scholarly journals Association Between the Use of Antidepressants and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Large, Population-Based Cohort Study in Japan

Diabetes Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 885-893
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Miidera ◽  
Minori Enomoto ◽  
Shingo Kitamura ◽  
Hisateru Tachimori ◽  
Kazuo Mishima
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 104-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy G.P.J. de Jong ◽  
Paul J.H.L. Peeters ◽  
Andrea M. Burden ◽  
Marie L. de Bruin ◽  
Harm R. Haak ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 1963-1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit R. Majumdar ◽  
Robert G. Josse ◽  
Mu Lin ◽  
Dean T. Eurich

Abstract Context: Type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis are both common, chronic, and increase with age, whereas type 2 diabetes is also a risk factor for major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). However, different treatments for type 2 diabetes can affect fracture risk differently, with metaanalyses showing some agents increase risk (eg, thiazolidinediones) and some reduce risk (eg, sitagliptin). Objective: To determine the independent association between new use of sitagliptin and MOF in a large population-based cohort study. Design, Setting, and Subjects: A sitagliptin new user study design employing a nationally representative Unites States claims database of 72 738 insured patients with type 2 diabetes. We used 90-day time-varying sitagliptin exposure windows and controlled confounding by using multivariable analyses that adjusted for clinical data, comorbidities, and time-updated propensity scores. Main Outcomes: We compared the incidence of MOF (hip, clinical spine, proximal humerus, distal radius) in new users of sitagliptin vs nonusers over a median 2.2 years follow-up. Results: At baseline, the median age was 52 years, 54% were men, and median A1c was 7.5%. There were 8894 new users of sitagliptin and 63 834 nonusers with a total 181 139 person-years of follow-up. There were 741 MOF (79 hip fractures), with 53 fractures (4.8 per 1000 person-years) among new users of sitagliptin vs 688 fractures (4.0 per 1000 person-years) among nonusers (P = .3 for difference). In multivariable analyses, sitagliptin was not associated with fracture (adjusted hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.8–1.4; P = .7), although insulin (P < .001), sulfonylureas (P < .008), and thiazolidinedione (P = .019) were each independently associated with increased fracture risk. Conclusions: Even in a young population with type 2 diabetes, osteoporotic fractures were not uncommon. New use of sitagliptin was not associated with fracture, but other commonly used second-line agents for type 2 diabetes were associated with increased risk. These data should be considered when making treatment decisions for those with type 2 diabetes at particularly high risk of fractures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-30
Author(s):  
Frederikke Sch⊘nfeldt Troelsen ◽  
Henrik Toft S⊘rensen ◽  
Lars Pedersen ◽  
Rune Erichsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document