scholarly journals Government Policy to Accelerating Legal Certainty of Land Through Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) (Studies in Kendal District Land Office)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Siti Sulistiyah ◽  
Umar Ma�ruf
Keyword(s):  
Government Policy ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration

Problems in this study: (1) How is the implementation of activities in the District Land Office PTSL Kendal? (2) How the Government's policy to accelerate the legal certainty Landrights through PTSL ?. The method used in this research is the method of approach to socio-legal research, consisting of socio research and legal research. The results of this study are: (1) Implementation PTSL in Kendal District Land Office begins by planning activities PTSL by the Head of the Kendal District Land Office with pre inventory candidate and potential participants. (2) Government policy in speeding up the legal certainty of land rights through PTSL is based in Kendal land that already has a certificate covering an area of 13834.46 hectares.Suggestions in this study is consistent with the objectives of land registration is to provide certainty and legal protection to the rights holder, to reduce the escalation of disputes continues to grow, it is time for a land registration system through PTSL changed to positive land registration system.Keywords : Government Policy; Legal Certainty of Land Rights; PTSL.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Village Communities Against Land Rights in the Construction of a National Strategy Project Through a Complete Systematic Land Registration System (Study of Pasuruan District Land Registration)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Ratna Biraeng Kumalasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Village Communities ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it’s intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it’s not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.

scholarly journals The Existence of Publicity Principles in Complete Systematic Land Registration

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-88
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Istri Chintya Paramitha ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
I Nyoman Alit Puspadma
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
Legal Principle ◽  
Made In ◽  
Laws And Regulations ◽  
Legal Force

This study aims to analyse the legal certainty of land rights certificates through the complete systematic land registration program regulated in Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018. The issues examined include the legal certainty of land rights certificates issued based on Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 and legal protection of certificates issued under Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 for holders of certificates of land rights. This study uses normative legal research. The data was primary and secondary legal materials related to land registration. The results of the study are associated with legal objectives, then Permen ATR / BPN No. 6/1997 provides great advantages and can create an element of justice by issuing certificates throughout the community, so that legal certainty is given but it becomes weak due to disharmony between the two rules. So that applies the legal principle of the lex superiori derogat legi inferiori. The lower provisions are null and void and have no binding legal force as a result, land rights certificates issued based on Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 do not have legal power. In order to achieve legal certainty and protection, the provisions of Article 24 paragraph (2) Permen ATR / BPN No.6 / 2018 is adjusted to Article 26 paragraph (1) PP No. 24/1997 or the rules regarding PTSL are made in laws and regulations of the same level or higher than PP No.24 / 1997.

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Recording Process ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

scholarly journals STRENGTHENING LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMAIN APPROACH IN MANIFESTING LEGAL CERTAINTY AND COMMUNITY JUSTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Nia Kurniati ◽  
Jordan Mordekhai
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
Community Justice ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Welfare Society ◽  
The Government

As an implementation of welfare society, the government issued Law Number 5 of 1960 Article 19 paragraph (2) c, which provide the legal certainty of land rights for all Indonesians carried out through land registration. The land registration system adopted by Indonesia is negative land cadastre with positive tendency. The implementation of land registration provide the basis of state duty to produce land registration evidence, namely certificate, which is valid as a strong proof of rights. This certificate guarantees the correctness of physical data besides juridical data as long as it is not proven otherwise. Method: This legal research used Normative juridical method, with qualitative juridical data analysis. Results of the study: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency adopted by Indonesia currently does not guarantee legal certainty of land ownership and the community justice itself. This is indicated by the fact that there is still a phenomenon of land disputes, among the result of the issuance of overlapping. By using a legal cadastre-based domain approach, through an approach of extracting historical values of land and integrating the process of dialogue within the issuing of certificate; obtaining legal certainty and the community justice can be achieved. Conclusion: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency is still unable to manifest legal certainty of land ownership and community justice so it is appropriate that an adage states “the highest legal certainty, is the highest injustice”. Strengthening land registration system through the domain approach is an alternative option to manifest legal certainty and community justice.

