scholarly journals Survival outcomes of a population-based cohort of adolescent and young adult (AYA), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients in Ontario, Canada: The IMPACT Cohort

Author(s):  
Cindy Lau ◽  
Jason Pole ◽  
Rinku Sutradhar ◽  
Nancy Baxter ◽  
Paul Nathan ◽  
...  

IntroductionAdolescents and young adults (AYA) are an understudied population in cancer research. The Initiative to Maximize Progress in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Therapy (IMPACT) cohort includes Ontario individuals aged 15-21 years, diagnosed with a malignancy during 1992-2011. This cohort contains a rich source of patient, disease, and treatment data. Objectives and ApproachThe IMPACT cohort was created using chart review and linkages to population-based health services databases. The cohort is comprised of AYA with a primary diagnosis of acute leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, sarcoma, or testicular cancer. For the current study, we focused on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients, and examined survival outcomes of those treated at pediatric vs adult centers, with adult vs pediatric protocols. We assessed 5-year event-free survival (first of relapse, progression, secondary malignant neoplasm, or death) and overall survival. ResultsThe IMPACT cohort contains 2,963 patients, of which 152/271 ALL patients were treated at adult centers. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS ± standard error) among those treated at a pediatric vs. adult center was 72%±4% vs. 56%±4% (p = 0.03), respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82%±4% vs. 64%±4% (p Conclusion/ImplicationsALL patients treated with a pediatric protocol at a pediatric center experienced better, crude survival outcomes compared to those at an adult center. The IMPACT cohort offers the opportunity to study a myriad of questions on different cancer groups, with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes among the AYA population.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (01) ◽  
pp. 051-060
Author(s):  
Vineet Agrawal ◽  
Smita Kayal ◽  
Prasanth Ganesan ◽  
Biswajit Dubashi

Abstract Background Treatment protocols for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have evolved over time to give excellent cure rates in children and moderate outcomes in adults; however, little is known how delays in chemotherapy affect long-term survival. Objectives To find the association of delays during different treatment phases on the survival outcomes. Materials and Methods Data from 149 ALL cases treated between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment course in commonly used protocols was divided into three phases—induction, consolidation (postremission), maintenance, and also a combined intensive phase (induction plus consolidation) for the purpose of analysis, and delay in each phase was defined based on clinically acceptable breaks. Analysis was done to find the impact of treatment delay in each phase on the survival outcomes. Results The median age was 12 years (range, 1–57). Multi-center Protocol-841 (MCP-841) was used for 72%, German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL) for 19%, and Berlin, Frankfurt, Muenster, 95 protocol (BFM-95) for 9% of patients. Delay in induction was seen in 52%, consolidation in 66%, and during maintenance in 42% of patients. The median follow-up was 41 months, and 3-year survival outcomes for the entire cohort were event-free survival (EFS)—60%, relapse-free survival (RFS)—72%, and overall survival (OS)—68%. On univariate analysis, delay in induction adversely affected EFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.78, p = 0.04), while delay in intensive phase had significantly worse EFS and RFS (HR = 2.41 [p = 0.03] and HR = 2.57 [p = 0.03], respectively). On separate analysis of MCP-841 cohort, delay in intensive phase affected both EFS (HR = 3.85, p = 0.02) and RFS (HR = 3.42, p = 0.04), whereas delay in consolidation significantly affected OS with (HR = 4.74, p = 0.04) independently. Conclusion Treatment delays mostly in intensive phase are associated with worse survival in ALL; attempts should be made to maintain protocol-defined treatment intensity while adequately managing toxicities.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 1112-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Nachman ◽  
Nyla A. Heerema ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
Bruce Camitta ◽  
Erik Forestier ◽  
...  

