Correlations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo Personality Inventory Facets

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. MacDonald ◽  
Peter E. Anderson ◽  
Catherine I. Tsagarakis ◽  
Cornelius J. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Female Undergraduate ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
Using Data

Using data obtained from 48 male and 161 female undergraduate students in psychology, correlations between scores on the scales of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the facets of the Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness domains of the NEO Personality Inventory were low to moderate.

Examination of the Relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo Personality Inventory

1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. MacDonald ◽  
Peter E. Anderson ◽  
Catherine I. Tsagarakis ◽  
Cornelius J. Holland
Keyword(s):  
Introductory Psychology ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
The Relationship

The study examined the relationship between scores on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and on the NEO Personality Inventory by administering these measures to 161 women and 48 men in introductory psychology. Notable correlations were found for MBTI Introversion and Extraversion with NEO-PI Extraversion (– .58 and .58 for men, – .68 and .68 for women), MBTI Sensation and Intuition with NEO-PI Openness (– .60 and .71 for men, – .70 and .65 for women), MBTI Thinking and Feeling with NEO-PI Agreeableness (– .60 and .52 for men, – .41 and .39 for women), and MBTI Judging and Perceiving with NEO-PI Conscientiousness (.56 and – .62 for men, .49 and – .50 for women). These findings are consistent with McCrae and Costa (1989). Implications for interpretation of the scores are discussed.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REVISED NEO-PERSONALITY INVENTORY AND THE MYERS-BRIGGS TYPE INDICATOR

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 577-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Furnham ◽  
Joanna Moutafi ◽  
John Crump
Keyword(s):  
Correlational Analysis ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Measures ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
The Relationship

This study investigated the relationship between two of the most widely used personality measures, the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A total of 900 participants completed the NEO PI-R and the MBTI. Correlational analysis of the personality measures showed that NEO PI-R Extraversion was correlated with MBTI Extraversion-Introversion, Openness was correlated with Sensing-Intuition, Agreeableness with Thinking-Feeling and Conscientiousness with Judging-Perceiving, replicating the findings of McCrae and Costa (1989).

Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: a study using the Neo Personality Inventory and the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Moutafi ◽  
Adrian Furnham ◽  
John Crump
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
The Past ◽  
Personality Predictors ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
Intelligence Scores ◽  
Negative Predictor

The aim of the present study was to investigate to what extent personality, gender, and age can predict psychometric intelligence scores. A total of 900 participants completed the Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Test, the Graduate Managerial Assessment: Abstract, the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, and the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator. Intelligence was found to be most consistently predicted by high Openness and low Neuroticism, which has been repeatedly reported in the past (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Kyllonen, 1997), as well as by low Extraversion and low Conscientiousness, which has also been previously reported (Furnham, Chamorro‐Premuzic, & Moutafi, under review). Of the demographic factors, there were no gender differences with respect to general intelligence (g), but age was found to be a significant negative predictor of g, in line with previous findings (Matthews, Davies, Westerman, & Stammers, 2000). Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Personality Type and Cognitive Style

1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 959-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Ferguson ◽  
Cove Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Cognitive Complexity ◽  
Verbal Ability ◽  
Personality Type ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Female Undergraduate ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
The Relationship

Examined the relationship between cognitive style and personality type as measured by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. 31 male and 46 female undergraduate students completed the Indicator and several cognitive instruments including a memory scale, measures of cognitive complexity and integration, verbal ability, and selective attention and recall. Correlational analysis showed there to be significant variations in cognitive style with different preferences on the Indicator. Although conclusions can only be tentative, feeling types tended to be better at verbal-based tests, whereas perceiving types tended to be better at tasks requiring cognitive control and attention.

Self-Descriptive Adjectives Associated with a Jungian Personality Inventory

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin R. Brooks ◽  
Ray W. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Check List ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Adjective Check List ◽  
Intuitive Thinking ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
Males And Females

The purpose of this paper was to provide information which might prove useful in the interpretation of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A sample of 209 students provided self-descriptions from the adjectives on the Adjective Check List and took the Myers-Briggs. On the basis of Myers-Briggs scores the sample was divided by sex into groups of extraverts and introverts, sensing and intuitive, thinking and feeling, and judging and perceiving types. Adjectives characteristic of males and females in each group were derived by means of chi-square.

Correlations among Three Measures of Personality Type

1993 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 650-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irving F. Tucker ◽  
Bonnie V. Gillespie
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Personality Type ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Computer Version ◽  
Keirsey Temperament Sorter ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

Correlational comparisons were made between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and both the Keirsey Temperament Sorter and its computer version, Please Understand Me, for 103 undergraduate students in psychology. Values from .68 to .86 suggest that these three instruments were measuring the same constructs. Specific differences are discussed.

Some Correlates of a Jungian Personality Inventory

1964 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 623-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. Stricker ◽  
John Ross
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
School Programs ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
High School Programs ◽  
Personality Typology

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is a self-report inventory which is intended to measure four variables stemming from the Jungian personality typology: extraversion-introversion, sensation-intuition, thinking-feeling, and judging-perceiving. The construct validity of each of its scales was assessed in a series of studies which investigated the scales' correlations with ability, interest, and personality scales and differences on the scales between the sexes and between students in different high school programs. The findings suggest that the Sensation-Intuition and Thinking-Feeling scales may reflect restricted aspects of the dimensions that they are intended to represent, and the Extraversion-introversion and Judging-Perceiving scales may reflect something quite different from their postulated dimensions.

Learning Style and Personality Type

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Drummond ◽  
Ann H. Stoddard
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Personality Type ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Gregorc Style Delineator ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

To investigate the relations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Gregorc Style Delineator and to examine the construct validity of the Style Delineator, 41 undergraduate students preparing to be teachers were given both tests. Observed differences in learning styles by personality type partially support the construct validity of the Style Delineator. Judging individuals ( n = 25) tended to perceive themselves as concrete sequential thinkers as opposed to perceptive individuals ( n = 16) who thought of themselves as concrete random thinkers. Feeling types ( n = 29) tended to prefer random modes of thinking.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document