ON THE CONCEPT AND CONTENT OF “ANOTHER ORDER OF PRE-TRIAL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES, ESTABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT”

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-298
Author(s):  
D.G. FILCHENKO ◽  
E.A. EVTUKHOVICH
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Critical Assessment ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Dispute Settlement Procedure ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
The Impact

The article analyzes the provisions of the arbitration procedural legislation and the practice of its application on a different pre-trial dispute settlement procedure established by the contract. A different pre-trial procedure is considered as an alternative to the general claim procedure for resolving disputes. The characteristic features of a different pre-trial order have been revealed. The authors summarized the practice of arbitration courts, highlighting other demanded pre-trial dispute settlement procedures. In particular, examples of atypical other methods of dispute settlement are provided. Separately, the issue of the admissibility of the cancellation of the general claim procedure for the settlement of disputes by the agreement was considered. An independent subject of the authors’ analysis was mediation as a pre-trial dispute settlement procedure. The work also focuses on the impact of a different pre-trial dispute settlement procedure on the course of the limitation period. The article discusses the provisions of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 22 June 2021 No. 18 “On Some Issues of Pre-Trial Settlement of Disputes Considered in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings”. Some of the recommendations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation received critical assessment. The authors note the existing contradictions in the legislation and possible ways to overcome them, formulate individual conclusions as a result of studying the materials of the practice of arbitration courts.

Conciliatory Justice in Modern Russia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Katerina DREMOVA
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Synthesis Methods ◽  
Universal Method ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The research studies conciliatory justice in modern Russia. Its formation and peculiarities in the institution of alternative ways of resolving legal conflict on the example of mediation are considered. Various views regarding the mediation definition are analyzed, and the author's vision of this category concept is given. The origins of mediation history abroad and in Russia are studied. The essence and peculiarities of mediation application as an alternative method of economic disputes settlement are characterized. The benefits of using conciliatory procedures in a business environment are revealed. The main aspects of the procedural legislation reform initiated by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation concerning the change in the legal regulation of conciliatory procedures application in the settlement of legal conflicts are outlined. It is noted that the beginning of procedural reform in Russia with regard to dispute settlement through conciliatory procedures was triggered by the resolution of the plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation ‘On submission to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of Russian Federation a federal law draft ‘On amendments to a number of legislative acts of the Russian Federation in connection with conciliatory procedure improvements’ adopted on 18 January 2018 and the resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation. Statistics on the ratio of dismissals agreed, dispute settlement through the mediation procedure, as well as plaintiff-triggered dismissals are provided. Methodology: the study is carried out on the basis of the universal method on scientific study of the social development principles –dialectical materialism provisions, as well as general and specific scientific methods: dogmatic, regulatory legal, legal comparative, fragmented historical and legal, case studies (statistical data and judicial statistics analysis), logical (hypotheses, analogy, modeling, analysis and synthesis methods), philosophic (axiological, derivation methods on the basis of priori and axiomatic provisions), generalization and abstraction methods. Conclusions: To date, entrepreneurs are increasingly using conciliatory procedures when settling disputes. This way of dispute settlement becomes very convenient, businessmen are not in the need to spend their time on litigation, often protracted, but can settle issues more quickly and effectively. Today, conciliatory justice in the Russian Federation is going through the stage of formation and development and in the future is to become a demanded institution of judicial law.

scholarly journals An Analysis of the Decrees of Plenary Sessions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from the Standpoint of Cognitive Biases of Criminal Proceedings' Professional Participants

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 798-807
Author(s):  
Svetlana Korableva
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Plenary Session ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Impact

The research concepts of cognitive biases - predictable systemic cognitive mistakes - are being actively developed and used in different areas. A series of experiments showed that criminal proceedings participants also fall under the influence of cognitive biases and heuristics. Irrational assessments of judges, investigators, prosecutors, etc. could have a negative impact on crime investigation and sentencing because these processes should be rationalized as much as it is possible. The author summarizes the available information on systemic cognitive mistakes, analyzes some types of cognitive biases typical of professional participants of criminal proceedings and examines the unfavorable consequences of their impact using the data of court statistics for 2018. It is proven that one of the available ways of overcoming the negative effects of cognitive biases is the recommendations of plenary sessions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. At the same time, its Decrees could acts as triggers of cognitive biases. The article presents an analysis of the Decrees of plenary sessions of the Supreme Court that proves the existence of contradictions between the objectives of presented recommendations and their actual impact on the professional participants of criminal proceedings due to the emerging cognitive biases. In this connection, the author raises the question of the necessity of changing recommendations given in the Decrees of the Supreme Court. Specifically, the author presents a new edition of the Decree of the plenary session of the Supreme Court «On the Practice of Imposing Criminal Penalties by Courts of the Russian Federation» of Dec. 22, 2015 No 58 with changes in the part that regulates taking into account the circumstances characterizing the personality of the defendant. Besides, in order to improve the law enforcement practice on cases of self-defense, the author suggests reconsidering the whole concept in the Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court «On the Application of Self-Defense Legislation by Courts and on Infliction of Harm during the Apprehension of a Person who Committed a Crime» of September 27, 2012 to reduce the impact of retrospective bias while adjudicating on cases of defense against attacks.

