Trends of Implant Placement in Relation to Crestal Bone Level in a Private Dental Institute

Dental implants provide a strong foundation for fixed or removable prosthetic teeth that are made to match natural dentition. It has become an ideal method of oral rehabilitation after missing natural dentition has been recognised as a reliable tool for dental reconstruction and aesthetics. Marginal bone loss is characterized by a reduction in bone loss is characterized by a reduction in bone level both vertically and horizontally. The levels at which dental implants are placed include sub-crystal, equi-crestal, and supra-crestal. The crestal levels affect bone height significantly. Failure to do so will lead to peri-implant bone loss which will affect the implant function and ultimately implant failure. A retrospective study was conducted based on a university setting. 615 patients with 1141 implant sites were reviewed from June 2019 to March 2020. Excel tabulation and SPSS analysis were done for data analysis. There was a statistically significant difference between the variables that included tooth region, crestal relation and site (jaw)—[p-value<0.05] The most common crestal relation of implant placement is equi-crestal implant placement. The assessment of trends of implant placement in relation to crestal bone level shows that equi-crestal implant is the most preferred crestal relation of implant placement in Saveetha Dental College.

Download Full-text

The Difference of Marginal Bone Preservation between Dental Implants with Non-Threaded or Micro-Threaded Collar Designs

Coatings ◽

10.3390/coatings11101232 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (10) ◽

pp. 1232

Author(s):

Mazen Almasri

Keyword(s):

Bone Loss ◽

Dental Implants ◽

P Value ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Bone Preservation ◽

The Mean ◽

The Difference ◽

Implant System ◽

Metal Show

This study analyzes the marginal bone loss (MBL) among dental implants characterized with non-threaded collar design (NT) when compared to the more classic micro-threaded collar design (MC) as such might reflect the future dentogengival esthetics, implant metal show, and mucositis. A total of 112 patients who received 311 implants have been included in the study and analyzed for their postoperative MBL using sequential periapical radiographs. The prevalence of postoperative peri-implant mucositis was recorded as well. The periapical radiographic comparison was performed between the immediate postoperative record and at the 24-month recall visit. Among the 311 implants, 124 (39.9%) had NT implants, and 187 (60.1%) had MC implants. Out of the 112 patients, 37 (44.6%) were females, and 10 (34.5%) were males included in the NT group. In contrast, 46 (55.4%) females and 19 (65.5%) males were in the MC group. The mean age among the two groups was 41.43 ± 15.900 and 46.68 ± 16.070, respectively. In contrast, the mean MBL among the groups were 0.544 ± 0.7129 and 0.061 ± 0.2648, respectively. The change in MBL was not positively correlated with gender (p-value = 0.154) or age (p-value = 0.115) in both groups. However, there was a significant difference (p-value = 0.001, X2 = 62.796, Df = 4) of MBL between the two implant systems themselves. The MBL was higher in people implanted with the NT system when compared to MC. Therefore, the MC implant system can be a better choice for marginal bone preservation, especially in restoring esthetically demanding areas in the mouth.

Download Full-text

The Role of Timing of Loading on Later Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Journal of Oral Implantology ◽

10.1563/aaid-joi-d-09-00078 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 36 (5) ◽

pp. 363-376 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Hakan Bilhan ◽

Emre Mumcu ◽

Selda Arat

Keyword(s):

Bone Loss ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Disuse Atrophy ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Implant Placement ◽

Early Loading ◽

Retrospective Clinical Study ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Mandibular Overdenture

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the relation between marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants after a loading period of 36 months and the timing of loading. A total of 87 patients with 252 implants were included in the study group. The time span from implant placement to beginning of loading of the implants was evaluated. Delay of loading of implants seems to increase MBL around dental implants as the result of disuse atrophy. Implants next to a tooth on 1 or 2 sides suffered less from MBL. No statistically significant difference in MBL rate was noted between single and splinted implants or between smooth collar and microgeometry neck implants. Results of this study encourage early loading, especially for the mandibular overdenture supporting implants.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in the same region where previous implants failed due to peri-implantitis: a retrospective study

International Journal of Implant Dentistry ◽

10.1186/s40729-021-00392-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Eduardo Anitua ◽

Adriana Montalvillo ◽

Asier Eguia ◽

Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Survival Rate ◽

Bone Loss ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Demographic Data ◽

High Survival ◽

Implant Survival ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Bone Level

Abstract Purpose There is paucity in the studies that assess dental implants replacing failed dental implants due to peri-implantitis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these implants in terms of implant survival and marginal bone loss. Methods Patients in this retrospective study were selected if having one or more implants removed due to peri-implantitis and the placement and loading of dental implants in the same region from April 2010 to December 2019. Information was collected about the patient's demographic data, implant dimensions, surgical and prosthetic variables. Changes in peri-implant bone level, cumulative implant survival rate and technical complications were assessed. Results Three hundred and eighty one dental implants in 146 patients that were placed in the same position or one-tooth position mesially/distally to the site of explantation were included. The patients' mean age was 63 ± 10 years. Ninety seven patients were females and 49 were males. After a mean follow-up of 34 ± 17 months, two implants failed. The cumulative survival rate was 99%. The marginal bone loss was −0.1 ± 0.6. Immediate or delay replacement of the failed implant did not affect implant survival or marginal bone stability. All the prostheses were screw-retained and presented the following complications: ceramic chipping (3 events), resin tooth fracture (1 event) and prosthetic screw loosening (1 event). Conclusions Dental implants replacing failed implants due to peri-implantitis would be an option in the management of peri-implantitis. They showed high survival rate and marginal bone stability.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Restored with Zirconium vis-à-vis Porcelain Fused to Metal: An In Vivo Study

