scholarly journals Transformation of myelodysplastic syndrome to acute megakaryoblastic leukemia: An aggressive disease

Author(s):  
Ganesh Kasinathan ◽  
Bee Sun Lee

A 59-year old gentleman with transformation of myelodysplastic syndrome to acute megakaryoblastic leukemia was treated with standard intensive chemotherapy. His poor outcome was attributed to advanced age, aggressive disease biology, underlying myelodysplastic syndrome, poor response to induction chemotherapy, high lactate dehydrogenase and lack of good cytogenetic and molecular mutations.

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Tsuchiya ◽  
Yasuhiko Kaneko ◽  
Seiji Seguchi ◽  
Yuko Matsui ◽  
Takaharu Matsuyama ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa de Souza Fernandez ◽  
Maria Helena Ornellas ◽  
Luize Otero de Carvalho ◽  
Maria Christina Maioli ◽  
Stella Beatriz Gonçalves de Lucena ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 401-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Reinhardt ◽  
Sylke Diekamp ◽  
Joerg Ritter ◽  
Claudia Langebrake ◽  
Gudrun Fleischhack ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) in children without Down’s syndrome occurs in less than 10% of childhood AML. Data on clinical presentation, immunological and genetic features and treatment strategies are rare. Between 6/1987 and 7/2003 89 children with AMKL (m=46; f=43) were treated according to the AML-BFM trials 87 (n=19), 93 (n=39) and 98 (n=31). AML FAB M7 was centrally confirmed by immunophenotyping (n=86) or immunohistology (n=3). The median age at diagnosis (1.5 yrs) was significantly lower compared to other children with AML (total group n=1,149; median age 7.8 yrs; p<0.004). The percentage of AMKL in the AML-BFM trials was 6%. Children with AMKL presented with anemia (93%), thrombocytopenia (88%) and hepatomegaly (83%). Hyperleukocytosis (> 100,000/μl) was less frequent (13%) compared to other AML subtypes (21%; p<0.0001). Immunophenotyping revealed the co-expression of stem cell antigens such as CD34 (61%) and CD117 (82%), myeloid antigens (CD33/CD13) and megakaryocytic antigens (CD41/CD42/CD61). The aberrant expression of CD7 (92%) was significantly increased (other AML subtypes 29%; p<0.0001). Cytogenetics revealed several aberrations such as t(1;22) (14%), monosomy 7 (12%) and trisomy 8 or 21 (7%), but mostly not isolated. The complete remission rate increased from 58% in study AML-BFM 87 to 77% and 83% in AML-BFM 93 and 98 (p<0.05), respectively. The outcome of all children with AMKL was as follows: 5-year event-free survival (EFS) 40±5%; disease-free survival (DFS) 49±6%; overall survival (OS) 42±6%. Compared to children with high risk (HR)-AML (n=714) treated in the AML-BFM studies, the EFS was similar (40±6% vs. 43±2%; p= 0.44). Due to poor response to relapse treatment, the OS tended to be inferior (AMKL 44±6% vs. HR-AML 52±2%; p=0.13). The treatment intensification in AML-BFM 93 and 98 with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM) as second induction resulted in a significantly improved EFS (46±6%), DFS (58±7%) and OS (49±6%) compared to AML-BFM 87 (11±7%, 18 ±12%. 21±9%; p<0.009). There was no significant difference of outcome between children treated with chemotherapy only (n=54) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in 1st CR (n=13 ) DFS 50±7 vs 37±14; p=0.49; OS 54±7 vs 43±15%; p=0.47). Considering gender, age, WBC, blast percentage, immunophenotype or cytogenetic subgroup (available n=74; 83%) no prognostic factor could be identified. Children with poor response (n=19) or relapse (n=33) had a very unfavorable outcome. Only 5 of these children survived. Two children stayed alive in CR after relapse chemotherapy (follow-up 12.8 and 11.3 years), two after alloSCT (follow-up 1.4 and 2.4 years) and one child was alive with disease after alloSCT and relapse (follow-up 0.6 years). In conclusion, in children with AMKL intensive chemotherapy enabled a remission rate and a long-term survival comparable to other childhood HR-AML. AlloSCT seemed not to improve outcome. Therefore new approaches for the treatment of AMKL in children are needed.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 959-959
Author(s):  
Naseema Gangat ◽  
Mrinal M. Patnaik ◽  
Ben Zhang

