Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure Around the World

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 319-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Tsang ◽  
Fei Xie ◽  
Xiangang Xin
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Home Country ◽  
Investor Protection ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Management Forecasts ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
The World ◽  
Foreign Institutional Investors ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT We examine the impact of foreign institutional investors on firms' voluntary disclosure practices measured by management forecasts. In a sample of 32 non-U.S. countries, we find that, on average, foreign institutional investments lead to improved voluntary disclosure, and their impact is larger than that of domestic institutional investors. These results are more pronounced when foreign institutional investors (1) are unfamiliar with the firm's home country, (2) have longer investment horizons, and (3) are from countries with stronger investor protection and disclosure requirements than the firm's home country. However, we also find some evidence of voluntary disclosure deterioration in firms with foreign institutional investors from countries with inferior disclosure requirements and securities regulations and with concentrated foreign institutional ownership. Overall, our results suggest that the relation between foreign institutional investors and voluntary disclosure is much richer and more complex than what has been documented for domestic institutional investors in the literature.

scholarly journals Board structure and institutional ownership at the time of IPO

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 950-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Neupane ◽  
Biwesh Neupane
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Critical Time ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Board Structure ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Institutional Holdings ◽  
Foreign Institutional Investors ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of mandatory regulatory provisions on board structure and the influence of such board structure on institutional holdings. Design/methodology/approach The study uses unique hand-collected data set of Indian IPOs during the 2004-2012 period after the corporate governance reforms with the introduction of clause 49 in the listing agreements in 2001. Using OLS regression, the paper empirically analyses the determinants of board size and board independence at the time of the IPOs and the influence of such a board structure on shareholdings by domestic and foreign institutional investors. Findings The authors find that complying with mandatory regulatory provisions does not impede firms from structuring their boards to reflect the firms’ advising and monitoring needs. The authors also find that complying with provisions have positive implication for the firm, as firms with greater board independence appear to attract more foreign institutional investors. Originality/value To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first study to examine the issue in a regime where regulation mandates the composition of the board of directors. The paper also extends the literature on institutional holdings by providing evidence on the impact of board structure on institutional ownership at a critical time in a firm’s life cycle when concerns for endogeneity for empirical investigations are weaker.

Cross-Listings and Voluntary Disclosure: International Evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Chen ◽  
Yashu Dong ◽  
Jeff Ng ◽  
Albert Tsang
Keyword(s):  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Management Forecasts ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
International Evidence ◽  
Management Forecast ◽  
Cross Listing ◽  
International Setting ◽  
Foreign Institutional Investors

This paper examines changes in firms' disclosure behavior around cross-listings. Using an international setting, we find significant differences in management forecast likelihood and frequency between cross-listed firms and firms with similar characteristics but that are not cross-listed; particularly when differences in accounting standards between a cross-listed firm's home and target countries are larger. Further, we find that firms choosing to cross-list in target countries with larger accounting standards differences tend to provide more voluntary disclosure during the two years preceding a new cross-listing, rather than during the earlier time periods or the period after cross-listing, and such voluntary disclosure helps firms attract more foreign institutional ownership in their cross-listing target countries. Collectively, our evidence suggests that although differences in accounting standards across countries deter firms' cross-listing activities, cross-listed firms, by providing more management forecasts voluntarily, preemptively alleviate the information disadvantage faced by foreign institutional investors.

scholarly journals Does Board Diversity Attract Foreign Institutional Ownership? Insights from the Chinese Equity Market

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 507
Author(s):  
Shoukat Ali ◽  
Ramiz Ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad ◽  
Joe Ueng
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Fixed Effect Model ◽  
Board Diversity ◽  
Financial Expertise ◽  
Foreign Institutional Investors ◽  
Variable Bias ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nonfinancial Firms

