scholarly journals Accounting Data and the Balanced Scorecard - Goals and Indicators

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Musinszki Zoltán ◽  
Süveges Gábor Béla

In their study, Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, Johnson and Kaplan concluded that management accounting systems since the 1980s have failed to meet the new challenges of a changing environment. Among other things, because managerial accounting has been subordinated to the needs of financial accounting. Financial accounting cannot provide adequate information to management and does not support strategic decision making. The reason for this can be found in the operational logic of financial accounting. Financial accounting is past-oriented, it evaluates (economic) events in money, and thinks in the short term. Would all this mean that financial accounting data cannot be used to support long-term decisions? In our study, we point out the connection between financial accounting data assets and strategic decision support. Our research question focuses on how financial accounting data, including an invoice issued by a company, can be used in Balanced Scorecard perspectives. Based on the content of the Balanced Scorecard, we want to point out where and what kind of relationship can be observed between financial accounting data assets and the BSC. Through a case study, we will present the strategic goals as well as the indicators suitable for measuring the goals. These will be presented for all aspects of the Balanced Scorecard.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 97-104
Author(s):  
Д. В. Адамов ◽  
М. А. Юхненко ◽  
Є. Р. Богдяж

The article deals with the problems that arise during the implementation of the concept of modern management accounting for Ukrainian enterprises by introducing new accounting systems and developing approaches to accounting and information generalization of transaction costs in order to effectively manage them in the globalized economy. The existing system of introduction of management accounting at enterprises is examined and the introduction of management accounting on foreign examples is considered, namely the balanced system of indicators, which is already actively used abroad and is just beginning its development in Ukraine. The research of this topic is related to the change of accounting information systems in modern conditions and the need to create a global accounting system, and adjustments are made to management accounting functions. The article compares and defines the distinctive features of accounting, and its composition of financial, tax and management accounting. A clear algorithm for the construction of this system at the enterprise and indicators that must be calculated for a complete and independent analysis of the work of the enterprise are distinguished and described. The ambiguous interpretation of the concept of managerial accounting in the course of its evolutionary development has led to the study of this topic. The article presents a system of metrics that are calculated within the Balanced Scorecard system used by the enterprise. The problems of implementing a balanced scorecard based on the experience of corporations already using the system are also discussed. The lack of legal and legislative framework to stimulate and encourage the introduction of this concept into the practice of management accounting in Ukraine leads to the unsatisfactory functioning of this system. According to the results of the research, the recommendations on the introduction of management accounting in the system of economic monitoring of activity in the conditions of globalization are given.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-224
Author(s):  
Helena Costa Oliveira ◽  
Lúcia Lima-Rodrigues ◽  
Russell Craig

Despite being widely pilloried, bureaucratic processes are present in many organizations as a form of neo-bureaucracy. In this paper, we analyse whether a technique used in Management Accounting Systems (MAS), known as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), represents a bureaucratic order. We propose the following set of concepts to identify a bureaucratic order: authority, jurisdiction, professional qualifications, knowledge, rationality, discipline, accountability, systematization and transparency. We discuss the presence of such a set of concepts in the design and implementation of the BSC and conclude that the BSC is an example of a neo-bureaucratic order. This paper also underlines another important finding, the value of bureaucracy in attaining good MAS. The theme we explore is overlooked in the accounting literature. This paper can be a starting point for further research. A pesar de haber sido ampliamente criticado, los procesos burocráticos están presente en muchos modelos organizacionales como una forma de neo-burocracia. En este artículo analizamos si una técnica utilizada en los Sistemas de contabilidad de gestión (MAS), conocida como Balanced Scorecard (BSC), representa una orden burocrática. Proponemos el siguiente conjunto de conceptos para identificar una orden burocrática: autoridad, jurisdicción, calificaciones profesionales, conocimiento, racionalidad, disciplina, responsabilidad, sistematización y transparencia. Discutimos la presencia de dicho conjunto de conceptos en la concepción e implementación del BSC y concluimos que el BSC es un ejemplo de un orden neo-burocrático. Este trabajo también subraya otro hallazgo importante, el valor de la burocracia para lograr un buen MAS. El tema que exploramos se pasa por alto en la literatura contable. Este artículo puede ser un punto de partida para futuras investigaciones.


2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan J. Richardson

This paper examines the relationship between financial and managerial accounting as reflected in articles, editorials and letters to the editor published in Cost and Management, the Canadian trade magazine for management accountants, between 1926 and 1986. It has been claimed that during this period management accounting techniques lost their relevance to manufacturers, in part, due to the dominance of financial accounting over managerial accounting. This is also the period in which management accounting struggled to become recognized as a profession distinct from financial accounting. The analysis thus focuses on the jurisdictional dispute between financial and managerial accounting and the mechanisms by which managerial accounting was subordinated to financial accounting. The paper identifies the technical, organizational and professional mechanisms used to subordinate managerial accounting. The paper also demonstrates that management accountants were aware of the consequences of their relationship to financial accounting for the relevance of their techniques. Contemporary events suggest that the intersection of financial and managerial accounting remains disputed territory.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar Mohammad Alsharari ◽  
Riyad Eid ◽  
Ali Assiri