Abstract Introduction Acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis (APMF) is classified under acute myeloid leukemia not otherwise specified by World Health organization (WHO). The clinical course of this entity is rapidly progressive and fatal, therefore, it is essential to make the accurate diagnosis and distinguish it from its mimickers, particularly acute megakaryoblastic leukemia; AML-M7 (AMKL). The main objective of this study is to identify clinical and pathologic features which could help distinguish APMF from AMKL. Methods We evaluated all patients treated at our institution between 1994 and 2013, with APMF and AMKL. We retrospectively reviewed their clinical data, laboratory results, and initial bone marrow morphologic evaluation. The lineage of blasts was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining with antibodies to CD34, anti-megakaryocyte antibodies CD41, CD61, and polyclonal factor VIII. Flow cytometry and cytogenetic studies were reviewed. Results i) Clinical characteristics 28 patients were studied which included 8 with APMF (median age 63 years) and 20 with AMKL (median age 65 years). Splenomegaly was commonly seen in AMKL (40%) as opposed to APMF (12.5%) (P=0.21). None of the APMF patients had an antecedent hematologic malignancy, compared to 50% of AMKL patients (p=0.02). Accordingly, APMF patients had a lower incidence of the JAK2V617F mutation compared to AMKL (14% vs. 78%, p=0.04). ii) Pathological features Patients with APMF had a hypercellular marrow with increased erythropoiesis (87% vs. 10%, p<0.01) and granulopoiesis (100% vs. 25%, p<0.01), with lower bone marrow blast percentage (14% vs. 33%, p<0.01), with all blasts staining positive for CD34 (p=0.23) compared with AMKL. In AMKL, the majority of blasts stain positive for anti-megakaryocytic antibodies CD61 (100% vs. 30%, p=0.02), CD41 (75% vs. 20%, p=0.10), and factor VIII (50% vs. 20%, p=0.02). On flow cytometry, all cases of APMF demonstrated multilineage proliferation with subsets of blasts positive for CD61, CD117, and MPO. In comparison, all cases of AMKL expressed megakaryocytic marker CD61. iii) Treatment Half of our patients received intensive induction chemotherapy in each group. Median survival was similar in APMF and AMKL of 8.6 and 7.6 months respectively (P=0.82). Of the 8 APMF patients, two are alive, with follow-up duration of 14 and 20 months, respectively. In the AMKL group, only one patient is alive, with follow-up duration of 55 months. All three patients have undergone allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Conclusion In summary, our study illustrated important clinical and pathologic differences between APMF and AMKL, two similar but distinct conditions. Allogenic stem cell transplant has shown promise in limited number of cases. Future trials evaluating the efficacy of novel therapies are warranted.Table 1Clinical and Laboratory features including treatment details of patients with APMF and AMKLAPMFN=8AMKLN=20P-valueAge in years (median)63650.11Gender, M:F5:310:100.69Splenomegaly at diagnosis, n (%)1 (12.5)8 (40)0.21Antecedent hematological malignancy08- myeloproliferative neoplasm 2- myelodysplastic syndromes0.02Hgb [median] g/dl9.68.70.73WBC [median] x 109/L1.14.40.15Platelets [median ] X 109/L28360.29Blast % [median]2130.47LDH [median]4227090.12JAK2V617F mutation, n (%)1/7 (14)7/9 (78)0.04Bone marrow Cellularity, n (%): - Hypercellular - Normocellular - Hypocellular8 (100) 13 (65) 4 (20) 3 (15)0.07 0.29 0.54↑erythropoiesis, n (%)7 (87)2 (10)<0.01Left shift, n (%)5 (62)6 (30)0.20↑granulopoiesis, n (%)8 (100)5 (25)<0.01Left shift, n (%)8 (100)9 (55)0.01↑megakaryopoiesis, n (%)7 (87)16 (80)1.00Micromegakaryocytes, n (%)7 (87)18 (90)1.00↓megakaryocyte nuclear lobulation, n(%)7 (87)12 (60)0.21Clustering of megakaryocytes, n (%)5 (62)13 (65)1.00BM blast % [median]3314<0.01% of blasts CD34 + [median]100300.23% of blasts + for megakaryocyte markers [median] - CD61+ - CD41+ - Factor VIII+30 20 20100 75 500.020.10 0.01Reticulin fibrosis ≥ 3+, n (%)5 (62)9 (45)0.67Complex karyotype, n (%)4(50)10(50)1.00Treatment, n (%) - Induction chemotherapy - Hypomethylating agent - Clinical trial - Supportive care4 (50) 0 0 4(50)10(50) 2(10) 2 (10) 6(30)Allogeneic bone marrow transplant, n (%)3 (38)3 (15)Overall survival in months (median)8.677.610.82 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Wang ◽  
Aidong Lu ◽  
Yueping Jia ◽  
Yingxi Zuo ◽  
Jun Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) is a biologically heterogeneous subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that originates from megakaryocytes. Despite improvements in the accuracy of diagnosing AMKL as well as increased amount of data available on this rare subtype, clear prognostic factors and treatment recommendations remain undefined.Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 40 patients (age ≤18 years) with non–Down syndrome AMKL and assessed the effect of different prognostic factors on the outcomesResults: The complete remission (CR) rate of the patients was 57.9% and 81.1%, respectively, at the end of induction therapy Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rate at 2 years was 41±13% and 41±10%, respectively. An analysis of the cytogenetic features showed that patients with +21 or hyperdiploid (>50 chromosomes) had significantly better OS than those in other cytogenetic subgroups (Plog-rank=0.048 and Plog-rank=0.040, respectively). Besides cytogenetics, an excellent early treatment response (CR and minimal residual disease<1% after induction therapy Ⅰ) also provided a significant survival benefit in univariate analysis in our study. However, multivariate analysis indicated that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was the only independent prognostic marker (RR=11.192; 95 % CI, 2.045-61.241; P=0.005 for OS and RR=5.400; 95 % CI, 1.635-17.832; P=0.006 for EFS, respectively). Conclusion: AMKL in patients with non-Down syndrome has a poor outcome and allo-HSCT may be a better option for post-remission therapy than conventional chemotherapy especially for those having a poor response to induction therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document