PROBLEMATIKA PIDANA HUKUMAN MATI DALAM PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PEMASYARAKATAN

Indonesia, which is trying to reorganize in the field of criminal law reform, cannot be separated from the issue of the death penalty. Of course this will have an impact on the context of the formation of the new Criminal Code (KUHP) made by the Indonesian people themselves which have long been aspired to. In addition, the increasing number of death penalty sentences handed down against criminals makes the author interested in studying the existence of capital punishment sanctions, especially in the aspect of human rights and also in the perspective of the correctional system. This is because the death penalty has conflicting values and concepts in the Constitution and the Indonesian Correctional System. In this study, the researcher conducted a normative analysis which resulted in the conclusion that convicts on death row would be able to carry out the coaching program without coercion.

Download Full-text

KONSEPSI DAN APLIKASI PIDANA MATI DALAM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA

Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) ◽

10.24843/jmhu.2016.v05.i04.p06 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 711

Author(s):

I Made Pasek Budiawan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Criminal Justice ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Human Life ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Psychotropic Substances ◽

Justice Process ◽

Criminal Justice Process

Imposition of the death penalty by the judge in the criminal justice process Indonesia still remains a debate among groups that agread with the group that oppose it. But in some laws for special crimes such as terrorism, corruption, narcotics, psychotropic substances, and a human rights capital punishment is still regulated, as well as of the criminal code and the concept of the criminal code by 2015 capital punishment is still based. The existence of the group that did not agree with the conception and application of this dying, argued that human life bussiness, my God, not the man to lift the perspective of the scientific criminal law that a death penalty still exists in all criminal acts by perpetrators of crimes with widespread impact as well as detrimental to the wider community the research for criminal santions was important to examine the existence of the norms of law as a basic for corrector by maximum capital punishment in Indonesia. Penjatuhan pidana mati oleh hakim dalam proses peradilan pidana Indonesia masih tetap menjadi perdebatan antara kelompok yang setuju dengan kelompok yang menentangnya. Namun dalam beberapa undang-undang tindak pidana khusus seperti terorisme, korupsi, narkotika, psikotropika dan peradilan hak asasi manusia pidana mati masih diatur, begitu juga KUHP dan konsep KUHP tahun 2015 pidana mati masih tetap dicanangkan. Adanya kelompok yang tidak setuju dengan konsepsi dan aplikasi pidana mati ini berdalih bahwa nyawa manusia menjadi urusan Tuhan, bukan menjadi kewenangan manusia untuk mencabutnya. Perspektif keilmuan hukum pidana bahwa pidana mati masih eksis untuk diberlakukan sepanjang tindak pidana yang dilakukan pelaku menyangkut kejahatan luar biasa dengan dampak luas serta merugikan masyarakat luas. Penelitian terhadap sanksi pidana mati penting dilakukan guna meneliti keberadaan norma hukum sebagai dasar pembenar dijatuhkannya pidana mati ini di Indonesia.

Download Full-text

Why Indonesia Maintain Capital Punishment?

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽

10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no1.1904 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 25-38

Author(s):

Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

The State ◽

Law Reform ◽

Effective Deterrent ◽

Victims Of Crime

The death penalty in Indonesia is still maintained to combat crime within the Indonesian criminal law reform. Although many states have it removed, Indonesia would have the sole discretion to keep it. Despite the opposition, the death penalty application still has a juridical and sociological basis, so it is still legal to be maintained. Indonesia itself has overshadowed the death penalty with a form of legality according to international law so that the position of Indonesia that still maintain the death penalty cannot be blamed. Moreover, sociologically, Indonesian people still accept those who commit an offence who may have profound implications that could lead to the death penalty. This issue is what became the basis for lawmakers in Indonesia to keep it. This research uses the doctrinal method toexamine various regulations regarding capital punishment and non-doctrinal to understand the community's situation related to the existence of capital punishment in Indonesia. The death penalty is a more effective deterrent and therefore prevents crime better. With the death penalty, others were about to commit a similar crime is expected not to commit the crime. The death penalty is more effectively immobilizing offenders. Perpetrators, in principle, still manage to have the desire to commit the crime again after release. The death penalty for perpetrators of crimes is not a violation of human rights, but rather to respect human rights itself, namely for victims of crime. The setting and the application of the death penalty in Indonesia until now is still needed. They are considering that there are still many crimes that undermine humanity's values or the crimes that harm the State and crackdown on corruption in society.

