KONSEPSI DAN APLIKASI PIDANA MATI  DALAM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA

Imposition of the death penalty by the judge in the criminal justice process Indonesia still remains a debate among groups that agread with the group that oppose it. But in some laws for special crimes such as terrorism, corruption, narcotics, psychotropic substances, and a human rights capital punishment is still regulated, as well as of the criminal code and the concept of the criminal code by 2015 capital punishment is still based. The existence of the group that did not agree with the conception and application of this dying, argued that human life bussiness, my God, not the man to lift the perspective of the scientific criminal law that a death penalty still exists in all criminal acts by perpetrators of crimes with widespread impact as well as detrimental to the wider community the research for criminal santions was important to examine the existence of the norms of law as a basic for corrector by maximum capital punishment in Indonesia. Penjatuhan pidana mati oleh hakim dalam proses peradilan pidana Indonesia masih tetap menjadi perdebatan antara kelompok yang setuju dengan kelompok yang menentangnya. Namun dalam beberapa undang-undang tindak pidana khusus seperti terorisme, korupsi, narkotika, psikotropika dan peradilan hak asasi manusia pidana mati masih diatur, begitu juga KUHP dan konsep KUHP tahun 2015 pidana mati masih tetap dicanangkan. Adanya kelompok yang tidak setuju dengan konsepsi dan aplikasi pidana mati ini berdalih bahwa nyawa manusia menjadi urusan Tuhan, bukan menjadi kewenangan manusia untuk mencabutnya. Perspektif keilmuan hukum pidana bahwa pidana mati masih eksis untuk diberlakukan sepanjang tindak pidana yang dilakukan pelaku menyangkut kejahatan luar biasa dengan dampak luas serta merugikan masyarakat luas. Penelitian terhadap sanksi pidana mati penting dilakukan guna meneliti keberadaan norma hukum sebagai dasar pembenar dijatuhkannya pidana mati ini di Indonesia.

Download Full-text

PARADIGM OF DEATH PENALTY (COMPARATIVE STUDY IN INDONESIA, SAUDI ARABIA AND CHINA)

Lampung Journal of International Law ◽

10.25041/lajil.v2i1.2032 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Tedy Nopriandi ◽

Risky Fany Ardhiansyah

Keyword(s):

Saudi Arabia ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Islamic Law ◽

Human Life ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

Law System ◽

The Right

The death penalty is one of old criminal type as the age of human life, and the most controversial crime in of all criminal systems, both in countries that adhere to the Common Law System and in countries that embrace Civil Law, Islamic Law and Socialist Law. There are two main thoughts about the death penalty, namely: first, those who want to keep it based on the force provisions, and second are those who wish to the abolition as a whole. Indonesia includes a country that still maintains capital punishment in a positive legal system. This paper aims to resolve problems of the death penalty concept concerning the controversy purpose of the death penalty and to analyze the regulations, procedures and philosophies regarding the death penalty in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and China. This paper uses normative juridical research and the methods based on the doctrine and developed by the author. The approach used the legal approach, historical approach and comparative approach, then analyzed by the customary method.The result of the study shows that the death penalty can be seen from the philosophical aspects of Indonesian criminal law, as well as the philosophical aspects of Islamic and Chinese criminal law. So that everything can not be separated from the essential legal objectives, namely for the creation of justice. Death penalty in Islamic law turns out the concept of restorative justice specifically for the crime of deliberate killing (al-qatl al-'amd), which the execution highly depends on the victim’s family. The victim’s family, in this case, has the right to choose whether qisas (death penalty) or their apologize for the murder suspect, and diyat payment. While China in the implementation of death penalty applies the concept of rehabilitation, which in the execution of the death penalty is called a death penalty delay for two years and in its implementation, the defendant is given a job and control them. Whereas in Indonesia, capital punishment is a specific criminal offence and threatened with alternatives and is still a draft Criminal Code.

