scholarly journals A Physical Function Test for Use in the Intensive Care Unit: Validity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Utility of the Physical Function ICU Test (Scored)

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (12) ◽  
pp. 1636-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Denehy ◽  
Natalie A. de Morton ◽  
Elizabeth H. Skinner ◽  
Lara Edbrooke ◽  
Kimberley Haines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Care Hospital

Background Several tests have recently been developed to measure changes in patient strength and functional outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). The original Physical Function ICU Test (PFIT) demonstrates reliability and sensitivity. Objective The aims of this study were to further develop the original PFIT, to derive an interval score (the PFIT-s), and to test the clinimetric properties of the PFIT-s. Design A nested cohort study was conducted. Methods One hundred forty-four and 116 participants performed the PFIT at ICU admission and discharge, respectively. Original test components were modified using principal component analysis. Rasch analysis examined the unidimensionality of the PFIT, and an interval score was derived. Correlations tested validity, and multiple regression analyses investigated predictive ability. Responsiveness was assessed using the effect size index (ESI), and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated. Results The shoulder lift component was removed. Unidimensionality of combined admission and discharge PFIT-s scores was confirmed. The PFIT-s displayed moderate convergent validity with the Timed “Up & Go” Test (r=−.60), the Six-Minute Walk Test (r=.41), and the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (rho=.49). The ESI of the PFIT-s was 0.82, and the MCID was 1.5 points (interval scale range=0–10). A higher admission PFIT-s score was predictive of: an MRC score of ≥48, increased likelihood of discharge home, reduced likelihood of discharge to inpatient rehabilitation, and reduced acute care hospital length of stay. Limitations Scoring of sit-to-stand assistance required is subjective, and cadence cutpoints used may not be generalizable. Conclusions The PFIT-s is a safe and inexpensive test of physical function with high clinical utility. It is valid, responsive to change, and predictive of key outcomes. It is recommended that the PFIT-s be adopted to test physical function in the ICU.

scholarly journals Characteristics and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients with Raised Cardiac Troponins Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil K. Nadar ◽  
Muhammad M. Shaikh ◽  
Muhammad A. Khatri ◽  
Wael A. Abdelmottaleb ◽  
Sheeraz Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Objectives: Critically ill patients have been shown to have raised troponins.  The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of myocardial injury in the intensive care unit (ICU) a tertiary care hospital in Oman and assess their management and prognosis. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving adult patients admitted to the ICU of our institution between 1st January and 31st December 2019 who had a high sensitive cardiac troponin (Hs-CTn) assay performed. We excluded patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Results: A total of 264 patients had a Hs-cTn measured during this period. Of these 128 patients (64.3+17.1 years; 58.5% male) had elevated levels giving an incidence of around 48.4%. Those with raised troponin were older and had more co-morbidities. These patients were also more critical with lower blood pressure, higher heart rates, hypotensive episodes. Of the 128 patients, 47 were treated as acute coronary syndrome and 32 underwent coronary angiography. Of these only 3 patients required stenting. Patients with raised troponin had a poor outcome with only 45 (35.1%) surviving to discharge as compared to 73.5% where troponin was normal. They had a shorter hospital length of stay as compared to those with normal troponin (16(8-25) vs 19(13-28) p=0.017). Conclusion: A high proportion of critically ill patients have evidence of myocardial injury without significant coronary artery disease. It is associated with poor prognosis. Further prospective studies are required to ascertain the best mode of treatment in these patients. Keywords: Troponin; Biomarkers; Intensive Care; Myocardial Infarction.