Download Full-text

KEBERADAAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP)

Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) ◽

10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23444 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 104

Author(s):

Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Dewi

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Legal System ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Deterrent Effect ◽

Human Rights Violations ◽

Right To Life ◽

The Right

Capital punishment is the heaviest crime and difficult to apply in a country of law considering the death penalty is one of the acts of human rights violations, but to make someone discourage of committing a crime there needs to be rules or penalties that can provide a deterrent effect and provide security for the community from all form of crime. The purpose of writing is directed to find out the regulation of the Death Penalty in the Criminal Law Code which is stipulated in several articles in the Criminal Code and the existence of capital punishment in the legal system in Indonesia in terms of human rights perspective, which of course would be contrary to human rights, especially the right to life, however capital punishment is also needed as an effort to prevent the occurrence of crimes, especially those classified as serious

Download Full-text

KEBIJAKAN MODERASI PIDANA MATI

Jurnal Yudisial ◽

10.29123/jy.v10i2.138 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 193

Author(s):

Mei Susanto ◽

Ajie Ramdan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Right To Life ◽

Life Imprisonment ◽

Research Results ◽

Moderation Model ◽

The Right

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007 selain menjadi dasar konstitusionalitas pidana mati, juga memberikan jalan tengah (moderasi) terhadap perdebatan antara kelompok yang ingin mempertahankan (retensionis) dan yang ingin menghapus (abolisionis) pidana mati. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam putusan a quo dikaitkan dengan teori pemidanaan dan hak asasi manusia dan bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 dikaitkan dengan putusan a quo. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, dan hasil-hasil penelitian yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, putusan a quo yang memuat kebijakan moderasi pidana mati telah sesuai dengan teori pemidanaan khususnya teori integratif dan teori hak asasi manusia di Indonesia di mana hak hidup tetap dibatasi oleh kewajiban asasi yang diatur dengan undang-undang. Kedua, model kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 beberapa di antaranya telah mengakomodasi amanat putusan a quo, seperti penentuan pidana mati di luar pidana pokok, penundaan pidana mati, kemungkinan pengubahan pidana mati menjadi pidana seumur hidup atau penjara paling lama 20 tahun. Selain itu masih menimbulkan persoalan berkaitan dengan lembaga yang memberikan pengubahan pidana mati, persoalan grasi, lamanya penundaan pelaksanaan pidana mati, dan jenis pidana apa saja yang dapat diancamkan pidana mati.Kata kunci: kebijakan, KUHP, moderasi, pidana mati. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court’s Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, in addition to being the basis of the constitutionality of capital punishment, also provides a moderate way of arguing between retentionist groups and those wishing to abolish the death penalty (abolitionist). The problem in this research is how the moderation policy of capital punishment in aquo decision is associated with the theory of punishment and human rights and how the moderation policy of capital punishment in the draft Criminal Code of 2015 (RKUHP) is related with the a quo decision. This study is doctrinal, using primary and secondary legal materials, in the form of legislation, literature and research results that are relevant to the object of analysis. This study concludes, firstly, the aquo decision containing the moderation policy of capital punishment has been in accordance with the theory of punishment, specificallyy the integrative theory and the theory of human rights in Indonesia, in which the right to life remains limited by the fundamental obligations set forth in the law. Secondly, some of the modes of moderation model of capital punishment in RKUHP of 2015 have accommodated the mandate of aquo decision, such as the determination of capital punishment outside the main punishment, postponement of capital punishment, the possibility of converting capital punishment to life imprisonment or imprisonment of 20 years. In addition, it still raises issues regarding the institutions that provide for conversion of capital punishment, pardon matters, length of delay in the execution of capital punishment, and any types of crime punishable by capital punishment. Keywords: policy, criminal code, moderation, capital punishment.

