scholarly journals TOPICAL ISSUES OF RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL POLICY DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 197-211
Author(s):  
Anna Rozentsvaig ◽  
R. A. Vdovin
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Educational Policy ◽  
Policy Development ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Competence Development ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Research Education ◽  
World Class

The article deals with some directions of the research and educational policy development. The correlation of approaches to the development of the strategic academic leadership program and the world-class research and educational centers establishing, centers of competence development is analyzed. Engineering knowledge and technology are at the heart of the modern economy. Engineering methods, approaches, and technologies have permeated medicine, biology, agriculture, chemistry, and the development of new materials. Understanding the directions of technological development determines the prospects for creating and using new products. further development of the issue related to the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in the engine-building industry from the point of view of legal regulation will allow to consolidate the official legal status of such technologies at the legal level and regulate the algorithm and delimit the use of artificial intelligence technologies. The analysis of responses to the big challenges of scientific and technological development and the exhaustion of economic growth opportunities, the formation of the digital economy and the risks of reducing human resources. The development of international accreditation procedures is proposed. Keywords: Research; Education: Research and educational center: Competence development center; Artificial intelligence technologies: International accreditation.

PATENT PROTECTION OF SCIENTIFIC RESULTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES

2020 ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
Daria Ponomareva ◽  
◽  
Alexander Barabashev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
Scientific Results ◽  
Will Force ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Artificial Intelligence Systems

This article is devoted to the legal problems associated with the provision of patent protection for the results of scientific activities created by artificial intelligence systems. The authors explore the approaches formulated by doctrine and practice in relation to objects created by robotic systems, computer technology and AI. The problem of the relationship between patent protection of the results of scientific (scientific and technical) activities and artificial intelligence systems is becoming more and more urgent. Modern AI systems are quite capable of creating inventions that are the result of the application (use) of the cognitive (thinking) abilities of a person, that is, such inventions can be patentable. There is no doubt that the increasingly active introduction of AI systems will force national legislators to reconsider the definition of the term “inventor.” In Russian legislation, the issue of patent protection of inventions created by AI is currently not resolved. The review of the state of legal regulation of patent protection of the results of scientific activity (first of all, inventions) created by AI systems, presented in the article, indicates the absence of clear rules both in Russian and foreign law (using the example of individual jurisdictions) regarding the determination of the legal status of this kind. objects and the person who has exclusive rights in relation to them. The use of already existing legal constructions by analogy, as well as the borrowing of foreign experience, can only temporarily solve the issue of patent protection of the results of scientific activity created with the help of AI.

scholarly journals The sphere of land relations as a component of administrative and legal regulation subject

1970 ◽  
pp. 283-289
Author(s):  
Vladyslav Zalievskyi
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Great Part ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Land Relations ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Subject

The author’s approach to defining the range of land-related and ground-related phenomena based on administrative law is proposed in the article. The availability of subject authority power relations in the structure and the fulfillment of relevant functions is the main criterion for the separation of such relations. The expediency of using the term “sphere of land relations” as those arising in connection with the exercise of power by the executive authorities and bodies of local self-government is validated and the subject of the relations is land, ground area, rights to them, as well as objects and subjects derived from them. Land relations are one of the largest in volume masses regulated by the norms of public relations law where an absolute majority of both private and public entities are involved. However, due to the diversity of such entities and differences in their legal status, the legal regulation of land relations uses the methods inherent in both civil and administrative law. In addition, in terms of the land law the existence of its own legal regulation method is emphasized. A great deal of research has been devoted to the issues of administrative and legal regulation of land relations, in particular by such scientists as E. Gladkova, M. Kovalsky, V. Pakhomov, M. Shulga, O. Nevmerzhitsky, D. Busuyok and others. Relevant papers from the administrative law point of view emphasize that a great part of the relations which have the subject of land and the phenomena connected with the ground are covered by the subject of administrative law. The aim of this article is to determine the range boundaries of land-related and ground-related phenomena that are regulated by administrative law. Taking into account the normative definition peculiarities of the “land relations” concept content in order to make scientific research, it is more correct to use the term “administrative and legal regulation in the field of land relations” in comparison with the term “administrative and legal regulation of land relations”. The term “sphere of land relations”, in our opinion, should be understood as a set of relations, which in addition to land includes relations arising in connection with the exercise of power by executive authorities and local governments and the subject of these relations is land, ground area, rights to them, and subjects and objects derived from them.

scholarly journals The fate of groundwater: a lawyer’s point of view

2021 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 12004
Author(s):  
Dmitry Sivakov ◽  
Yury Truntsevsky ◽  
Roman Osokin ◽  
Sergey Belyasov ◽  
Oleg Karpovich
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Water Bodies ◽  
European Union Law ◽  
Use Of Data ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Study Process ◽  
Subterranean Water

