scholarly journals The effect of monetary rewards on autonomous motivation in an enabling performance measurement context

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn Van der Hauwaert ◽  
Werner Bruggeman

This paper investigates the impact of monetary rewards on autonomous motivation in a context of an enabling performance measurement system (PMS). The study uses survey data from 314 managers. The results indicate that organizations benefit from PMSs that are perceived as highly enabling. A highly enabling PMS leads to a higher level of autonomous motivation, when compared to a situation with a minimally enabling PMS or no PMS at all. In companies where the PMS is perceived as minimally enabling, the results indicate that perceived fairness of individual monetary rewards positively affects managers’ autonomous motivation. The findings also reveal that the more the PMS is perceived as enabling, the less effective a fair individual bonus is for enhancing autonomous motivation

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vieri Maestrini ◽  
Andrea Stefano Patrucco ◽  
Davide Luzzini ◽  
Federico Caniato ◽  
Paolo Maccarrone

PurposeGrounding on resource orchestration theory, this paper aims to study the relationship between the way buying companies use their supplier performance measurement systems and the performance improvements obtained from suppliers, with relationship trust identified as a mediator in the previous link.Design/methodology/approachThe authors design a conceptual model and test it through structural equation modelling on a final sample of 147 buyer-supplier responses, collected by means of a dyadic survey.FindingsResults suggest that the buyer company may achieve the most by balancing a diagnostic and interactive use of the measurement system, as they are both positively related to supplier performance improvement. Furthermore, relationship trust acts as a mediator in case of the interactive use, but not for the diagnostic. This type of use negatively affects relationship trust, due to its mechanistic use in the buyer-supplier relationship.Originality/valueThe authors’ results contribute to the current academic debate about supplier performance measurement system design and use by analyzing the impact of different supplier performance measurement system uses, and highlighting their relative impact on relationship trust and supplier performance improvement. From a methodological perspective, adopting a dyadic data collection process increases the robustness of the findings.


Author(s):  
Naser Zouri ◽  
Zahra Abdolkarimi ◽  
Seyed A. Payambarpour

Objective- The aim of the study is to enhance the mechanism of strategic performance measurement system goals base of four research questions: (i) to what association between the MCS and enterprise resource planning system (ERPS) intention to strategy performance management system (SPMS)? (ii) To what association between the performance management system (PMS) and ERPS intention to SPMS? (iii) To what relationship between the resource–based view/capabilities and ERPS intention to SPMS? (iv)To do comprehensiveness of organizational performance factors affected on ERPS intention to SPMS? Methodology/Technique A survey questionnaire was used to collect the data in Madinah, Reyaz, and Jeddah. Data was collected during the last section of 2013 of which 160 successful questionnaires were gathered for further analysis. Findings The result shows the impact of evaluation SPMS to solve the market place error and also ability of executives' level of management to solve the behaviours issue in business organization. Novelty - The significance of study contribute executive branch in Saudi universities for the safety of strategic performance measurement system implementation to be modified or changed, taking into account the financial metrics and non-financial when designing a control system. Type of Paper Empirical paper Keywords: , Strategic performance measurement system, Enterprise resource planning system, Strategic management category, Market place error.


2019 ◽  
pp. 509-527
Author(s):  
Elad Moskovitz ◽  
Adir Even

Performance measurement, as an effective tool for implementing organizational strategy and assisting ongoing control and surveillance, is broadly adopted today. The performance measurement system (PMS) explored in this case study was implemented, using business intelligence (BI) technologies, for a public police force. The system lets police commanders view and analyze the performance scores of their own units and get feedback on the success of their activities. The study examines the system's impact, through analysis of the metric results over a time period of five years. The results show that the vast majority of the metrics examined indeed improved. Further, the results underscore the moderation effect of relative metrics weights, as well as the different behavior of metrics that reflect activity versus those that reflect outcomes. The study underscores both the positive and the negative aspects of those results, and discusses their implications for future PMS implementation with BI technologies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Primastiwi

The aim of this study is to give empirical evidence about the influence of external pressure on the using of performance measurement system for operational purposes and the impact on the performance of public sector organizations. The samples were the SKPD’s and BUMD’s chairmen or chairwomen who lead the governmental services in Klaten Regency, and they must be in their term of office for at least one year. This study analyzed their perceptions about the statements in the questionaire. The data was analized by partial least square (PLS) with Smart PLS Version 3.0. The findings showed an empirical evidence that accountability demands from supervisors and specific (external) stakeholder groups do have positive and significant effect on the using of performance measurement system for operational purposes, but that general public or political attention does not affect to the using of performance measurement system for operational purposes. The finding also showed that using the system for operational purposes has no impact on performance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (77) ◽  
pp. 194-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Eduardo de Souza ◽  
Ilse Maria Beuren

ABSTRACT This study analyzes the impact of a Performance Measurement System (PMS) with enabling characteristics, mediated by psychological empowerment, on task performance and job satisfaction in a Shared Services Center (SSC). The literature on management controls has sought to identify elements that are capable of improving performance, and the enabling controls associated with psychological empowerment may bring new clues to this discussion. Given the ability of the context to affect individuals’ perceptions, it is important to understand the impacts of controls on satisfaction, which can lead to practices that are more aligned with their expectations and favorable results for the organization. The results of the study indicate that the characteristics of a PMS affect the motivation of individuals, so that implementing systems with enabling characteristics can contribute to employees’ perceptions regarding their control over and autonomy in their work. In the mechanistic structure of the SSC, the way in which PMSs are shaped can avoid potential adverse results from less organic structures in employees’ perceptions of psychological empowerment. A survey was conducted at a SSC located in southern Brazil, which provides administrative, financial, and accounting services. Eighty-eight of the 125 operational employees participated, corresponding to 70% of the total. The research tool used was based on the assertions of the studies conducted by Mahama and Cheng (2013), Spreitzer (1995), Tarrant and Sabo (2010), and Van Der Hauwaert and Bruggeman (2015). Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the hypotheses. Evidence drawn from the research indicates that the use of an enabling PMS can contribute to the balance needed in companies between levels of formal controls and psychological empowerment to obtain employee job satisfaction and task performance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Kruis ◽  
Sally K. Widener

ABSTRACT: Extant literature holds that business unit (BU) managers' influence in the design of their performance measurement system (PMS) is beneficial; however, empirical evidence is mixed. Using survey data from 293 BU managers, we study their perception that the PMS fails to support their decision-making. The findings indicate that, on average, managerial influence in PMS design decreases the perception of PMS failure and hence indeed seems to be beneficial. However, importantly, the effect differs depending on the situation. For instance, when there are higher levels of information asymmetry between managers and superiors, lower levels of interdependencies, or lower levels of information asymmetry between employees and managers, managerial influence in PMS design decreases failure. To the contrary, when there are lower levels of information asymmetry between managers and superiors, higher levels of interdependencies, or higher levels of information asymmetry between employees and managers, influence in PMS design increases PMS failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document