Download Full-text

PARADIGM OF DEATH PENALTY (COMPARATIVE STUDY IN INDONESIA, SAUDI ARABIA AND CHINA)

Lampung Journal of International Law ◽

10.25041/lajil.v2i1.2032 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Tedy Nopriandi ◽

Risky Fany Ardhiansyah

Keyword(s):

Saudi Arabia ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Islamic Law ◽

Human Life ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

Law System ◽

The Right

The death penalty is one of old criminal type as the age of human life, and the most controversial crime in of all criminal systems, both in countries that adhere to the Common Law System and in countries that embrace Civil Law, Islamic Law and Socialist Law. There are two main thoughts about the death penalty, namely: first, those who want to keep it based on the force provisions, and second are those who wish to the abolition as a whole. Indonesia includes a country that still maintains capital punishment in a positive legal system. This paper aims to resolve problems of the death penalty concept concerning the controversy purpose of the death penalty and to analyze the regulations, procedures and philosophies regarding the death penalty in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and China. This paper uses normative juridical research and the methods based on the doctrine and developed by the author. The approach used the legal approach, historical approach and comparative approach, then analyzed by the customary method.The result of the study shows that the death penalty can be seen from the philosophical aspects of Indonesian criminal law, as well as the philosophical aspects of Islamic and Chinese criminal law. So that everything can not be separated from the essential legal objectives, namely for the creation of justice. Death penalty in Islamic law turns out the concept of restorative justice specifically for the crime of deliberate killing (al-qatl al-'amd), which the execution highly depends on the victim’s family. The victim’s family, in this case, has the right to choose whether qisas (death penalty) or their apologize for the murder suspect, and diyat payment. While China in the implementation of death penalty applies the concept of rehabilitation, which in the execution of the death penalty is called a death penalty delay for two years and in its implementation, the defendant is given a job and control them. Whereas in Indonesia, capital punishment is a specific criminal offence and threatened with alternatives and is still a draft Criminal Code.

Download Full-text

MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE INDONESIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY

Asy-Syari ah ◽

10.15575/as.v18i1.7607 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 185-198

Author(s):

Tajul Arifin

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Human Rights ◽

United Nations ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Statistical Data ◽

The United States ◽

Drugs And Crime ◽

Low Rate

AbstractThis research mainly uses statistical data published by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDDC) in April 2014 to support the hypothesis of this research that “Human Rights Activists in Indonesia as in other countries have failed in comprehending the wisdom (hikmah) of the application of Capital Punishment”. This study found that: (1) the hypothesis of this research was strongly supported by the data; (2) the application of Syari`ah Criminal Law in Saudi Arabia has been an unchallenged proof for the wisdom (hikmah) behind the application of Capital Punishment by keeping the level of murder crime to a low rate which sharply contrast to many countries which apply positive laws which are based on a social contract between the ruler and the ruled, such as in The United States and Mexico; and (3) In upholding the true justice in Islamic Criminal Law, punishment can only be awarded to the criminals in a society where the Islamic ideal of social justice has been achieved. AbstrakPenelitian ini menggunakan data statistik yang diterbitkan oleh United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDDC) pada bulan April 2014 untuk mendukung hipotesis dari penelitian ini bahwa "Aktivis HAM di Indonesia seperti di negara-negara lain telah gagal dalam memahami hikmah dari penerapan hukuman mati". Studi ini menemukan bahwa: (1) hipotesis penelitian ini sangat didukung oleh data; (2) penerapan Hukum Pidana Syari`ah di Arab Saudi telah menjadi bukti tak terbantahkan untuk menunjukkan hikmah di balik penerapan hukuman mati dengan menjaga tingkat kejahatan pembunuhan pada tingkat yang sangat rendah yang sangat berlawanan dengan yang terjadi di banyak negara yang menerapkan hukum positif yang didasarkan pada kontrak sosial antara penguasa dan rakyat, seperti di Amerika Serikat dan Meksiko; dan (3) dalam menegakkan keadilan sejati dalam Hukum Pidana Islam, hukuman hanya dapat diberikan kepada penjahat dalam masyarakat di mana keadilan sosial yang ideal menurut Islam telah dicapai.

