scholarly journals Prolongation of survival time and improvement of the quality of life after treatment with irinotecan liposomal in the patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Oncoreview ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3(43)) ◽  
pp. 77-79
Author(s):  
Wojciech Rogowski ◽  
Przemysław Będkowski
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is one of the malignant neoplasms with the worst prognosis. It is most often diagnosed at an advanced stage, which relates to unsatisfactory results of the therapy. Only about 15–20% of patients with pancreatic cancer qualify for surgery. The remaining patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease or much more frequently in the generalized stage. Systemic treatment (chemotherapy) remains the mainstay of therapy in these patients, but both the response rate and progression-free time are unsatisfactory [1, 2]. This paper presents a case of a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer, in whom three lines of systemic treatment were applied sequentially, which allowed to extend the survival time and improve the quality of life.

Quality of life study in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine in combination with nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone:ax-panc-sy001: A phase II randomized study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 346-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suayib Yalcin ◽  
Faysal Dane ◽  
Berna Oksuzoglu ◽  
Nuriye Yildirim ◽  
Abdurrahman Isikdogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Free Survival

346 Background: Although clinical efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with nabpaclitaxel has been shown to be superior to single agent gemcitabine in a randomize phase 3 trial, data are lacking on the quality of life of this combination regimen as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: We randomly assigned 125 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 to receive gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 plus nabpaclitaxel 125 mg/m2 or gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter weekly for 7 of 8 weeks and then weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was 3-months deterioration-free rate (percentage of patients free from definitive deterioration) and quality of life of patients. Results: The median overall survival was 9.92 months in the gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel group as compared with 5.95 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.642, 95% confidence interval, 0.422 to 0.866; p < 0.038). Median progression-free survival was 6.28 months in the combination group and 3.22 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.582; 95% CI, 0.391 to 0.866; p < 0.008). The objective response rate was 37.1% in the combination group versus 23.7% in the gemcitabine group (p < 0.009). Median time to deterioration was 3.68 months in the gemcitabine arm versus 5.36 months in the combination arm. More data on quality of life will be presented. Conclusions: As compared with gemcitabine, gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel was associated with an overall and progressive free survival advantage, with increased response rate, without increasing toxicity and deterioration of quality of life. Gemcitabine and nabpaclitaxel combination regimen with this form is a preferable option for the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer Clinical trial information: EudraCT: 2013-004180-32.

scholarly journals A Case of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Successfully Resected after 14 Months Therapy with Gemcitabine and Meriva®

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Caterina Soldà ◽  
Romeo Bardini ◽  
Francesca Zingales ◽  
Davide Pastorelli
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Clinical Conditions ◽  
Disease Free

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the leading cause of cancer death. Neoadjuvant therapy has been progressively used in the context of locally advanced/unresectable disease improve patients’ outcome. New drugs combination are associated with increased response rate but at the expense of higher toxicities. We presented a case of a patient with locally advanced disease treated who could undergo surgery after 14 cycles of therapy with gemcitabine and curcumin conjugated with phospholipids (Meriva®). Treatment was well tolerated without severe toxicities or impairment of quality of life. The patient is disease free at 9 month from surgery and 28 months from initial diagnosis and he still is in good clinical conditions. The combination of gemcitabine and Meriva® was effective in allowing radical surgery in a patient with locally advanced PC. Moreover, this results was obtained with minimally toxic regimen.

scholarly journals Epidemiologic, humanistic and economic burden of hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA: a systematic literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. HEP27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdalla Aly ◽  
Sarah Ronnebaum ◽  
Dipen Patel ◽  
Yunes Doleh ◽  
Fernando Benavente
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Economic Burden ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Humanistic Burden

Aim: To describe the epidemiologic, humanistic and economic burdens of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the USA. Materials & methods: Studies describing the epidemiology and economic burden from national cohorts, any economic models, or any humanistic burden studies published 2008–2018 were systematically searched. Results: HCC incidence was 9.5 per 100,000 person-years in most recent data, but was ∼100-times higher among patients with hepatitis/cirrhosis. Approximately a third of patients were diagnosed with advanced disease. Patients with HCC experienced poor quality of life. Direct costs were substantial and varied based on underlying demographics, disease stage and treatment received. Between 25–77% of patients did not receive surgical, locoregional or systemic treatment. Conclusion: Better treatments are needed to extend survival and improve quality of life for patients with HCC.

