Environmental Regulation and Economic Development: The Movement of Chemical Production among States

1990 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Feiock ◽  
C. K. Rowland
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
Chemical Production

scholarly journals The Relationship between Environmental Regulation and Green Total Factor Productivity in China: An Empirical Study Based on the Panel Data of 177 Cities

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 5287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingliang Zhao ◽  
Fangyi Liu ◽  
Wei Sun ◽  
Xin Tao
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
Total Factor Productivity ◽  
Inflection Point ◽  
Factor Productivity ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Development Level ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship

Promoting the coordinated development of industrialization and the environment is a goal pursued by all of the countries of the world. Strengthening environmental regulation (ER) and improving green total factor productivity (GTFP) are important means to achieving this goal. However, the relationship between ER and GTFP has been debated in the academic circles, which reflects the complexity of this issue. This paper empirically tested the relationship between ER and GTFP in China by using panel data and a systematic Gaussian Mixed Model (GMM) of 177 cities at the prefecture level. The research shows that the relationship between ER and GTFP is complex, which is reflected in the differences and nonlinearity between cities with different monitoring levels and different economic development levels. (1) The relationship between ER and GTFP is linear and non-linear in different urban groups. A positive linear relationship was found in the urban group with high economic development level, while a U-shaped nonlinear relationship was found in other urban groups. (2) There are differences in the inflection point value and the variable mean of ER in different urban groups, which have different promoting effects on GTFP. In key monitoring cities and low economic development level cities, the mean value of ER had not passed the inflection point, and ER was negatively correlated with GTFP. The mean values of ER variables in the whole sample, the non-key monitoring and the middle economic development level cities had all passed the inflection point, which gradually promoted the improvement of GTFP. (3) Among the control variables of the different city groups, science and technology input and the financial development level mainly had positive effects on GTFP, while foreign direct investment (FDI) and fixed asset investment variables mainly had negative effects.

The contribution of environmental regulation to technological innovation and quality competitiveness

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhong Cao ◽  
Jianxin You
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Manufacturing Quality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Time

Purpose This paper aims to explore the relationship between environmental regulation, technological innovation and manufacturing quality competitiveness to provide some references for emission reduction activities and improvements in manufacturing quality competitiveness to achieve environmental protection targets and economic development as part of a win–win situation. Design/methodology/approach Based on the structure-behavior-performance paradigm and Grabowski’s research, a new empirical model was provided. The software, EViews 6.0, was used for econometric analysis. Regression analysis was adopted to explore the three indicators’ relationships. Findings First, environmental regulation can promote technological innovation effectively. Second, compared with wasted gas and wasted solids, investment in wasted water control promotes Chinese technological innovation most. Third, the impact of research and development investment, induced by environmental regulation, on manufacturing quality competitiveness is greater than that induced by non-environmental regulation. Fourth, the impact of lagged two-phase environmental regulation on manufacturing quality competitiveness is similar to that of lagged one-phase regulation. Practical implications The issue that Chinese manufacturing is facing is how to manage the trade-off between pollution control investment and improved quality competitiveness. This study enables managers to understand how to better implement environmental regulation initiatives while achieving environmental protection and quality competitiveness as part of a win–win situation. Originality/value This paper analyzes the relationships between environmental regulation, technological innovation and manufacturing quality competitiveness for the first time and provides the basic argument for integrating Chinese environmental regulation with quality competitiveness to reveal the uniqueness of the circumstances determining China’s economic development.

scholarly journals How Does Technological Innovation Mediate the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development? Empirical Evidence from China

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2231
Author(s):  
Die Li ◽  
Sumin Hu
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Mediating Effect ◽  
Mediation Effect ◽  
High Tech ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Measure Model ◽  
The Impact

Technological innovation is considered to be an effective way to promote the quality of economic development and green transition under environmental policies, while the specific mechanism of this process is still unclear. Thus, the purpose of this paper was to examine how technological innovation mediates the relation between environmental regulation and high-quality economic development. Based on the panel data of 34 industries in China from 2007 to 2015, this paper firstly calculated the green total factor productivity (GTFP) as a proxy variable for the quality of economic development through the super-slack-based measure model, and then analyzed the impact of environmental regulation and technical innovation on the GTFP by making use of the mediation effect model. The results showed that environmental-related policy directly affected the GTFP while technological innovation indirectly moderated this process, where the moderate impact of technological innovation was industrial heterogeneous. Specifically, the relation between environmental regulation and GTFP was positively and partially moderated by technological innovation in clean industries and high-tech industries, while positively but completely moderated by technological innovation in low-and medium-tech industries. Moreover, the mediating effect of technological innovation in pollution-intensive industries was positive but insignificant.

scholarly journals Does Environmental Regulation Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of Chinese Cities? A Threshold Effect Analysis Based on the Economic Development Level

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4828
Author(s):  
Xinfei Li ◽  
Chang Xu ◽  
Baodong Cheng ◽  
Jingyang Duan ◽  
Yueming Li
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Threshold Effect ◽  
Waste Utilization ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Treatment Rate ◽  
So2 Removal ◽  
Development Level ◽  
The Impact

Improvement of green total factor productivity (GTFP) through environmental regulation is of great practical significance in promoting the high-quality development of urban economies. Based on panel data for 163 cities in China from 2003 to 2016, five indicators were selected to quantify the effects of environmental regulation: the SO2 removal rate, smoke and dust removal rate, solid waste utilization rate, domestic sewage treatment rate, and waste harmless treatment rate. This study evaluated the impact of environmental regulation on urban GTFP, and analyzed the threshold effect of urban economic development levels. The research results showed that the impact of environmental regulations on GTFP changed as the level of urban economic development increases. When the economic development level was low, environmental regulation had a significant positive effect on GTFP, especially the SO2 removal rate. When the economy developed to reach a medium level, the impact of environmental regulation on GTFP was negative. When the economic development level was high, the SO2 removal rate still had a significant positive impact on GTFP. The solid waste utilization rate had a significant negative impact on GTFP. It was concluded that the government should consider the local economic development level when formulating environmental regulation policies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document