scholarly journals Tanah Grant Sultan Melayu Deli menurut Teori Positivistik

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Rafiqi Rafiqi
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Social Engineering ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Regulatory Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
Agrarian Law

<h1>"Grant Sultan" land certificate is not the basis of rights. The certificate only explained that the land was Grant Sultan's previous right. The Sultan Grant Certificate is a guide for the National Land Agency to see the basis for land ownership. In accordance with the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) No. 5/1960, land that is certified by Grant Sultan will be converted to land, either direct or indirect conversion, further consideration and assessment needs to be done. From the background of this writing the problem is formulated How Legal Certainty Land Registration holders of Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay Customary Community, how Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay society is seen from Positivistic Theory The research method used in this writing is a regulatory approach and concept. Legal Certainty Land Registration of Grant Sultan Land holders in the Deli Malay Customary community if seen from the positivistic school of thought that Grant Sultan's land must be registered by Grant Sultan holders to ensure legal certainty. Grant Sultan's land in the Deli Malay community is seen from the Positivistic Theory. According to the Pound the law is a Social Engineering conflict with interests compared to the others. From positivistic theory Grant holders must immediately register Grant land in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.</h1>

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Jual Beli di Bawah Tangan atas Tanah Hak Milik di Kabupaten Badung

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-180
Author(s):  
I Gusti Agung Ayu Lita Pratiwi ◽  
Nella Hasibuan Oleary ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Selling Process ◽  
Ownership Rights

The sale and purchase transaction in Badung Regency which was made by both parties was in the form of an agreement of hands, but one of the parties who broke a promise or could be called a default. The purpose of this research is to see the legal dangers of underhand trading on land ownership in Badung Regency. This research method uses empirical legal research. In practice, the implementation of binding purchases and purchases under land ownership rights is often carried out by several parties, one of which occurred in Badung Regency. The practice of buying and selling land carried out under the hand is not in accordance with government regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, which requires that the sale and purchase be made with an authentic deed, and not under hand. However, the buying and selling process in Lukluk District, Mengwi District, Badung Regency is still ready for those who, the deed, because the fulfillment of the legal requirements for buying and selling under the UUPA is material, formal and cash, clear and sincere. In principle, in fine sales agreements and notaries will be a legal approach as law for them made. And also according to article 1320 of the Civil Code the validity of an agreement if, among others: There is an agreement, skills, certain matters, and valid reasons. And although according to lawful compliance with the requirements according to article 1320 of the Civil Code, the sale and purchase of land must be carried out before the prohibited authority (PPAT).

scholarly journals Kedudukan Notaris dan PPAT dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah dan Jaminan Perlindungan bagi Para Pihak

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-383
Author(s):  
I Komang Edy Susanto ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Basically, notaries also serve as Land Deed Making Official (hereafter called PPAT) after they carry out a test. Thus, in carrying out their role as PPAT, they are entitled to make deeds of transferring land rights. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the position of the notary and PPAT in transferring land rights and how legal protection for parties who transfer land through sale and purchase. The research method used in this research was a normative legal method. The results of this study indicated that the position of a notary in the transfer of land rights as an official deed maker is mentioned in article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2/2014 concerning the Position of Notary, which states that a notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other Prevailing Laws. The position of the PPAT in essence has the task of carrying out land registration by making deeds as evidence and having carried out certain legal actions regarding land rights. Legal protection for parties transferring land through sale and purchase is stated in the 1945 Constitution, namely Article 27 paragraph (1) which states that each person has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, and legal certainty that is just and equal treatment before the law.

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH DALAM KETENTUAN PASAL 32 AYAT (2) PP No. 24 TAHUN 1997

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Ade Harriestha Martana
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Material Research ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Normative Basis ◽  
Legal Concepts

The title of this study is “legal protection for land ownership right certificate holder according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997”. There is a contradiction between the negative publication system which is adopted in Indonesian land registration system and the indefeasable title that is given after the certificate is published for more than five years according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 about Land Registration. Therefore some issues are occured, which is the legal certainty and legal protection of the land ownership right certificate holder after the five years period according to Article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997. The research method used in this study is normative legal research focusing on investigation of legislature as the primary legal material and supported with the legal doctrine as secondary legal material. The approaching methods used is legal concepts approach and statute approach. From the legal material research can be concluded that in normative basis the aim of article 32 clause (2) Government Regulation Number 24 year 1997 is to give a legal protection and legal certainty, but in the process the article  is contradictory to the negative publication system and the clauses in the article itself is contradictory, therefore it does not give adequate legal protection and legal certainty for the holder of the land ownership right certificate after the five years period.

scholarly journals PERALIHAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG BERASAL DARI WARISAN

LEGALITAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Amin Slamet
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Descriptive Method