Impact of stereotactic body radiation therapy on patient-reported quality of life in patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Rosati ◽  
Zhi Cheng ◽  
Scott P. Robertson ◽  
Megan N. Kummerlowe ◽  
Amy Hacker-Prietz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

413 Background: The impact of fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and physician-reported toxicity in patients with recurrent or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PCA) was prospectively evaluated. Methods: Forty-two PCA patients were treated with 25-33 Gy using SBRT in 5 fractions on a single-institution study. Both patient- and physician-reported outcomes were evaluated prior to SBRT and 4-6 weeks post-SBRT. Eight outcomes were consistently evaluated among both groups—performance status, fatigue, pain, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea. Patient-reported QOL metrics were assessed using a 4-point Likert scale on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26, while physician-reported toxicities were graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0. Comparisons between those with paired patient- and physician-reported outcomes collected prior to and 4-6 weeks after SBRT were made using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Of the 42 patients currently enrolled onto the study, 29 had both patient- and physician-reported outcomes collected prior to and 4-6 weeks after SBRT. Fifty-five percent were female and 83% were Caucasian. The median age at diagnosis was 65.6 years (range, 40.8-86.6). There was no significant impairment of any of the 8 physician-reported toxicities, nor were significant changes observed in patient-reported overall health (p = 0.66) or QOL (p = 0.18) scores following SBRT. Patients felt less worried about their future health (mean change [mD] = -0.45, p = 0.02), and an improvement in feeling less attractive as a result of disease and treatment reached borderline significance (mD= 0.31, p = 0.09). However, patients felt limited in planning activities in advance (mD= 0.45, p = 0.02) and were more constipated (mD= 0.38, p = 0.01) 4-6 weeks post-SBRT. Conclusions: Although the numbers are small, patients with unresectable or locally recurrent PCA do not appear to suffer any detriment of overall health or QOL after receiving a five-day course of SBRT. Moreover, this regimen may lead to a more optimistic point of view on future health and/or level of physical attraction. Clinical trial information: NCT01781728.

Impact of systemic treatment associated to radiotherapy on quality of life in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients in Brazil: Prospective real-world data study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17563-e17563
Author(s):  
Marcos Antonio Santos ◽  
Luis Felipe Oliveira e Silva ◽  
Hugo Fontan Kohler ◽  
Otavio Curioni ◽  
Ricardo Alencar Vilela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Alcohol Consumption ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Head

e17563 Background: the purpose of this study was to compare quality of life (QoL) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy only (RT), chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (CT-RT) or RT with cetuximab (CET-RT). Methods: in this real-world, multi-institutional and prospective study, QoL outcomes were assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N43 questionnaires. Patients were treated according to each participating institution’s protocol. The Item Response Theory was used to generate a global QoL score, based on the 71 questions of both forms. Questionnaires were completed before treatment and every three months, thereafter. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meyer method, and groups were compared by the log-rank test. The impact of the treatment modalities on QoL was analyzed using multivariate regression analyses. Results: Six hundred and twenty-six patients, with tumors located at the oral cavity (36%), oropharynx (30%), larynx (21%), hypopharynx (9%) and nasopharynx (4%) were included. Median follow up was 10.2 months. RT was delivered to 39% of the patients while 58% received CT-RT and 3% received CET-RT. Patients submitted to surgery were not included. OS was higher when systemic treatment was added to RT (median OS CET-RT: 21.9 months and CT-RT: 24.3 months, versus 14.2 months with RT, p < 0.05). A decrease in QoL during treatment was observed in all patients’ groups, but CT-RT had a statistically significant negative impact on QoL when compared to CET-RT (p = 0.02). An important limitation of the study is the low number of patients that received this last treatment modality, what is, probably, a result of local policies on reimbursement. Other factors that influenced QoL were alcohol consumption (better QoL for patients with no history of chronic alcohol consumption, p = 0.007) and radiotherapy technique (better QoL for patients treated with intensity-modulated RT, when compared to conformal RT, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We observed, as expected, better OS with systemic therapy, when associated to RT. A decrease in QoL was detected, as well, during treatment, but a less pronounced decrease was seen in patients receiving CET-RT, when compared to CT-RT. More studies are needed to confirm the QoL improvement in patients submitted to this last treatment approach.

