Efficacy of Coenzyme Q10 in the Treatment of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome in Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brezin F ◽  
◽  
Wiedemann A ◽  
Bansept C ◽  
Albuisson E ◽  
...  

Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome (CVS) is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder related to migraine, characterized by episodic nausea and vomiting. The treatment of CVS remains based on tricyclic antidepressants, triptans and antiepileptics. As mitochondriopathy has been involved in the pathophysiology of CVS, Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a mitochondrial cofactor, has been used as the third line treatment in CVS. Considering the excellent safety profile of CoQ10, we decided to use it as the first line treatment in CVS. We retrospectively studied the evolution of 23 CVS patients who were treated for one year by CoQ10 alone. We recorded the characteristics of patients and their CVS history and compared data obtained the year before and the year following the prescription of CoQ10 treatment. We found a significant decrease in the number of vomiting episodes between the year before and the year after the start of CoQ10 (median [IQR]: 18.0 [15.75] vs. 3.00 [5.0]; p <0.001). This decrease persisted with time (2 and 3 years of treatment). The treatment was very efficient in 17/23 patients and did not decrease the number of vomiting episodes in 3 patients. Only one mild side effect related to the drug has been reported. Conclusions: CoQ10 is an efficient and safe treatment of CVS and should be used as the first line treatment in this episodic syndrome related to migraine.

1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl a) ◽  
pp. 10A-12A
Author(s):  
André Cartier

Corticosteroids are the most potent inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs for asthma treatment. This paper reviews the clinical evidence supporting the early use of inhaled steroids in asthma as a first line treatment. Inhaled steroids can probably alter the course of asthma, especially in mild asthmatics. Once they have been shown to improve control of asthma and even if the need for beta2-agonists is virtually nil, their use should be continued at low doses (ie, equivalent to 400 to 500 μg of budesonide or beclomethasone) for at least one year before attempting to reduce the dosage.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14558-14558 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lièvre ◽  
E. Samalin ◽  
P. Senesse ◽  
C. Boyer-Gestin ◽  
E. Mitry ◽  
...  

14558 Introduction: Bevacizumab (Bev) is efficient in MCRC patients (pts) as first-line treatment (L1) with 5FU±irinotecan, and with FOLFOX as second-line (L2). It has no efficacy in 3rd or later-line, alone or with 5FU. In Europe, Bev was approved by the EMEA (European Medicines Evaluation Agency) in 2005 and many patients could not received it in L1 before this date. This study evaluated the efficacy of Bev combined to polychemotherapy (CT) in L2, L3 or later-line in CT refractory pts. Methods: Between May 2005 and October 2006, 38 pts (median age: 54.5 years, range:25–82) received Bev combined with CT as L2 (n=18), L3 (n=6), L4 (n=7), L5 or later-line (n=7). Tumor response (OR) was assessed according to RECIST criteria by CT-scan. Results: Tumor sites: 28 colon and 10 rectum. Number of metastatic sites were 1, 2 and more in 16, 13 and 9 cases, mostly hepatic (89%) or pulmonary (42%). Bev (5mg/kg/2weeks) was combined with FOLFIRI (n=24) or FOLFOX (n=14); 299 cycles were administered, mean: 7.9 cycles/pt (range:2–14). OR rate was 42,1%, stabilization 42,1% and was not different according to the line or the CT regimen (table). Initial progressions were rare. Tolerance was acceptable (no perforation and no severe Hypertension). Conclusion: This study reports a significant activity of Bev at the dose of 5mg/kg combined with FOLFOX and/or FOLFIRI in CT refractory pts. These results warrant prospective studies of Bev combined with active CT in CT refractory pts who could not received Bev in the setting of the EMEA authorization. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7073-7073
Author(s):  
A. Ghavamzadeh ◽  
K. Alimoghaddam ◽  
S. Ghaffari ◽  
S. Rostami ◽  
M. Jahani ◽  
...  

7073 Background: Standard treatment of APL is ATRA plus chemotherapy but Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) is most potent single agent against APL cells. Role of ATO in first line therapy of APL needs to clarify. Methods: Between may 2000 and September 2006,we treated 141 new cases of APL(Median age 28±12.8 y/o min=11,max=71) by 2 hours iv infusion of 0.15mg/kg ATO until complete remission. Trial approved by IRB and consent form obtained. Diagnosis was by clinical and morphologic characteristics and confirmed by cytogenetic and RT-PCR for detection of t(15,17) and presence of PML-RARa. After complete remission patients received consolidation by 28 days infusion of ATO for one or four courses.(one consolidation one month after CR and for some patients second, third and forth consolidations one month after first one and two another , one year and two year after CR) Results: : complete remission observed in 121 cases(85.8%) and early mortality rate was14.9%(most common cause of early mortality was APL syndrome,61.9%).Median follow up was 28 months. For patients who achieve to complete remission,one, two and three year disease free survival were 95.6%± 2%, 76.9±4% and 57± 6%,respectively. Many relapsed patients salvaged again with ATO alone so, two and three years overall survival for this cohort was 95.6%±2% and 83.7%±4%. Increasing number of consolidation from one to four couldn’t increase DFS or OS in one and two years after CR. Conclusions: ATO is effective in treatment of new cases of APL. Introduction of ATO in first line treatment of APL(with or without ATRA plus chemotherapy) needs a multi center randomized clinical trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4043-4043
Author(s):  
Hiroo Katsuya ◽  
Koichi Suyama ◽  
Kazuma Kobayashi ◽  
Naoki Izawa ◽  
Yoshikazu Uenosono ◽  
...  

