ABSTRACTMethod-dependent Etest epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) are not available for susceptibility testing of eitherCandidaorAspergillusspecies with amphotericin B or echinocandins. In addition, reference caspofungin MICs forCandidaspp. are unreliable.CandidaandAspergillusspecies wild-type (WT) Etest MIC distributions (microorganisms in a species-drug combination with no detectable phenotypic resistance) were established for 4,341Candida albicans, 113C. dubliniensis, 1,683C. glabrataspecies complex (SC), 709C. krusei, 767C. parapsilosisSC, 796C. tropicalis, 1,637Aspergillus fumigatusSC, 238A. flavusSC, 321A. nigerSC, and 247A. terreusSC isolates. Etest MICs from 15 laboratories (in Argentina, Europe, Mexico, South Africa, and the United States) were pooled to establish Etest ECVs. Anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, and amphotericin B ECVs (in micrograms per milliliter) encompassing ≥97.5% of the statistically modeled population were 0.016, 0.5, 0.03, and 1 forC. albicans; 0.03, 1, 0.03, and 2 forC. glabrataSC; 0.06, 1, 0.25, and 4 forC. krusei; 8, 4, 2, and 2 forC. parapsilosisSC; and 0.03, 1, 0.12, and 2 forC. tropicalis. The amphotericin B ECV was 0.25 μg/ml forC. dubliniensisand 2, 8, 2, and 16 μg/ml for the complexes ofA. fumigatus,A. flavus,A. niger, andA. terreus, respectively. While anidulafungin Etest ECVs classified 92% of theCandida fksmutants evaluated as non-WT, the performance was lower for caspofungin (75%) and micafungin (84%) cutoffs. Finally, although anidulafungin (as an echinocandin surrogate susceptibility marker) and amphotericin B ECVs should identifyCandidaandAspergillusisolates with reduced susceptibility to these agents using the Etest, these ECVs will not categorize a fungal isolate as susceptible or resistant, as breakpoints do.