The study of the provisions of various branches of Russian law and practice of law enforcement (judicial), which in different ways express the complex legal status of subterranean water bodies. During the study process of the considered question the following general and private methods of scientific cognition of the real and objective reality were applied: dialectical, logical and legal, statistical, system analysis, specific sociological, and professional methods of research. The peculiarity of the authors’ methodology is the use of data of natural science, as well as data of economic or technical properties, based on which legal ideas are developed. The comparative legal method of research is applied. The authors have analyzed, summarized, and synthesized the main approaches to the legal regulation of relations concerning groundwaters. The main provisions and proposals are compared with the domestic legislation and European Union law, its individual members (for example, Croatia). The example of the law of the state of Texas USA is given. Step by step, the legal status for the use and protection of subterranean water bodies has evolved into a qualitatively new phenomenon that absorbs all previous legal approaches and principles.

scholarly journals Argumentation in Favor of the Legal Confirmation of the Principle of Good-Faith Discharge of Tax Obligations

Taxes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Maryana B. Napso ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Definition ◽  
Direct Dependence ◽  
Complex Approach ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

Throughout studying of a problematics of conscientiousness in article the question of legislative fastening of a category of conscientiousness from the point of view of various approaches is considered. Considering the complex approach necessary in questions of legal definition of the maintenance of this or that category, the author insists on introduction of concepts of conscientiousness, the diligent tax bearer, a presumption of conscientiousness not only and it is not so much within the limits of separate norms and articles, how many on necessity of reduction of maintenance НК the Russian Federation according to them. The legal regulation in such context when conscientiousness is a letter and spirit of the law, demands revision of set of its positions, concerning legal status of tax bearers, tax departments, tax agents, banks, a legal regulation of actions of tax control and consideration of their results, the tax information etc. Hence, for the author it is a question of giving to legal regulation of a certain orientation, a formulation new концепта, according to which: 1) the diligent person always has advantage before unfair, and the more so before the defaulter; 2) the diligent person cannot be put in the worst position, than unfair; 3) granting of tax privileges demands a recognition of the person the diligent; 4) application of special tax modes is put in direct dependence on a recognition of the person by the diligent. Thus, in a basis of legal regulation of a principle of conscientiousness the author puts the approach based on a recognition of a difference of legal status of persons depending on execution by them of a duty on payment of taxes that, in its opinion, to the greatest degree corresponds to taxation major principles — compulsions, generality, equality and justice.

scholarly journals People, robots, artificial intelligence: regulatory challenges

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Yana Gayvoronskaya
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Regimes ◽  
Regulatory Instruments ◽  
Modern Level ◽  
Definition Of

The problem of regulating the processes of development, creation and use of robots and artificial intelligence (AI) units is acute for all states engaged in the digital transformation of public relations. The article addresses two aspects of the problem: first, the choice of optimal regulatory means corresponding to the present stage of technological development;second, the dependence of legal regimes on the concept and definition of robots and units of artificial intelligence. Qualitative legal regulation is always inextricably linked to precise definitions and the definition of the subject matter of legal regulation. The article examines different approaches to defining robots and artificial intelligence, as well as articulating an author’s view of the choice of legal regimes for different types of AI and robots. The importance of and the need for ethical regulation of robotics and AI are shown in relation to the choice of regulatory instruments. Deontological regulation is considered by the authors to be the most promising and acceptable for the modern level of technology development. At the same time, it has been proved that, in modern conditions, ethical regulation in the field of AI and autonomous robotic apparatus plays the role of self-regulation and assumes the functions of various means of self-regulation.

scholarly journals PLASMA OF BLOOD: LEGAL STATUS AND TURNOVER THEREOF IN RUSSIAN AND EUROPEAN CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Виолетта Трубина ◽  
Violetta Trubina
Keyword(s):  
Blood Plasma ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Human Blood Plasma ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation

The shortage of blood plasma medicine in the Russian Federation has made the production of domestic medicine a top priority task of the state. Until recently the blood products were made mainly by state-owned enterprises, nowadays this has become very attractive for privately owned companies. In practice, they have to deal with the ambiguity of the status and transferability of blood plasma at different stages of the medicine production line. Therefore, the issue of legal regulation of plasma as the main raw material for the production of blood medicine has become to be a practical issue. This article attends to the problem of the nature and legal status of human blood plasma from the point of view of currently effective laws of the Russian Federation and European legislation. Special attention is paid to the basic principles applied to the use of human tissues and organs. The author reviews the legal regulation relating to the status of a human body and its organs from the point of view of international legal norms, civil legislation of the EU, Switzerland and the Russian Federation. Also, the author reasons the proprietary nature of the blood plasma as a source for biological medicine, and describes the factors limiting its transferability. The conclusion contains brief description of the legal status of the blood plasma.

