scholarly journals Characteristics and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients with Raised Cardiac Troponins Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit

Author(s):  
Sunil K. Nadar ◽  
Muhammad M. Shaikh ◽  
Muhammad A. Khatri ◽  
Wael A. Abdelmottaleb ◽  
Sheeraz Ahmed ◽  
...  

Objectives: Critically ill patients have been shown to have raised troponins.  The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of myocardial injury in the intensive care unit (ICU) a tertiary care hospital in Oman and assess their management and prognosis. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving adult patients admitted to the ICU of our institution between 1st January and 31st December 2019 who had a high sensitive cardiac troponin (Hs-CTn) assay performed. We excluded patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Results: A total of 264 patients had a Hs-cTn measured during this period. Of these 128 patients (64.3+17.1 years; 58.5% male) had elevated levels giving an incidence of around 48.4%. Those with raised troponin were older and had more co-morbidities. These patients were also more critical with lower blood pressure, higher heart rates, hypotensive episodes. Of the 128 patients, 47 were treated as acute coronary syndrome and 32 underwent coronary angiography. Of these only 3 patients required stenting. Patients with raised troponin had a poor outcome with only 45 (35.1%) surviving to discharge as compared to 73.5% where troponin was normal. They had a shorter hospital length of stay as compared to those with normal troponin (16(8-25) vs 19(13-28) p=0.017). Conclusion: A high proportion of critically ill patients have evidence of myocardial injury without significant coronary artery disease. It is associated with poor prognosis. Further prospective studies are required to ascertain the best mode of treatment in these patients. Keywords: Troponin; Biomarkers; Intensive Care; Myocardial Infarction.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-61
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saghir ◽  
Muhammad Hussain ◽  
Kousar Perveen ◽  
Muhammad Afzal ◽  
Maliha Shoukat Shoukat

Purpose: The purpose of the study to examine nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards physical assessment of critically ill patients in Tertiary Care Hospital, Lahore Pakistan. Methodology: The cross-sectional study was performed. A well-designed questionnaire was used to observe responses. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 was used to analyze the data. For the analysis, descriptive statistics of demographic data were used, meaning standard deviation and frequency. The Pearson correlation test was used to measure the correlation between knowledge, attitude, and practice towards physical assessment of critically ill patients. The study results display in tables and charts. Pearson correlation at p <0.05 consider as significant. Findings: The study was carried out to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice among intensive care unit nurses towards physical assessment of critically sick patients in Tertiary Care Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. In this study, around 57.2% of nurses had good knowledge, 59.4% positive attitude, and 68.1% good practice towards critical ill patient’s physical assessment Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: This study provide the opportunity to the nurses better to enhance their level of knowledge and skill of practice on physical assessment. Nurses, who had better knowledge and skill, should also teach their respective colleagues. Keywords: Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, Intensive Care Unit, Nurses, Physical Assessment.


Author(s):  
Reetu Verma ◽  
Sasmita Panda ◽  
Rajeev Kumar Nishad

Introduction: Patients admitted in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) experiences various discomforts which may be recognised or unrecognised. These discomforts may arise from the environment, may be related to the ICU care and discomfort related to the health status of the patient and critical care interventions. Aim: To identify the various discomforts in ICU patients, to classify them with respective causes, identify the most common cause among them and whether ICU sedation helps in reducing discomforts. Materials and Methods: This observational study was conducted from 15th July to 15th October 2018 on 120 mixed ICU patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India. Patients who were admitted to ICU for more than 24 hours, aged 18 years and above, those who gave written informed consent were observed and enquired for any discomfort. Discomforts have been identified and recorded by a fulltime intensivist by direct observation, by interacting with the patients and asking the family members and others (indirect approach). Through this study discomforts of critically ill patients were broadly classified into four categories 1. Due to existing illness, 2. Due to ICU interventions, 3. Due to improper nursing care and 4. Due to environmental factors. Results: Out of 120 patients studied, 84 patients (70%) reported some kind of discomfort during their ICU stay. Existing illness was the most common cause of discomfort, 80 patients (66.6%) suffered due to it. ICU interventions was the second most common cause, 71 patients (59.1%) had discomfort due to interventions. Thirty five patients (29.1%) suffered due to improper nursing care and 25 patients (20.8%) suffered due to the environmental factors. In this study, it was observed that sedation reduces all kind of discomforts. conclusion: In this study 70% of patients, who were admitted to ICU due to various illness reported some kind of discomfort. The most common cause of ICU discomforts was existing illness followed by ICU interventions. In this study it was observed that sedation reduces all kind of discomforts. Sedated patients tolerate the endotracheal tube better and they had less environmental and procedure related discomforts. With the present study observation it can be suggested that ICU charts of nurses and doctors can carry a separate column for mentioning discomforts in different duty shifts. However, with the use of appropriate analgesia and sedation discomfort can be reduced.


