scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH DALAM KETENTUAN PASAL 32 AYAT (2) PP No. 24 TAHUN 1997

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Ade Harriestha Martana
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Material Research ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Normative Basis ◽  
Legal Concepts

The title of this study is “legal protection for land ownership right certificate holder according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997”. There is a contradiction between the negative publication system which is adopted in Indonesian land registration system and the indefeasable title that is given after the certificate is published for more than five years according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 about Land Registration. Therefore some issues are occured, which is the legal certainty and legal protection of the land ownership right certificate holder after the five years period according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997. The research method used in this study is normative legal research focusing on investigation of legislature as the primary legal material and supported with the legal doctrine as secondary legal material. The approaching methods used is legal concepts approach and statute approach. From the legal material research can be concluded that in normative basis the aim of article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 year 1997 is to give a legal protection and legal certainty, but in the process the article  is contradictory to the negative publication system and the clauses in the article itself is contradictory, therefore it does not give adequate legal protection and legal certainty for the holder of the land ownership right certificate after the five years period.

scholarly journals STRENGTHENING LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMAIN APPROACH IN MANIFESTING LEGAL CERTAINTY AND COMMUNITY JUSTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Nia Kurniati ◽  
Jordan Mordekhai
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
Community Justice ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Welfare Society ◽  
The Government

As an implementation of welfare society, the government issued Law Number 5 of 1960 Article 19 paragraph (2) c, which provide the legal certainty of land rights for all Indonesians carried out through land registration. The land registration system adopted by Indonesia is negative land cadastre with positive tendency. The implementation of land registration provide the basis of state duty to produce land registration evidence, namely certificate, which is valid as a strong proof of rights. This certificate guarantees the correctness of physical data besides juridical data as long as it is not proven otherwise. Method: This legal research used Normative juridical method, with qualitative juridical data analysis. Results of the study: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency adopted by Indonesia currently does not guarantee legal certainty of land ownership and the community justice itself. This is indicated by the fact that there is still a phenomenon of land disputes, among the result of the issuance of overlapping. By using a legal cadastre-based domain approach, through an approach of extracting historical values of land and integrating the process of dialogue within the issuing of certificate; obtaining legal certainty and the community justice can be achieved. Conclusion: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency is still unable to manifest legal certainty of land ownership and community justice so it is appropriate that an adage states “the highest legal certainty, is the highest injustice”. Strengthening land registration system through the domain approach is an alternative option to manifest legal certainty and community justice.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Village Communities Against Land Rights in the Construction of a National Strategy Project Through a Complete Systematic Land Registration System (Study of Pasuruan District Land Registration)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Ratna Biraeng Kumalasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Village Communities ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it’s intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it’s not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

scholarly journals Government Policy to Accelerating Legal Certainty of Land Through Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) (Studies in Kendal District Land Office)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Siti Sulistiyah ◽  
Umar Ma�ruf
Keyword(s):  
Government Policy ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration

Problems in this study: (1) How is the implementation of activities in the District Land Office PTSL Kendal? (2) How the Government's policy to accelerate the legal certainty Landrights through PTSL ?. The method used in this research is the method of approach to socio-legal research, consisting of socio research and legal research. The results of this study are: (1) Implementation PTSL in Kendal District Land Office begins by planning activities PTSL by the Head of the Kendal District Land Office with pre inventory candidate and potential participants. (2) Government policy in speeding up the legal certainty of land rights through PTSL is based in Kendal land that already has a certificate covering an area of 13834.46 hectares.Suggestions in this study is consistent with the objectives of land registration is to provide certainty and legal protection to the rights holder, to reduce the escalation of disputes continues to grow, it is time for a land registration system through PTSL changed to positive land registration system.Keywords : Government Policy; Legal Certainty of Land Rights; PTSL.

scholarly journals Tanah Grant Sultan Melayu Deli menurut Teori Positivistik

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Rafiqi Rafiqi
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Social Engineering ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Regulatory Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
Agrarian Law

<h1>"Grant Sultan" land certificate is not the basis of rights. The certificate only explained that the land was Grant Sultan's previous right. The Sultan Grant Certificate is a guide for the National Land Agency to see the basis for land ownership. In accordance with the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) No. 5/1960, land that is certified by Grant Sultan will be converted to land, either direct or indirect conversion, further consideration and assessment needs to be done. From the background of this writing the problem is formulated How Legal Certainty Land Registration holders of Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay Customary Community, how Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay society is seen from Positivistic Theory The research method used in this writing is a regulatory approach and concept. Legal Certainty Land Registration of Grant Sultan Land holders in the Deli Malay Customary community if seen from the positivistic school of thought that Grant Sultan's land must be registered by Grant Sultan holders to ensure legal certainty. Grant Sultan's land in the Deli Malay community is seen from the Positivistic Theory. According to the Pound the law is a Social Engineering conflict with interests compared to the others. From positivistic theory Grant holders must immediately register Grant land in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.</h1>

scholarly journals ESENSI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITASI DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deselfia D N M Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
The Government

