Dual and Self-curing Potential of Self-adhesive Resin Cements as Thin Films

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
RR Moraes ◽  
N Boscato ◽  
PS Jardim ◽  
LFJ Schneider

Clinical Relevance Self-adhesive resin cements present slower polymerization and lower degree of conversion than conventional resin cements, in either the dual- or self-cure mode.

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Aguiar ◽  
M. D. Francescantonio ◽  
C. A. G. Arrais ◽  
G. M. B. Ambrosano ◽  
C. Davanzo ◽  
...  

Clinical Relevance Within the limited experimental conditions, self-adhesive cements provided a higher degree of conversion values when light-activated. In addition, the results showed that, after 15 minutes, the degree of conversion values increased for all materials in both activation modes.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Trajtenberg ◽  
S. J. Caram ◽  
S. Kiat-amnuay

Clinical Relevance Among the self-adhesive resin cements, Panavia F 2.0 demonstrated less microleakage than RelyX Unicem or Multilink, whether or not a die spacer technique was used.


2018 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nara Sousa Rodrigues ◽  
Lidiane Costa de Souza ◽  
Victor Pinheiro Feitosa ◽  
Alessandro Dourado Loguercio ◽  
Camillo D'Arcangelo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e20910917850
Author(s):  
Antonio Carlos Gordilho ◽  
Denis Mauro Oliveira Swerts ◽  
Milton Edson Miranda ◽  
Letícia Cidreira Boaro ◽  
William Cunha Brandt

The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) and cohesive strength (CS) of two conventional   resin cements and a self-adhesive resin cement using different forms of activation. Two conventional dual resin cements (Variolink II and RelyX ARC) and a self-adhesive resin cement were polymerized in three different ways of activation, namely Chemically Activated (CA), Light Activated with Interposition of a resin disc (LI) and Light-Activated (L). The DC was evaluated using Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy - FTIR (Spectrum 100). In the CS test, the samples were tested until fracture in a universal testing machine (Instron 4411). The mean values obtained in the DC and CS tests were evaluated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (cement and activation) and Tukey test (p≤0.05). Irrespective of the activation mode, RelyX ARC showed the highest DC values,  RelyX U200, the lowest values, and Variolink II intermediate values. Group L always had higher for DC and CS values than group CA. Among the resin cements, irrespective of the activation mode, there were no differences in CS values. The chemical activation mode of dual resin cements led to lower DC and CS values. RelyX ARC cement had the highest DC values and RelyX U200 cement the lowest values, however, in relation to CS, there were no differences.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. L. Yan ◽  
Y. K. Kim ◽  
K-H. Kim ◽  
T-Y. Kwon

Clinical Relevance Chemical- and dual-cured resin cements, as well as light-cured resin cements, appear to be cured within the first 24 hours post-mix or post-light activation with no further significant changes in the degree of conversion or microhardness.


10.2341/07-81 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. da Silva ◽  
L. T. Poskus ◽  
J. G. A. Guimarães

Clinical Relevance The nanofilled composite presented a lower degree of conversion, flexural modulus and flexural strength than the hybrid composite. On the other hand, the two materials had a similar hardness. The light polymerization mode influenced only the degree of conversion and the hardness of composites.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Al-Saleh ◽  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
L. Tam ◽  
A. Fenton

Clinical Relevance Two self-adhesive resin cements resulted in minimal microleakage scores when used as liners in Class II composite restorations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
CAG Arrais ◽  
CL Chagas ◽  
A Munhoz ◽  
M Oliveira ◽  
AF Reis ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Objectives This study evaluated the degree of conversion (DC) of two commercial, self-adhesive resin cements (SARCs) using Fourier transform infrared analysis (FTIR) polymerized at simulated prepared tooth surface temperatures and under different curing conditions. Materials and Methods RelyX U100 (U100, 3M ESPE) and Maxcem Elite (MX, Kerr Corporation) were mixed at 25°C and applied to the surface of a horizontal attenuated total reflectance (ATR) unit, which was near room temperature (RT, control) (25°C) or heated to simulate prepared tooth surface temperatures (28°C and 32°C) and then attached to an infrared spectrometer. The products were polymerized using one of three conditions: direct light exposure through a glass slide (DLE), exposure through a 1.5-mm thick ceramic disc overlay (CO) (A2 shade, IPS e.max, Ivoclar Vivadent), or self-curing (SC). FTIR spectra were recorded for 12 minutes (1 spectrum/s, 16 scans/spectrum, resolution 4 cm−1) immediately after application to the ATR. The DC was calculated using standard techniques of observing changes in aliphatic-to-aromatic peak ratios before and 12 minutes after curing, as well as during each 1-second interval. DC data (n=7) were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test (p=0.05). Results Both simulated tooth temperatures significantly increased DC in all groups of MX and in the CO and SC groups of U100 compared with the RT control. For MX, the self-cure groups exposed to tooth temperatures showed DC values similar to those of the CO groups. For U100, the CO groups showed higher DC values than SC groups regardless of temperature. Time-based conversion profiles ranged according to product, temperature, and curing mode. Conclusions Causing SARCs to polymerize at simulated tooth temperatures increases DC of SARCs compared with room-temperature curing values, mainly in the SC mode.


2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaiane R. Aguiar ◽  
Michele de Oliveira ◽  
César A.G. Arrais ◽  
Glaucia M.B. Ambrosano ◽  
Frederick Rueggeberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document