Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Dialysis Patients

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Roberts ◽  
John P. Middleton

Cardiovascular disease is a common cause of death and disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Registry data show that 41% of deaths in ESRD patients are due to a variety of cardiovascular causes, such as acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia/sudden cardiac death, and stroke. In the general population, each of these disease entities in isolation can be effectively managed according to evidence from large clinical trials and evidence-based guidelines. However, many of these trials did not include patients with ESRD, limiting the transferability of this evidence to the care of patients on dialysis. To complicate matters, cardiovascular events in ESRD patients are likely augmented from a unique interplay of cardiac risk due to both reduced kidney function and the necessity for artificial renal replacement therapies. In this light, the patient on dialysis is subjected to a series of unique factors: the continued presence of the metabolic perturbations of uremia and the peculiar environment of the dialysis treatment itself. Since the ESRD heart is under a considerable amount of strain due to chronic volume overload, rapid electrolyte and fluid shifts, and accelerated vascular calcification, management can be complex and outcomes multifactorial. In this review, we summarize the current evidence regarding management of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, sudden cardiac death, and atrial fibrillation. We also address modifiable risk factors related to the dialysis procedure itself and highlight recent randomized controlled trials that included dialysis patients and measured important cardiovascular outcomes. 

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Roberts ◽  
John P. Middleton

Cardiovascular disease is a common cause of death and disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Registry data show that 41% of deaths in ESRD patients are due to a variety of cardiovascular causes, such as acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia/sudden cardiac death, and stroke. In the general population, each of these disease entities in isolation can be effectively managed according to evidence from large clinical trials and evidence-based guidelines. However, many of these trials did not include patients with ESRD, limiting the transferability of this evidence to the care of patients on dialysis. To complicate matters, cardiovascular events in ESRD patients are likely augmented from a unique interplay of cardiac risk due to both reduced kidney function and the necessity for artificial renal replacement therapies. In this light, the patient on dialysis is subjected to a series of unique factors: the continued presence of the metabolic perturbations of uremia and the peculiar environment of the dialysis treatment itself. Since the ESRD heart is under a considerable amount of strain due to chronic volume overload, rapid electrolyte and fluid shifts, and accelerated vascular calcification, management can be complex and outcomes multifactorial. In this review, we summarize the current evidence regarding management of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, sudden cardiac death, and atrial fibrillation. We also address modifiable risk factors related to the dialysis procedure itself and highlight recent randomized controlled trials that included dialysis patients and measured important cardiovascular outcomes. 


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash C Deedwania ◽  
Bertram Pitt ◽  
Enrique V Carbajal ◽  
Ali Ahmed

Background: The effect of hyperglycemia on outcomes in patients with acute MI (AMI) and low LVEF without diabetes mellitus is not well known. Methods: In the EPHESUS trial, of the 4411 non-DM patients, 554 had baseline hyperglycemia (≥140 mg/dL). Propensity scores for hyperglycemia were calculated for each of the 4411 patients based on 63 baseline covariates, and a greedy 1:8 matching protocol was used to match 400 and 2542 patients respectively with and without hyperglycemia. Matched Cox regression models were used to estimate associations between hyperglycemia and outcomes during 16 months of follow up. Results: Patients with hyperglycemia were more likely to be older, have higher heart rate, lower LVEF, and receive nitrates, statins, digoxin, loop diuretics, and PTCA during index admission. Unadjusted hazard ratios {HR} and 95% confidence intervals {CI} for hyperglycemia were: all-cause death (1.51; 1.22–1.87; P<0.001), cardiovascular (CV) death (1.52; 1.21–1.90; P<0.001), heart failure (HF) death (2.19, 1.46–3.29; P<0.001), all-cause hospitalization (1.23; 1.08–1.40; P=0.002), CV hospitalization (1.51, 1.24–1.84; P<0.001) and HF hospitalization (1.75; 1.37–2.25; P<0.001). In the matched cohort, hyperglycemia was significantly associated with CV death (HR=1.25, 95%CI=1.01–1.54; P=0.039), sudden cardiac death (HR=1.33; 95%CI=1.02–1.73, P=0.035) and fatal/nonfatal AMI (HR=1.53, 95%CI=1.07–2.19; P=0.04; Figure ). Conclusions: In non-diabetic post-AMI HF patients, hyperglycemia is a poor prognosticator and is associated with increased risk of fatal and non-fatal AMI, CV death, HF deaths, sudden cardiac death, and CV hospitalization. Figure Fatal or non fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by baseline serum glucose in post-AMI patients with no known history of diabetes mellitus