2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. e1-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Liu ◽  
Merita Shehu ◽  
Edmund Herrold ◽  
Henry Cohen

BackgroundCardiac troponin I levels are often obtained to help rule out acute coronary syndrome.ObjectiveTo determine if elevation of troponin level within 24 hours for patients without acute coronary syndrome admitted to the intensive care unit provides important prognostic information. METHODS Patients without acute coronary syndrome admitted to the intensive care unit were prospectively divided into 2 groups according to highest serum level of cardiac troponin I within 24 hours of admission (elevated &gt; 0.049 ng/mL; control ≤ 0.049 ng/mL). Hospital mortality, incidence of intubation, and other parameters were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsPatients with elevated troponin level (n = 40) had higher mortality than did control patients (n = 50) (35% vs 12%; P = .01). Compared with control patients, patients with elevated levels were more likely to be intubated (41% vs 17%; P = .02).ConclusionCritically ill patients without acute coronary syndrome with elevated levels of cardiac troponin I at admission had higher mortality and more intubations than did control patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-111
Author(s):  
Rameshwar A Warkad ◽  

Background: Impairment of renal function is a serious complication in critically ill patients. Mortality of acute renal failure remains high ranging from 35% to 86% despite haemodialysis therapy and substantial improvement of dialysis techniques. Therefore attention must be paid to the conditions favouring deterioration of renal function in order to prevent acute renal failure or to intervene in an early phase when less invasive therapies might be even more promising. Methods: This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai from 1st January 2006 to 31st December 2006. All patients consecutively admitted in intensive care unit were studied. Results: Total number of patients admitted during the said period to the Intensive care Unit was 406, of which 50 had evidence of acute renal failure. The incidence of acute renal failure in the critically ill patients included in our study was 12.31%. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of fluid overload, oliguria and hyperkalemia between the pre-renal and renal failure groups. Conclusion: The incidence of acute renal failure in the critically ill patients was 12.31% and commonest predisposing factors associated with acute renal failure were acute insults like hypotension, sepsis and risk factors like age >50 years and pre-existing renal disease.


2020 ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
ASM Areef Ahsan ◽  
Rozina Sultana ◽  
Kaniz Fatema ◽  
Fatema Ahmed ◽  
Debasish Kumar Saha ◽  
...  

Background: First outbreak of corona virus disease (COVID-19) started in Wuhan, China at December 2019 and since then, it spread globally but information about critically ill patients with COVID-19 is still limited. So, it is important to know the demographic profile and overall outcome of COVID-19 patients. We aimed to describe the clinic-demographic characteristics and outcome of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted in our intensive care unit. Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out in the intensive care unit of department of Critical Care Medicine of BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from 11th June to 31st October, 2020. Out of 382 suspected cases, 86 patients were found to be RT-PCR for COVID-19 positive and were included in this study. After admission in ICU, all patients were resuscitated according to ICU protocol. Length of ICU stay were recorded and patient outcomes were mentioned as survival (transferred or discharged) or death. Results: A total of 86 patients (male 53, female 33, mean age 63.6 ± 12.8 years) with RT-PCR for COVID-19 positive were enrolled in this study. Regarding COVID related symptoms, Ninety six percent(83) had respiratory distress, 93.02 % (n=80) had cough, 84.9% (n=73) had history of fever,11.6 % (n=10) had loose motion and 7% (n=6), had anosmia. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the most common co morbidity (91.9%).For improvement of oxygenation of COVID patient, we treated 7% of patients (n=6) by nasal Cannula, 24.4% (n=21) by Face Mask, 20.9% (n=18) by Non Rebreather Mask, 22.1% (n= 19) by High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and 25.6% (n= 22) by Mechanical Ventilation. Mean length of ICU stay were 6.9 ± 3.6 days and range of icu stay were 1-20 days. Among 86 COVID patient, 51.16% (n=44) were transferred to the isolation ward or discharged at home and 48.8% (n=42) were died. Conclusion: This study showed the overall demographic and clinical features of critically ill COVID-19 patients, admitted in an icu of a tertiary care hospital. As it is a single centered study, we need more study with multi center approach to know the detail demographic profile and outcome of COVID-19 patients. Birdem Med J 2020; 10, COVID Supplement: 51-55


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Afshan Bibi ◽  
Nida Basharat ◽  
Muhammad Aamir ◽  
Zujaja Hina Haroon