scholarly journals PENDAFTARAN TANAH DENGAN ALAS HAK JUAL BELI DI BAWAH TANGAN PADA PROGRAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH SISTEMATIS LENGKAP (PTSL) (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Donald Andrean
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
City District ◽  
The Government

In civil law, land is included in registered objects. Therefore ownership of land rights must be registered, for legal certainty. Land registration is regulated in PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. However, there are still many lands that have not been registered, to overcome this the government has issued a comprehensive systematic land registration program (PTSL) based on Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 6 of 2018. The aim of this program is to provide legal certainty and legal protection for land rights owned by the community. The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) provides an opportunity for people who have not registered their land that is located throughout Indonesia in one village or village area. As in the Lima Puluh Kota Regency, there are still many lands that have not been registered, the people obtained them from buying and selling under their hands.The formulation of the problem in this thesis is firstly how is the land registration procedure with the basis of under-selling rights of purchase under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office ?; second, what are the obstacles in the implementation of land registration on the basis of the right to buy and sell under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office? The specification of this research is analytical descriptive, with a normative juridical approach, which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as primary data and primary data as support, which are collected through literature studies and field studies with interview techniques. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. The results of the research and discussion of this thesis can be concluded that the procedure of land registration with the basis of the rights under the hand in the PTSL program in fifty cities is carried out with the stages of planning, location determination, preparation, formation and establishment of the PTSL adjudication committee and task force, counseling, physical data collection and collecting juridical data, researching juridical data for proving rights, announcing physical and juridical data and ratifying it, affirming conversion, recognizing rights and granting rights, accounting for rights, issuing certificates of land rights, documenting and submitting the results of activities and reporting.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Notaris dan PPAT dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah dan Jaminan Perlindungan bagi Para Pihak

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-383
Author(s):  
I Komang Edy Susanto ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Basically, notaries also serve as Land Deed Making Official (hereafter called PPAT) after they carry out a test. Thus, in carrying out their role as PPAT, they are entitled to make deeds of transferring land rights. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the position of the notary and PPAT in transferring land rights and how legal protection for parties who transfer land through sale and purchase. The research method used in this research was a normative legal method. The results of this study indicated that the position of a notary in the transfer of land rights as an official deed maker is mentioned in article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2/2014 concerning the Position of Notary, which states that a notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other Prevailing Laws. The position of the PPAT in essence has the task of carrying out land registration by making deeds as evidence and having carried out certain legal actions regarding land rights. Legal protection for parties transferring land through sale and purchase is stated in the 1945 Constitution, namely Article 27 paragraph (1) which states that each person has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, and legal certainty that is just and equal treatment before the law.

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

KEDUDUKAN SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI JAMINAN KEBENDAAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH BESERTA BENDA-BENDA YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN TANAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Bayu Setiawan Hendri Putra ◽  
Arief Suryono
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Land Title ◽  
Strong Position ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Right