4043 Background: Elderly patients are often intolerable in the combination with cytotoxic agents. Therapy with S-1 alone is a key option for initial chemotherapy for Japanese elderly patients with unresectable gastric cancer in clinical practice. However, there are some cases in which the antitumor effects with S-1 alone are insufficient. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus ramucirumab therapy to elderly patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. Methods: Patients aged 70 years and older with previously untreated unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer patients were included in Japan. They received S-1 therapy (40-60 mg twice daily for 28 days, every 6 weeks) plus ramucirumab therapy (8 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the one-year survival rate and null hypothesis of one-year survival was set as 40%, which is the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval in previously reported studies on S-1 therapy. The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and safety. Results: Between September 2017 and November 2019, 48 patients were enrolled in this study. The characteristics of patients were male/female: 34/14, median age: 77.5 years (range: 71-87), and PS (0/1): 20/28. The one-year survival rate was 65.2% (95% confidence interval 49.8-78.6%), which means this trial met the primary endpoint. The median OS and PFS were 16.4 months (95%CI:12.0–20.7) and 5.8 months (95%CI:4.0–7.2), respectively. The best RR (CR+PR) was 60.9%. The frequent grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (27.7%), anorexia (23.4%), anemia (19.1%), hypertension (14.9%), leucopenia (12.8%) and hypoalbuminemia (12.8%). Conclusions: Based on the observed efficacy and safety, S-1 plus ramucirumab is an appropriate first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000028309.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carayanni V ◽  
Gogas H ◽  
Bafaloukos D ◽  
Boukovinas I ◽  
Latsou D ◽  
...  

