scholarly journals EFISIENSI PASAR SAHAM SYARIAH DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PENGUMUMAN PERUBAHAN KOMPOSISI SAHAMDI JAKARTA ISLAMIC INDEX (JII)

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Mas Nur Mukmin ◽  
Hermi Hermi

<p><em>This research is aim to figure out the information content and market efficiency of syariah stock exchange in Indonesia based on the announcement of the change of stock composition in Jakarta Islamic Index (JII). This research is addressed to the included and excluded stocks. This research use event study method. The window event last for seven days (t-3 to t+3).The result support signalling theory. There’s no abnormal return around the window event for the included stocks. Negative abnormal return exist for the excluded stocks. The result also showed that JII is an efficient market in a semi-strong form based on the announcement of the JII stock composition change.</em></p>

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Happy Sista Devy ◽  
Bahrain Pasha Irawan

<p>Goals of the research to analyze whether occurred abnormal return of ASIAN Games phenomena and see how investors react to the big ASIAN Games 2018 event in Indonesia. . This reseach uses a sample of companies included in the hotel, restaurant and tourism sub-sector on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the observation period, based on the purposive sampling method which obtained 22 companies and used the event study method. There is a significant abnormal return but not on the phenomenon of the Asian Games 2018. This shows that investors still wait and see to the organization of the Asian Games in 2018. No difference of abnormal return before and after the Asian Games 2018. This is because, as investors look to the many tourists who have started to flock to Indonesia before the Asian Games in 2018 took place.<em></em></p><p><strong><em></em></strong><em><br /></em></p>


Performance ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Fransisca Astuti Mutiara ◽  
Leo Indra Wardhana

This study revisits the market reactions on the dividend payment events, cum-dividend date and payment date, using the event study method. The sample of this study includes all dividend announcements from 2017 to 2018 in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study performs various robust statistical tests proposed by Harrington and Shrider (2007), who point out that standard classical t-test is not enough to ensure abnormal return on an event because of the bias due to volatility caused by an event. Using various statistical tests for testing the abnormal return, this study shows that the market indeed reacts to the cum-dividend date and dividend payment date, as well as showing that the classical t-test showing the same conclusion as the other tests.    


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 3136
Author(s):  
Ni Kadek Ayu Semitayani ◽  
Ni Ketut Rasmini

This study aims to examine the information content by looking at the market reaction to the publication of unqualified opinion with the paragraph emphasizing a matter as measured by abnormal returns and trading volume activity. This research is an event study with an observation period of 7 stock exchange days. The population in this study were manufacturing companies listed on the IDX in 2016-2018, totaling 177 companies. The sampling method used non-probability sampling with purposive sampling technique, in order to obtain a sample of 23 companies with 33 audited financial reports. The data analysis technique used paired samplesxt-test. The results of this study indicate that there is no difference in average abnormal return and average trading volume activity before and after the publication of unqualified opinion with an emphasis on a paragraph. This indicates that the publication of an unqualified opinion with an emphasis on a subject paragraph does not cause a market reaction because there is no information content on the event.  Keywords: Event Study; Abnormal Return; Trading Volume Activity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Seyed Jalal Sadeqi Sharif ◽  
Ebrahim Joshan ◽  
Marjan Orouji

<p>This research investigates the relation between put option issuing and risk adjusted return in Iran capital market for the period 2002-2016. Because data were not available before 2002, data from the period 2002 to 2016 were studied. All data gathered from Tehran Stock Exchange database the sample include 36 issuing events. The Event Study method was implied for 5 days. The empirical result shows that there is a significant relation between issuing options and abnormal return for the company stock, furthermore there is an approved relation between that abnormal return and stock liquidity, but the relation between option volume and that rerun was not approved.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevanrhoo Noya Dean Tanardi ◽  
Irwan Trinugroho

<p>We examine the information content of the announcements of quantitative easing policy by The Fed in 2008, 2010 and 2012 on the stock price of firms listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange, more particular firms with liquid stocks included in the list of LQ45. Moreover, we also investigate the determinants of abnormal return by focusing on the effect differences between foreign-controlled and domestic firms as well as between crisis and non-crisis period. Event study and OLS regression are employed to examine our hypotheses. We find that there are significant abnormal returns around the announcement dates both during the crisis and non-crisis period. No evidence is found on the difference between foreign-controlled and domestic firms.  </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taleb Lotfi

The main objective of this study was to establish the stock price reaction to dividend announcements of firms quoted at the Tunisian Securities exchange (TSE). To do so, we develop a traditional event study. Two robust results emerge: First, when we observe the 196 announcements of dividends between years 1996-2004, the result is inconsistent with signaling theory, as long as, no abnormal return was observed on the announcement day (event period). Second, When the overall sample is divided into three sub-group (dividend increase, dividend-no-change and dividend), we observe a significant and abnormal return about -1.242 percent and -1.697 percent respectively on day D(t0-4) and D(t0+4) around the dividend announcement day (Dt0) only for the sub-group of firms that decreases their dividend. This result corroborates prior research in Tunisian context [Ben Naceur and al. (2006); Guizani and Kouki (2011)] that confirm, by using a different approach, the Lintner’s (1956) conclusions which states that Tunisian’ firms generally tend to avoid a dividend decrease (or cuts) and can constitute a supporting evidence of the dividend information content hypothesis in TSE.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Altiok-Yilmaz ◽  
Elif Akben Selcuk

This study investigates the market reaction to dividend change announcements at the Istanbul Stock Exchange. A sample of 184 announcements made by 46 companies during the period 2005 to 2008 is analyzed by using the event study methodology. The results suggest that the market reacts positively to dividend increases, negatively to dividend decreases and does not react when dividends are not changed, consistent with the signaling hypothesis. Also, the results show pre-event information leakage for the decreasing dividends sample.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-387
Author(s):  
Miljan Leković

Abstract The concept of an efficient financial market, in literature known as efficient market hypothesis (EMH), has had a long and difficult development path from the idea itself to its final conception, as one of the central paradigms in modern finance. It has been tested and critically reviewed for decades, and the two basic types of problems it has encountered are theoretical paradoxes and market anomalies. The aim of the paper is to examine the validity of EMH through various financial market efficiency tests and the results of previous research. The intention is to answer the question of whether, despite theoretical paradoxes and market anomalies, the notion of validity can be attributed to the concept of an efficient financial market. In this regard, the paper presents plenty of evidence for and against the validity of weak, semi-strong, and strong form of EMH, to conclude that, even after more than half a century of research, financial literature has not reached a consensus on the presence or absence of the validity of this hypothesis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-266
Author(s):  
Weiwei Zhang ◽  
Tiezhu Sun ◽  
Patrick Han Lin Goh ◽  
Zilong Wang ◽  
Nick Mansley

This study explicitly rejects the prima facie proposition that the top-tier investment banks are capable of delivering supernormal value creation to the shareholders of a REIT acquirer in a corporate acquisition. Using the event study method, we find that REIT acquirers advised by market-leading investment banks suffer an average cumulative abnormal return of −4.41% following the M&A announcement, whereas REIT acquirers advised by non-top-tier investment banks only suffer an average cumulative abnormal return of −1.49%. The evidence shows that the contemporary practice of employing investment banks based on the prestige of the advisory firms could potentially result in value-destroying M&As for the REIT acquirers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document