Hugo Grotius on Ethics and War

1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 639-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Forde
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Moral Authority ◽  
Theoretical Position ◽  
Moral Ideals ◽  
Law And Ethics ◽  
Hugo Grotius ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
The Law

Interest in the thought of Hugo Grotius on international law and ethics is justified inasmuch as he attempted to define a theoretical position between an idealism he thought counterproductive and an amoral realism he found unacceptable. Grotius constructed a system in which the moral authority of natural law was combined with the flexibility of human law. This required him to develop a special understanding of the nature and relation of these two types of law. In giving the law of nations, as a product of human will, the authority to suspend provisions of natural law, he provided for a code of international conduct that could permit injustice where necessary, without abandoning moral ideals altogether.

scholarly journals Three Grotian Theories of Humanitarian Intervention

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan J. Criddle
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Humanitarian Intervention ◽  
First Century ◽  
Responsibility To Protect ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
The People ◽  
Hugo Grotius ◽  
Law Of Nations

AbstractThis Article explores three theories of humanitarian intervention that appear in, or are inspired by, the writings of Hugo Grotius. One theory asserts that natural law authorizes all states to punish violations of the law of nations, irrespective of where or against whom the violations occur, to preserve the integrity of international law. A second theory, which also appears in Grotius’s writings, proposes that states may intervene as temporary legal guardians for peoples who have suffered intolerable cruelties at the hands of their own state. Each of these theories has fallen out of fashion today based on skepticism about their natural law underpinnings and concerns about how they have facilitated Western colonialism. As an alternative, this Article outlines a third theory that builds upon Grotius’s account of humanitarian intervention as a fiduciary relationship, while updating Grotius’s account for the twenty-first century. According to this new fiduciary theory, when states intervene to protect human rights abroad they exercise an oppressed people’s right of self-defense on their behalf and may use force solely for the people’s benefit. As fiduciaries, intervening states bear obligations to consult with and honor the preferences of the people they seek to protect, and they must respect international human rights governing the use of force within the affected state. By clarifying the respective responsibilities of the Security Council and individual states for humanitarian intervention, the fiduciary theory also lends greater coherency to the international community’s “responsibility to protect” human rights.

The School of Salamanca

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Pagden
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
International Law ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Law Of Nature ◽  
Hugo Grotius ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
School Of Salamanca ◽  
The Law ◽  
Ius Gentium ◽  
Francisco De Vitoria

The members of the so-called School of Salamanca (or “Second Scholastic,” as it is sometimes called) were, for the most part, the pupils, and the pupils of the pupils—from Domingo de Soto and Melchor Cano to the great Jesuit metaphysicians Luís de Molina and Francisco Suárez—of Francisco de Vitoria, who held the Prime Chair of Theology at Salamanca between 1526 and his death in 1546. Although they are often described vaguely as “theologians and jurists,” they were all, in fact, theologians. In the early modern world, theology, the “mother of sciences,” was considered to be above all other modes of inquiry, and covered everything that belongs to what today is called jurisprudence, as well as most of moral and political philosophy, and what would later become the human sciences. This article focuses on the Salamanca theologians' discussion of the law of nature—the ius naturae—and of the law of nations (ius gentium), for which reason Vitoria has often been referred to (along with Hugo Grotius) as the “father of international law.”

The Law of Nations and the Sources of the Cosmopolis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Goodman
Keyword(s):  
Seventeenth Century ◽  
New England ◽  
International Law ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Nation State ◽  
Hugo Grotius ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
The World ◽  
The Law ◽  
John Selden

The Puritans’ cosmopolitan thought in late seventeenth-century New England had its source in the cosmopolitanism of a law of nations that was as much about the world as a whole as it was about the nation-state it later came to epitomize. With the nation-state not yet a consolidated entity, the seventeenth-century law of nations was far more open-ended than the international law to which it gave rise more than a century later. In the absence of a fixed idea of sovereignty, the law of nations was able to articulate multiple historical possibilities for social, political, and legal communities, one of which—the cosmopolitan—is fundamental. The cosmopolis emerges as a central part of the intellectual project of the law of nations put forth by the Protestant thinkers Alberico Gentili, Hugo Grotius, and John Selden, with the main features of the law recast as the building blocks of the cosmopolis.

A Short History of International Law

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C Neff
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Middle Ages ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
League Of Nations ◽  
Ancient World ◽  
Classical Period ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Law ◽  
History Of International Law

This chapter presents a brief history of international law. It proceeds chronologically, beginning with an overview of the ancient world, followed by a more detailed discussion of the great era of natural law in the European Middle Ages. The classical period (1600–1815) witnessed the emergence of a dualistic view of international law, with the law of nature and the law of nations co-existing (more or less amicably). In the nineteenth century—the least-known part of international law—doctrinaire positivism was the prevailing viewpoint, though not the exclusive one. For the inter-war years, developments both inside and outside the League of Nations are considered. The chapter concludes with some historically oriented comments on international law during the post-1945 period.

