scholarly journals Effect Ownership, Accountant Public Office, and Financial Distress to the Public Company Financial Fraudulent Reporting in Indonesia

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2(J)) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Mardiana

This study empirically examine the influence of ownership, accountant public office and the financial distress on fraudulent financial reporting. The variables studied were foreign ownership, family ownership, accountant public office and the financial distress of public companies in Indonesia in 2009 to 2012. The research was conducted by quantitative methods using secondary data. Secondary data comes from a list of cases Bapepam-LK and the annual reports listed companies on the Stock Exchange. This population of study was company listed on the Stock Exchange, and then the samples were taken by purposive sampling criteria the company's corporate criteria sanctioned Bapepam-LK and the sanctions contained elements of fraud, including the non-financial corporate sector and have the data required in this study. At the end, the total sample of 64 companies that the company. This study uses logistic regression statistical tools as the dependent variable is a dummy variable (non-metric), while the independent variable is a variable mixture of metric and non-metric. The results show that the family ownership significantly affect financial reporting fraud but in the opposite direction because of the negative impact. Foreign ownership of a significant negative effect on fraudulent financial reporting. This indicates the greater ownership by the family, the lower the level of financial of fraudulent reporting accountant public office has no effect on fraudulent financial reporting. This occurs because both KAP Big Four and Small Firm have the same standards in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in carrying out their duties as auditor. Financial distress negatively affects fraudulent financial reporting.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Aris Sanulika ◽  
Wahyu Nurul Hidayati

ABSTRACTFraudulent Financial Reporting is a deliberate attempt by a company to deceive and mislead users of financial statements, especially investors and creditors, by presenting and manipulating the material value of financial statements. This study aims to determine how the auditor's opinion can moderate the comparative analysis of the pentagon fraud with the beneish ratio in the detection of fraudulent financial reporting. The type of data used in this study is comparative quantitative data. The data source in this study is secondary data. The population in this study are banking companies listed on the IDX. With a sample of 16 publicly traded companies engaged in financial and banking institutions and were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2017. The results of this study indicate that of 64 samples there were 12.5% which indicated that the financial statements had been manipulated. Auditor opinions can increase the influence of Financial Stability, external auditor quality, change in auditor, change of directors, days sales in receivables index, sales gross margin Index, Asset Quality Index, growth index, depreciation index, sales, and general administration expenses index, leverage index, total accrual to fraudulent financial reporting. Beneish Ratio affects Fraudulent Financial Reporting while Fraud Pentagon does not affect Fraudulent Financial Reporting


Author(s):  
Andrian Budi Prasetyo

This study examines the effect of audit committee characteristics, firm characteristic and ownership structure on the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Audit committee characteristics is examined by audit committee financial expertise, meetings of the audit committee and the audit committee tenure. Firm characteristic is examined by the leverage, firm size, firm’s growth rate and external auditor. Ownership structure is examined by managerial ownership and institutional ownership. This research is using a quantitative methods research. This research is using secondary data that comes from the cases list of Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) and annual reports of the listed companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Using a sample of 15 fraud and 15 non-fraud firms, we did not find a significant relation between the independent variabels and fraudulent financial reporting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (02) ◽  
pp. 235-246
Author(s):  
Nurina Prawinin Tyas ◽  
Nurmala Ahmar ◽  
M. Ardiansyah Syam

ABSTRACT        This study aims to test and prove the empirical evidence of the Financial Distress Prediction Model of Family Companies in Indonesia with the Beneish Ratio Index. The sample used in this study is a group of family companies in Indonesia which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with an observation period of 31 December 2014 to 2018. The research method used is a quantitative method with a survey approach for secondary data. The Days Sales in Receivable Index (DSRI), Sales Growth Index (SGI), Sales General and Administrative Index (SGAI), and Leverage Index (LVGI) variables do not differ in the treatment of the Beneish Model components based on the Financial Distress status of the Family Group Company. Variable Gross Margin Index (GMI), Asset Quality Index (AQI), Depreciation Index (DEPI), and Total Accruals to Total Assets Index (TATA) differ in the treatment of the Beneish Model component based on the Financial Distress status of the Family Company Group. This research contributes to the parties concerned with the prediction of financial distress, such as auditors and the government in assessing the potential for financial distress in the company. ABSTRAK         Studi ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan membuktikan bukti empiris Model Prediksi Financial Distress Grup Perusahaan Keluarga Di Indonesia Dengan Beneish Ratio Index. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Grup perusahaan keluarga di Indonesia yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan periode pengamatan 31 Desember 2014 hingga 2018. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan survey untuk data sekunder. Variabel Days Sales in Receivable Index (DSRI), Sales Growth Index (SGI), Sales General and Administrative Index (SGAI), dan Leverage Index (LVGI) tidak ada perbedaan perlakuan komponen Beneish Model berdasarkan status Financial Distress pada Grup Perusahaan Keluarga. Variabel Gross Margin Index (GMI), Asset Quality Index (AQI), Depreciation Index (DEPI), dan Total Accruals to Total Assets Index (TATA) ada perbedaan perlakuan komponen Beneish Model berdasarkan status financial distress pada Grup Perusahaan Keluarga. Riset ini memberikan panduan kepada pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan terhadap memprediksi financial distress yang akan terjadi dalam perusahaan ataupun industri, pihak yang berkepentingan seperti Auditor dan Pemerintahan. JEL Classification : G32, M41