Download Full-text

Victims’ rights are human rights: The importance of recognizing victims as persons

Temida ◽

10.2298/tem1202071w ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 15 (2) ◽

pp. 71-83 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Jo-Anne Wemmers

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Justice System ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Justice System ◽

Crime Victims ◽

The State ◽

Justice Process ◽

Criminal Justice Process ◽

The Right

In this paper the author argues that victims? rights are human rights. Criminal law typically views victims as witnesses to a crime against the state, thus shutting them out of the criminal justice process and only allowing them in when they are needed to testify. This is a major source of dissatisfaction for victims who seek validation in the criminal justice system. Victims are persons with rights and privileges. Crimes constitute violations of their rights as well as acts against society or the state. While human rights instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, do not mention crime victims specifically, a number of rights are identified, which can be viewed from the victim?s perspective. As individuals with dignity, victims have the right to recognition as persons before the law. However, such rights are only meaningful if they can be enforced.

Download Full-text

HAK ASASI MANUSIA VERSUS PIDANA MATI

10.31219/osf.io/wt2u8 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Boni Suparto Wuarlela

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Criminal Justice ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Research Method ◽

Secondary Data ◽

The State ◽

Right To Life ◽

Human Right ◽

Justice Process ◽

Criminal Justice Process

Human Rights are the basic rights of every human being as God's creatures who are equal to one another. The application of the death penalty by the state through a court decision means that the state revokes the convict's right to life which is an unlimited human right. Therefore, its implementation must take into account the rights of the convict. The purpose of this paper is to find out whether the imposition of the death penalty for criminals is against human rights. What are the criteria for imposing the death penalty for perpetrators of crimes that do not conflict with human rights? The method used is a normative research method using secondary data. It can be concluded that the imposition of the death penalty is against human rights. However, in its application, it can be justified on the grounds of defending human rights and only for crimes that go beyond humanity and damage human civilization. The implementation of the criminal justice process must be transparent and fair.

Download Full-text

ALTERNATIF PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA DILIHAT DARI PERSPEKTIF HAM (Alternative of Death Penalty of Human Rights Perspective, In Indonesia)

Jurnal HAM ◽

10.30641/ham.2016.7.69-83 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 69

Author(s):

Bungasan Hutapea

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Criminal Justice ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Secondary Data ◽

The State ◽

Human Right ◽

Important Thing ◽

Justice Process ◽

Criminal Justice Process

Penjatuhan pidana mati merupakan bagian terpenting dari proses peradilan pidana. Penerapan pidana mati oleh Negara melalui putusan pengadilan, berarti Negara mengambil hak hidup terpidana yang merupakan hak asasi manusia yang sifatnya tidak dapat dibatasi (non derogable). Oleh karena itu penerapannya harus memperhatikan Hak Asasi Manusia terpidana. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui penjatuhan hukuman mati bagi pelaku kejahatan, bertentangan dengan atau tidak dengan hak asasi manusia dan kriteria penjatuhan pidana mati bagi pelaku kejahatan yang tidak bertentangan dengan hak asasi manusia. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa penjatuhan pidana mati bertentangan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia dan penetapan dapat dibenarkan dengan alasan membela hak asasi manusia dan hanya pada kejahatan yang bersifat melampaui batas kemanusiaan.AbstractThe death penalty is an important thing in the criminal justice process. Its practice by the state with a verdict, that means state takes a life right of convict which is a nonderogable right. Therefore, its practice must pay attention to their human right. The purpose of this research is to know death penalty of the offenders and its criteria against to the human right or not. This method of this research is normative juridical with secondary data. It concludes that death penalty against to human right and its stipulation can be justifiable by reasoning to defend the human right and merely on crime tend to beyond humanity.

Download Full-text

ANALYSIS OF NOTARY HONORARY COUNCIL CONSENT AS GROUNDS OF IMPUNITY (STRAFUITSLAUTINGSGRONDEN) AGAINST REVELATION OF SECRETS

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v6i3.17012 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (3) ◽

pp. 570

Author(s):

Gaza Carumna Iskadrenda ◽

Anggita Mustika Dewi

Keyword(s):

Criminal Justice ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Research Result ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Public Prosecutor ◽