Abstract One-hundred thirty-nine patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and hypodiploidy (fewer than 45 chromosomes) were collected from 10 different national ALL study groups and single institutions. Patients were stratified by modal chromosome number into 4 groups: 24 to 29 (N = 46); 33 to 39 (N = 26); 40 to 43 (N = 13); and 44 (N = 54) chromosomes. Nine patients were Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive (4 cases: 44 chromosomes; 5 cases: 40-43 chromosomes) and were not considered further. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the remaining 130 patients were 38.5% ± 4.4% and 49.8% ± 4.2% at 8 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in outcome between patients with 24 to 29, 33 to 39, or 40 to 43 chromosomes. Compared with patients with fewer than 44 chromosomes, patients with 44 chromosomes had a significantly better EFS (P = .01; 8-year estimate, 52.2% vs 30.1%) and OS (P = .017; 69% vs 37.5%). For patients with 44 chromosomes, monosomy 7, the presence of a dicentric chromosome, or both predicted a worse EFS but similar OS. Doubling of the hypodiploid clone occurred in 32 patients (24-29 chromosomes [n = 25] and 33-39 chromosomes [n = 7]) and had no prognostic implication. Children and adolescents with ALL and hypodiploidy with fewer than 44 chromosomes have a poor outcome despite contemporary therapy.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3968-3968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Alves ◽  
Liane Daudt ◽  
Karina L. M. Mazzucco ◽  
Adriano Taniguchi ◽  
Tiago Nava ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSE: To compare pediatric and adult therapeutic practices in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1997 to December 2007, 34 and 11 adolescents (10 to 20 years of age) were treated according to German pediatric BFM 90 and 95 and adult BFM 84 protocols, respectively. Age, B/T lineage, WBC count, complete remission, cytogenetics, and response to steroids were analyzed. Age, B/T lineage and WBC count were similar. Poor risk-cytogenetics (t (9;22),t(4;11) and hypodiploidy less than 45 chromosomes were present only in BFM 90 and 95 group. Among the different prognostic factors, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of the trial on achieving overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: OS in 10 years and EFS was, respectively, 68.6% and 68.7% for the pediatric protocol and 31.4% and 21.6% for the adult protocol. CONCLUSION: This study’s findings were similar to others in USA, UK, France, Italy and Holland that clearly demonstrate that current pediatric regimens are more effective for adolescents and may contribute to indicate that adolescents should be included in intensive pediatric protocols. Keywords: leukemia, survival, adolescent.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5075-5075
Author(s):  
Yajaira Valentine Jimenez-Antolinez ◽  
Julia Esther Colunga Pedraza ◽  
José Eduardo Mares-Gil ◽  
Emma Lizeth Estrada ◽  
Jesus Mauricio Gonzalez-Diaz ◽  
...  

Introduction Pediatric acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients have about 90% overall survival (OS) in developed countries. However, many children in low-middle income countries (LMIC) do not have access to appropriate drugs at optimal doses, a multidisciplinary medical team, laboratory resources for diagnosis and follow-up, and appropriate support therapy for morbidities and treatment-related toxicities. A 50-60% five-year OS has been reported in children with ALL in Mexico, and our center is not the exception. This low survival rate has pushed Mexican centers to develop strategies highlighting collaboration between centers with economic, research and teaching resources ("Mexico en Alianza con St. Jude MAS"), and outpatient treatment. However, each center must adapt their chemotherapy protocol to its own supplies and possibilities. We report the results of a risk adapted therapy protocol in a limited-resource treatment setting. Materials and Methods All pediatric patients with a diagnosis of ALL from January 2017 to December 2018 were classified according to risk as shown in Figure 1. Depending on risk classification, modifications to the induction, consolidation and intermediate maintenance regimens were made. The higher the risk, the higher the intensity of the regimen, as defined by the number of anthracycline doses, the presence or absence of high-dose methotrexate, and the duration of the consolidation and maintenance phases (Table 1). Demographic data is reported using distribution analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method is used to analyze and predict overall survival, event-free survival (EFS) and relapse. Our results were compared with previous results from our institution. Results There were 35 male and 25 female patients; median age at diagnosis was 5.5. B-cell and T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia was the diagnosis in 57 (95%), and 3 (5%) patients, respectively, with a follow-up of 16 (8-30) months. Twenty-three (38%), 21 (35%), and 16 (26%) children were classified as high, intermediate and low risk ALL, respectively. After one week of corticosteroids 46 (77%) of patients had a good response. At the end of induction 53 patients had an evaluable MRD (88%), out of which 9 were positive (17%). Median follow-up was 16 (0.6-30) months. Mortality at induction was 6 (10%) patients. Very early relapse was observed in 3(5%) of patients. Estimated 2-year relapse rate was 6%, event-free survival was 84.1%, and OS was 85%. A comparison of results obtained with previous regimens (protocols 1 and 2) and the risk-adapted treatment (protocol 3) is observed in Table 2. Conclusions The implementation of a modified chemotherapy regimen based on adjusted stratification risk was associated to improved responses as reflected by MRD. A decrease in very early relapse rate to 5%, without increasing the toxicity and death during induction was observed. Periodic and prospective outcome evaluation in a limited-resource setting is fundamental to adjust and to standardize therapy. Long-term follow-up of this patient group is required to compare OS and EFS at 5 years. This is a preliminary report, but it seems that we are changing the fate of Mexican children with ALL. Disclosures Gomez-Almaguer: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Maria Trujillo ◽  
Adriana Linares Ballesteros ◽  
Isabel Cristina Sarmiento

Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common cancer in children. In developed countries, overall survival rates are around 80%, while in developing countries, survival rate is much lower due to high rates of relapse, and abandonment and complications arising from the disease treatment.Objectives: To assess induction mortality, relapse and treatment abandonment. To describe the most frequent side effects of chemotherapy. To evaluate survival rates of patients and compare the findings found in this study with the existing literature.Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged 1 to 18 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, who received treatment under the BFM ALL IC 2009 protocol at Fundación Hospital La Misericordia (HOMI), from November 2012 to December 2014.Results: 119 patients were included. Death occurred in two cases during induction (1.67%) and in nine (7.7%) due to treatment, all of them caused by infection/sepsis and in complete remission. Six patients abandoned treatment (5%), while seven relapses occurred (5.9%). All patients experienced some type of side effect related to chemotherapy, the most frequent being febrile neutropenia (41.2%) and grade 3-4 infections (15.8%). Overall survival and event-free survival rates were 79.9% and 73.3%, respectively.Conclusions: Evaluating complications of treatment and death allows adopting measures and strategies to reduce such complications.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3770-3770 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Simon Kliman ◽  
Michael J Barnett ◽  
Raewyn Broady ◽  
Donna L. Forrest ◽  
Alina S. Gerrie ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In recent decades, overall survival rates for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved dramatically. Unfortunately, older patients have not experienced the same benefit. Recent years have seen investigation into the use of pediatric protocols for younger adults with ALL. Increased toxicity has often limited use to patients 40 years or younger. The Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Program of BC is the referral center for adults with ALL in British Columbia. Approximately 20 patients are newly diagnosed with ALL each year. Until 2008, an adult protocol (known as ALL 89-1) was used in patients over 18 years. Since 2008, pediatric-based chemotherapy has been offered to patients 40 years or younger. We analyzed whether this change altered complete remission (CR), relapse and survival rates. We assessed whether the more intense protocol increased toxicity. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated for ALL on a pediatric-based protocol. These protocols (ALL 08-01 and ALL 13-01) were modifications of the Donna Farber Cancer Institute 01-175 protocol. The format included induction with high dose methotrexate, followed by central nervous system (CNS) therapy including cranial irradiation. A single cycle of etoposide and high-dose cytarabine was given. Consolidation and continuation cycles included doxorubicin, asparaginase, vincristine and dexamethasone. Patients were included if they were aged 18-40 years and had standard risk, Philadelphia chromosome negative ALL. Between February 2008 and November 2014, 25 eligible patients were identified. These were compared with the 23 consecutive standard risk patients most recently treated with ALL 89-1. They had been diagnosed between February 2003 and July 2008. Exclusion criteria were age greater than 40 and non-standard risk ALL. Demographic and clinical data were collected on all patients from the Leukemia Program databases. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from time of diagnosis until death. Event free survival (EFS) was calculated from diagnosis until death, induction failure or relapse. Estimation of OS and EFS was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient characteristics were compared using Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Ethics approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia ethics board. Results The median age of the combined patient group was 24.5 years. There were no statistically significant differences pre-treatment between groups. Combined median follow up was 28.7 months All 25 patients receiving a pediatric protocol achieved a CR, compared to 19 of 22 with the adult protocol. Despite the more intense chemotherapy dosing regimen in the pediatric protocol, there was no increase in hospitalizations, invasive fungal infections or deaths from treatment toxicity (Table 1). There was a trend towards increased thrombotic events in the pediatric-treated group, at 32% versus 9%. These included deep vein thrombosis in 4 patients, pulmonary emboli in 2, and cerebral sinus thrombosis in 2. Relapse occurred in 24% of the pediatric-treated patients and 45% of the adult-treated ones (p=0.215). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was performed in 4 patients in the former group and 7 in the latter. Nine of these were carried out in CR2 or later, with two patients going into transplant with active disease. Overall survival following transplant was 44%. Two year event free survival was significantly improved in the group treated on the pediatric protocol (Figure 1), at 79% versus 36% (p=0.011). There was a trend towards improved overall survival in this small cohort, at 83% versus 49% (Figure 2). Conclusions A pediatric-based ALL treatment protocol was tolerated in patients up to the age of 40 years. In our centre, this is associated with an increase in EFS, and a trend towards increased OS, even considering the small cohort. We await with interest the results of larger studies investigating the ideal upfront therapy for young patients with ALL. Table 1. Results All Patients N=47 Adult N=22 Pediatric N=25 P Number % Number % Number % CR after induction 44 of 47 94 19 of 22 86 25 of 25 100 .095 Severe infection 20 of 47 43 9 of 22 41 11 of 25 44 .831 Thrombosis 10 of 47 21 2 of 22 9 8 of 25 32 .079 Pancreatitis 2 of 47 4 0 of 22 0 2 of 25 8 .491 Toxicity deaths 3 of 47 6 2 of 22 9 1 of 25 4 .593 Relapse 16 of 47 34 10 of 22 45 6 of 25 24 .215 AlloHSCT 11 of 47 23 7 of 22 32 4 of 25 16 .303 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Muffly ◽  
Frances B Maguire ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Vanessa Kennedy ◽  
Theresa H Keegan