Objective: Melanoma is one of the most aggressive cancers and is responsible for the majority of skin cancer deaths, with the presence of metastases prognostic for poor survival. At a time when most cancer incidences are falling, the annual incidence of melanoma has risen as rapidly as 4-6% in many European countries, with a substantial economic burden in advanced stages. The objective of this study is the investigation of treatment pathways and healthcare resource use related to advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma in Greece. Methods: This study is based on the information collected by an expert panel comprising of 3 oncologists of major public and private melanoma clinics around Greece. A 3-round survey was undertaken, according to a modified Delphi method. The treatment phases studied were: pre-progression; disease progression and terminal care. Oncology drug costs, medical visits, laboratory tests, imaging examinations, hospitalization and concomitant medications were the resources considered in the context of the Greek National Services Organization (EOPYY). Results: Τhe most common management scenario (80% of cases) in Greece for patients of stage IV BRAF V600 mutated melanoma was: targeted therapies as first line treatment at 95%, followed by immunotherapies at 100% as second line as well as third line treatment at 65% of cases. The weighted annual cost of treatment was 89.215,78 €, (90%CI:62,451.05; 115,980.51) for first line treatment at list price and around 41.584,50 (90%CI:29,109.15; 54,059.85) based on the negotiated price. At second line, the cost of treatment has been estimated between 15,704.272 (90%CI:10,992.990; 20,415.553) and 19,800.92€, (90%CI: 16,489; 30,622) for the two most common management scenarios for immunotherapies. For third line treatment the cost was 37,778.93 (90%CI 26,445.25; 49,112.61€) for the mostly used management scenario (50% ipilimumab). Conclusions: Μetastatic BRAF mutant melanoma requires prolonged and costly treatment with new therapies shown to substantially increase life expectancy. Identifying the appropriate treatment options in order to optimize health outcomes should be an important priority in healthcare system.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4251-4251
Author(s):  
Romany Johnpulle ◽  
Simran Sindhu ◽  
Lynn Nichols ◽  
Lynda Dimitroff ◽  
Mehul Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4251 Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable clonal plasma cell malignancy. At least 50% of all MM patients are older than 70 years of age and 20% are older than 80 years of age (Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10–29). The approach to treatment of patients with MM depends on a multitude of factors including age, underlying comorbidities, and disease characteristics. Elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials. The purpose of our study was to assess the overall outcomes and impact of novel agents in the treatment of newly diagnosed elderly (≥75 years of age) patients with MM in a community setting. We conducted a retrospective review of the records of MM patients seen at Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, who were 75 years of age or older at the time of diagnosis of MM. The study period was from January 2001 to August 2012. Sixty-six patients met the study criteria. Patients with smoldering MM were excluded. Demographic information, comorbid conditions, disease characteristics, laboratory data, first line treatment given, response to treatment, and disease- and treatment-related complications were collected from medical records. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 14. Univariate analysis was performed and the mean, median, and standard deviation were calculated. A statistically significant difference between variables was denoted by a p value < 0.05. Response to treatment was calculated using Bladé Criteria. Overall survival was estimated by using Kaplan-Meier curves. Grade III and IV toxicity was determined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) version 4.0. Sixty-six patients (median age 81 years, range 75–95 years) with symptomatic MM were studied. Sixty-two percent were males. Twenty-seven percent had underlying diabetes mellitus, 29% had experienced a prior stroke or MI, and 68% had hypertension. Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) was high (3–4) in 46% and very high (≥5) in 31%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was ≥3 in 27% of patients. Sixty-five percent of patients had IgG subtype, while 28% had IgA subtype. There was a predominance of kappa light chains over lambda (55% versus 42%). Twenty percent, 34%, and 40% of patients had International Staging System (ISS) stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively, while in 6% ISS could not be determined. The median hemoglobin level was 10.5 g/dL (range 6.1–14.8 g/dL), the median serum creatinine level was 1.3 mg/dL (range 0.1–8.0 mg/dL), the median serum albumin level was 3.2 g/dL (range 1.4–4.8 g/dL), and the median serum calcium level was 8.7 mg/dL (range 8.0–17.3 g/dL). As first line treatment 75% received standard therapy, while 25% received novel agents. The most commonly used standard therapies were cyclophosphamide + steroid (36%), melphalan + steroid (25%), and steroid alone (8%). First line therapy included bortezomib in 12%, thalidomide in 10%, and lenalidomide in 3% of patients. Median duration of first line treatment was 26 weeks (range 3–103 weeks). The median overall survival was 72 weeks (range 10–406 weeks). In those who received a novel agent as first line therapy the median overall survival was 127 weeks (range 38–318 weeks). Overall response rate (≥ partial response) was 55% in patients treated with a novel agent versus 23.6% in patients treated with standard therapy. There was no significant correlation between grade III/IV toxicity and the use of a novel agent (p=0.68). When including all non-transplant patients (> 65 years of age), there was a positive correlation between the use of a novel agent and overall survival at one year (Correlation coefficient, CC 0.281, p=0.01). The CC for elderly patients (≥ 75 years of age) was 0.175. The CC in 65–74 year-olds was 0.387. Percentage survival at one year was 59.6 % in patients ≥75 years of age versus 70.6% in those aged 65–74 years. In conclusion, our study shows that very elderly patients (≥75 years of age) with MM, who are considerably ill at baseline with a high or very high CCI and poor PS continue to experience shortened survival despite the use of new agents. However, notwithstanding this, the early use of novel agents has a positive impact on survival at one year, with improved response rates to new therapies, and without an increase in toxicity. Disclosures: Patel: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Speakers Bureau; Eli Lilly and Company: Speakers Bureau.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 800-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatsune Shibutani ◽  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
Hisashi Nagahara ◽  
Tatsunari Fukuoka ◽  
Yasuhito Iseki ◽  
...  

With advances in new cytotoxic drugs and molecular-targeted drugs, the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved. However, physicians often hesitate to administer intensive standard regimens to elderly patients with mCRC. Recently, first-line regimens that are effective in and well-tolerated by patients who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy have been established. However, the therapeutic strategies to adopt after the failure of first-line treatment for patients who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy remain unclear. We herein report two cases of long-term control of mCRC via FTD/TPI+bevacizumab (Bmab) as second- or third-line treatment in elderly patients without severe adverse events. In case 1, first-line treatment with Tegafur-Uracil, which is a prodrug of 5-FU, caused disease progression in a short period after the initiation of chemotherapy. In case 2, intensive first-line treatment caused severe adverse events, and treatment was discontinued. However, in both cases, disease control was obtained for a long time without severe adverse events by subsequent treatment with FTD/TPI+Bmab. The success in these present cases indicates that FTD/TPI+Bmab as a second- or third-line treatment is a therapeutic option for elderly patients with mCRC who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy, even after failure of treatment with 5-FU.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518
Author(s):  
Paresh Sewpaul ◽  
Donna Ashley ◽  
Paul Riley

