scholarly journals A modified digital functional reach test device using an ultrasonic sensor for balance assessment: A test of validity and reliability

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Panida Hanphitakphong ◽  
Somruthai Poomsalood ◽  
Chakkapong Chamroon ◽  
Palagon Udomkichpagon
Keyword(s):  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Ultrasonic Sensor ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Balance Assessment ◽  
Test Device ◽  
Functional Reach ◽  
Functional Reach Test ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

Abstract Study aim: Evaluation of dynamic balance is inferred to be compulsory for fall prevention in the elderly. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a modified digital functional reach test device using an ultrasonic sensor for balance assessment and to test validity and reliability of the newly developed tool to qualify psychometric properties. Material and methods: This study was a cross-sectional study of a convenient sample including 50 participants both males and females. Mean age of the participants was 51.20 ± 19.30 years. Reliability of the newly developed device was analysed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM). The criterion validity was also investigated using a yardstick mounted on the wall at a level of shoulder together with the MaxTraq® 2D motion analysis software. The modified digital functional reach test device using an ultrasonic sensor was correlated with the conventional FRT and the MaxTraq® 2D motion analysis. Results: The results presented that test-retest reliability of the modified digital functional reach test device was good reliability (ICC = 0.76) and low standard error of measurement (1.41) was found for test-retest reliability. The degree of agreement between the modified device, the conventional FRT, and the MaxTraq® 2D motion analysis was high (r = 0.71 and 0.77 respectively). Conclusions: The findings suggested that the modified digital functional reach test device using an ultrasonic sensor was a valid and reliable instrument for fall risk screening towards functional reach distance.

Test–Retest Reliability of Skill Tests in the F-MARC Battery for Youth Soccer Players

2019 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 1006-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Padrón-Cabo ◽  
Ezequiel Rey ◽  
Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós ◽  
Anton Kalén
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Young Male ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Youth Soccer ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Absolute Reliability ◽  
Error Of Measurement

This study aimed to evaluate the test–retest reliability of soccer skill tests belonging to the F-MARC test battery. To avoid bias during talent identification and development, coaches and scouts should be using reliable tests for assessing soccer-specific skills in young male players. Fifty-two U-14 outfield male soccer players performed F-MARC soccer skill tests on two occasions, separated by 7 days. After familiarization, we administered two trial sessions of five skill tests: speed dribbling, juggling, shooting, passing, and heading. We assessed absolute reliability by expressing the standard error of measurement as a coefficient of variation with 95% limits of agreement, and we assessed relative reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient and with Pearson’s correlation ( r). The results demonstrated satisfactory relative and absolute reliability for speed dribbling, right foot juggling, short passing, shooting a dead ball right, shooting from a pass, heading in front, and heading right. However, reliability values for left foot juggling, chest-head-foot juggling, head-left-foot-right foot-chest-head juggling, long pass, and shooting a dead ball left tests were not strong enough to suggest their usage by coaches in training or sport scientists in research.

scholarly journals Rethinking the neurological examination I: static balance assessment

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 954-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péricles A. Maranhão-Filho ◽  
Eliana Teixeira Maranhão ◽  
Marcos Martins da Silva ◽  
Marco Antônio Lima
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Neurological Examination ◽  
Sensory Integration ◽  
Static Equilibrium ◽  
Static Balance ◽  
Clinical Test ◽  
Balance Assessment ◽  
Risk Of Falling ◽  
Functional Reach ◽  
Functional Reach Test

The authors advocate a modernization of the neurologic exam with regard to the evaluation of static equilibrium through the application of some easily performed and interpreted bedside maneuvers like the Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance - modified and the Functional Reach Test. The authors also believe that these and other assessments, such as that of the risk of falling for elderly patients, should be incorporated into the routine neurological examination.

