Effect on Achievement of Written Responses to Programmed Learning Material for Students of Differing Academic Ability
A review of the relevant literature suggests the hypothesis that (1) the requirement of overt (written) responses to the program interferes with learning for students of high ability and (2) facilitates learning for students of low ability. The hypothesis was tested in two different experiments which followed the same procedures but which utilized two different programs. Analyses of variance were made for the scores on a posttest and for the scores on a Σ Criterion Frames Test. All F values for interactions were nonsignificant, the main effect of response mode was nonsignificant except in one analysis which favored the covert response mode; finally, the main effect of ability was highly significant. In terms of immediate achievement students who responded covertly performed at least as well as students who responded overtly, and students who responded covertly spent significantly less time in reaching the same level of achievement. This conclusion appears to apply at both ends of the ability continuum.