scholarly journals Determinants of compliance with mandatory disclosure: Research evidence

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sónia Fernandes ◽  
Isabel Lourenço
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Explanatory Factors ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
Country Characteristics

This study analyses research evidence on the determinants of compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements, classified in four main areas: business characteristics, country characteristics, enforcement and corporate governance. The literature concerning the compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements is a relatively recent field of research when compared to the literature on voluntary disclosure. Given the well-known economic benefits of disclosure, it is of great interest to academics and practitioners to understand the incentives that explain the behaviour of firms in terms of compliance with disclosure requirements. This review provides several insights. First, although the business characteristics found in different studies as explanatory factors for the level of compliance are not always the same, there are four business characteristics that predominate as explanatory factors of the level of compliance with disclosure requirements: the firm’s size, the firm’s profitability, the type of auditor, and the level of internationalization. Second, the country characteristics and the enforcement have always proved to be relevant when analysing the level of compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements, independently of the approach used. Third, some corporate governance characteristics (including the nature of the board members and the type of ownership/control) begin to emerge as determinants of the level of compliance with mandatory disclosure. Overall, whereas research on the determinants of compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements provides relevant insights, it does not yet provide a sufficient accumulation of empirical evidence. Based on this, we develop suggestions for future research, highlighting the importance of analysing the role of corporate governance on the level of compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements.

scholarly journals Does Governance Affect Compliance with IFRS 7?

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Amal Yamani ◽  
Khaled Hussainey ◽  
Khaldoon Albitar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
Corporate Governance Codes ◽  
Ifrs 7 ◽  
Enforcement Mechanisms ◽  
The Impact

Although there has been considerable research on the impact of corporate governance on corporate voluntary disclosure, empirical evidence on how governance affects compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements is limited. We contribute to governance and disclosure literature by examining the impact of corporate governance on compliance with IFRS 7 for the banking sector in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). We use a self-constructed disclosure index to measure compliance with IFRS 7. We use regression analyses to examine the impact of board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and ownership structure on compliance with IFRS 7. Using a sample of 335 bank-year observations for GCC listed banks over the period 2011–2017, we report evidence that corporate governance variables affect compliance with IFRS 7. However, the significance of these variables depends on the type of the regression model used. Our findings suggest that governance matters for mandatory disclosure requirements. So to improve the level of compliance, regulators, official authorities, and policymakers should intensify their efforts toward improving corporate governance codes, following up their implementation and enhancing the enforcement mechanisms.

scholarly journals Editorial: Promulgating innovative ideas in corporate governance

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Kalin Kolev
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Compensation Contracts ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Fertile Ground ◽  
Stakeholder Interactions

This issue keeps the Journal’s tradition of promulgating innovative ideas on a broad range of questions related to corporate governance. By its nature, governance is inseparable from the existence, operation, and evolution of economic entities. As such, gaining understanding of its characteristics informs the spectrum of social science disciplines. Compensation contracts, a board of directors’ composition, stakeholder interactions, and the role of mandatory and voluntary disclosure of entities that are searching for or have acquired capital, serve as some of its many manifestations. Limited by data availability, extant research often favors public, for-profit entities. Understanding the role of governance in non-for-profit entities, private enterprises, and individuals, however, is just as important, and offers a fertile ground for future research

The association between corporate governance mechanisms and compliance with IFRS mandatory disclosure requirements: evidence from 12 African countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1371-1392
Author(s):  
Yosra Mnif ◽  
Hela Borgi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
African Region ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Expected Benefits

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the association between two corporate governance (CG) mechanisms, namely, the board of directors and the audit committee (AC) and the compliance level with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) mandatory disclosure requirements across 12 African countries. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a self-constructed checklist of 140 items to measure the compliance with IFRS mandatory disclosure requirements (here after, COMP) of 202 non-financial listed firms during the 2012–2016 period. This paper applies panel regressions. Findings The findings reveal that CG mechanisms play an important role in enhancing compliance with IFRS in the African context. The results show that board independence, AC independence and the number of meetings held by the AC are positively associated with COMP. Regarding expertize, this paper find that AC industry expertise along with accounting financial expertise is associated with a higher level of COMP than accounting financial expertize alone. These results show the importance of the CG mechanisms to enforce African companies to fully comply with IFRS required disclosures. Practical implications The findings should give a signal to supervisory authorities that more effort is necessary to enforce IFRS across African countries if the introduction of IFRS is to bring the expected benefits to investors and other users. Hence, the lack of full compliance should remain a concern for regulators, professional accounting bodies and policymakers. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by providing further insights that, within the African region an understudied context, extend current understanding of the association between CG mechanisms and COMP.

scholarly journals How Far That Little Candle Throws His Beams! An Interview With Mats Isaksson

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-419
Author(s):  
Alessandro Merendino ◽  
Marc Goergen
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Policy Maker ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
The Future

This article adopts a policy-maker perspective on corporate governance, while exploring the role of academia in influencing corporate governance principles, the reasons for the boilerplate approach to governance rules typically adopted by most companies, and the reasons for a possible disconnect between research and corporate governance policies. The article ends with some key lessons about corporate governance and the future research agenda.