Dental Journal of Advance Studies ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1709094 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 08 (01) ◽

pp. 17-21

Author(s):

Udey Singh Wirring ◽

Tarun Kalra ◽

Manjit Kumar ◽

Ajay Bansal ◽

Aquib Javaid

Keyword(s):

Bone Loss ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Test Group ◽

Radiographic Evaluation ◽

Control Group ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Zirconia Crowns ◽

Bone Level ◽

The Difference

Abstract Introduction Marginal bone level is the criterion for implant success. Patient expectations for more natural looking implant restorations created the need to restore implants with more esthetically pleasing materials like Zirconia rather than conventional porcelain-fused to-metal (PFM) crowns. The aim of this study was to evaluate marginal bone loss around dental implants clinically and radiographically when restored with Zirconia and PFM prosthesis. Materials and Methods Two groups (control and test) were formed with 14 patients each. In the control group, the subjects were rehabilitated with PFM crowns and in the test group, the subjects were rehabilitated with Zirconia crowns. Rehabilitation was done after the healing period of 3 months. Radiographic evaluation was done at regular (baseline, 3rd, 6th, and 12th month) intervals. Results The results were statistically analyzed. Keeping in mind the limitations of the study, it was revealed that the difference in the crestal bone resorption in both the groups was not significant.

Download Full-text

Image-based study of marginal bone loss in teeth restored with cast endodontic posts

RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia ◽

10.1590/1981-863720180004000093522 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 66 (4) ◽

pp. 353-359

Author(s):

Sandro Luiz FARIAS ◽

Milena Bortolloto Felippe SILVA ◽

Rielson José Alves CARDOSO ◽

Marcelo SPERANDIO

Keyword(s):

Bone Loss ◽

Root Length ◽

Cone Beam ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Cone Beam Tomography ◽

Bone Height

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to assess marginal bone loss in teeth restored with endodontic posts on all four aspects of the teeth using cone beam tomography. Bone loss was assessed via scores (0-5) in relation to root length and bone height. The results showed that the scores for the contralateral and restored sides, respectively, ranged from 0 to 3 and 0 to 5 buccally, 0 to 4 and 0 to 4 palatally, 0 to 3 and 0 and 4 mesially and 0 to 3 and 0 to 4 distally. A significant difference in bone loss was observed between the post-restored teeth and their contralaterals for the buccal, lingual/palatal and mesial aspects (p<0.05), with teeth bearing endodontic posts scoring highest. In conclusion, marginal bone loss was higher in teeth restored with intra-canal posts when compared to their sound contralaterals.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of proximal bone loss around 2 commercial brands of SLA-surfaced implants and investigating possible effective factors

Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Research ◽

10.18502/jcr.v6i4.3291 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Abbas Karimi ◽

Nahid Azizimoghadam ◽

Elahe Soltanmohamadi Borujeni

Keyword(s):

Bone Resorption ◽

Bone Loss ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Clinical Success ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Effective Factors ◽

Preprosthetic Surgery ◽

Dental Implantation ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction: The long term clinical success of dental implants depends on the stability of crestal bone level. Different dental implantation systems focus on micro-and macro-design to reduce late bone resorption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone loss at the proximal (mesial and distal) surfaces of SLA implants from 2 different companies. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was done on 48 patients receiving 161 SLA-surfaced (Straumann and Dentium) dental implants. The marginal bone loss was measured at mesial & distal sides of the implants on peri-apical X-ray images. The effective factors considered in this study were patients age, implant brand, time passed from fixture placement, preprosthetic surgery and type of prosthetic treatment that were obtained from patient records & interviews. Results: Average mesial and distal bone loss was 1.50±1.359 and 1.517±1.3465 respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient indicates that 1) time passed from fixture placement, 2) commercial brand, 3) history of pre-prosthetic surgery and 4) age affected the amount of bone loss. Conclusion: SLA-surfaced dental implants showed an acceptable amount of bone resorption and no statistically significant difference was observed between commercial brands.

