scholarly journals Risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremic pneumonia in the emergency department

2022 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Chest Radiography ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
Bacteremic Pneumonia

The infection rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has increased worldwide and MRSA bacteremic pneumonia is associated with a high mortality rate. This is a retrospective study conducted at a university hospital in Korea involving adult patients diagnosed as bacteremic pneumonia caused by S. aureus in the ED between January 2009 and December 2019. We compared MRSA bacteremic pneumonia patients (n = 56) to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremic pneumonia patients (n = 49). Our study showed that that underlying hypertension (OR = 5.68; 95% CI = 2.00–16.11; p = 0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (OR = 3.54; 95% CI = 1.06–11.75; p = 0.038), recent intravenous therapy within 1 month (OR = 8.38; 95% CI = 2.88–24.38; p = 0.0001), and pleural effusion on chest radiography (OR = 5.77; 95% CI = 1.79–18.57; p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for MRSA bacteremic pneumonia presenting to the ED. Although MRSA infection has been more frequently derived from the community than before, inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment was overwhelmingly observed in the majority of patients in our study. Considering the resistance of MRSA to the typical empiric regimen prescribed for community-acquired pneumonia, emergency physicians should pay attention to the predictors for MRSA bacteremic pneumonia including pleural effusion on chest radiography when deciding on the appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy for pneumonia patients in the ED.

scholarly journals 1301. Risk Factors for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Community Acquired Pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S738-S739
Author(s):  
Maya Bell ◽  
Courtney Veltri ◽  
Evelina Kolychev ◽  
Leila S Hojat
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The 2019 American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) guidelines concluded that the major risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA) include prior isolation of these organisms and previous hospitalization with IV antibiotic use within 90 days. However, the guidelines recognized that results may vary by region and recommended local validation of risk factors. The primary objective of this study was to determine which potential risk factors are associated with MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in CAP in our institution. This study also evaluated appropriateness of antibiotics used for empiric CAP therapy. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study performed in an urban academic medical center in Cleveland, OH. Adults hospitalized for CAP who had a respiratory culture performed between January 2016 and September 2020 were included. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into MRSA, PsA, and non-resistant CAP (NR-CAP) groups. Patients with bacterial co-infections or resistant pathogens other than MRSA or PsA were excluded. Results The study included 111 patients with 37 patients in each group. The median age was 61 years (IQR 52-70), and 58.6% of patients were male. There were no independent risk factors for MRSA (Table 1). Independent risk factors for PsA included prior isolation and enteral feeding (Table 2). MRSA risk factors as defined by the 2019 CAP guidelines were found in 48.6% of patients with MRSA CAP (Figure 1). Guideline-defined PsA risk factors were found in 56.8% of patients with PsA CAP (Figure 2). In NR-CAP, 62.2% received empiric MRSA coverage while only 27% had a guideline-defined risk factor; PsA coverage was administered in 78.4% of NR-CAP patients, but risk factors were found in only 24.3% of this cohort. MRSA and P. aeruginosa Risk Factor Analyses Empiric MRSA and P. aeruginosa Coverage and Guideline-Defined Risk Factors Conclusion Our findings were consistent with the risk factors identified in the 2019 CAP guidelines, but additional risk factors may be present in our patient population. Empiric coverage for MRSA and PsA was disproportionately high relative to the rate of recovery. This study encourages local validation of risk factors; however, further analyses are needed to determine the impact on empiric therapy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: risk factors and clinical outcome in non-intensive-care units

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karinne Spirandelli Carvalho Naves ◽  
Natália Vaz da Trindade ◽  
Paulo Pinto Gontijo Filho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistance ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Disk Diffusion Method ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection

INTRODUCTION: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is spread out in hospitals across different regions of the world and is regarded as the major agent of nosocomial infections, causing infections such as skin and soft tissue pneumonia and sepsis. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) and the predictive factors for death. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of fifty-one patients presenting bacteraemia due to S. aureus between September 2006 and September 2008 was analysed. Staphylococcu aureus samples were obtained from blood cultures performed by clinical hospital microbiology laboratory from the Uberlândia Federal University. Methicillinresistance was determined by growth on oxacillin screen agar and antimicrobial susceptibility by means of the disk diffusion method. RESULTS: We found similar numbers of MRSA (56.8%) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (43.2%) infections, and the overall hospital mortality ratio was 47%, predominantly in MRSA group (70.8% vs. 29.2%) (p=0.05). Age (p=0.02) was significantly higher in MRSA patients as also was the use of central venous catheter (p=0.02). The use of two or more antimicrobial agents (p=0.03) and the length of hospital stay prior to bacteraemia superior to seven days (p=0.006) were associated with mortality. High odds ratio value was observed in cardiopathy as comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite several risk factors associated with MRSA and MSSA infection, the use of two or more antimicrobial agents was the unique independent variable associated with mortality.

scholarly journals Multimicrobial Pneumonia during the Early Stages of a Global Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalal H ◽  
◽  
Henriksen G ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Lung Parenchyma ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Global Pandemic

Community-acquired pneumonia is an acute infection of lung parenchyma which causes local and systemic inflammatory changes via cytokines. Several bacteria and viruses are responsible for this type of pneumonia, and the most common bacterial cause is Streptococcus pneumoniae. The classic symptoms are cough, fever, and pleuritic chest pain. In the Winter of 2020, a new strain of coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 spread throughout the world and was responsible for a global pandemic that transformed the way we live our lives. A 93-year old female presented to the hospital with respiratory distress and was found to have not only COVID-19 pneumonia but also superimposed Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Following the most up-to-date guidelines, she was determined to have community-acquired pneumonia. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are uncommon causes of communityacquired pneumonia. She was treated with the standard of care at the time, which included vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and hydroxychloroquine. This case highlights the rarity of this specific presentation of community acquired pneumonia in regards to microbial etiology. It showcases that patients may develop certain diseases despite not having any risk factors. A major takeaway point is that apt decision making is a critical and time sensitive matter when determining whether a bacterial co-infection is present since it can affect patient outcomes. Since co-infections are relatively infrequent, antibiotic use in COVID-19 positive patients needs to be tailored accordingly. At the same time, it is crucial to keep in mind that co-infections are associated with increased severity of COVID-19 as well as poorer outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document