The purpose of this research is: First, to find out the implementation of the transfer of ownership of the inherited land in Samarinda. Second, to find out the inhibiting factors in the registration of the transfer of title to inherited land in Samarinda. To find out the purpose above, then determined the research method is The Qualitative Descriptive Method, with sampling techniques by purposive sampling. Data collection techniques such as interviews with observations and study documents relevant to the problem under study.Therefore it is hoped that the National Land Agency as the only body that regulates land in Indonesia is expected to be able to better socialize land regulations so that people can better understand the importance of registering land rights transfers using deeds to provide legal certainty and protection for right holders. as well as the main purpose of land registration itself.Keywords: Land Ownership, Inheritance

scholarly journals JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM YANG TERKANDUNG DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmat Ramadhani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Physical Data ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Subjects

The product of the land registration process is a certificate of title granted to the right holder. The certificate according to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 is in the form of one sheet of documents containing information about the juridical data and physical data required on a parcel of registered land. Although the certificate of land rights is referred to as the strongest evidence but in reality the certificate of land rights has not fully guaranteed legal certainty. This is because the law still opens loopholes for other legal subjects to question it both personally and in groups within the judiciary. In order to ensure legal certainty of a right to land for the right holder, the certificate of land rights must be tested in three aspects: relating to; Legal Certainty of Object, Legal Certainty of Status of Rights and Legal Certainty on Subject.

scholarly journals PERKEMBANGAN PENGATURAN OBJEK WAKAF DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM TANAH NASIONAL DAN HUKUM ISLAM

LITIGASI ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
FX. Sumarja
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Law ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Agrarian Law

This study aims: first, to analyze the development of objects arrangement waqf in perspective National Land Law and the Law of Islam; secondly, analyze the status of waqf land of the provisions in the Basic Agrarian Law with the birth of Waqf Act. Research conducted normative. Materials ruling National Land Law and the Law of Islam. Analysis of the data using analysis of law or rechtmatigheidsdaad tootsing. The research found that the object of waqf expanded. Waqts movable and immovable objects. Includes fixtures and other property, such as leasehold, Broking and Right to Use. The development of waqf objects influenced by the development ideology or doctrine held by the public. Waqts do not have to perpetuate the benefits of charitable objects. Act waqt cause legal conflicts between the provisions of waqts in the Basic Agrarian Law to the Waqf Act. Government Regulations on Land Registration Owned by Government Regulation Implementation Waqts Act. Terms of waqts in the Basic Agrarian Law remains in effect based on the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalis. Based on the principle of lex posterior derogat legi priori the applicable Regulation on the Implementation of the Law of Waqts.Keywords: Development; Waqts; National Land Law; Law of IslamABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan: pertama, menganalisis perkembangan pengaturan objek wakaf dalam perspektif Hukum Tanah Nasional dan Hukum Islam; kedua menganalisis status ketentuan wakaf tanah dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dengan lahirnya Undang-Undang Wakaf. Penelitian dilakukan secara normatif. Bahan hukumnya Hukum Tanah Nasinoal dan Hukum Islam. Analisis data menggunakan analisis hukum (law analisys) atau rechtmatigheidsdaad tootsing. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa objek wakaf mengalami perluasan. Wakaf benda bergerak dan benda tidak bergerak. Benda tidak bergerak mencakup tanah milik dan yang lain, seperti Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan dan Hak Pakai. Perkembangan objek wakaf dipengaruhi oleh perkembangan paham atau ajaran yang dianut oleh masyarakat. Wakaf tidak harus mengekalkan manfaat benda wakaf. Undang-Undang wakaf menyebabkan konflik hukum antara ketentuan wakaf dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dengan Undang-Undang Wakaf. Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pendaftaran Tanah Milik dengan Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Wakaf.  Ketentuan wakaf dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria tetap berlaku berdasarkan asas lex specialis derogat legi generalis. Berdasarkan asas lex posterior derogat legi priori yang berlaku adalah Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Wakaf.Kata kunci: Perkembangan; Wakaf;  Hukum Tanah Nasional; Hukum Islam

scholarly journals Kebijakan Satu Peta (One Map Policy) Mencegah Konflik di Bidang Administrasi Pertanahan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-205
Author(s):  
Ana Silviana
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Data ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Administration ◽  
The One