Download Full-text

FOREIGN CONVICTS EXECUTION: CRIMINAL JURISDICTION BENEATH INTERNATIONAL TENSION

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v96i0.5060 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 96 ◽

Author(s):

Tajudin . ◽

Solihin Niar Ramadhan

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Death Sentence ◽

Foreign Nationals ◽

Law System ◽

Head Of State ◽

National Jurisdiction ◽

The Postponement

The existence ofthe death penalty remains a controversial issue in several countries around the world. Although many countries have abolished the death penalty in its criminal law system, Indonesia still retainsthe capital punishment within its criminal law policy.In Practice, theexecutionhasbeen implemented long agodespite the fact that it leaves a lot of problems. There are many reactions from other countries when prosecutors process to execute foreign nationals. On fact, many head of state request to president of Republic of Indonesia to change the punishment or give forgiveness.This journal will discuss the main problemsencountered in the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia. The problems are: Firstly,the imposition of the death penalty for foreign nationals in order to implement the national jurisdiction underinternational community’s pressure. Secondly,the postponement of death sentence associated with the theory of retribution and human rights. Keyword: The death penalty, retribution theory, human rights.

Download Full-text

PEMBAHARUAN SANKSI PIDANA BERDASARKAN FALSAFAH PANCASILA DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA DIINDONESIA

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v95i0.2826 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 95 ◽

Author(s):

Tommy Leonard ,

Keyword(s):

Social Work ◽

Law Enforcement ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Law Reform ◽

