scholarly journals ESENSI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITASI DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deselfia D N M Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
The Government

The essence of transparency and accountability in land registration within the legal system in Indonesia has not been realized properly. Due to the weakness of the guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection from the government.  In addition, the publication system of land registration adopted is negative with a positive tendency, not applied in Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 regarding expiration to file a five-year lawsuit there is a synchronization / non-harmonization concerning land authority between local government Article 14 paragraph (2 ) Letter k of Law Number 23 Year 2014 regarding Regional Government and Authority of National Land Agency (Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No.2 Year 2013 regarding Abundance of Land Rights and Land Registration Authority) and regulation of grace period of entitlement right. AbstrakEsensi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pendaftaran tanah dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia belum terealisasi dengan baik. Karena lemahnya jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dari pemerintah. Selain itu, sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah yang diadopsi negatif dengan kecenderungan positif, tidak diterapkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang berakhirnya pengajuan gugatan lima tahun ada sinkronisasi / non-harmonisasi tentang kewenangan pertanahan antar pemerintah daerah Pasal 14 ayat (2) Huruf k Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.2 Tahun 2013 tentang Kelimpahan Hak atas Tanah dan Pendaftaran Tanah Otoritas) dan peraturan masa tenggang hak cipta. Kata kunci: Transparansi; Akuntabilitas; Pendaftaran Tanah; Sistem Hukum;

scholarly journals ESENSI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITASI DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Deselfia D N M Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
The Government

The essence of transparency and accountability in land registration within the legal system in Indonesia has not been realized properly. Due to the weakness of the guarantee of legal certainty and legal protection from the government.  In addition, the publication system of land registration adopted is negative with a positive tendency, not applied in Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997 regarding expiration to file a five-year lawsuit there is a synchronization / non-harmonization concerning land authority between local government Article 14 paragraph (2 ) Letter k of Law Number 23 Year 2014 regarding Regional Government and Authority of National Land Agency (Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No.2 Year 2013 regarding Abundance of Land Rights and Land Registration Authority) and regulation of grace period of entitlement right. AbstrakEsensi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pendaftaran tanah dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia belum terealisasi dengan baik. Karena lemahnya jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dari pemerintah. Selain itu, sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah yang diadopsi negatif dengan kecenderungan positif, tidak diterapkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang berakhirnya pengajuan gugatan lima tahun ada sinkronisasi / non-harmonisasi tentang kewenangan pertanahan antar pemerintah daerah Pasal 14 ayat (2) Huruf k Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No.2 Tahun 2013 tentang Kelimpahan Hak atas Tanah dan Pendaftaran Tanah Otoritas) dan peraturan masa tenggang hak cipta. Kata kunci: Transparansi; Akuntabilitas; Pendaftaran Tanah; Sistem Hukum;

scholarly journals PENGARUH SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM MENCAPAI KEPASTIAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-43
Author(s):  
Abdul Muthallib
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Role Of The Government

This article discusses legal certainty as one of the objectives of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian (Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Pokok-Pokok Agraria) Principles and the influence of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof of land registration. The provision of guarantees of legal certainty to holders of land rights is accommodated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and further regulated in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah). Using a normative legal view, this article refers to regulations on agrarian. The discussion of the article looks at the role of the government in providing opportunities for all citizens to register land with the aim of obtaining legal certainty and minimizing disputes. This article looks at the purpose of issuing certificates in land registration activities so that right-holders can easily prove that they are the right-holders. This is done so that rights holders can obtain legal certainty and legal protection. However, the land rights certificate issued is considered to be still lacking in minimizing disputes and it is assumed that it has not affected the land rights owners to protect their rights.

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Recording Process ◽  
Potential Loss ◽  
The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

scholarly journals STRENGTHENING LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEM THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMAIN APPROACH IN MANIFESTING LEGAL CERTAINTY AND COMMUNITY JUSTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Nia Kurniati ◽  
Jordan Mordekhai
Keyword(s):  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Positive Tendency ◽  
Community Justice ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Welfare Society ◽  
The Government

As an implementation of welfare society, the government issued Law Number 5 of 1960 Article 19 paragraph (2) c, which provide the legal certainty of land rights for all Indonesians carried out through land registration. The land registration system adopted by Indonesia is negative land cadastre with positive tendency. The implementation of land registration provide the basis of state duty to produce land registration evidence, namely certificate, which is valid as a strong proof of rights. This certificate guarantees the correctness of physical data besides juridical data as long as it is not proven otherwise. Method: This legal research used Normative juridical method, with qualitative juridical data analysis. Results of the study: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency adopted by Indonesia currently does not guarantee legal certainty of land ownership and the community justice itself. This is indicated by the fact that there is still a phenomenon of land disputes, among the result of the issuance of overlapping. By using a legal cadastre-based domain approach, through an approach of extracting historical values of land and integrating the process of dialogue within the issuing of certificate; obtaining legal certainty and the community justice can be achieved. Conclusion: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency is still unable to manifest legal certainty of land ownership and community justice so it is appropriate that an adage states “the highest legal certainty, is the highest injustice”. Strengthening land registration system through the domain approach is an alternative option to manifest legal certainty and community justice.