Features of the election of such preventive measure as house arrest in relation to minors

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Manohina
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
A Minor

In the article, the author turns to the study of the peculiarities of choosing such a preventive measure as house arrest for minors. Due to the fact that the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation does not precisely define cases when a court must elect a house arrest in relation to minors, in practice there are often difficulties in which cases to choose such a preventive measure as detention, and in which house arrest. In the work, the author attempts to determine the essence of such a preventive measure as house arrest and the peculiarities of his election in relation to minors, and also considers the prohibitions and (or) restrictions to which minors cannot be subjected. The positions contained in the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court “On the practice of the application by the courts of legislation on preventive measures in the form of detention, house arrest and bail” are analyzed. The author expresses the opinion that it is inadvisable to choose such a preventive measure as house arrest for minors. Based on the study, the author makes recommendations on the possibility, at the discretion of the court, to make adjustments to the prohibitions and (or) restrictions to which a minor suspect or accused will be subjected to whom such a preventive measure as house arrest is chosen.

Remote Proceedings in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-118
Author(s):  
A. S. German ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

Introduction. Currently, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, like many state bodies, is faced with a global challenge – the coronavirus pandemic, which has affected all public processes. The need for social distancing has contributed to the more active use of modern technologies that facilitate remote court hearings. Theoretical basis. Methods. The theoretical basis of the study were the Russian and foreign scientific works devoted to the problems of introducing information technologies into judicial activity. The methodological basis of the study was a systematic approach that made it possible to consider the possibilities of remote justice in its relationship to significant factors of a legal and organisational nature. The study used the methods of logical generalisations, analysis and synthesis, together with a systematic approach and the method of comparative jurisprudence. Results. The article briefly presents the results of a systematic analysis of measures carried out by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation aimed at ensuring the widespread use of remote technologies in the administration of justice. Discussion and Conclusion. Given the current pandemic situation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has introduced integrated related web conferencing and video conferencing technologies for remote court hearings. These technologies began to be actively used by courts during the pandemic period. Their application ensures a reasonable time frame for legal proceedings and makes it possible to ensure the availability of justice even in conditions of social distancing. The undoubted advantage of remote technologies is their potential to reduce procedural costs in the course of legal proceedings. However, the issues under consideration require further research, as well as preparation of conceptual suggestions to the legislator aimed at optimising procedural legislation.

Theft and Fraud Committed Using Electronic Payment Systems (Regional Judicial and Investigative Practice)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
S. L. Morozov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Payment Systems ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Electronic Payments ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The advent of the electronic currency and the effecting of electronic payments has caused new forms of thefts and types of acquisitive crimes. The judicial investigative practice of criminal cases of embezzlement committed using bank cards and other types of electronic payments has encountered problems with the qualification of such acts. The author identifies the most common enforcement problemsand their causesby a retrospective study of judicial practice, the changing norms of the criminal law. At the same time, a ten-year period of work of the judicial investigating authorities was studied. On the basis of traditional general scientific methods of cognition, as a result of a system-legal analysis of the considered set of specific situations, the author gives an author's view of the complex of causes that cause a lack of uniformity in judicial investigative practice. Using the hermeneutic approach, the author paid special attention to the application by the courts of the interpretation of the criminal law by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in different years. In conclusion, ways of resolving contentious issues of qualification of thefts and fraud in the field of electronic means of payment are proposed. It has been ascertained that high-quality and uniform law enforcement can provide additional clarification on the delimitation of related and competing theft from the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. It is concluded that in general, the current concept of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation does not contain contradictions with the novels of the criminal law, but can be improved. The rationale and edition of possible additions to the relevant decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are given.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document