understand medical students’ attitudes and experience of General Practice and Family Medicine. While many studies have explored the facilitators and barriers to teaching undergraduate medical students in this field of medicine from the perspectives of GP teachers and trainers, few have examined students’ exposure to primary care in medical schools. Although there are works on factors influencing students’ attitudes towards primary care careers, the roles of medical schools, professional bodies and state institutions tend to be discussed independently of one another. This article explores medical students’ perceptions towards careers in primary care and how different stakeholders might collaborate in strengthening the medical school experience. Methods: Six focus groups involving 54 students from three medical schools in Singapore were conducted. Discussions focussed on their primary care experience, their professional and career aspirations, and perceptions towards the opportunities and challenges of primary care careers. Thematic analysis was used to interpret the qualitative data. Results: 15 key themes emerged from the discussions; 10 reflected key concerns of pursuing primary care careers whereas 5 others highlighted their positive aspects. The former include society’s perceptions of primary care professions as sub-standard, specialists’ negative attitudes towards family doctors, the emphasis on the lifestyle benefits of primary care careers rather than their professional characteristics, mundane case mix, limited professional opportunities, lack of continuity of care, limited consultation time, low remuneration, need for business acumen, and conflicts created by business in clinical care. However, the respondents also articulated positive views, including its lifestyle benefits, autonomy of private practice and better patient care, opportunities for entrepreneurialism and a portfolio career, breadth of clinical problems presented, and an improved future for General Practice and Family Medicine. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that coordinated initiatives from multiple stakeholders would help to increase the attractiveness of primary care as a career choice among students. Improvements in the medical school experience will significantly enhance the prestige of General Practice and Family Medicine.


1985 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Franklin ◽  
Pamela A. Samaha ◽  
Janet C. Rice ◽  
Susan M. Igras

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 987-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred W. Markham ◽  
James J. Diamond

The psychosocial orientation of fourth-year medical students planning careers in family medicine was compared to those selecting other specialities using the Physician Belief Scale. This scale has shown that practicing family physicians have a greater psychosocial orientation than those in other specialities such as internal medicine. The current study was done to see whether students choosing family medicine already have this greater orientation before they begin training as residents. 664 fourth-year medical students received surveys during their senior year and 378 (57%) returned completed surveys. Female students had a significantly greater psychosocial orientation than their male peers, but there were no significant differences between students planning residencies in family medicine and those selecting other residencies. The greater orientation of family doctors would appear to be a product of further training and experience either during residency or later during the actual practice of family medicine.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Hoedebecke ◽  
Joseph Scott-Jones ◽  
Luís Pinho-Costa

Abstract The international ‘#1WordforFamilyMedicine’ initiative explores the identity of General Practitioners (GPs) and Family Physicians (FPs) by allowing the international Family Medicine community to collaborate on advocating for the discipline via social media. The New Zealand version attracted 83 responses on social media. Thematic analysis was performed on the responses and a ‘word cloud’ image was created based on an image identifying the country around the world - that of the silver fern. The ‘#1WorldforFamilyMedicine’ project was promoted by WONCA (World Organisation of Family Doctors) globally to help celebrate World Family Doctor Day on 19 May 2015. To date, over 80 images have been created in 60 different countries on six continents. The images represent GPs’ love for their profession and the community they serve. We hope that this initiative will help inspire current and future Family Medicine and Primary Care providers.


PRiMER ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maribeth P. Williams ◽  
Denny Fe Agana ◽  
Benjamin J. Rooks ◽  
Grant Harrell ◽  
Rosemary A. Klassen ◽  
...  

Introduction: With the estimated future shortage of primary care physicians there is a need to recruit more medical students into family medicine. Longitudinal programs or primary care tracks in medical schools have been shown to successfully recruit students into primary care. The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics of primary care tracks in departments of family medicine.  Methods: Data were collected as part of the 2016 CERA Family Medicine Clerkship Director Survey. The survey included questions regarding the presence and description of available primary care tracks as well as the clerkship director’s perception of impact. The survey was distributed via email to 125 US and 16 Canadian family medicine clerkship directors.  Results: The response rate was 86%. Thirty-five respondents (29%) reported offering a longitudinal primary care track. The majority of tracks select students on a competitive basis, are directed by family medicine educators, and include a wide variety of activities. Longitudinal experience in primary care ambulatory settings and primary care faculty mentorship were the most common activities. Almost 70% of clerkship directors believe there is a positive impact on students entering primary care.  Conclusions: The current tracks are diverse in what they offer and could be tailored to the missions of individual medical schools. The majority of clerkship directors reported that they do have a positive impact on students entering primary care.