scholarly journals PENDAFTARAN TANAH DENGAN ALAS HAK JUAL BELI DI BAWAH TANGAN PADA PROGRAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH SISTEMATIS LENGKAP (PTSL) (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Donald Andrean
Keyword(s):  
Task Force ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
City District ◽  
The Government

In civil law, land is included in registered objects. Therefore ownership of land rights must be registered, for legal certainty. Land registration is regulated in PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. However, there are still many lands that have not been registered, to overcome this the government has issued a comprehensive systematic land registration program (PTSL) based on Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 6 of 2018. The aim of this program is to provide legal certainty and legal protection for land rights owned by the community. The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) provides an opportunity for people who have not registered their land that is located throughout Indonesia in one village or village area. As in the Lima Puluh Kota Regency, there are still many lands that have not been registered, the people obtained them from buying and selling under their hands.The formulation of the problem in this thesis is firstly how is the land registration procedure with the basis of under-selling rights of purchase under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office ?; second, what are the obstacles in the implementation of land registration on the basis of the right to buy and sell under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office? The specification of this research is analytical descriptive, with a normative juridical approach, which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as primary data and primary data as support, which are collected through literature studies and field studies with interview techniques. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. The results of the research and discussion of this thesis can be concluded that the procedure of land registration with the basis of the rights under the hand in the PTSL program in fifty cities is carried out with the stages of planning, location determination, preparation, formation and establishment of the PTSL adjudication committee and task force, counseling, physical data collection and collecting juridical data, researching juridical data for proving rights, announcing physical and juridical data and ratifying it, affirming conversion, recognizing rights and granting rights, accounting for rights, issuing certificates of land rights, documenting and submitting the results of activities and reporting.

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Village Communities Against Land Rights in the Construction of a National Strategy Project Through a Complete Systematic Land Registration System (Study of Pasuruan District Land Registration)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Ratna Biraeng Kumalasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
Village Communities ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it’s intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it’s not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.

scholarly journals The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriella Talenta Sekotibo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study is to provide legal certainty and to resolve disputes over land rights ownership for buyers who are acting in good faith when purchasing and selling inheritance. The research method is normative juridical, employing both a statutory and case-based approach. According to the study's findings, buyers with good intentions receive legal protection in the form of compensation. However, when parties with bad intentions violate Article 1267 of the Civil Code, the legal consequences of buying and selling inherited land are null and void, as they contain elements of fraud, oversight, and ignorance. additional heirs. Keeping in mind that the property being traded is inheritance land that already possesses permanent legal standing and cannot be traded without the approval of other heirs.Keywords: Legal Protection; Good Faith Buyers; and Inheritance Land.

scholarly journals The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights

2019 ◽  
pp. 133-148
Author(s):  
Sulistiani Adont ◽  
La Syarifuddin ◽  
Rahmawati Al Hidayah
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.

scholarly journals Karakteristik Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah yang Belum Terdaftar Hak atas Tanah

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-443
Author(s):  
I Gusti Bagus Andika Bagaskara ◽  
I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Legal Risks ◽  
The Government ◽  
Materials Used

Government Regulation No. 24/1997 concerning Land Registration, the Government requires all holders of land rights to register their lands with the competent authorities, but in the community there are still unregistered lands, this phenomenon is to ensure legal certainty for holders of land, land that has not been registered must be registered from the aspect of legal risk. The purpose of this study is to reveal the characteristics of the land sale and purchase agreement whose land rights have not been registered and the legal certainty of the sale and purchase agreement whose land has not been registered. This research method uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by classifying legal materials. The sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary sources of legal materials. After the data was collected, the data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results of the study reveal that in terms of legal risks, it is more prone to occur compared to registered land, then from a procedural aspect it will be different from registered lands where unregistered land requires accuracy so as not to cause legal problems.

scholarly journals Legal Assurance and Legal Protection in Land Registration in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Suharyono Suharyono
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Site ◽  
Land Title ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Legal assurance to protect the owner of the land title has been the main objectives of the 1997 Government Regulation No. 24. However, in reality, the objectives above cannot be spelled due to the negative publication system of land title registration regulated by the regulation above. The loophole the system has, inter alia, concerns with the actual or the correctness of land site or the physical data of the land.  As a result, a conflict will not be prevented between or amongst the true land deed holder, land rights holder and the third party. If the case is brought before the court, the further consequence is that the verdict will declare the cancelation of or invalidity of the land deed. Then the legal status of the land deed will become uncertain and landowners will lose their rights without getting any protection from the State.  The problem raised in this article regarding the negative system of land registration in the 1997 government regulation no. 24 does not provide legal protection for the landowner who has already land certificate. The results of the study showed that there were two different values of legal certainty and legal protection manifested in the Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 and those of legal certainty and legal protection as mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.  Therefore it is not superfluous to state that legal certainty and legal protection are intended and regulated by Government Regulation No.24 of 1997 which is in contradictory to the manifested value of legal certainty and legal protection guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document