scholarly journals Enhancing Writing Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Students with Learning Disabilities Improves their Writing Processes and Products

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana María De Caso ◽  
Jesús Nicasio García ◽  
Carmen Díez ◽  
Patricia Robledo ◽  
Mª Lourdes Álvarez
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy Beliefs ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Writing Processes ◽  
Educación Primaria

Introducción. La autoeficacia se muestra como uno de los determinantes motivacionales más importantes por lo que parece tener gran influencia sobre el rendimiento académico de los alumnos. Por ello, el presente estudio examina la influencia de la auto-eficacia en los procesos y productos de composición escrita, a través de una intervención específica que entrena las cuatro fuentes de autoeficacia propuestas por Bandura.Método. Un total de 60 alumnos con dificultades de aprendizaje o bajo rendimiento de 5º y 6º de Educación Primaria, se han distribuido en dos grupos: uno experimental (40 alumnos), que ha sido sometido a 10 sesiones de instrucción específica en autoeficacia hacia la escritura, dentro de su contexto escolar; y otro grupo control (20 alumnos) que han recibido el currículum ordinario.Resultados. Los datos muestran una mejora significativa no sólo de los textos escritos por los alumnos con DA sino también de los procesos que llevan a cabo a la hora de escribir, pero sólo en los alumnos intervenidos.Discusión y Conclusión. Se requieren más estudios instruccionales y experimentales para confirmar la naturaleza de la relación proceso-producto en composición escrita, pero parece que están asegurados los beneficios de utilizar un modelo de proceso-producto de la escritura.

Self-Concept, Attributional Style and Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Students with Learning Disabilities with and without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waheeda Tabassam ◽  
Jessica Grainger
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Attributional Style ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy Beliefs ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Hyperactivity Disorder ◽  
Students With Ld ◽  
Academic Self Efficacy ◽  
Typically Achieving

A considerable comorbidity, ranging from 40% to 80%, has been reported in the literature between learning disabilities (LD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study examined how students with LD and students with comorbid ADHD (LD/ADHD) differ from typically achieving peers in self-concept, self-efficacy beliefs and attributional style. The study also explored the relationship between academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy beliefs and academic-attributional style. Both students with LD and students with LD/ADHD reported significantly lower scores on academic self-concept, academic attributional style and academic self-efficacy beliefs than typically achieving peers. No significant differences were found between students with LD and with LD/ADHD on these variables. However, the LD/ADHD group reported significantly lower scores on peer-relation self-concept than the other two groups. Results revealed that the academic self-perceptions of students with learning disabilities were not significantly influenced by their comorbidity with ADHD. The correlational analysis demonstrated a close relationship between self-concept, self-efficacy beliefs and attributional style. The need for further research and implications for self-concept enhancement of students with LD and with LD/ADHD are discussed.

A Question of Calibration: A Review of the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Students with Learning Disabilities

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Klassen
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Efficacy Beliefs ◽  
The Self ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Writing Difficulties ◽  
Students With Ld ◽  
Efficacy Measure

This article reviews the literature on the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities (LD). Motivational and metacognitive difficulties of students with LD are briefly discussed, followed by a synopsis of Bandura's self-efficacy theory, with special attention to the issue of calibration. From the literature search, 22 studies met the criteria of (a) using a measure of self-efficacy, and (b) including a sample of students identified as having learning disabilities. The resulting body of literature is summarized and analyzed in terms of the nature of the sample, the performance task or domain, the self-efficacy measure used, the research question and outcomes, and the accuracy of calibration between perceived self-efficacy and task outcome. The results from this review suggest that in specific contexts — in the writing performance of students with specific writing difficulties, in particular — students appear to optimistically miscalibrate their self-efficacy. Methodological problems found in some of the research, such as “conceptual blurring,” are discussed. Finally, implications for practice are considered, and suggestions are made for future research.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of an Improvement Writing Program According to Students' Reflexivity Levels

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Nicasio García ◽  
Ana Mª de Caso-Fuertes
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Specific Intervention ◽  
Writing Program ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Experimental Group

After designing a writing program to enhance students' reflexivity and thus improve their compositions (García & de Caso, 2002a, 2002b), the aim of the research project was to show how reflexivity levels could influence the effectiveness of this program. This writing instruction through reflexivity was carried out with 5th and 6th grade students with learning disabilities (LD) and/or low achievement (LA) during 25 sessions. One hundred participants were assigned to either the experimental group (n = 49), which received specific intervention in writing and reflexivity, or the control group (n = 51), which simply received the ordinary curriculum. Both groups were assessed on the productivity and quality of their writing composition as well as their attitudes, self-efficacy, and reflexivity towards writing. The results show that coherence and reflexivity improved depending on the level of reflexivity, whereas the relationship with attitudes and self-efficacy is not so clear. Thus, it seems possible to improve LD and/or LA students' compositions by taking their reflexive style into account. Depending on the students' learning style, teachers should use either one or another technique.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document