The essence of transparency and accountability in land registration within the legal system in Indonesia has not been realized properly. Due to the weakness of the guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection from the government.  In addition, the publication system of land registration adopted is negative with a positive tendency, not applied in Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 regarding expiration to file a five-year lawsuit there is a synchronization / non-harmonization concerning land authority between local government Article 14 paragraph (2 ) Letter k of Law Number 23 Year 2014 regarding Regional Government and Authority of National Land Agency (Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No.2 Year 2013 regarding Abundance of Land Rights and Land Registration Authority) and regulation of grace period of entitlement right. AbstrakEsensi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pendaftaran tanah dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia belum terealisasi dengan baik. Karena lemahnya jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dari pemerintah. Selain itu, sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah yang diadopsi negatif dengan kecenderungan positif, tidak diterapkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang berakhirnya pengajuan gugatan lima tahun ada sinkronisasi / non-harmonisasi tentang kewenangan pertanahan antar pemerintah daerah Pasal 14 ayat (2) Huruf k Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.2 Tahun 2013 tentang Kelimpahan Hak atas Tanah dan Pendaftaran Tanah Otoritas) dan peraturan masa tenggang hak cipta. Kata kunci: Transparansi; Akuntabilitas; Pendaftaran Tanah; Sistem Hukum;

scholarly journals PENGARUH SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENCAPAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-43
Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Role Of The Government

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.

scholarly journals Permanent Grant of Land Certificate for Adat People, is it Possible?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1245-1255
Author(s):  
Yusuf Zamil ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Positive System ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land ◽  
Legal Entities

Adat peoples mean the original inhabitants or the first inhabitants of a country or the earliest population's descendants lived in the area. All this time, adat people in Indonesia have always been marginalized and banished from their homeland. Companies that acquired investment permits from the government often dismiss the adat peoples for their interests. This dismissal occurs due to the absence of proof for the collective land ownership (ulayat land), which is used and utilized collectively and communally. This article discusses the possibility of permanently grant the land certificates to provide legal protection for the adat peoples. Granting a certificate of land rights is possible if the government changes the land registration system from the negative to the positive system (torrens system). Adat peoples may acquire land certificates if they are considered as a legal entity. According to Indonesian law, only individuals or legal entities can register ownership of land. To make adat people a legal entity is by making regulations by the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning which states that adat people in certain areas who have met the requirements are declared as legal entities.

scholarly journals ESENSI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITASI DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deselfia D N M Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
The Government

The essence of transparency and accountability in land registration within the legal system in Indonesia has not been realized properly. Due to the weakness of the guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection from the government.  In addition, the publication system of land registration adopted is negative with a positive tendency, not applied in Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 regarding expiration to file a five-year lawsuit there is a synchronization / non-harmonization concerning land authority between local government Article 14 paragraph (2 ) Letter k of Law Number 23 Year 2014 regarding Regional Government and Authority of National Land Agency (Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No.2 Year 2013 regarding Abundance of Land Rights and Land Registration Authority) and regulation of grace period of entitlement right. AbstrakEsensi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pendaftaran tanah dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia belum terealisasi dengan baik. Karena lemahnya jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dari pemerintah. Selain itu, sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah yang diadopsi negatif dengan kecenderungan positif, tidak diterapkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang berakhirnya pengajuan gugatan lima tahun ada sinkronisasi / non-harmonisasi tentang kewenangan pertanahan antar pemerintah daerah Pasal 14 ayat (2) Huruf k Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.2 Tahun 2013 tentang Kelimpahan Hak atas Tanah dan Pendaftaran Tanah Otoritas) dan peraturan masa tenggang hak cipta. Kata kunci: Transparansi; Akuntabilitas; Pendaftaran Tanah; Sistem Hukum;

scholarly journals KEABSAHAN SERTIFIKAT DARI PERBEDAAN JANGKA WAKTU PUBLISITAS DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Asriyanti Nuralifah
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Elements ◽  
Negative Publicity ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Consequences

 Demi terwujudnya kesejahteraan masyarakat, pemerintah Indonesia saat ini dalam mengatur kepemilikan tanah dan memimpin penggunaannya telah menyelenggarakan pendaftaran tanah di seluruh wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia. Pendaftaran tanah ini merupakan kewajiban pemerintah yang bertujuan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum. Akan tetapi dalam pelaksanaannya terdapat perbedaan pengaturan jangka waktu pengumuman pembuktian pemilikan tanah data yuridis dan data fisik bidang tanah serta peta bidang-bidang tanah diumumkan antara Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. Oleh karena itu, dilakukakan penelitian ini untuk memperoleh kejelasan bagaimana keabsahan sertifikat yang diterbitkan dan bagaimana akibat hukum dari perbedaan peraturan dalam pendaftaran tanah terkait asas publisitas negatif berunsur positif.. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan analitis. Dari hasil penelitian ini kedudukan sertifikat berdasarkan perbedaan peraturan jangka waktu publisitas sah apabila tidak diadakan yudicial review dan tidak dibatalkan oleh pembatalan sertifikat.Kata kunci: Pengaturan asas publisitas, Perbedaan pengaturan, dan Keabsahan sertifikatIn order to realize the welfare of society, this time Indonesian government in regulating land ownership and leading its use that have registered land in the entire territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This land registration is a government obligation that aims to guarantee legal certainty. However, in the implementation there are different arrangements for the period of announcement of proof of land ownership of juridical data and physical data on parcels of land and maps of land parcels announced between Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning / National Land Agency Regulation Number 6 in 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. Therefore, this research was carried out to obtain clarity on the validity of the certificates issued and how the legal consequences of the different regulations in land registration related to the principle of negative publicity are positive elements. The method used in this study is normative with a legal approach and analytical approach. From the results of this study the position of the certificate is based on differences in the rules of the period of validity of publicity if a judicial review is not held and is not canceled by the cancellation of the certificate.Keywords: Setting publicity principles, Setting differences, Certificate validity

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document