Abstract Abstract 1518 Introduction: Haemophilia A is a rare inherited bleeding disorder characterised by spontaneous or trauma-related bleeding, most commonly into the joints, leading to pain, swelling and limited movement. Some 30–50% of patients with haemophilia A develop inhibitors to their standard treatment, comprised of FVIII concentrates. There are two bypassing agents used for the management of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors in the UK: recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa, NovoSeven®) and plasma-derived activated prothrombin complex concentrate (pd-aPCC, Feiba®). Objective: A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of pd-aPCC versus rFVIIa was published in 2003. Since the analysis, costs of bypassing agents in the UK have changed significantly (pd-aPCC +30% from ≤0.57/U to ≤0.74/U; rFVIIa -11% from ≤0.51/mcg to ≤0.46/mcg). The present study examines the evolution in costs of resolving a mild to moderate bleeding episode with treatment initiated outside hospital. Methods: A decision analytic model estimated the expected costs and outcomes of resolving a mild-moderate bleeding episode in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors. The model compared three treatment regimens in patients with a mean weight 70kg. Each regimen comprised first-, second- and third-line treatment: (1) pd-aPCC-pd-aPCC-rFVIIa; (2) pd-aPCC-rFVIIa-rFVIIa; and (3) rFVIIa-rFVIIa-rFVIIa. Efficacy and dosing of pd-aPCC and rFVIIa were estimated from the published literature, with rFVIIa assumed to resolve 92% of mild-moderate bleeds when used as first and second line treatment and pd-aPCC resolving 79% and 88% of mild-moderate bleeds when used first and second line respectively. Patients whose bleeding episodes were not resolved with first-line treatment were admitted to hospital for second- and third-line treatment. Costs included in the economic model were bypassing agent costs and hospitalisation costs. Results: The different treatment regimens result in different total costs for the resolution of a single mild-moderate bleeding episode with up to three lines of treatment: (1) GBP 13,542 (EUR 15,180); (2) GBP 12,985 (EUR 14,556); and (3) GBP 8,569 (EUR 9,605). Since 2001, the costs of regimens 1 and 2 have increased by 26% and 18%, but regimen 3 has decreased by 11% in the UK. Conclusion: Divergence in the price of pd-aPCC and rFVIIa since 2001 has increased the cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa. The results reinforce the fact that effective first-line treatment with rFVIIa results in lower overall treatment costs due to a reduced need for further treatment and associated hospitalisation costs. Adopting rFVIIa as first-line treatment is cost-saving and more effective compared to reserving rFVIIa as a second- or third-line treatment option. Disclosures: Sewpaul: Novo Nordisk : Employment. Ashley:Novo Nordisk : Employment. Riley:Novo Nordisk Ltd: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16048-e16048
Author(s):  
Koen Degeling ◽  
Hui-Li Wong ◽  
Amanda Pereira-Salgado ◽  
Suzanne Kosmider ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
...  

e16048 Background: Bevacizumab remains the dominant biologic treatment option for RAS mutant (RASmt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). While the health economic impact of bevacizumab in the RASmt subpopulation may deviate from its use in the general mCRC population, this has never been investigated. This study uses the power of real-world data to assess the cost-effectiveness of doublet chemotherapy with compared to without bevacizumab (ChemBev and ChemOnly, respectively) for first-line treatment of RASmt mCRC, while accounting for subsequent treatment in second and third line. Methods: Data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was analyzed to populate a discrete event simulation of three treatment lines, surgery of primary tumor and metastases, hospitalizations following serious adverse events, and best supportive care. Imbalance in baseline patient and disease characteristics was corrected for in all analyses using inverse probability weights. Costs were included from an Australian public payer perspective in Australian dollars (AUD). All health and economic outcomes were discounted at 5% per year. Results: Of the 507 included RASmt mCRC patients that started first-line treatment in the 2010 – 2017 time period, 345 received ChemBev and 162 ChemOnly. The corrected median time on first-line treatment was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval: 6.4 – 8.0) for ChemBev and 4.1 months (3.5 – 5.1) for ChemOnly. Time on second- and third-line treatment was comparable between the groups. Corrected overall survival was 22.6 months (21.7 – 24.0) for ChemBev and 14.3 months (12.1 – 21.7) for ChemOnly. In terms of the health economic impact, mean life years were 1.9 for ChemBev and 1.5 for ChemOnly, and mean costs were AUD 93,025 and AUD 44,929 per patient, respectively. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ChemBev compared to ChemOnly was AUD 149,317 per life-year gained (LYG). Conclusions: In contrast to results from clinical trials, overall survival was substantially longer for patients who received bevacizumab, which can possibly be attributed to an imbalance between groups despite correction for known prognostic factors. At an ICER of AUD 149,317 per LYG, the economic burden of upfront treatment with bevacizumab was found to be substantial and consistent with estimates for the general mCRC population. This is mainly caused by the duration of first-line treatment, which was significantly longer for ChemBev.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Moon Kim ◽  
Dong Hoon Min ◽  
Hye Lim Jung ◽  
Jae Won Shim ◽  
Deok Su Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document