The Third ◽

The People ◽

Criminal Penalties

Abstract Since Indonesia’s Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Code) applied, criminal law reformed to continue till now, both the modernity of the criminal law material, formally criminal law, and criminal law enforcement. The third part of the criminal law is part of the criminal law integratted to criminal law reform which must be involved to all three parts so they can be implemented. To achieve the objective of sentencing, Bill Criminal Code of 2012 also formulated a modernity of criminal code. types consist of three types. First, the principal of the criminal consisting of imprisonment, criminal surveillance,criminal fines,and criminal social work. Second the criminal subject of a special nature, namely the death penalty. Third, the additional penalty which consists of the removal of certain rights, deprivation of certain goods and / or bill, the judge’s verdict, payment of compensation,and the fulfillment of obligations of local customs or obligations under the laws of living in society. A appropriate theory and the theory improvement prevention of criminal penalties is an approach based on instrumental perspective. The punishment had been seen as an instrument to achieve certain objectives that lies beyond the punishment itself, namely the improvement of the perpetrator or the people protection. The nature and modalities of punishment must be tailored to the objectives which would be achieved. Thus, the imposition of punishment has no meaning in itself, but deriving their value from something else, namely from those objectives. The implication is that if the penalty is only seen as a means, basically can be replaced by other means which may be more efficient Keywords: criminal code, concept, Pancasila Abstrak Sejak Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (selanjutnya disebut KUHP) berlaku, pembaharuan hukum pidana terus berlangsung hingga saat ini, baik pembaharuan terhadap hukum pidana material, hukum pidana formal, maupun hukum pelaksanaan pidana. Ketiga bagian hukum pidana tersebut merupakan bagian dari hukum pidana yang terintegral sehingga pembaharuan hukum pidana harus melibatkan ketiga bagian tersebut agar dapat dilaksanakan. Untuk mencapai tujuan pemidanaan, RUU KUHP Tahun 2012 juga merumuskan pembaharuan jenis pidana. Pembaharuan tersebut terdiri atas tiga jenis. Pertama, pidana pokok yang terdiri atas pidana penjara, pidana tutupan, pidana pengawasan, pidana denda, dan pidana kerja sosial. Kedua, pidana pokok yang bersifat khusus, yaitu pidana mati. Ketiga, pidana tambahan yang terdiri atas pencabutan hak tertentu, perampasan barang tertentu dan/atau tagihan, pengumuman putusan hakim, pembayaran ganti kerugian, dan pemenuhan kewajiban adat setempat atau kewajiban menurut hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Pendekatan teori perbaikan dan teori prevensi tentang hukuman pidana adalah pendekatan berdasarkan perspektif instrumentalistik. Hukuman dipandang sebagai instrumen untuk mencapai tujuan tertentu yang terletak di luar hukuman itu sendiri, yakni perbaikan pelaku atau perlindungan masyarakat. Sifat dan modalitas dari hukuman harus disesuaikan pada tujuan yang mau dicapai. Jadi, Penjatuhan hukuman tidak memiliki makna dalam dirinya sendiri, tetapi memperoleh nilainya dari sesuatu yang lain, yakni dari tujuan itu. Implikasinya adalah jika hukuman hanya dipandang sebagai sarana, pada dasarnya dapat diganti dengan sarana-sarana lain yang mungkin lebih efisien. Teori hukuman instrumentalistik mengimplikasikan penghapusan hukuman. Keyword: Hukum Pidana, Konsep, Pancasila

Download Full-text

PEMBAHARUAN SANKSI PIDANA BERDASARKAN FALSAFAH PANCASILA DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA DIINDONESIA

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8764 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Tommy Leonard

Keyword(s):

Social Work ◽

Law Enforcement ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Law Reform ◽

The Third ◽

Criminal Penalties

AbstractSince Indonesia’s Law Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Code) applied, criminal law reformed to continue till now, both the modernity of the criminal law material, formally criminal law, and criminal law enforcement. The third part of the criminal law is part of the criminal law integratted to criminal law reform which must be involved to all three parts so they can be implemented. To achieve the objective of sentencing, Bill Criminal Code of 2012 also formulated a modernity of criminal code. types consist of three types. First, the principal of the criminal consisting of imprisonment, criminal cover, criminal surveillance, criminal fines, and criminal social work. Second, the criminal subject of a special nature, namely the death penalty. Third, the additional penalty which consists of the removal of certain rights, deprivation of certain goods and / or bill, the judge's verdict, payment of compensation, and the fulfillment of obligations of local customs or obligations under the laws of living in society. A appropriate theory and the theory improvement prevention of criminal penalties is an approach based on instrumental perspective. The punishment had been seen as an instrument to achieve certain objectives that lies beyond the punishment itself, namely the improvement of the perpetrator or the people protection. The nature and modalities of punishment must be tailored to the objectives which would be achieved. Thus, the imposition of punishment has no meaning in itself, but deriving their value from something else, namely from those objectives. The implication is that if the penalty is only seen as a means, basically can be replaced by other means which may be more efficient. Keywords: criminal code, concept, Pancasila AbstrakSejak Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (selanjutnya disebut KUHP) berlaku, pembaharuan hukum pidana terus berlangsung hingga saat ini, baik pembaharuan terhadap hukum pidana material, hukum pidana formal, maupun hukum pelaksanaan pidana. Ketiga bagian hukum pidana tersebut merupakan bagian dari hukum pidana yang terintegral sehingga pembaharuan hukum pidana harus melibatkan ketiga bagian tersebut agar dapat dilaksanakan. Untuk mencapai tujuan pemidanaan, RUU KUHP Tahun 2012 juga merumuskan pembaharuan jenis pidana. Pembaharuan tersebut terdiri atas tiga jenis. Pertama, pidana pokok yang terdiri atas pidana penjara, pidana tutupan, pidana pengawasan, pidana denda, dan pidana kerja sosial. Kedua, pidana pokok yang bersifat khusus, yaitu pidana mati. Ketiga, pidana tambahan yang terdiri atas pencabutan hak tertentu, perampasan barang tertentu dan/atau tagihan, pengumuman putusan hakim, pembayaran ganti kerugian, dan pemenuhan kewajiban adat setempat atau kewajiban menurut hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Pendekatan teori perbaikan dan teori prevensi tentang hukuman pidana adalah pendekatan berdasarkan perspektif instrumentalistik. Hukuman dipandang sebagai instrumen untuk mencapai tujuan tertentu yang terletak di luar hukuman itu sendiri, yakni perbaikan pelaku atau perlindungan masyarakat. Sifat dan modalitas dari hukuman harus disesuaikan pada tujuan yang mau dicapai. Jadi, Penjatuhan hukuman tidak memiliki makna dalam dirinya sendiri, tetapi memperoleh nilainya dari sesuatu yang lain, yakni dari tujuan itu. Implikasinya adalah jika hukuman hanya dipandang sebagai sarana, pada dasarnya dapat diganti dengan sarana-sarana lain yang mungkin lebih efisien. Teori hukuman instrumentalistik mengimplikasikan penghapusan hukuman.Keyword: Hukum Pidana, Konsep, Pancasila