The study aimed to empirically investigate the impact of board diversity variables (age, gender, nationality, education, tenure, and expertise) on the investment preferences of foreign institutional investors in an emerging market, China. For this, sample data consisted of 1374 nonfinancial Chinese firms from 2009 to 2018. The study used OLS regression as a baseline regression, a fixed effect model to control omitted variable bias, and the two-step systems GMM model to control the endogeneity problem. The study revealed that board diversity variables (gender, nationality, education, and financial expertise) are positively associated with foreign institutional ownership in Chinese nonfinancial firms, implying that foreign institutional investors own a high percentage of Chinese nonfinancial firms with diversity of gender, nationality, education, and financial expertise. Age and tenure of board diversity, on the other hand, have little correlation with foreign institutional ownership. Further, the robustness regressions also confirmed the relationship between board diversity and foreign institutional ownership. This study made a unique attempt to provide empirical evidence that firms having diverse boards attract foreign institutional ownership by reducing asymmetric information.

scholarly journals Does Governance Affect Compliance with IFRS 7?

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Amal Yamani ◽  
Khaled Hussainey ◽  
Khaldoon Albitar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Disclosure Requirements ◽  
Corporate Governance Codes ◽  
Ifrs 7 ◽  
Enforcement Mechanisms ◽  
The Impact

Although there has been considerable research on the impact of corporate governance on corporate voluntary disclosure, empirical evidence on how governance affects compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements is limited. We contribute to governance and disclosure literature by examining the impact of corporate governance on compliance with IFRS 7 for the banking sector in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). We use a self-constructed disclosure index to measure compliance with IFRS 7. We use regression analyses to examine the impact of board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and ownership structure on compliance with IFRS 7. Using a sample of 335 bank-year observations for GCC listed banks over the period 2011–2017, we report evidence that corporate governance variables affect compliance with IFRS 7. However, the significance of these variables depends on the type of the regression model used. Our findings suggest that governance matters for mandatory disclosure requirements. So to improve the level of compliance, regulators, official authorities, and policymakers should intensify their efforts toward improving corporate governance codes, following up their implementation and enhancing the enforcement mechanisms.

scholarly journals Impact of Institutional Investment Pattern on Stock Volatility: A Study of BSE-30 Companies

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harendra Singh
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Stock Volatility ◽  
Institutional Investment ◽  
Investment Pattern ◽  
Institutional Holdings ◽  
The Mind ◽  
The Impact

<p>There are many studies found in the field of stock volatility and institutional investors. Most of the studies found an inconsistent relationship between volatility and institutional investors. It creates a curiosity in the mind of investor, whether riskier securities attract institutional investors or an increase in institutional holdings results in an increase in volatility.</p><p><br />In this paper we tried to examine the impact of institutional ownership pattern on stock volatility. We have considered BSE-30 companies and taken 5 year data from 1st January 2009 to 1st January 2014. Our result shows that institutional ownership has positive and significant impact on stock volatility.</p>

scholarly journals Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Poh-Ling Ho ◽  
Gregory Tower
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Voluntary Disclosure ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
The Impact

This paper examines the impact of ownership structure on the voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. The result shows that there is an increase in the extent of voluntary disclosure in Malaysian listed firms over the eleven-year period from 1996 to 2006. Ownership concentration consistently shows positive association with voluntary disclosure. Firms with higher foreign and institutional ownership have a significantly positive association with voluntary disclosure levels while firms with family ownership exhibit lower voluntary disclosure. Consistent with agency theory, different ownership structures have varied monitoring effects on agency costs and clearly influence firm’s disclosure practices. The findings provide insights to policy makers and regulators in their desire to increase transparency and accountability amidst the continual enhancement of corporate governance. The findings provide evidence that optimized ownership structure in any jurisdiction should be considered in any regulatory process that seeks to improve transparency.