UVserva ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Domingo Vázquez Martínez

La Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos (CNDH) tiene 20 años realizando recomendaciones a las autoridades del Sistema Nacional de Salud por violaciones a los derechos humanos de los usuarios de las unidades de salud, derivadas de la falta de supervisión a estudiantes de medicina que, como parte de su educación profesional, atienden pacientes. La Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos establece que las universidades e instituciones de educación superior autónomas tienen la responsabilidad de la formación profesional en el país. En este sentido, las universidades son garantes de la formación, evaluación y supervisión de los estudiantes de medicina en las unidades de salud. Dirigir las recomendaciones de la CNDH a las instituciones educativas contribuiría significativamente a que los programas de educación médica mejoren significativamente y a que no se violen derechos humanos de los usuarios de las unidades de salud por falta de compromiso educativo.Palabras clave: Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos; Sistema Nacinal de Salud; estudiantes medicina; trato a pacientes; instituciones educativas; derechos humanos AbstractFor 20 years the National Human Rights Commission of Mexico (CNDH as it is a Spanish acronym) has been making recom­mendations addressed to the authorities of the National Health System on human rights violation against users of health units, which result from the lack of supervision of medical students that, as part of their professional tra­ining, treat patients. The Political Constitution of the Mexican United States points out that autonomous universities and higher education institutions are responsible for professional training in the country. In this sense, univer­sities are guarantors of training, assessment and supervision of medical students at heal­th units. Addressing the recommendations by CNDH to educational institutions will signifi­cantly contribute to improve the medical edu­cation programs and stop human rights viola­tions against users of health units because of lack of educational commitment.Keywords: National Human Rights Commission; National Health System; medical students; treat patients; educational institutions; human rights


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arielle L. Langer ◽  
Miriam Laugesen

Abstract The income gap between specialists and primary care physicians and among specialists is well established, but the drivers of this difference are not well delineated. Using the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Physician Survey, we sought to isolate and compare premiums paid to physicians for specialization and the proportion of time spent on offices visit rather than procedures. We divided medical subspecialties according the proportion of Medicare billing for Evaluation and Management (E&M) codes for the specialty as a whole. We report substantial differences in income across physician specialty, and over 70 percent of the difference in income remained controlling for factors that may confound the relationship between income and specialty including gender, location and type of practice, and hours. We note a large variation in premiums for specialization: 11.3–46.8 percent above family medicine after controlling for confounders. Classifying medical subspecialties by E&M billing as procedural versus non-procedural specialties revealed clear income differences. Controlling for confounders, procedural medical specialties earned 37.5 percent more than family medicine, as compared with 15.3 percent for non-procedural medical specialties. This analysis suggests that differences in physician income and resulting incentives are a direct consequence of the payment structure itself, rather than compensation for additional years of training or a reflection of different underlying demographics.


Author(s):  
Felicity Goodyear-Smith

This reflection describes my funded visit to South Africa to assist in primary care research capacity building as Chair, WONCA Working Party on Research (WP-R). The trip included time at the Universities of Walter Sisulu, Limpopo and Stellenbosch to mentor postgraduate students working on master’s and PhD theses. I held one-on-one and group sessions and ran interactive scientific writing workshops. I assisted with the establishment of a Stellenbosch University Family Physician Research Network of faculty academics and family physicians (FP) which will generate research questions from community stakeholders. I also ran a writing workshop at the Joint 5th WONCA Africa and 20th South African National Family Practitioners Conference in Pretoria attended by about 100 conference delegates, ranging from FP registrars to academics with PhDs and peer-reviewed publications. A WP-R panel presentation of international comparisons of primary care systems was also held at this conference, with the countries of Ghana, Malawi, Zimbabwe, Ethiopia and Nigeria presented. During my stay, Ireflected on the differences between family medicine in South Africa and in my home country, New Zealand (NZ). In South Africa, there is high prevalence of HIV and tuberculosis, seldom seen in NZ. Donor-funded vertical programmes cause significant fragmentation of care. Family doctors generally work in district hospitals, providing consultancy support to nurseled clinics. They have a laudable requirement to complete a Master’s in Medicine in conjunction with vocational training. Academic family medicine in South Africa is coming of age. I feel privileged to play a small part in its journey to maturity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document