The Public ◽

Positive Law ◽

Justice Process ◽

Criminal Justice Process

Article 66 paragraph (1) Act Number 2 of 2014 essentially regulates the consent of the Notary Honorary Council in the criminal justice process. The provisions in the a quo article have been still being applied and become a positive law in Indonesia. One of the criminal justice process in the notarial field relates to the criminal act of revelation of secrets as regulated in Article number 322 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The consent given by the Notary Honorary Council as outlined above can certainly be viewed in the context of criminal law.The research is a normative legal research using secondary data of both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collecting technique used is documentary study with written materials as the data collection tool to be analyzed qualitatively using content analysis.The research result showed that in the context of criminal law, basically a notary who provides a copy of the deed and/or documents attached to the minuta deed or notarial protocol in the notarial archives for the purpose of the investigator, the public prosecutor or the judge has committed a criminal act of revelation of secrets as stipulated in Article number 322 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. However, the notary is not necessarily criminally liable considering the consent of the Notary Honorary Council as the grounds of impunity. Keywords: Notary Honorary Council consent, grounds of impunity, criminal act of revelation of secrets.

Download Full-text

PROBLEMATIKA PIDANA HUKUMAN MATI DALAM PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PEMASYARAKATAN

Journal Publicuho ◽

10.35817/jpu.v4i3.20998 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 4 (3) ◽

Author(s):

Ravi Agsel Pratama ◽

Mitro Subroto

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Law Reform ◽

Death Row ◽

Normative Analysis ◽

Correctional System

Indonesia, which is trying to reorganize in the field of criminal law reform, cannot be separated from the issue of the death penalty. Of course this will have an impact on the context of the formation of the new Criminal Code (KUHP) made by the Indonesian people themselves which have long been aspired to. In addition, the increasing number of death penalty sentences handed down against criminals makes the author interested in studying the existence of capital punishment sanctions, especially in the aspect of human rights and also in the perspective of the correctional system. This is because the death penalty has conflicting values and concepts in the Constitution and the Indonesian Correctional System. In this study, the researcher conducted a normative analysis which resulted in the conclusion that convicts on death row would be able to carry out the coaching program without coercion.

Download Full-text

KEBERADAAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP)

Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) ◽

10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23444 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 104

Author(s):

Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Dewi

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Legal System ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Deterrent Effect ◽

Human Rights Violations ◽

Right To Life ◽

The Right

Capital punishment is the heaviest crime and difficult to apply in a country of law considering the death penalty is one of the acts of human rights violations, but to make someone discourage of committing a crime there needs to be rules or penalties that can provide a deterrent effect and provide security for the community from all form of crime. The purpose of writing is directed to find out the regulation of the Death Penalty in the Criminal Law Code which is stipulated in several articles in the Criminal Code and the existence of capital punishment in the legal system in Indonesia in terms of human rights perspective, which of course would be contrary to human rights, especially the right to life, however capital punishment is also needed as an effort to prevent the occurrence of crimes, especially those classified as serious

Download Full-text

ALTERNATIF PENJATUHAN HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA DILIHAT DARI PERSPEKTIF HAM (Alternative of Death Penalty of Human Rights Perspective, In Indonesia)

Jurnal HAM ◽

10.30641/ham.2016.7.170 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 69

Author(s):

Bungasan Hutapea

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Criminal Justice ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Secondary Data ◽

The State ◽

Human Right ◽

Important Thing ◽

Justice Process ◽

Criminal Justice Process

Download Full-text

KEBIJAKAN MODERASI PIDANA MATI

Jurnal Yudisial ◽

10.29123/jy.v10i2.138 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 193

Author(s):