Board financial expertise and foreign institutional investment: the moderating role of ownership concentration

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoukat Ali ◽  
Ramiz Ur Rehman ◽  
Bushra Sarwar ◽  
Ayesha Shoukat ◽  
Muhammad Farooq
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Institutional Investment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Expertise ◽  
Foreign Institutional Investors ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the impact of board financial expertise on the shareholding of foreign institutional investors in an emerging equity market of China and to explore whether ownership concentration moderates the relationship between board financial expertise and foreign institutional investment. Design/methodology/approach To test the hypothesized relationships, this study uses panel data regression models, i.e. static (fixed effect and random effect) and dynamic (two-step generalized methods of moments) models. Further, to control the possible endogeniety issue, this study uses two instrumental variables, namely, board size and industry average financial expertise of board to proxy board financial expertise. This study covers a period from 2006 to 2015 for 169 listed Chinese firms. Findings The results revealed that foreign institutional investors positively perceived board financial expertise and holds more shareholdings with the increasing level of financial experts at boards of directors. Moreover, ownership concentration positively moderated this relationship. It means that in highly concentrated firms, the board financial expertise conveys a stronger signal to foreign institutional investors that firms can manage financial resources rationally by controlling negative effects of ownership concentration. Further, the robustness model also confirmed the relationship between board financial expertise and foreign institutional shareholdings. Originality/value To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to investigate board-level financial expertise as a determinant of foreign institutional ownership. Further, no previous study has used ownership concentration as a contextual variable on the relationship between board financial expertise and foreign institutional investment.

scholarly journals Informed Trading of Futures Markets During the Financial Crisis: Evidence from the VPIN

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Hsien Lee ◽  
Wen-Chien Liu ◽  
Chia-Lin Hsieh
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Special Kind ◽  
Informed Trading ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Day Of The Week ◽  
Foreign Institutional Investors ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Probability Of Informed Trading ◽  
The Impact

This paper examines the impact of informed trading on futures returns during the 2008-2009 financial crisis. To precisely capture the informed trading in the highly volatile market during this period, we adopt the Volume-Synchronized Probability of Informed Trading (VPIN) of Easley, Hvidkjaer and O’Hara (2012) as our main measurement for informed trading. Besides, we also use a unique transaction dataset with investor identity to classify investors into domestic and foreign institutional investors, which the foreign institutional investors are supposed to be characterized by a higher degree of informed trading. Our empirical results show that the VPIN of foreign institutional investors has indeed significantly positive impacts on futures returns at the individual level. By contrast, the effect of the VPIN of domestic institutional investors on futures returns is only significant on Wednesdays, which could be seen as a special kind of day-of-the-week effect.

Subsidiary ownership decisions by bank holding companies

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-444
Author(s):  
Wenling Lu ◽  
Wan-Jiun Paul Chiou
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Bank Holding Companies ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Holding Companies ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This study aims to examine the intertemporal changes in the institutional ownership of publicly traded bank holding companies (BHCs) in the USA. The role of owned-subsidiary investing in the portfolio decisions is investigated as compared to unaffiliated banks and non-bank institutional investors. Design/methodology/approach The authors apply panel regressions that control bank-fixed and time-fixed effects to study the impact of prudence, liquidity, information advantages and historical returns on each type of the institutional ownership from 1986 to 2014. Findings The subsidiary banks tend to invest in more shares of their parent BHCs when they are traded for a short period of time and when they have low-market risk, low turnover, a low capital equity ratio and great reliance on off-balance activities. However, the impact of these determinants of institutional ownership is opposite for unaffiliated banks and non-bank institutions. Research limitations/implications This study provides evidence that the criteria used by subsidiary banks to invest in their parent company stock are different than the unaffiliated banks and non-bank institutions, raising concerns about the owned-subsidiary investing activities and banks’ trustees’ duty to work in the best interest of their trust clients. Originality/value This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the level and market value of BHC institutional ownership over the past three decades and the impact of different determinants on the ownership of BHCs by subsidiary banks, unaffiliated banks and non-bank institutional investors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document