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Hui ◽  
A Sharma ◽  
K Docherty ◽  
J.J.V McMurray ◽  
B Pitt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is responsible for 20–40% of mortality following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The risk of SCD is even higher among patients with AMI complicated by heart failure (HF) (either clinically apparent HF or left ventricular dysfunction). The temporal relationship between an AMI complicated by HF and subsequent SCD and the association of non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events following AMI with SCD has yet to be described. Purpose Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, we evaluated the probability and temporal association of subsequent non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events (HF hospitalization, recurrent MI, or stroke) and SCD. Methods The High-Risk Myocardial Infarction (HRMI) database contains 28,771 patients with signs of HF or reduced LV ejection fraction (&lt;40%) after AMI. Among patients with an AMI complicated by HF, we used adjudicated cause of death from the HRMI Database to identify: 1) the temporal distribution of SCD among patients following an index AMI; 2) the probability of having SCD following a non-fatal CV event following the index AMI. Results Median follow-up was 1.9 years. Mean age was 65.0±11.5 years and 70% were male. The incidence of CV death was 7.9 per 100 patient-year [py] and for SCD was 3.1 per 100py (40% of CV deaths). SCD rates were highest in the early period (&lt;90 days) after AMI and decreased over time. Recurrent MI preceded 9.6% of SCD after a median time of 145 days; HF hospitalization preceded 17.0% of SCD after a median 144 days; and stroke preceded 2.7% of SCD after a median of 138 days (vs. non-sudden CV death: MI 46.6% at 1 days, HF hospitalization: 30.9% at 67 days, stroke 12.9% at 9 days). The incidence of SCD preceded by HF hospitalization was significantly higher than SCD without preceding HF hospitalization. Conclusion Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, SCD predominantly occurred in the early “high-risk” period after AMI; SCD rates decreased afterwards. Patients with non-fatal HF hospitalizations during follow-up may have a higher subsequent SCD risk. Preventing HF onset after MI may help decreasing SCD. Proportion of sudden cardiac death Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Lucien Award, McGill University


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (55) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Wojdyła-Hordyńska ◽  
Grzegorz Hordyński

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common arrhythmias, with a significant increase in incidence in recent years. AF is a major cause of stroke, heart failure, sudden cardiac death, and cardiovascular disease. Timely intervention and modification of risk factors increase chance to stop the disease. Aggressive, multilevel prevention tactics are a component of combined treatment, including – in addition to lifestyle changes, anticoagulant therapy, pharmacotherapy and invasive anti-arrhythmic treatment – prevention of cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, ischemia, valvular disease and heart failure.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Luo ◽  
Hao Xu ◽  
Keji Chen

Objective. This paper systematically evaluated the efficacy and safety of compound Danshen dropping pill (CDDP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing CDDP with no intervention, placebo, or conventional western medicine, were retrieved. Data extraction and analyses were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane standards. We assessed risk of bias for each included study and evaluated the strength of evidence on prespecified outcomes.Results. Seven RCTs enrolling 1215 patients were included. CDDP was associated with statistically significant reductions in the risk of cardiac death and heart failure compared with no intervention based on conventional therapy for AMI. In addition, CDDP was associated with improvement of quality of life and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction. Nevertheless, the safety of CDDP was unproven for the limited data. The quality of evidence for each outcome in the main comparison (CDDP versus no intervention) was “low” or “moderate.”Conclusion. CDDP showed some potential benefits for AMI patients, such as the reductions of cardiac death and heart failure. However, the overall quality of evidence was poor, and the safety of CDDP for AMI patients was not confirmed. More evidence from high quality RCTs is warranted to support the use of CDDP for AMI patients.


2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 757-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari M. Tapanainen ◽  
Kai S. Lindgren ◽  
Timo H. Mäkikallio ◽  
Olli Vuolteenaho ◽  
Juhani Leppäluoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document