Download Full-text

Scientific Trends in Clinical Research on Zirconia Dental Implants: A Bibliometric Review

Materials ◽

10.3390/ma13235534 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (23) ◽

pp. 5534

Author(s):

Felice Lorusso ◽

Sammy Noumbissi ◽

Inchingolo Francesco ◽

Biagio Rapone ◽

Ahmad G. A. Khater ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Survival Rate ◽

Bone Loss ◽

Clinical Research ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Clinical Studies ◽

Medical Center ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Oral Rehabilitation ◽

Bibliometric Review ◽

Zirconia Implants

Background: The clinical use of zirconia implants has been shown to increase steadily due to their biological, aesthetic, and physical properties; therefore, this bibliometric study aimed to review the clinical research and co-authors in the field of zirconia dental implant rehabilitation. Methods: We searched Scopus and Web of Science databases using a comprehensive search strategy to 5 October 2020, and independently paired reviewers who screened studies, and collected data with inclusion criteria restricted to clinical research only (either prospective or retrospective). Data on article title, co-authors, number of citations received, journal details, publication year, country and institution involved, funding, study design, marginal bone loss, survival rate, failure, follow-up, and the author’s bibliometric data were collected and evaluated. Results: A total of 29 clinical studies were published between 2008 and 2020 as 41.4% were prospective cohort studies and 48.3% originated from Germany. Most of the included studies had been published in Clinical Oral Implant Research (n = 12), and the most productive institution was the Medical Center of University of Freiburg. The author with the largest number of clinical studies on zirconia implants was Kohal R.J. (n = 10), followed by Spies B.C. (n = 8). Conclusions: This study revealed that zirconia implants have been more prominent in the last ten years, which is a valuable option for oral rehabilitation with marginal bone loss and survival rate comparable to titanium dental implants.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Full and Partial Arches with Internal-Conical-Connection Dental Implants: Clinical Results after 5 Years of Follow-Up

Applied Sciences ◽

10.3390/app10238709 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (23) ◽

pp. 8709

Author(s):

Diego Lops ◽

Riccardo Guazzo ◽

Alessandro Rossi ◽

Antonino Palazzolo ◽

Vittorio Favero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Loss ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Distal Aspect ◽

The Stability ◽

Maxilla And Mandible ◽

Implant Loading

The aim of the present investigation is to evaluate the implant therapy outcomes over a period of 5 years and to analyze several patient risk factors influencing the stability of the peri-implant tissues. Seventy-eight patients were consecutively treated between 2009 and 2017 and restored with implant-supported fixed prostheses. The following inclusion criteria were considered: partial or complete edentulism; residual bone volume of at least 3.3 mm in diameter and 8 mm in length; a favorable relationship between maxilla and mandible; at least a minimum 5 year follow-up for each implant included in the statistical analysis. Intraoral radiographs were taken at implant loading and every 12 months during the follow-up visits. They were subsequently stored on a personal computer and analyzed to determine the changes in bone level. Seventy-eight patients receiving 209 implants completed a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. One-hundred dental implants were inserted in the maxilla while 109 were placed in the mandible. Eleven (14.1%) out of 78 treated patients who received 29 (13.9%) dental implants were considered as drop-outs. On the whole, peri-implantitis was diagnosed in three implants. The average final pocket probing depth at implant level was 2.5 ± 1.2 mm. The average final bone loss after 5 years was 0.3 ± 0.4 mm, both at the mesial and distal aspect of the implant. The effects of the prosthesis type, sex and implant site did not statistically influence the marginal bone loss; on the contrary, a statistically significant difference regarding marginal bone loss was detected between smoker and non-smoker patients (p = 0.021). Implants with internal-conical abutment connection showed stable peri-implant bone levels at the medium-term follow-up. Nevertheless, further prospective long-term clinical studies are necessary to confirm these data.

Download Full-text

Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph182010715 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (20) ◽

pp. 10715

Author(s):

Odontuya Dorj ◽

Hsi-Kuei Lin ◽

Eisner Salamanca ◽

Yu-Hwa Pan ◽

Yi-Fan Wu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Bone Loss ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Bone Level ◽

Natural Teeth ◽

Marginal Bone Level

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants.

Download Full-text

Radiological Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Dental Implants: Systematic Review

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph17186920 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (18) ◽

pp. 6920

Author(s):

Saverio Cosola ◽

Simone Marconcini ◽

Michela Boccuzzi ◽

Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris ◽

Ugo Covani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Bone Loss ◽

Success Rate ◽

Dental Implants ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Tissue Level ◽

Marginal Bone Loss ◽

Bone Level ◽

English Articles

Background: to assess the radiological marginal bone loss between bone-level or tissue-level dental implants through a systematic review of literature until September 2019. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and other database were searched by two independent authors including only English articles. Results: The search provided 1028 records and, after removing the duplicates through titles and abstracts screening, 45 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. For qualitative analysis 20 articles were included, 17 articles of them for quantitative analysis counting a total of 1161 patients (mean age 54.4 years) and 2933 implants, 1427 inserted at Tissue-level (TL) and 1506 inserted at Bone-level (BL). The survival rate and the success rate were more than 90%, except for 2 studies with a success rate of 88% and 86.2%. No studies reported any differences between groups in term of success and survival rates. Three studies showed that BL-implants had statistically less marginal bone loss (p < 0.05). Only one study reported statistically less marginal bone loss in TL-implants (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the most part of the studies, differences between implant types in marginal bone loss were not statistically significant after a variable period of follow-up ranged between 1 and 5 years.

Download Full-text