Intraoperative electrochemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Results and impact on quality of life. a single center experience.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16731-e16731
Author(s):  
Mariacristina Di Marco ◽  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Riccardo Carloni ◽  
Elisa Grassi ◽  
Stefania De Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
The Body ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
The Mean

e16731 Background: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is usually treated with chemoradiotherapy with poor results, thus additional therapies have been proposed. Of the latter, electrochemotherapy (ECT) represents a non-thermal ablation method, which combines the administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with permeabilizing electric pulses for cell membrane electroporation. The present study is the first to assess the short and long-term results, and the quality of life of the patients who underwent ECT for LAPC. Methods: Observational study of patients affected by LAPC who underwent intraoperative ECT after chemoradiotherapy. The inclusion criteria were: 1- patients with LAPC (defined according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019), 2- previous chemoradiotherapy and 3- absence of disease progression at restaging. Data at diagnosis and at restaging were collected for each patient. The Quality of life was evaluated using the Euro Quality of Life Group Association Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The questionnaire was administered to all patients before and after ECT. Results: From May 25, 2018 to November 26, 2019 five patients underwent ECT: in 4 cases, the tumors were located in the head and, in one, in the body of the pancreas. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted mainly of 6 cycles of modified folfirinox, while the radiotherapy consisted of 54 Gy (27 fractions). At restaging, the serum value of CA 19-9 and tumor size were reduced; however, the vascular involvement did not change. No downstaging was recorded. Intravenous bleomycin 15,000IU/m2 was given as a bolus, the ECT procedure was performed using at least 4 needles with a mean duration time of 27 minutes, (range 15-40). No postoperative mortality or major complications were reported. The mean length of stay was 8 days (range 5-14). Four patients were alive and well at the end of the study while one patient died from disease progression. The mean follow-up was 20.8 months (range 9-34) from diagnosis and 9.4 months (range 2-19) from ECT. The quality of life was good (EQ-5D-5L scale > 50 in all cases) and there was improvement in pain/discomfort with respect to the pre-treatment period in 3 out of 5 patients. Conclusions: Electrochemotherapy can be considered a simple, feasible and safe palliative additional treatment in LAPC without progression after chemoradiotherapy, and it seems to allow a good quality of life and pain improvement.

503 QUALITY OF LIFE AS A PREDICTOR OF POST-ESOPHAGECTOMY SHORT TERM OUTCOMES AND SURVIVAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Katz ◽  
J Ramirez-GraciaLuna ◽  
A Kammili ◽  
F Abureida ◽  
J Cools-Lartigue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Disease

Abstract   Most esophageal cancer patients present with symptoms that impact quality of life (QOL). In this study, we sought to determine the influence of QOL at diagnosis on postoperative outcomes and survival (OS). Methods A prospectively-collected esophagectomy database (2006–17) was queried to identify patients who completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophageal module (FACT-E). Demographics/tumor/treatment details, operative variables, complications and OS were collected. Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression, logistic regression, ANOVA or Chi-square tests. Results Of 647 patients underwent esophagectomy in the study period, 359 how completed FACT-E at diagnosis were included in the study (age 64 ± 11, male 82%, stage I:9%, II:15%, III:69%, IV:7%, adenocarcinoma: 78%, neoadjuvant therapy: 70%). Clinical stage I was associated with better QOL at diagnosis (131 ± 2 vs 118 ± 28, p &lt; 0.02). FACT-E &gt; 125 was associated with lower peri-operative mortality (9% vs 1%, 0R = 6.1, P = 0.01), and when divided into quintiles, correlated directly with OS (Figure 1a), more over it was able to prognostically differentiate patients with locally-advanced disease (stage II + III) (Figure 1b) better than the clinical staging (Figure 1c). Conclusion QOL at diagnosis predicts peri-operative mortality and long-term survival. It can help to prognostically differentiate between patients with locally advanced disease. Attempts to improve QOL prior to surgery, such as with pre-habilitation, remain an attractive area of investigation.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy and patient-reported quality of life prospectively evaluated in patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Rosati ◽  
Zhi Cheng ◽  
Scott P. Robertson ◽  
Megan N. Kummerlowe ◽  
Amy Hacker-Prietz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