Mei Susanto ◽

Ajie Ramdan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Right To Life ◽

Life Imprisonment ◽

Research Results ◽

Moderation Model ◽

The Right

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007 selain menjadi dasar konstitusionalitas pidana mati, juga memberikan jalan tengah (moderasi) terhadap perdebatan antara kelompok yang ingin mempertahankan (retensionis) dan yang ingin menghapus (abolisionis) pidana mati. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam putusan a quo dikaitkan dengan teori pemidanaan dan hak asasi manusia dan bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 dikaitkan dengan putusan a quo. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, dan hasil-hasil penelitian yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, putusan a quo yang memuat kebijakan moderasi pidana mati telah sesuai dengan teori pemidanaan khususnya teori integratif dan teori hak asasi manusia di Indonesia di mana hak hidup tetap dibatasi oleh kewajiban asasi yang diatur dengan undang-undang. Kedua, model kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 beberapa di antaranya telah mengakomodasi amanat putusan a quo, seperti penentuan pidana mati di luar pidana pokok, penundaan pidana mati, kemungkinan pengubahan pidana mati menjadi pidana seumur hidup atau penjara paling lama 20 tahun. Selain itu masih menimbulkan persoalan berkaitan dengan lembaga yang memberikan pengubahan pidana mati, persoalan grasi, lamanya penundaan pelaksanaan pidana mati, dan jenis pidana apa saja yang dapat diancamkan pidana mati.Kata kunci: kebijakan, KUHP, moderasi, pidana mati. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court’s Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, in addition to being the basis of the constitutionality of capital punishment, also provides a moderate way of arguing between retentionist groups and those wishing to abolish the death penalty (abolitionist). The problem in this research is how the moderation policy of capital punishment in aquo decision is associated with the theory of punishment and human rights and how the moderation policy of capital punishment in the draft Criminal Code of 2015 (RKUHP) is related with the a quo decision. This study is doctrinal, using primary and secondary legal materials, in the form of legislation, literature and research results that are relevant to the object of analysis. This study concludes, firstly, the aquo decision containing the moderation policy of capital punishment has been in accordance with the theory of punishment, specificallyy the integrative theory and the theory of human rights in Indonesia, in which the right to life remains limited by the fundamental obligations set forth in the law. Secondly, some of the modes of moderation model of capital punishment in RKUHP of 2015 have accommodated the mandate of aquo decision, such as the determination of capital punishment outside the main punishment, postponement of capital punishment, the possibility of converting capital punishment to life imprisonment or imprisonment of 20 years. In addition, it still raises issues regarding the institutions that provide for conversion of capital punishment, pardon matters, length of delay in the execution of capital punishment, and any types of crime punishable by capital punishment. Keywords: policy, criminal code, moderation, capital punishment.

Download Full-text

MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE INDONESIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY

Asy-Syari ah ◽

10.15575/as.v18i1.7607 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 185-198

Author(s):

Tajul Arifin

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Human Rights ◽

United Nations ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Statistical Data ◽

The United States ◽

Drugs And Crime ◽

Low Rate

AbstractThis research mainly uses statistical data published by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDDC) in April 2014 to support the hypothesis of this research that “Human Rights Activists in Indonesia as in other countries have failed in comprehending the wisdom (hikmah) of the application of Capital Punishment”. This study found that: (1) the hypothesis of this research was strongly supported by the data; (2) the application of Syari`ah Criminal Law in Saudi Arabia has been an unchallenged proof for the wisdom (hikmah) behind the application of Capital Punishment by keeping the level of murder crime to a low rate which sharply contrast to many countries which apply positive laws which are based on a social contract between the ruler and the ruled, such as in The United States and Mexico; and (3) In upholding the true justice in Islamic Criminal Law, punishment can only be awarded to the criminals in a society where the Islamic ideal of social justice has been achieved. AbstrakPenelitian ini menggunakan data statistik yang diterbitkan oleh United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDDC) pada bulan April 2014 untuk mendukung hipotesis dari penelitian ini bahwa "Aktivis HAM di Indonesia seperti di negara-negara lain telah gagal dalam memahami hikmah dari penerapan hukuman mati". Studi ini menemukan bahwa: (1) hipotesis penelitian ini sangat didukung oleh data; (2) penerapan Hukum Pidana Syari`ah di Arab Saudi telah menjadi bukti tak terbantahkan untuk menunjukkan hikmah di balik penerapan hukuman mati dengan menjaga tingkat kejahatan pembunuhan pada tingkat yang sangat rendah yang sangat berlawanan dengan yang terjadi di banyak negara yang menerapkan hukum positif yang didasarkan pada kontrak sosial antara penguasa dan rakyat, seperti di Amerika Serikat dan Meksiko; dan (3) dalam menegakkan keadilan sejati dalam Hukum Pidana Islam, hukuman hanya dapat diberikan kepada penjahat dalam masyarakat di mana keadilan sosial yang ideal menurut Islam telah dicapai.

Download Full-text