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT), C- reactive protein (CRP), total leukocyte count (TLC) and lactate in critically ill patients admitted with suspicion of sepsis. Methods: It was a cross sectional study conducted at the department of Chemical Pathology and Endocrinology AFIP, Rawalpindi, in collaboration with Medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU) of CMH Rawalpindi from January 2019 to December 2019. A total of 126 patients of both genders with age above 18 years and fulfilling the inclusion criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) were inducted in the study. Results: Out of 126 patients 82 (65%) patients have positive blood culture results. Male predominance was noted in patients with positive blood culture. Out of 82 patients with positive blood culture results 69(84%) patients have positive PCT results as well whereas 13(15%) patients with positive blood culture results have negative PCT values. 57(69%) patients had Gram negative bacterial infection and 25(30%) patients had Gram positive bacterial infection. Significant difference was noted between the medians of PCT in blood culture positive and blood culture negative group (p value< 0.05) whereas no significant difference was found between medians of CRP, TLC and lactate between blood culture positive and blood culture negative patients (p value > 0.05). ROC curve analysis of PCT, CRP and TLC were done, keeping blood culture as reference standard, PCT showed largest area under the curve (AUC) and clearly outperformed TLC and CRP. PCT showed AUC of 0.781 as compared to CRP and TLC, which was 0.568 and 0.617 respectively. PCT showed sensitivity of 93.9%, specificity of 47.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 77% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 80.8%. Conclusion: Higher NPV makes it a reliable marker for screening out sepsis in suspected cases. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4183 How to cite this:Bibi A, Basharat N, Aamir M, Haroon ZH. Procalcitonin as a biomarker of bacterial infection in critically ill patients admitted with suspected Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(7):---------.  doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.7.4183 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanasios Chalkias ◽  
Ioannis Pantazopoulos ◽  
Nikolaos Papagiannakis ◽  
Anargyros Skoulakis ◽  
Eleni Laou ◽  
...  

AbstractRationaleThe progress of COVID-19 from moderate to severe may be precipitous, while the heterogenous characteristics of the disease pose challenges to the management of these patients.ObjectivesTo characterize the clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 during two successive waves.MethodsWe leveraged the multi-center SuPAR in Adult Patients With COVID-19 (SPARCOL) study and collected data from consecutive patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit from April 1st to December 31st, 2020.Measurements and Main ResultsOf 252 patients, 81 (32%) required intubation and mechanical ventilation. Of them, 17 (20.9%) were intubated during the first wave, while 64 (79%) during the second wave. The most prominent difference between the two waves was the overall survival (first wave 58.9% vs. second wave 15.6%, adjusted p-value=0.006). This difference is reflected in the prolonged hospitalization during the first wave. The mean ICU length of stay (19.1 vs. 11.7 days, p=0.022), hospital length of stay (28.5 vs. 17.1 days, p=0.012), and days on ventilator (16.7 vs. 11.5, p=0.13) were higher during the first wave. A significant difference between the two waves was the development of bradycardia. In the first wave, 2 (11.7%) patients developed sinus bradycardia only after admission to the intensive care unit, while in the second wave, 63 (98.4%) patients developed sinus bradycardia during hospitalization.ConclusionsSurvival of critically ill patients with COVID-19 was significantly lower during the second wave. The majority of these patients developed sinus bradycardia during hospitalization.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 554-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghu R. Seethala ◽  
Kevin Blackney ◽  
Peter Hou ◽  
Haytham M. A. Kaafarani ◽  
Daniel Dante Yeh ◽  
...  

Background: Based on the current literature, it is unclear whether advanced age itself leads to higher mortality in critically ill patients or whether it is due to the greater number of comorbidities in the elderly patients. We hypothesized that increasing age would increase the odds of short-term and long-term mortality after adjusting for baseline comorbidities in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 57 160 adults admitted to any ICU over 5 years at 2 academic tertiary care centers. Patients were divided into age-groups, 18 to 39, 40 to 59, 60 to 79, and ≥80. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 365-day mortality. Results were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression adjusting for demographics and the Elixhauser-van Walraven Comorbidity Index. Results: The adjusted 30-day mortality odds ratios (ORs) were 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-1.60), 2.00 (95% CI: 1.75-2.28), and 3.33 (95% CI: 2.90-3.82) for age-groups 40 to 59, 60 to 79, and ≥80, respectively, using the age-group 18 to 39 as the reference. The adjusted 365-day mortality ORs were 1.46 (95% CI: 1.32-1.61), 2.10 (95% CI: 1.91-2.31), and 2.96 (95% CI: 2.67-3.27). Conclusion: In critically ill patients, increasing age is associated with higher odds of short-term and long-term death after correcting for existing comorbidities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document