Abstract This study aims to study normatively to see the implementation of the one map policy in the land sector and prevent land administration conflicts. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the study show that the One Map Policy or One Map Policy in order to realize the Land Administration Order is still a roadblock because there are still many problems that arise related to ownership disputes and duplicate disputes as evidence of land ownership. In an effort to accelerate the development of quality spatial data, efforts have been made through the implementation of land registration to ensure the legal certainty of land rights. Keywords: One Map Policy, Agrarian Conflict, Land Administration Abstrak  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara normatif untuk melihat implementasi kebijakan one map policy di bidang pertanahan dan mencegah konflik administrasi pertanahan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Kebijakan Satu Peta atau One Map Policy dalam rangka mewujudkan Tertib Administrasi Pertanahan masih dipersimpangan jalan, karena masih banyaknya permasalahan yang muncul terkait dengan sengketa kepemilikan dan sengketa duplikasi alat bukti kepemilikan tanah. Dalam upaya untuk percepatan pembangunan data spasial yang berkualitas telah dilakukan usaha-usaha melalui penyelenggaraan pendaftaran tanah untuk menjamin kepastian hukum hak-hak atas tanah. Kata Kunci: Kebijakan Satu Peta, Konflik Agraria, Administrasi Pertanahan

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah Dalam Pola Kemitraan Sebagai Penerima Waralaba

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
I Made Bagus Suardana ◽  
I Wayan Wiryawan
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Regional Governments

The legal certainty for micro, small and medium enterprises in a partnership scheme is as a franchisee. Economic growth is so fast and advanced that many regulations by the central government and regional governments issue policies that cannot be implemented and result in no guarantee of legal certainty for the community. The purpose of this paper is to review the regulation of the minister of trade regarding franchising in 2019 related to legal certainty for micro, small and medium enterprises in the framework of a franchise business. The method used in this paper is a normative legal research method by analyzing the provisions of statutory regulations. The results of this study explain that based on the principle of lex superior derogate legi inferiori, the law with a higher position removes the laws that are under it, namely in the MSME partnership pattern in the franchise business, it should still use the rules in Government Regulation No. 17 of 2013 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. Kepastian hukum usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah dalam pola kemitraan adalah sebagai penerima waralaba. Pertumbuhan ekonomi yang demikian cepat dan maju, menyebabkan banyak regulasi oleh pemerintah pusat maupun pemerintah daerah menerbitkan kebijakan–kebijakan yang belum dapat dilaksanakan dan berakibat tidak adanya jaminan kepastian hukum yang berkeadilan bagi masyarakat. Tujuan dari penulisan ini, untuk mengkaji peraturan menteri perdagangan tentang waralaba tahun 2019 terkait kepastian hukum bagi usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah dalam rangka bisnis waralaba. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menganalisa dari ketentuan peraturan perundang–undangan. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa  berdasarkan asas lex superior derogate legi inferiori mengakibatkan hukum yang kedudukannya lebih tinggi menghapus hukum yang ada di bawahnya yaitu dalam pola kemitraan UMKM dalam bisnis waralaba sudah seharusnya tetap menggunakan aturan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah No. 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah.

scholarly journals KEABSAHAN SERTIFIKAT DARI PERBEDAAN JANGKA WAKTU PUBLISITAS DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Asriyanti Nuralifah
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Spatial Planning ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Elements ◽  
Negative Publicity ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Consequences

 Demi terwujudnya kesejahteraan masyarakat, pemerintah Indonesia saat ini dalam mengatur kepemilikan tanah dan memimpin penggunaannya telah menyelenggarakan pendaftaran tanah di seluruh wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia. Pendaftaran tanah ini merupakan kewajiban pemerintah yang bertujuan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum. Akan tetapi dalam pelaksanaannya terdapat perbedaan pengaturan jangka waktu pengumuman pembuktian pemilikan tanah data yuridis dan data fisik bidang tanah serta peta bidang-bidang tanah diumumkan antara Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. Oleh karena itu, dilakukakan penelitian ini untuk memperoleh kejelasan bagaimana keabsahan sertifikat yang diterbitkan dan bagaimana akibat hukum dari perbedaan peraturan dalam pendaftaran tanah terkait asas publisitas negatif berunsur positif.. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan analitis. Dari hasil penelitian ini kedudukan sertifikat berdasarkan perbedaan peraturan jangka waktu publisitas sah apabila tidak diadakan yudicial review dan tidak dibatalkan oleh pembatalan sertifikat.Kata kunci: Pengaturan asas publisitas, Perbedaan pengaturan, dan Keabsahan sertifikatIn order to realize the welfare of society, this time Indonesian government in regulating land ownership and leading its use that have registered land in the entire territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This land registration is a government obligation that aims to guarantee legal certainty. However, in the implementation there are different arrangements for the period of announcement of proof of land ownership of juridical data and physical data on parcels of land and maps of land parcels announced between Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning / National Land Agency Regulation Number 6 in 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) with Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. Therefore, this research was carried out to obtain clarity on the validity of the certificates issued and how the legal consequences of the different regulations in land registration related to the principle of negative publicity are positive elements. The method used in this study is normative with a legal approach and analytical approach. From the results of this study the position of the certificate is based on differences in the rules of the period of validity of publicity if a judicial review is not held and is not canceled by the cancellation of the certificate.Keywords: Setting publicity principles, Setting differences, Certificate validity

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document