Appropriating Nature: Commerce, Property, and the Commodification of Nature in the Law of Nations

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
ILEANA PORRAS
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Common Good ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Urgent Task ◽  
Hugo Grotius ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
The Law ◽  
Commodification Of Nature ◽  
The Right ◽  
Francisco De Vitoria

AbstractThis article explores the structural link between international law's long-standing doctrinal commitment to commerce and its inability to act decisively on behalf of the environment. One of the fundamental rights the early authors of jus gentium discovered was the right to engage in commerce. Francisco de Vitoria, Alberico Gentili, and Hugo Grotius each drew on and applied a providentialist theory of commerce. The doctrine held that Providence distributed scarcity and plenty across the earth so that peoples could not be self-sufficient, but would need to go in search of one another in order to acquire what they lacked. Commerce imagined in its pure form of reciprocal, mutually beneficial exchange would be the means to bring separated mankind to friendship. The embrace of the providentialist doctrine by these early exponents of the law of nations, carried forward by Emer de Vattel, set the stage for international law's longstanding commitment to international commerce, viewed (despite all the distortions) as a virtuous activity that tends to the common good. The doctrine's additional legacy was the installation of a view of nature as commodity. The providentialist doctrine of commerce, adopted by the early authors of international law, remains embedded in the structure of international law and cannot easily be dislodged. Until this doctrine is dislodged, however, international law will continue to be hobbled in its ability to address the urgent task of protecting the natural environment.

Pufendorf, Samuel (1632–94)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Ford
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
International Law ◽  
Human Nature ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Moral Science ◽  
Law Of Nature ◽  
Hugo Grotius ◽  
University Professor ◽  
The Law

Pufendorf was the first university professor of the law of nature and nations. His De iure naturae et gentium (On the Law of Nature and Nations) (1672) and De officio hominis et civis iuxta legem naturalem (On the Duty of Man and Citizen according to Natural Law) (1673) greatly influenced the handling of that subject in the eighteenth century. As a result Pufendorf has been recognized as an important figure in the development of the conception of international law as a body of norms commonly agreed to have universal validity by sovereign states. He regarded himself as an exponent of a new moral science founded by Hugo Grotius which transformed the natural law tradition by starting from identifiable traits of human nature rather than ideas about what human beings ought to be.

scholarly journals A Importância de Hugo Grócio para o Direito

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Antonia Sofia Mafrica Biazi
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Santa Catarina ◽  
Main Work ◽  
Hugo Grotius ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Ius Gentium

A IMPORTÂNCIA DE HUGO GRÓCIO PARA O DIREITO  THE IMPORTANCE OF HUGO GROTIUS FOR THE LAW  Chiara Antonia Sofia Mafrica Biazi*  RESUMO: O presente artigo visa estudar a figura do jurista e teólogo holandês Hugo Grócio, considerando a época conturbada em que o mesmo viveu e que acabou influenciando seu pensamento e suas obras de forma marcante. Analisam-se as contribuições do autor no tocante ao direito internacional, à filosofia do direito e à história do direito, levando em conta a importância do jurista como um dos maiores representantes do iusnaturalismo laico e um dos principais autores que contribuem para o desenvolvimento do direito internacional. O artigo debruça-se sobre a obra principal de Grócio, o De iure belli ac pacis, frisando os pontos considerados mais relevantes aptos a testemunhar as inovações trazidas pelo autor no direito. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Hugo Grócio; jusnaturalismo; De iure belli ac pacis. ABSTRACT: The aim of this article is to study Dutch jurist and theologist Hugo Grotius, taking into account the troubled times in which he lived and which ended up influencing his thought and works in a remarkable way. His contributions related to international law, philosophy of law and history of law are analysed, bearing in mind his importance as one of the main representatives of secular natural law and one of the main authors who contributed to the development of international law. The article addresses Grotius main work, namely De iure belli ac pacis, highlighting the most relevant aspects capable of showing the innovations brought by the author into the field of law. KEYWORDS: Hugo Grotius, jusnaturalism; De iure belli ac pacis. SUMÁRIO: Introdução. 1 A vida e as obras de Hugo Grócio 2 A obra de iure belli ac pacis 2.1 Contexto histórico da obra. 2.2 A importância de regulamentar a guerra e o direito natural. 2.3 A hipótese impíssima. 3. Sistema de direito e fontes do direito em Grócio. 3.1 Divisão do direito e das fontes do direito. 3.2 Definição do direito. Considerações finais. Referências.* Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Mestre em Direito e Relações Internacionais pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Graduada em Direito pela Università degli Studi di Trento. Membro do grupo de pesquisa em Direito Internacional Ius Gentium, registrado no Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Natural Law and International Law in Edmund Burke

1959 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Davidson
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Edmund Burke ◽  
Traditional Concept ◽  
Similar Role ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Many ◽  
Positivist Approach

Among the many discussions stirred by recent searchings after the source and substance of a conservative tradition has been that of the place of natural law in the thought of Edmund Burke. One view which has received renewed emphasis is that Burke's natural law is essentially Thomistic. Those who support this view frequently cite Burke's many references to “the law of nations and of nature.” The purpose of this paper is to show, by particular reference to the subject of international law, that it is misleading to place Burke in the older natural law tradition. In ideas as well as in time, he stands more nearly at a mid-point between that tradition and the positivist approach to law. Revelation and the interpretive aid of a Universal Church, which were crucial to the traditional concept of natural law, do not play a similar role in Burke's thought. The same meaning, therefore, cannot be attributed to his references to the natural law.

Hobbes among the Classic Jurists

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Boucher
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
International Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Of Nature ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
Complete Identification ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Hedley Bull ◽  
Hans Morgenthau

The classic foundational status that Hobbes has been afforded by contemporary international relations theorists is largely the work of Hans Morgenthau, Martin Wight, and Hedley Bull. They were not unaware that they were to some extent creating a convenient fiction, an emblematic realist, a shorthand for all of the features encapsulated in the term. The detachment of international law from the law of nature by nineteenth-century positivists opened Hobbes up, even among international jurists, to be portrayed as almost exclusively a mechanistic theorist of absolute state sovereignty. If we are to endow him with a foundational place at all it is not because he was an uncompromising realist equating might with right, on the analogy of the state of nature, but instead to his complete identification of natural law with the law of nations. It was simply a matter of subject that distinguished them, the individual and the state.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document