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to find out the position and legal protection of holders of land title certificates as a material guarantee. This normative legal research is prescriptive and applied. The types and sources of material for this study include primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Data collection techniques used are literature studies or document studies. Data analysis techniques are carried out by examining research from literature studies or secondary data studies. The results of this study explain that the position of Land Rights as collateral is regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law which states that land rights can be used as collateral for debt by encumbering Mortgage Rights. Land rights that can be used as Mortgage Rights objects must fulfill two elements, namely, must be registered with the Land Office and according to their nature must be transferable. Creditors have a strong position against collateral objects. Legal protection for the holder of the land rights certificate as a material guarantee if the debtor defaults, the creditor has the right to sell collateral for repayment of the receivables regulated in the Mortgage Right Act. The Mortgage Rights Act is a manifestation of the objectives of the Basic Agrarian Law in providing and guaranteeing legal certainty and legal protection in preventive and repressive forms.<br />Keywords: Collateral; Mortgage Right; Legal Protection; Land Right</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan dan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai suatu jaminan kebendaan. Penelitian hukum normatif ini bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Jenis dan sumber bahan penelitian ini meliputi bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu studi kepustakaan atau studi dokumen. Teknik analisis data dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji penelitian dari studi kepustakaan atau studi data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa kedudukan Hak Atas Tanah sebagai jaminan diatur dalam UU Pokok Agraria yang menyatakan bahwa hak atas tanah dapat dijadikan jaminan utang dengan dibebani Hak Tanggungan. Hak Atas tanah yang dapat dijadikan obyek Hak Tanggungan harus memenuhi dua unsur yaitu, wajib didaftarkan pada Kantor Pertanahan dan menurut sifatnya harus dapat dipindah tangankan. Kreditur memiliki kedudukan yang kuat terhadap benda jaminan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang sertifikat hak atas tanah sebagai suatu jaminan kebendaan apabila debitur wanprestasi, kreditur berhak menjual benda jaminan untuk pelunasan piutangnya yang diatur dalam UU Hak Tanggungan. UU Hak Tanggungan merupakan wujud dari tujuan UU Pokok Agraria dalam memberikan dan jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dalam bentuk preventif dan represif. <br />Kata Kunci: Jaminan; Hak Tanggungan; Perlindungan Hukum; Hak Atas Tanah</p>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH DALAM KETENTUAN PASAL 32 AYAT (2) PP No. 24 TAHUN 1997

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Ade Harriestha Martana
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Material Research ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Normative Basis ◽  
Legal Concepts

The title of this study is “legal protection for land ownership right certificate holder according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997”. There is a contradiction between the negative publication system which is adopted in Indonesian land registration system and the indefeasable title that is given after the certificate is published for more than five years according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 about Land Registration. Therefore some issues are occured, which is the legal certainty and legal protection of the land ownership right certificate holder after the five years period according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997. The research method used in this study is normative legal research focusing on investigation of legislature as the primary legal material and supported with the legal doctrine as secondary legal material. The approaching methods used is legal concepts approach and statute approach. From the legal material research can be concluded that in normative basis the aim of article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 year 1997 is to give a legal protection and legal certainty, but in the process the article  is contradictory to the negative publication system and the clauses in the article itself is contradictory, therefore it does not give adequate legal protection and legal certainty for the holder of the land ownership right certificate after the five years period.

scholarly journals ESENSI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITASI DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deselfia D N M Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
The Government

The essence of transparency and accountability in land registration within the legal system in Indonesia has not been realized properly. Due to the weakness of the guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection from the government.  In addition, the publication system of land registration adopted is negative with a positive tendency, not applied in Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 regarding expiration to file a five-year lawsuit there is a synchronization / non-harmonization concerning land authority between local government Article 14 paragraph (2 ) Letter k of Law Number 23 Year 2014 regarding Regional Government and Authority of National Land Agency (Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No.2 Year 2013 regarding Abundance of Land Rights and Land Registration Authority) and regulation of grace period of entitlement right. AbstrakEsensi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pendaftaran tanah dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia belum terealisasi dengan baik. Karena lemahnya jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dari pemerintah. Selain itu, sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah yang diadopsi negatif dengan kecenderungan positif, tidak diterapkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang berakhirnya pengajuan gugatan lima tahun ada sinkronisasi / non-harmonisasi tentang kewenangan pertanahan antar pemerintah daerah Pasal 14 ayat (2) Huruf k Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.2 Tahun 2013 tentang Kelimpahan Hak atas Tanah dan Pendaftaran Tanah Otoritas) dan peraturan masa tenggang hak cipta. Kata kunci: Transparansi; Akuntabilitas; Pendaftaran Tanah; Sistem Hukum;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document