Abstract Background Knowledge regarding late effects (medical conditions and subsequent neoplasms) in survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is lacking. Methods Using the population-based California Cancer Registry linked with California hospitalization data, we evaluated late effects in 1069 AYAs (aged 15–39 years) diagnosed with ALL in California between 1995 and 2012 and surviving a minimum of 3 years from diagnosis. Results The estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of subsequent endocrine disease (28.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.8% to 31.6%) and cardiac disease (17.0%, 95% CI = 14.6% to 19.5%) were strikingly high; avascular necrosis (9.6%, 95% CI = 7.8% to 11.6%), liver disease (6.5%, 95% CI = 5.0% to 8.3%), respiratory disease (6.2%, 95% CI = 4.8% to 8.0%), seizure and/or stroke (4.3%, 95% CI = 3.1% to 5.8%), renal disease (3.1%, 95% CI = 2.1% to 4.4%), and second neoplasms (1.4%, 95% CI = 0.7% to 2.4%) were estimated to occur at 10 years with the reported frequencies. Multivariable analyses including the entire patient cohort demonstrated that public or no insurance (vs private and/or military insurance) and receipt of hematopoietic cell transplantation were independently associated with the occurrence of all late effects considered. In multivariable analyses limited to the 766 AYAs who were not transplanted, we continued to find a statistically significant association between public and no insurance and the occurrence of all late effects. Frontline regimen type (pediatric vs adult) was not statistically significantly associated with any of the late effect categories. Conclusions This large population-based analysis is among the first to describe late effects in survivors of AYA ALL. The strong association between insurance type and late effects suggests that AYAs with public or no insurance may have reduced access to survivorship care following completion of ALL therapy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (31) ◽  
pp. 5175-5181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
W. Paul Bowman ◽  
Alexander Aledo ◽  
William B. Slayton ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
...  

Purpose Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent that may be used against Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), one of the highest risk pediatric ALL groups. Patients and Methods We evaluated whether imatinib (340 mg/m2/d) with an intensive chemotherapy regimen improved outcome in children ages 1 to 21 years with Ph+ ALL (N = 92) and compared toxicities to Ph− ALL patients (N = 65) given the same chemotherapy without imatinib. Exposure to imatinib was increased progressively in five patient cohorts that received imatinib from 42 (cohort 1; n = 7) to 280 continuous days (cohort 5; n = 50) before maintenance therapy. Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) –identical sibling donors underwent blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) with imatinib given for 6 months following BMT. Results Continuous imatinib exposure improved outcome in cohort 5 patients with a 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of 80% ± 11% (95% CI, 64% to 90%), more than twice historical controls (35% ± 4%; P < .0001). Three-year EFS was similar for patients in cohort 5 treated with chemotherapy plus imatinib (88% ± 11%; 95% CI, 66% to 96%) or sibling donor BMT (57% ± 22%; 95% CI, 30.4% to 76.1%). There were no significant toxicities associated with adding imatinib to intensive chemotherapy. The higher imatinib dosing in cohort 5 appears to improve survival by having an impact on the outcome of children with a higher burden of minimal residual disease after induction. Conclusion Imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy improved 3-year EFS in children and adolescents with Ph+ ALL, with no appreciable increase in toxicity. BMT plus imatinib offered no advantage over BMT alone. Additional follow-up is required to determine the impact of this treatment on long-term EFS and determine whether chemotherapy plus imatinib can replace BMT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document