Corporate governance and provisions under IAS 37

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ece Acar ◽  
Serdar Ozkan
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Full Disclosure ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Reporting ◽  
Concentrated Ownership ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
Institutional Owners

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the extent of disclosure of provisions reported under IAS 37 provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets and explore the relation between provisions and corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach The current research utilizes a panel data analysis using a sample of 1,078 firm-year observations from Borsa Istanbul between the years 2005 and 2010. Findings Overall findings indicate that 62 percent of 1,078 firm-year observations recognize provisions, and among those, only 32 percent provide IAS 37’s full disclosure requirements. Firms that recognize provisions have larger board of directors and are more likely to be characterized with concentrated ownership and institutional owners. Also, firms with larger board of directors, greater independence and concentrated ownership have higher total provision/total debt ratios. Finally, firms that make full disclosure of provisions are more likely to have larger boards, higher ownership concentration and institutional owners and less likely to have CEO duality. Research limitations/implications As with all research, there are several limitations of this study. The study suffers from a lack of literature about provisions under IAS 37. The lack of literature directly focusing on provisions or IAS 37 appears to be one of the main limitations as well as one of the main contributions. Since this study focuses on one country, the comparison is not possible. Further research may contribute to literature by the use of other emerging economy’s capital market data. Moreover, further research can cover any other mandatory disclosure information specified in IASs/IFRSs and can provide comparative results about the compliance and strictness of the mandatory disclosure regime. Practical implications This study can be of interest to government, investors, business management, regulatory bodies, educators, researchers, accountants, auditors and scholars particularly in the field of accounting by seeking to make theoretical and practical contributions in the area of accounting disclosures and also serves as benchmark for future researches on corporate disclosures. Also this study provides significant insights to accounting regulators who set disclosure requirements. Originality/value Accurate corporate reporting is a necessary tool for the short- and long-term survival of the firms, hence the capital markets. Studying the level of disclosure will enable us to have additional insights about corporate reporting and will enhance the understanding of the nature of corporate reporting in developing countries. Disclosure practices by developing countries were empirically investigated in the past; however, the relation between provisions under IAS 37 and corporate governance has been unexplored in the literature. Thus, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is a pioneering research on provisions and corporate governance structure.

scholarly journals Disclosure of AGM Minutes on Corporate Website: An Assessment of Malaysian Listed Companies

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Mohd Shazwan Mohd Ariffin ◽  
Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin ◽  
Siti Seri Delima Abdul Malak
Keyword(s):  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Shareholder Rights ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Annual General Meeting ◽  
Corporate Website ◽  
Corporate Information

Disclosure of annual general meeting (AGM) minutes on the corporate website is considered as additional disclosure. Consequently, Listing Requirements states compulsory disclosure of corporate information. In this regard, the awareness of compulsory disclosure of information among all Malaysian listed companies in 2017 was below expectations. Despite the role of AGM minutes as documented proof of meeting, the management had been reluctant to disclose AGM minutes on the corporate website unless demanded by the shareholders. This paper focuses on previous mandatory disclosure of discussions on key matters after AGM minutes among 261 listed companies based on the financial year ended December 31, 2016. The findings indicated that shareholder activism and the role of grey directors exerted influence on the disclosure of AGM minutes on the corporate website. Undoubtedly, management and investors have contributed toward voluntary disclosure in line with the government’s role to enhance shareholder rights. Besides, grey directors’ contribution towards information disclosure has remained relatively unexplored.

scholarly journals Corporate governance challenges: In the context of MENA countries

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Khaled Otman
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Development Economic ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Mena Countries ◽  
Governance Model ◽  
Governance Challenges ◽  
Corporate Governance Model

Strong corporate governance is vital for countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) as they strive to increase economic growth and reinforce competitiveness and create prosperous societies. This paper evaluates the corporate governance landscape by identifying Development Economic and policy challenges in the MENA countries. In addition, it discovers the role of MENA markets and OECD in improving corporate governance. The current study found that corporate governance is still in the early stages in MENA region and it recommends that there is a need for future research to develop corporate governance model in the unique economic and social environment in the MENA countries. The contribution of this research is significant, not only for the MENA region, but also for application to other emerging markets. In this study, clear insights are provided for policymakers, regulators, managers, investors and researchers involved in emerging markets.

scholarly journals Impact of corporate governance on financial disclosures: Evidence from India

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 874-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehul Raithatha ◽  
Varadraj Bapat
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
Financial Disclosures

The paper aims at identifying impact of corporate governance variables i.e. board structure (board size, board independence, board activity and board busyness) and ownership structure (foreign promoters holding, institutional shareholding and CEO duality) on financial disclosures made by the Indian firms. Using cross sectional data of 325 listed firms for the financial year 2009-10, we compute financial disclosure score (using 171 checklist points) based on disclosure requirements of accounting standards. We find average disclosure score of 73%, maximum and minimum being 100% and 46% respectively. Our finding support agency theory in terms of monitoring role of board since board size is found to be significant however we do not find any influence of board independence on the disclosures. The study also supports resource dependency theory in terms of outside directorship which might provide exposure to different corporate environment, brings diverse perspectives and knowledge to the directors and this in turn leads to improved disclosures. We also support the notion that having foreign promoter shareholding improves disclosures

The Role of the Media in Corporate Governance

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Bednar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Wide Audience ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanism ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Many ◽  
Made In

Corporate governance scholars have long been interested in understanding the mechanisms through which firms and their leaders are held accountable for their actions. Recently, there has been increased interest in viewing the media as a type of corporate governance mechanism. Because the media makes evaluations of firms and leaders, and can broadcast information to a wide audience, it has the potential to influence the reputation of firms and firm leaders in both positive and negative ways and thereby play a role in corporate governance. The media can play a governance role and even influence firm outcomes by simply reporting about firm actions, giving stakeholders a larger voice with which to exert influence, and through independent investigation. However, despite the potential for the media to play a significant governance role, several barriers limit its effectiveness in this capacity. For example, media outlets have their own set of interests that they must strive to fulfill, and journalists often succumb to several cognitive biases that could limit their ability to successfully hold leaders accountable. While significant progress has been made in understanding the governance role of the media, future research is needed to better understand the specific conditions in which the media is effective in this role. Understanding how social media is changing the nature of journalism is just one example of the many exciting avenues for future research in this area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document