92 Background: The impact of fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and physician-reported toxicity in patients with recurrent or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PCA) was prospectively evaluated. Methods: Forty-two PCA patients were treated with 25-33 Gy using SBRT in 5 fractions on a single-institution study. Both patient- and physician-reported outcomes were evaluated prior to SBRT and 4-6 weeks post-SBRT. Eight outcomes were consistently evaluated among both groups—performance status, fatigue, pain, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea. Patient-reported QOL metrics were assessed using a 4-point Likert scale on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26, while physician-reported toxicities were graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0. Comparisons between those with paired patient- and physician-reported outcomes collected prior to and 4-6 weeks after SBRT were made using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Of the 42 patients currently enrolled onto the study, 29 had both patient- and physician-reported outcomes collected prior to and 4-6 weeks after SBRT. Fifty-five percent were female and 83% were Caucasian. The median age at diagnosis was 65.6 years (range, 40.8-86.6). There was no significant impairment of any of the 8 physician-reported toxicities, nor were significant changes observed in patient-reported overall health (p = 0.66) or QOL (p = 0.18) scores following SBRT. Patients felt less worried about their future health (mean change [mD] = -0.45, p = 0.02), and an improvement in feeling less attractive as a result of disease and treatment reached borderline significance (mD= 0.31, p = 0.09). However, patients felt limited in planning activities in advance (mD= 0.45, p = 0.02) and were more constipated (mD= 0.38, p = 0.01) 4-6 weeks post-SBRT. Conclusions: Although the numbers are small, patients with unresectable or locally recurrent PCA do not appear to suffer any detriment of overall health or QOL after receiving a five-day course of SBRT. Moreover, this regimen may lead to a more optimistic point of view on future health and/or level of physical attraction. Clinical trial information: NCT01781728.

scholarly journals Quality of life of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after FOLFIRINOX treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fleur van der Sijde ◽  
Laura Schafthuizen ◽  
Freek R. van ’t Land ◽  
Miranda Moskie ◽  
Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract  Background Quality of life in cancer patients might be affected by chemotherapy-induced toxicity. Especially in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a short life expectancy, fear of poor quality of life is often a reason for both patients and medical oncologists to refrain from further treatment. In this study, we investigated quality of life (QoL), pain, sleep, and activity levels in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients after FOLFIRINOX treatment. Methods A total of 41 LAPC patients with stable disease or partial response were included after completion of at least four cycles of FOLFIRINOX. QoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and NRS pain scores. Patients completed the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) for five consecutive nights and wore a GENEActiv tri-axial accelerometer (Actiwatch) for 7 days, registering sleep duration, efficiency, and activity. Results Mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score for global health status was 78.3 (± 17.3), higher than reference values for cancer patients (P < 0.001) and general population (P = 0.045). LAPC patients reported few disease-related symptoms. Two patients (5%) reported pain scores > 3. Mean sleep duration was 8 h/night (± 1.2 h) and sleep efficiency 70% (± 9%) with high patient-reported quality of sleep (mean RCSQ score 72.0 ± 11.4). Mean duration of moderate-vigorous activity was 37 min/week (± 103 min/week). Conclusions QoL is very good in most LAPC patients with disease control after FOLFIRINOX, measured with validated questionnaires and Actiwatch registration. The fear of clinical deterioration after FOLFIRINOX is not substantiated by this study and should not be a reason to refrain from treatment. Trial registration Dutch trial register NL7578.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document