scholarly journals The Moral and Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence (Present Dilemmas and Future Challenges)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Igor Milinkovic
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Moral Status ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Autonomous Action ◽  
Legal Personhood ◽  
Legal Subjectivity ◽  
Future Challenges

Abstract The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems raises dilemmas regarding their moral and legal status. Can artificial intelligence possess moral status (significance)? And under what conditions? Can one speak of the dignity of artificial intelligence as the basis of its moral status? According to some authors, if there are entities who have the capacities on which the dignity of human beings is based, they would also possess intrinsic dignity. If dignity is not an exclusive feature of human beings, such status also could be recognised by artificial intelligence entities. The first part of the paper deals with the problem of moral status of artificial intelligence and the conditions that must be fulfilled for such a status to be recognised. A precondition for the existence of moral status of artificial intelligence is its ability to make autonomous decisions. This part of the paper considers whether developing autonomous AI is justified, or, as some authors suggest, the creation of AI agents capable of autonomous action should be avoided. The recognition of the moral status of artificial intelligence would reflect on its legal status. The second part of the paper deals with the question of justifiability of ascribing legal personhood to the AI agents. Under what conditions would recognition of legal personhood by the artificial intelligence be justified and should its legal subjectivity be recognised in full scope or only partially (by ascribing to the AI agents a “halfway-status,” as some authors suggest)? The current state of the legal regulation of artificial intelligence will be observed as well.

Oltre il video, verso il video. Arte e intelligenza artificiale

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentino Catricalà
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Artistic Practice ◽  
Ecological Vision ◽  
Development Processes

The paper aim at investigating the artistic practices linked to the latest developments in artificial intelligence. From one hand, the paper shows how the role of artists within technological development processes is neither secondary nor marginal, but that instead represents an engine for technological innovation. On the other hand, the idea of artificial intelligence is connected to those practices which, rather than uncritically taking up these themes, try to investigate the meanings, the new relationships and the reflections opened by the advent of these areas. After an introduction section, the concept of videoart will be reread from the point of view of the latest development in AI showing the polymorph nature of the concept. The analysis of the artistic practice will be developed not only from the point of view of technics and languages, but also showing how a new trend of artists, using AI technologies, are leading a new ecological vision, a postanthropocentric vision of the human being.

PECULIARITIES OF THE PROCEDURAL STATUS OF SUBJECTS WHICH HAVE THE OBLIGATION OF PROOF DURING THE PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrii Vorobey ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Judicial Investigation ◽  
Definition Of

The article considers the peculiarities of the procedural status of the subjects who are obliged to prove criminal offenses during the pre-trial investigation, taking into account the latest changes in the current criminal procedure legislation made in connection with the adoption of the Law of Ukraine n Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning Simplification of Pre-trial Investigation of Certain Categories of Criminal Offenses". The author notes that this issue is little studied in the scientific literature and relevant from a practical point of view. The peculiarities of the procedural status of the head of the inquiry body are studied, a number of problematic issues of legal regulation of the powers of the specified subject of evidence are indicated and it is proposed to amend the current version of Article 391 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine to eliminate contradictions. The procedural status of the interrogator and the person authorized to carry out pre- trial investigation of criminal offenses is analyzed, offers on modification of item 401 of the Criminal procedure code of Ukraine are presented. It is also proposed that the bylaws of the relevant law enforcement agencies provide for qualification requirements for persons authorized to investigate criminal offenses in the form of higher legal education in the specialty "Law", as the lack of qualification requirements may adversely affect the quality of pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses. The content of Articles 84, 92 and 94 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine is analyzed, proposals are made to supplement these legal norms after the word "investigator" with the word "interrogator". The specific circle of subjects on which the duty of proof during the pre-judicial investigation in the form of inquiry is assigned is defined. According to the author of the article, further areas of research of certain problematic issues are a comprehensive doctrinal study of the legal status of such subjects of evidence as the interrogator and head of the inquiry body, determination of legal guarantees of their activities and procedural independence, definition of functions and tasks assigned to these subjects.

Artificial Intelligence in Education

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Vassya Likova-Arsenova
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Policy Development ◽  
High Technology ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Artificial Intelligence In Education ◽  
Effective Policy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
And Training

The article examines the impact of Information Technology (IT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education, the joint design of working with high technology and the need for effective policy development. The use of AI in education is an important topic for teachers from both a conceptual and a practical point of view. Ethical challenges in the training and working with AI are on the agenda. It is necessary to adapt the educational programs for future pedagogues in regards to implementing AI in teaching and training.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document