Purpose This paper aims to explain institutional contradictions in the balanced scorecard (BSC) implementation process between organizations, which successfully implemented BSC. The purpose of this paper is to identify a comprehensive set of potential determinants influencing the successful implementation of BSC. Design/methodology/approach This study is an exploratory investigation into the BSC implementation based on a dialectical perspective. It uses the triangulation of data collection including interviews, documents and surveys. This also includes a comprehensive scrutiny of the relevant literature; a comprehensive analysis of case studies of BSC implementations in four organizations; and interviews and documents evidences that have already implemented or are in the process of implementing BSC. Findings The BSC was successfully implemented in the organizations, when the accounting systems introduced in these organization had already been institutionalized, that is, accepted and used on day-to-day basis. The dialectical perspective postulates that for change to become institutionalized in the organization, it needs to overcome the problem of embedded agency. This process of change is possible due to the accumulation of institutional contradiction that enables human praxis to introduce change (Seo and Creed, 2002). Research limitations/implications There is a need to empirically test and refine the proposed factors and explore relationships among the various variables by collecting data from organizations that have already implemented BSC. Practical implications The findings of this study are important and relevant to all the different-sized organizations in the different sectors and industries. This study also makes a significant contribution to society in general. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature on organizational and accounting change that emphasis the crucial role that institutional contradiction plays in the process of BSC implementation. The findings of this study will help management in making crucial decisions and in resource allocations that are required to make the BSC implementation a success.


suits of operations. The ordres were linked together either by double-entry or by the use of contra-accounts. The plan's double­ entry systems were as follows [CNOF, 1946]: Financial accounting Ordre 1 — Operating accounts (revenues and expenses) (accounting elements seen as causes) Ordre 2 — Balance sheet accounts (assets and liabilities) (effect of transactions on the company's position) Managerial accounting Ordre 3 — Cost accounts and sales accounts (transactions classified as to purpose) Ordre 4 — Imputation or contra-accounts Budgetary accounting Ordre 5 — Budgeted operations Ordre 6 — Budgeted liquidities Ordre 7 and 8 were left open, in case other accounting systems were developed in the future. Ordre 9 was devoted to commit­ ments and transitory accounts, such as purchases and sales in cash, and internal transfers. In financial statements, transitory ac­ counts were to be replaced by the ordre to which they were related (1 or 2), and commitments were to be listed at the end of the balance sheet. Each ordre was further divided into categories, each having its own specific meaning. For example, the categories found in ordre 1 were charges and revenues that are included in the gross profit margin, operating charges and revenues, investment-related charges and revenues, administrative charges, miscellaneous rev­ enues and financial charges. These categories were further grouped to provide the following summary accounts: the gross profit margin, results of operations, net revenue from investments, net administrative charges and financial charges. The classifica­ tion adopted in that ordre was based first on the economic func­ tion of the transactions and second on their nature. Another ex­ ample of the breakdown of an ordre into categories is provided by ordre 2. In the latter, assets were divided, according to their eco­ nomic function in the company and their degree of liquidity, into fixed assets, investments, short-term assets (inventories and short­ term investments), receivables and liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents). Ordre 3 and 4 were devoted to cost accounting, constituting a 287

2014 ◽  
pp. 343-343

Author(s):  
Barulina E.V ◽  
Barulina M.S

This article deals with management accounting, its role and objectives during financial planning process. Research of on American, German and Russian scientists are also considered. Author formulates his own definitions of aims of management accounting, highlighters that object of financial accounting have to include economic costs, economic revenue and economic added value, economic interest. More  over Author defines methods of managment accounting.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 141-156
Author(s):  
Kinga Bauer

A business plan focuses on a formal statement of the set business goals, the reasons why theyare believed attainable, and the plan for reaching those goals. It may also contain informationabout the organization. A business plan is usually created for the benefit of the external ownersof capital. The most important information for investors is that about costs, profits and risk.Accounting provides information about a separate economic unit. Accounting informationis verifiable, objective and quantitative. It is the basis for economic decision making. The accountinginformation system basically serves two categories of users – those that are external tothe business organization and those that are internal. Both financial and managerial accountingare possible. Organizations require both. Financial accounting is primarily for those externalto the organization; managerial accounting is for the internal use of managers, but it can alsobe used by external users. Accounting data can be used in a business plan.The demand for accounting data has grown rapidly because it increases knowledge andreduces risk. Financial institutions that supply the business with capital for investment orexpansion are very interested in such factors as the reputation and ability of the company’smanagement, its ability to meet its financial obligations, and its prospects for future success.A company’s financial statements, financial analyses and managerial accounting are an importantsource of this information. To reduce their risks lenders can demand accounting data in abusiness plan.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio de Araujo Wanderley ◽  
John Cullen ◽  
Mathew Tsamenyi

PurposeThe Balanced Scorecard (BSC) possesses an inherent duality, as it has been described as a carrier of institutions (i.e. the BSC is a “management ideology” or “mode of thinking”) and a flexibly interpretive boundary object at the same time. This study examines how this inherent duality of the BSC may influence the unfolding rationales surrounding its implementation and use.Design/methodology/approachEmpirical support for this investigation is gathered from an in-depth field study. The focal firm is a Brazilian electricity distribution company that transitioned from state to private ownership under hyper-regulation, and whose holding company experienced strategic and structural changes.FindingsThe study identified a misalignment between the characteristics of the firm (e.g. organizational logics) and the perceived BSC features. This misalignment initially produced tensions and institutional logics complexity for the organization forcing the BSC implementers to rationalize it to provide meaning regarding its implementation in the firm. The findings also show why and how the promoters of the BSC conducted its “strategy of translation” in order to disentangle and reassemble both the material and symbolic components of the BSC to facilitate its implementation and use. It was found that promoters of the BSC engaged in contextualization work, which featured two main actions: a combination of coupling and selective decoupling and a change of meaning.Originality/valueThis paper advances current understanding of the process of the unfolding rationales surrounding management accounting innovations (e.g. the BSC). The study shows that the BSC unfolds in more complex, time-related and simultaneous ways than has previously been reported in the literature. Moreover, the paper contributes by explaining how the management's rationales, relating to their historical understanding, perception of legitimation needs and social skills, contributed to the continuous unfolding of the BSC. In addition, four potentially interesting areas for further research were identified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document