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Devira Puri Ayu Melati ◽  
Dwi Jaya Kirana ◽  
Noegrahini Lastiningsih

Abstract - The purpose of this research is to determine the influence of financial targets, ineffective monitoring, rationalization, and capability of fraud detection of financial statements. This research also uses family ownership as a moderation variable. The fraudulent financial reporting in this study were measured using earnings management. The population in this research is a banking company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2016-2018. The amount of samples is 123 samples for Model 1 and Model 2. The analytical methods used are multiple linear regression analyses, coesfisien determinations, simultan test (test F) and partial test (Test T) with application SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution) version 25th . The research result indicates that financial target, ineffective monitoring, rationalization, and capability have a significant influence on the detection of fraud financial statements and family ownership can moderate variable relationships Capability change of Directors on fraud detection of financial statements. Keywords: fraudulent financial reporting , fraud diamond, family ownership


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Putri Suprijani ◽  
Dina Patrisia

Purpose - This study aims to determine the effect of ownership structure, board of commissioners, and dividend policy on corporate social responsibility of companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange.Methodology - this research is classified as causative research. The populations in this study were all companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2018. The sample in this study was determined by purposive sampling based on the criteria of companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange companies that are consecutively ranked in the Indonesia Stock Exchange  during the 2014-2018. The samples in this study were 87. The type of data used is secondary data from the website www.idx.co.id. The analytical method used is multiple regression analysis using the SPSS program.Finding – the results of this study indicate (1)family ownership has no significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (2)foreign ownership has a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (3)meeting frequency of board of commissioners has a no significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (4)independen board of directors has significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (5) dividend payout ratio has no significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility on capital structure in companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, family ownership, foreign ownership, dividend payout ratio


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suhaily Hasnan ◽  
Rashidah Abdul Rahman ◽  
Sakthi Mahenthiran

ABSTRACT This study examines ten factors associated with fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) in Malaysian publicly listed companies. We hypothesize that three factors proxy for management rationalization, four factors proxy for management motives, and three factors proxy for the opportunity to commit fraud. Our sample consists of 53 fraud firms convicted of securities fraud and 53 no-fraud firms, all of which were listed on the Bursa Malaysia and have a complete set of data from 1996–2007. With regard to rationalization, we find that prior violations and founders on the board are positively and significantly associated with FFR. With regard to motive, we find that financial distress is positively and significantly associated with FFR while family ownership is negatively and significantly associated with FFR. Our opportunity for fraud proxies, multiple directorships, and audit quality are positively and significantly associated with FFR. Additionally, we find evidence of earnings management in the years leading up to FFR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Wulan Wahyuni Rossa Putri ◽  
Nilda Tartilla ◽  
M. Nofal Pamungkas

Accounting conservatism is a precautionary principle in financial reporting. In this principle, it slows down the recognition of revenue and accelerates the recognition of costs so as to result in lower profits and assets, as well as high costs and debt. This study aims to determine the factors that affect accounting conservatism in the Property Real Estate and Buliding Construction sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX.The data source used in this research is secondary data. Data is sourced from audited annual reports obtained from the IDX official website, namely www.idx.co.id. The population of this research is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, with research samples in the Property Real Estate and Buliding Construction sector in the 2013-2017 period. The samples were determined using purposive sampling method. The method of analysis used in this research is multiple regression with the SPSS version 25 program and hypothesis testing is done using multiple linear regression method.The results of this study indicate that leverage has no effect on accounting conservatism with a significance value of 0.554. Financial distress has no effect on accounting conservatism with a value of 0.852. Meanwhile, capital intensity has an effect on accounting conservatism with a significance value of 0.000. As well as Leverage, Financial Distress, and Capital Intensity simultaneously affect accounting conservatism.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-124
Author(s):  
Yuliamos Tirta Wijaya Pasaribu ◽  
Synthia Madya Kusumawati ◽  
L. Jade Faliany