Rate of Healthcare Worker–Patient Interaction and Hand Hygiene Opportunities in an Acute Care Setting

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Goodliffe ◽  
Kelsey Ragan ◽  
Michael Larocque ◽  
Emily Borgundvaag ◽  
Sophia Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Healthcare Worker ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Patient Interactions

Objective.Identify factors affecting the rate of hand hygiene opportunities in an acute care hospital.Design.Prospective observational study.Setting.Medical and surgical in-patient units, medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and emergency department (ED) of an academic acute care hospital from May to August, 2012.Participants.Healthcare workers.Methods.One-hour patient-based observations measured patient interactions and hand hygiene opportunities as defined by the “Four Moments for Hand Hygiene.” Rates of patient interactions and hand hygiene opportunities per patient-hour were calculated, examining variation by room type, healthcare worker type, and time of day.Results.During 257 hours of observation, 948 healthcare worker-patient interactions and 1,605 hand hygiene opportunities were identified. Moments 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised 42%, 10%, 9%, and 39% of hand hygiene opportunities. Nurses contributed 77% of opportunities, physicians contributed 8%, other healthcare workers contributed 11%, and housekeeping contributed 4%. The mean rate of hand hygiene opportunities per patient-hour was 4.2 for surgical units, 4.5 for medical units, 5.2 for ED, 10.4 for NICU, and 13.2 for MSICU (P < .001). In non-ICU settings, rates of hand hygiene opportunities decreased over the course of the day. Patients with transmission-based precautions had approximately half as many interactions (rate ratio [RR], 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.80]) and hand hygiene opportunities per hour (RR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.29-0.77]) as did patients without precautions.Conclusions.Measuring hand hygiene opportunities across clinical settings lays the groundwork for product use-based hand hygiene measurement. Additional work is needed to assess factors affecting rates in other hospitals and health care settings.

scholarly journals Predicting Discharge to a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital After Admission to an Intensive Care Unit

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. e46-e53 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Szubski ◽  
A. Tellez ◽  
A. K. Klika ◽  
M. Xu ◽  
M. W. Kattan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital

scholarly journals Contamination of Healthcare Worker Personal Protective Equipment with MRSA Outside the Intensive Care Unit Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s27-s28
Author(s):  
Gita Nadimpalli ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
Karly Lebherz ◽  
J. Kristie Johnson ◽  
David Calfee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Surveillance Culture ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Patient Interactions ◽  
The Right

Background: Estimates of contamination of healthcare personnel (HCP) gloves and gowns with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) following interactions with colonized or infected patients range from 17% to 20%. Most studies were conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting where patients had a recent positive clinical culture. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of MRSA transmission to HCP gloves and gown in non-ICU acute-care hospital units and to identify associated risk factors. Methods: Patients on contact precautions with history of MRSA colonization or infection admitted to non-ICU settings were randomly selected from electronic health records. We observed patient care activities and cultured the gloves and gowns of 10 HCP interactions per patient prior to doffing. Cultures from patients’ anterior nares, chest, antecubital fossa and perianal area were collected to quantify bacterial bioburden. Bacterial counts were log transformed. Results: We observed 55 patients (Fig. 1), and 517 HCP–patient interactions. Of the HCP–patient interactions, 16 (3.1%) led to MRSA contamination of HCP gloves, 18 (3.5%) led to contamination of HCP gown, and 28 (5.4%) led to contamination of either gloves or gown. In addition, 5 (12.8%) patients had a positive clinical or surveillance culture for MRSA in the prior 7 days. Nurses, physicians and technicians were grouped in “direct patient care”, and rest of the HCPs were included in “no direct care group.” Of 404 interactions, 26 (6.4%) of providers in the “direct patient care” group showed transmission of MRSA to gloves or gown in comparison to 2 of 113 (1.8%) interactions involving providers in the “no direct patient care” group (P = .05) (Fig. 2). The median MRSA bioburden was 0 log 10CFU/mL in the nares (range, 0–3.6), perianal region (range, 0–3.5), the arm skin (range, 0-0.3), and the chest skin (range, 0–6.2). Detectable bioburden on patients was negatively correlated with the time since placed on contact precautions (rs= −0.06; P < .001). Of 97 observations with detectable bacterial bioburden at any site, 9 (9.3%) resulted in transmission of MRSA to HCP in comparison to 11 (3.6%) of 310 observations with no detectable bioburden at all sites (P = .03). Conclusions: Transmission of MRSA to gloves or gowns of HCP caring for patients on contact precautions for MRSA in non-ICU settings was lower than in the ICU setting. More evidence is needed to help guide the optimal use of contact precautions for the right patient, in the right setting, for the right type of encounter.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document