MOVEMENT MEASUREMENT VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE IMAGE J PROGRAM FOR KINEMATIC ANALYSIS

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (08) ◽  
pp. 1640028 ◽  
Author(s):  
JEONG J. LEE ◽  
JOSHUA H. YOU
Keyword(s):  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Kinematic Analysis ◽  
Motion Analysis System ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Dynamic Movement ◽  
Angle Data ◽  
Hemiparetic Stroke ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background: While advanced motion analysis systems can provide accurate kinematic information, the majorities of motion analysis systems are stationary, expensive and time consuming. Image J is a Java-based image processing program that was originally developed at the National Institutes of Health and has rapidly gained widespread acceptance among rehabilitation specialists as a portable and affordable alternative motion analysis system. However, the validity and reliability of the Image J program have not been well established. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and test–retest reliability of the Image J kinematic analysis system. The Image J kinematic analysis system is designed to produce precise kinematic evidence during normal and pathological static and dynamic movement patterns. Methods: The Image J motion analysis system was concurrently compared with the electrogoniometer system as a reference standard measure by obtaining sagittal kinematic knee joint angle data. Results: Image J motion analysis system measurement revealed outstanding validity ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). The test–retest reliability for kinematic knee angle data showed remarkable consistency (Cronbach’s [Formula: see text]). Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence highlighting the Image J kinematic analysis system’s excellent validity and reliability for evaluating human kinematic movements in elderly people with hemiparetic stroke.

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the Standardized Orthopedic Assessment Tool (SOAT): A Variation of the Traditional Objective Structured Clinical Examination

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Lafave ◽  
Larry Katz
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
Clinical Competence ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Pearson Product Moment Correlation ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

Context: Health care professions have replaced traditional multiple choice tests or essays with structured and practical, performance-based examinations with the hope of eliminating rater bias and measuring clinical competence. Objective: To establish the validity and reliability of the Standardized Orthopedic Assessment Tool (SOAT) as a measure of clinical competence of orthopaedic injury evaluation. Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Setting: University. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 60 undergraduate students and 11 raters from 3 Canadian universities and 1 standardized patient. Intervention(s): Students were required to complete a 30-minute musculoskeletal evaluation in 1 of 2 randomly assigned mock scenarios involving the knee (second-degree medial collateral ligament sprain) or the shoulder (third-degree supraspinatus muscle strain). Main Outcome Measure(s): We measured interreliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,k) and stability of the tool with standard error of measurement and confidence intervals. Agreement was measured using Bland-Altman plots. Concurrent validity was measured using a Pearson product moment correlation coefficient whereby the raters' global rating of a student was matched to the cumulative mean grade score. Results: The ICCs were 0.75 and 0.82 for the shoulder and knee cases, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated no systematic bias between raters. In addition, Pearson product moment correlation analysis demonstrated a strong relationship between the overall cumulative mean grade score and the global rating score of the examinees' performances. Conclusions: This study demonstrated good interrater reliability of the SOAT with a standard error of measurement that indicated very modest stability, strong agreement between raters, and correlation indicative of concurrent validity.

Identifying reliable change in tactile temporal thresholds in multiple sclerosis: test-retest reliability

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 573-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
L N Brown ◽  
L M Metz ◽  
M Eliasziw
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Measurement Error ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Real Change ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

Background Tactile temporal thresholds are typically significantly higher (ie, prolonged) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients when compared to controls and increase significantly during relapses, probably reflecting integrity of conduction across a portion of the corpus callosum. As part of an ongoing validation study of tactile temporal thresholds, the test-retest reliability of these thresholds was examined in patients with MS. Methods Tactile temporal thresholds were measured in 61 MS patients during two separate test sessions within three weeks. Test-retest reliability and the standard error of measurement were calculated. The threshold of change in tactile temporal thresholds in MS patients that would correspond to real change beyond measurement error with 95% certainty was also calculated. Results The test-retest reliability of this measure of tactile temporal thresholds was 0.93. The threshold indicating change beyond chance or measurement error with 95% certainty was 19 ms. Conclusions This measure of tactile temporal thresholds has excellent test - retest reliability and a change of greater than 19 ms is highly likely to represent real change. This measure is promising as a precise, reliable outcome measure in MS.

scholarly journals Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chidozie Emmanuel Mbada ◽  
Oluwabunmi Esther Oguntoyinbo ◽  
Francis Oluwafunso Fasuyi ◽  
Opeyemi Ayodiipo Idowu ◽  
Adesola Christiana Odole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