Abstract– This research aimed at analyzing the effect of fraud pentagon proxied by nine variables, namely financial stability, personal financial needs, external pressure, financial targets, ineffective monitoring, industry characteristics, auditor changes, director changes, and frequent number of CEO’s picture towards fraudulent financial reporting proxied by Beneish M-Score at non-financial service companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2015-2017. The data used were secondary data obtained from annual reports and financial statements of nonfinancial service companies period 2015-2017 with a total of 285 eligible samples. The data analysis methods used were descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the variables of financial stability and the nature of the industry generated a significant and positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, the variables of personal financial needs, external pressure, financial targets, ineffective monitoring, auditor changes, director changes, and often the CEO's image were not significant to fraudulent financial reporting. Keywords: Fraud Pentagon, Fradulent Financial Reporting, Beneish M-Score


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 20-29
Author(s):  
Snežana Knežević ◽  
Marko Špiler ◽  
Marko Milašinović ◽  
Aleksandra Mitrović ◽  
Stefan Milojević ◽  
...  

Bankruptcy is a risk that any company can face, regardless of its size. The importance of predicting a company's bankruptcy for years before its development is enormous, and it is important for financial sustainability. Financial reporting is an important platform for making financial decisions of investors and creditors. In recent years, the frequency of false financial reporting by firms has increased and there are concerns about investors' confidence in capital market. Academics and industry experts adopt a variety of risk management techniques to detect fraudulent financial reporting. A case study was applied in this paper. Based on publicly available financial data (disclosed financial statements) of a domestic textile company for the period 2017-2020, whose shares are listed on the stock exchange, a survey was conducted based on the application of Altman's Z-Score model and Beneish M-Score model. Financial distress is an important criterion to monitor when assessing the likelihood of fraud reporting. When a company is operating poorly, there is a greater motivation to engage in fraudulent financial reporting. The findings show that the results differ according to the applied method in terms of identifying the possibility of bankruptcy and the possibility of fraud in the financial statements of the observed company. The results of the study can be important to investors, auditors, regulators, bankers, tax and other government bodies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (02) ◽  
pp. 235-246
Author(s):  
Nurina Prawinin Tyas ◽  
Nurmala Ahmar ◽  
M. Ardiansyah Syam

ABSTRACT        This study aims to test and prove the empirical evidence of the Financial Distress Prediction Model of Family Companies in Indonesia with the Beneish Ratio Index. The sample used in this study is a group of family companies in Indonesia which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with an observation period of 31 December 2014 to 2018. The research method used is a quantitative method with a survey approach for secondary data. The Days Sales in Receivable Index (DSRI), Sales Growth Index (SGI), Sales General and Administrative Index (SGAI), and Leverage Index (LVGI) variables do not differ in the treatment of the Beneish Model components based on the Financial Distress status of the Family Group Company. Variable Gross Margin Index (GMI), Asset Quality Index (AQI), Depreciation Index (DEPI), and Total Accruals to Total Assets Index (TATA) differ in the treatment of the Beneish Model component based on the Financial Distress status of the Family Company Group. This research contributes to the parties concerned with the prediction of financial distress, such as auditors and the government in assessing the potential for financial distress in the company. ABSTRAK         Studi ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan membuktikan bukti empiris Model Prediksi Financial Distress Grup Perusahaan Keluarga Di Indonesia Dengan Beneish Ratio Index. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Grup perusahaan keluarga di Indonesia yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan periode pengamatan 31 Desember 2014 hingga 2018. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kuantitatif dengan pendekatan survey untuk data sekunder. Variabel Days Sales in Receivable Index (DSRI), Sales Growth Index (SGI), Sales General and Administrative Index (SGAI), dan Leverage Index (LVGI) tidak ada perbedaan perlakuan komponen Beneish Model berdasarkan status Financial Distress pada Grup Perusahaan Keluarga. Variabel Gross Margin Index (GMI), Asset Quality Index (AQI), Depreciation Index (DEPI), dan Total Accruals to Total Assets Index (TATA) ada perbedaan perlakuan komponen Beneish Model berdasarkan status financial distress pada Grup Perusahaan Keluarga. Riset ini memberikan panduan kepada pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan terhadap memprediksi financial distress yang akan terjadi dalam perusahaan ataupun industri, pihak yang berkepentingan seperti Auditor dan Pemerintahan. JEL Classification : G32, M41


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document