Download Full-text

PERDEBATAN HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Islam dengan Hukum Pidana Indonesia

MIQOT Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman ◽

10.30821/miqot.v36i2.121 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 36 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Muhammad Hatta

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Death Penalty ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Capital Punishment ◽

Public Interest ◽

The Public

Abstrak: Secara tegas, hukum pidana Islam dan Indonesia mengatur tentang hukuman mati. Tetapi, di Indonesia eksistensi hukuman mati masih menjadi perdebatan. Ada pendapat bahwa hukuman mati bertentangan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dan ada juga menilai hukuman mati dimaksudkan untuk melindungi kepentingan umum. Untuk mengkaji pertentangan pandangan tersebut, perlu dilakukan analisis secara kritis dengan mengunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Disimpulkan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan hukuman mati, baik hukum pidana Islam maupun Indonesia mem- berlakukan secara hati-hati dan dengan batasan yang telah ditentukan oleh undang- undang. Dengan batasan-batasan inilah diharapakan dapat mengimbangi pandangan antara yang mendukung dan menolak hukuman mati di Indonesia. Hukuman mati dalam hukum pidana Islam untuk melindungi agama, jiwa, harta, akal, dan keturunan yang merupakan karunia Allah SWT. yang harus dilindungi, di mana pelanggarnya pantas dihukum mati. Abstract: The Debate of Capital Punishment in Indonesia: A Comparative Study between Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Law. Strictly speaking, the Islamic and Indonesian criminal law provide for capital punishment. However, the existence of the death penalty in Indonesia is still debatable. It is assumed that the death penalty is against human rights, but others consider it as to protect the public interest. In order to discuss the contravening views, this paper is an attempt to critically analyzed the issu by using a normative juridical approach. It is concluded in its implementation of capital punishment both the in Islamic and Indonesian criminal law is carefully applied and with the limits prescribed by law. Such restrictions are expected to balance the views between the pro and against capital punishment in Indonesia. The death penalty in Islamic criminal law is to protect religion, life, property, intellect and descendant. The five basic human rights is given by the Almighty God that should be protected, the violator of which is liable for capital punishment. Kata Kunci: hukuman mati, hukum pidana, Islam

Download Full-text