Interpretations of Rod-and-Frame Test Scores: An Application of Pattern Analysis

1982 ◽  
Vol 54 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1339-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Haller ◽  
Eugene S. Edgington

Rod-and-frame test data of 100 undergraduates were analyzed by a recently developed pattern analysis and several interpretations of their test scores were considered. Pattern analysis showed (a) that most subjects (about 65%) tilt toward the spatial position of the frame and (b) that some (about 30%) utilize two frame cues, i.e., the nearest to vertical side and corner of the frame. Tilting to the starting position of the rod and tilting away from the frame or the starting position of the rod were not viable interpretations.

1983 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Haller ◽  
Eugene S. Edgington

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1259-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Antonio Amador-Campos ◽  
Teresa Kirchner-Nebot

The Children's Embedded Figures Test and the Rod and Frame Test were administered to 179 boys and 110 girls of an average age of 9.03 years to measure field dependence-independence. No significant gender-related differences were found on either test. Scores on these tests were moderately and significantly correlated.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e65321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bagust ◽  
Sharon Docherty ◽  
Wayne Haynes ◽  
Richard Telford ◽  
Brice Isableu

1979 ◽  
Vol 48 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1279-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Erdos

It has been demonstrated that feedback is effective in changing rod-and-frame performance for women if given the opportunity to adjust the rod to the vertical repeatedly from the same starting position. It is also shown that the significant difference between males and females in the Rod-and-frame Test is carried by the large difference in the initial tilting position.


1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmuth Nyborg

Male and female subjects were selected on the basis of their unsigned deviation scores (USD) in the rod-and-frame test to be retested and scored by a new method. The new method analyzes performance on this task in terms of the effect of the tilt of the frame (φ), the constant deviation (μ), the starting position of the rod (ρ), and the response consistency (σ) of each subject. The geometrical structure of the frame was varied by changing the number of identical stimulus elements in it. Variations in the geometrical structure of the frame affected φ-scores primarily in subjects with significantly high φ-scores (frame-dependent subjects). Variations in the frame's geometrical structure did not affect μ or p. The relationship between USD-scores and the values for φ, μ, and ρ for each subject is discussed.


1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1395-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin Apitzsch ◽  
Wen Hao Liu

Contradictory claims exist as to whether field dependence or field independence is advantageous to team ball-game performance. For further investigation, Swedish national male handball players' Rod-and-Frame Test scores were correlated with their field-goal shooting attempts and shooting efficiency in the '94 European Handball Championship. No significant correlation was found; discussion followed.


1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Bogo ◽  
Carolyn Winget ◽  
Goldine C. Gleser

This study explored similarities between Voth's personality construct (ego-close—ego-distant) and that of Witkin (field-dependent—field-independent), especially with reference to ego defenses. A measure of autokinesis, the Figure-drawing Test, the Rod-and-frame Test and the Defense Mechanisms Inventory were administered to 45 men and 52 women. The correlations between autokinetic scores and the Figure-drawing Test and Rod-and-frame Test scores were of low order and not significant. Correlations between Figure-drawing and Rod-and-frame Test scores and between combined Figure-drawing—Rod-and-frame scores and the subcategories of the Defense Mechanisms Inventory tended to confirm previous findings. Predicted relations between the autokinetic effect and ego defenses were obtained only for men. Other significant sex differences are presented. Possible explanations for these results are discussed.


1968 ◽  
Vol 26 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1307-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene Lester

The technique of the Rod-and-frame Test as used by most psychologists is criticized for difficulties in control of head position, starting position effects, control readings, and the effect of instructions. Differences in results reported with Witkin's method and with other methods are discussed.


1965 ◽  
Vol 20 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1046-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Hellkamp ◽  
John N. Marr

To clarify the nature of the relationship between dogmatism and field-dependency, 38 male Catholics were administered the Dogmatism Test and the Rod and Frame Test (RFT). (1) Dogmatism Test scores were correlated with RFT performance. (2) Responses to items on the Dogmatism Test judged as measures of dependency were correlated with RFT performance. (3) Responses to Dogmatism Test items which Rokeach considered to be measuring authoritarianism were correlated with RFT performance. All three correlations were not significant, indicating that dogmatism and field-dependency emphasize two distinct aspects in the perceptual process.


1981 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Haller

Rod-and-frame component scores can be derived from an over-all deviation score which measures direction and amount of rod tilt from vertical. Nyborg (1974) presented one procedure for deriving component scores, another procedure is presented here. This procedure is appropriate to determine whether the rod or the frame is used as a predominant and consistent cue for verticality. Also, rod-and-frame test data are presented as a function of performance on a backward digit-span test. The over-all result can be described as an interaction of complex field-dependency category by sex. The constant error component may complicate this interaction. The results show that there are several kinds of field dependencies and that one kind of field dependency may have a different meaning for men and women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document