AbstractIntroductionLow Back Pain is a common public health problem worsened by maladaptive beliefs and incongruent back pain behaviour. It is imperative to develop outcome measures to assess these beliefs among patients with chronic LBP. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and determine the psychometric properties of the Yoruba version of the ODI (ODI-Y).MethodsThe ODI-Y was cross-culturally adapted following the process involving forward translation, synthesis, backward translation, expert review, and pilot testing. One hundred and thirty-six patients with chronic LBP took part in the validation of the ODI-Y; 86 of these individuals took part in the test-retest reliability (within 1-week interval) of the translated instrument. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the ODI-Y were determined using the Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation. Other psychometric properties explored included the factor structure and fit, convergent validity, standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change.ResultsThe mean age of the respondents was 50.5±10.6years. The ODI-Y showed a high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha (α) of 0.81. Test-retest of the Yoruba version of the ODI within 1-week interval yielded an Intra-Class Correlation coefficient of 0.89. The ODI-Y yielded a two-factor structure which accounted for 51.7% of the variance but showed poor fit. Convergent of ODI-Y with the visual analogue scale was moderate (r=0.30; p=0.00). The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the ODI-Y were 2.0 and 5.5.ConclusionsThe ODI was adapted into the Yoruba language and proved to have a good factor structure and psychometric properties that replicated the results of other obtainable versions. We recommend it for use among Yoruba speaking patients with low-back pain.

scholarly journals A Reliability of Electromyographic Normalization Methods for the Infraspinatus Muscle in Healthy Subjects

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-min Ha ◽  
Heon-seock Cynn ◽  
Oh-yun Kwon ◽  
Kyue-nam Park ◽  
Gyoung-mo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Normalization Methods ◽  
Infraspinatus Muscle ◽  
Detectable Difference ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of normalization methods for the infraspinatus muscle in a group of healthy subjects. Twelve healthy subjects (male=8, female=4) performed the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) with examiner`s resistance, MVIC with a digital tension-meter (MVIC-DT), and sub-MVIC methods. Surface electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded from the infraspinatus muscles according to normalization methods. Reliability was analyzed using the intra-class coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable difference (MDD). The results of the present study demonstrated that the sub-MVIC method has excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.92) with a relatively small SEM (5.9 mV) and MDD95 (16.4 mV), compared to MVIC-DT (ICC=0.73; SEM=11.2 mV; MDD95: 31 mV) and MVIC-E (ICC=0.5; SEM=15.7 mV; MDD95: 43.6 mV). These findings provide evidence that sub-MVIC is more appropriate for comparing the EMG activity for the infraspinatus muscle as a normalization method. If MVIC for normalization is needed, MVIC-DT is more appropriate than MVIC-E.

scholarly journals French translation and validation of the Keele STarT MSK Tool

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Charlotte Beaudart ◽  
Lorédana Criscenzo ◽  
Christophe Demoulin ◽  
Stephen Bornheim ◽  
Julien van Beveren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Smallest Detectable Change ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

Background The Keele STarT MSK Tool is a 10-item questionnaire developed to classify patients suffering from one of the five most common types of musculoskeletal pain into 3 sub-groups of risk of chronic pain (i.e. low risk, medium risk and high risk). Objective The objective of the present study was to translate the Keele STarT MSK Tool into French and to evaluate its main psychometric properties. Methods The translation and intercultural adaptation of the questionnaire were carried out using a 6-step process. The following psychometric properties were investigated: floor and ceiling effects, construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability including Standard Error of Measurement and Smallest Detectable Change. Results 101 patients suffering from musculoskeletal pain participated in the study. No floor nor ceiling effects were observed. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.65 was found, revealing a moderate internal consistency. Nevertheless, all items were demonstrated to be significantly correlated with the total score (range of correlations: r=0.2 for item 7 to r=0.78 for item 1). A good construct validity was also found with a significant correlation of r=0.78 between the French Keele STarT MSK Tool and the ÖMPSQ-short. Test-retest reliability was excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 0.97). A Standard Error of Measurement of 0.42 and a Smallest Detectable Change of ±1.17 were measured. Conclusion A validated French version of the Keele STarT MSK Tool is now available and can be used by health practitioners to stratify patients as being at low, medium or high risk of persistent musculoskeletal pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document