Political Parties and the Supply Side of the Economy: The Provision of Physical and Human Capital in Advanced Economies, 1960-90

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carles Boix
Author(s):  
Hanspeter Kriesi ◽  
Edgar Grande ◽  
Romain Lachat ◽  
Martin Dolezal ◽  
Simon Bornschier ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 909-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper Muis ◽  
Tim Immerzeel

This article reviews three strands in the scholarship on the populist radical right (PRR). It covers both political parties and extra-parliamentary mobilization in contemporary European democracies. After definitional issues and case selection, the authors first discuss demand-side approaches to the fortunes of the PRR. Subsequently, supply-side approaches are assessed, namely political opportunity explanations and internal supply-side factors, referring to leadership, organization and ideological positioning. Third, research on the consequences of the emergence and rise of these parties and movements is examined: do they constitute a corrective or a threat to democracy? The authors discuss the growing literature on the impact on established parties’ policies, the policies themselves, and citizens’ behaviour. The review concludes with future directions for theorizing and research.


1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H Topel

Supply-side factors may contribute to rising wage inequality. First, certain changes in the supply of skills allegedly exacerbate wage inequality. Women's increased labor force participation and increased immigration are the leading candidates; both allegedly reduce the wages of less-skilled men. However, immigration's impact on wage inequality has been minor and the effects of women's participation is inconclusive. Second, in evaluating the likelihood that human capital investment will mitigate future inequality, evidence suggests that rising returns to education have increased the proportion of young people attending college, limiting the growth of inequality among high-wage workers.


Author(s):  
Jonathan Wheatley ◽  
Fernando Mendez

AbstractScholars seeking to understand political competition in Europe have proposed various models of political dimensionality. While most scholars draw on data from the supply side of politics (political parties), demand-side (voter) studies remain few. In this article we compare the two approaches. The main difference is that while supply-side approaches suggest a single model of dimensionality that can be applied to all EU countries, demand-side approaches suggest a greater degree of divergence. In particular, the bundle of issues commonly identified by supply-side studies as TAN/GAL not only fail to form a coherent dimension when viewed from a demand-side perspective, but incorporate issues of EU integration in some (northern European) cases, but not in others.


Author(s):  
Bob Stephens

Although education was an issue of major concern to voters in the lead-up to the 1993 election, and political parties responded with a variety of policy proposals, there was a noticeable reticence for further state funding of education. By international standards, tax levels are low in New Zealand, as is participation by tertiary standards. But whether increases in Vote: Education are the best use of further tax dollars depends on philosophical stances as to the nature of education. The human capital school argue for increased fees, whilst those who regard education as a right have to realise that quality may suffer if the state is the sole funder. Provision and policy development based in Iwi and Maori worlds are not covered.


2020 ◽  
pp. 195-211
Author(s):  
Phillip Brown

This chapter argues for a fundamental revaluation of how the productive dividend is to be shared. If there is little prospect of narrowing income inequalities or upgrading the quality of life for all through existing supply-side policies, new human capital requires a wide-ranging policy response to address inequalities of condition alongside inequalities of opportunity. This is why the question of returns (economic prizes) is so important, because there is the need for a new narrative and public policy agenda aimed at spreading the benefits of economic activity to enable human flourishing across society. It requires a redefinition of economic purpose linked to reimagining both earning and learning and the relationship between them. A key insight of the chapter is that what is capitalized by individuals and firms rests on a social dividend that needs to be built into the distributional foundations of the new human capital. It shares the widely held view that the competition for economic prizes should be constructed so that every individual has an equal chance to win.


2010 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. R51-R61
Author(s):  
Solomos Solomou ◽  
Martin Weale

This article uses a dataset covering ten advanced economies (Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States) to explore the role of real wages as an influence on employment and unemployment in the Great Depression and more generally in the 1920s and 1930s. The distinction between employment and unemployment movements during the Great Depression helps to clarify the role of supply side influences on the national heterogeneity of unemployment increases during the Great Depression. We find little general econometric evidence for the idea that movements in product wages had strong influences on employment either during the period of rising unemployment associated with the depression of the 1930s or more generally with the data which exist for the 1920s and 1930s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document