scholarly journals Pengaruh Reputasi Auditor, Prediksi Kebangkrutan, Disclosure Dan Leverage Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eko Budi Santoso ◽  
Ivan Yudhistira Wiyono

AbstractGoing concern opinion is accepted by a company represents the condition and events which arises auditor’s hesitation of the company’s going concern. Going concern audit opinion used as early warning to the user of financial statements in order to prevent mistakes on decision making. This study objective was to reinvestigate factors that influencing going concern audit opinion. The factors used on this research are auditor reputation, bankruptcy prediction, disclosure and leverage.Samples were collected with purposive sampling method and obtained 229 observation data of listed manufacture companies that meet the criteria from year 2009-2011. Logistic regression was been used for hypothesis testing. The result showed that bankruptcy prediction using Z-score model and leverage affected acceptance going concern audit opinion. The hypothesis testing also showed that auditor reputation and disclosure did not affect acceptance going concern audit opinion.


Owner ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 343-355
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yunus ◽  
Calen Calen ◽  
Sarida Sirait

This study aims to determine the effect of the bankruptcy prediction of the Altman z-score model, auditor reputation and opinion shopping on going concern audit opinion in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. This research is a causal associative research with a quantitative approach. The sample in this study were 25 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange which were determined using purposive sampling technique. Observations in this study were carried out throughout the period 2015 to 2019 so that the number of observations was 125 data. The type of data used in this study is secondary data. While the data analysis method used in this research is panel data regression analysis with statistical data processing software, namely STATA. Based on the results obtained in this study, it can be seen that the prediction of bankruptcy based on the Altman z-score model has no significant effect on going concern audit opinion on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Auditor reputation is proven to have a negative and significant effect on going concern audit opinion on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. And opinion shopping is also proven to have a negative and significant effect on going concern audit opinion on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.



2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Hendra Firdaus

ABSTRACT Going concern opinion accepted by a company represents the condition and events which arises auditor’s hesitation of the company’s going concern. Going concern audit opinion can be used as early warning to the user of financial statements in order to prevent mistakes on decision making. A number of research has been conducted concerning factors that influence to going concern audit opinion. Yet, its result keeps showing inconsistency. This study objective is to reinvestigate factors that influence going concern audit opinion. The factors used on this research are liquidity, leverage, profitability, company’s size, company’s growth, audit lag, and auditor client tenure.This research using sample of manucaturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2012-2016. Based on purposive sampling, there are 30 manufacturing companies which fulfilled the sample requirements. Hypotesis testing on this research was done by the logistic regression analysis.The hypotesis testing showed that leverage have positive relationship to going concern audit opinion. Variables of profitability have negative relationship to going concern audit opinion. Variables of liquidity, company’s size, company’s growth, audit lag  and auditor client tenure have no relationship to going concern audit opinion.



2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-93
Author(s):  
Benedictus Wibisono Senosuryoputro ◽  
Ratnawati Kurnia

This research as causal research studies conducted to establish a causal relationship between variables Quick Ratio, Loan to Deposit Ratio, Non-Performing Loans, Return on Assets, Capital Adequacy Ratio, and Prior Year Audit Opinion on the acceptance of going concern audit opinion. The object of this research is the banking companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008 - 2012.  Samples were taken by using purposive sampling as many as 24 banking company. Criteria taken among companies that publish financial statements audited by an external auditor in the year 2008 - 2012 and has a poor financial ratios (LDR<78% and LDR> 92%, NPL>5%, ROA<1.2%, and CAR<8%) at least one time period between the years 2008-2012, in accordance with regulation of Bank Indonesia. This research use Regression logistic, because the dependent variable measured by nominal scale, therefore dummy model is used, where 1 is symbolized for a company that received going concern audit opinion, and 0 is symbolized for a company that not received going concern audit opinion. In testing the hypothesis can be seen that only the previous year's audit opinion variable which is non-financial information, have a significant influence on the acceptance of going concern audit opinion. While other variables such as Quick Ratio, Loan to Deposit Ratio, Non-Performing Loans, Return on Assets and Capital Adequacy Ratio which is a ratio of financial information, does not have a significant effect on the auditor in the provision of going concern audit opinion. Keywords: Acceptance of Going Concern Audit Opinion, Quick Ratio, Loan to Deposit Ratio, Non-Performing Loans, Return on Assets, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Prior Year Audit Opinion.



2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Farid Muhamadiyah

<p>Going-concern audit opinion is the auditor’s opinion regarding the ability of<br />the entity to maintain the viability of their business is one of the important things to<br />consider users of financial statements to make decisions especially berinvestas<br />decisions. This study aimed to examine the effect of bankruptcy prediction models (Altman revised model), growth companies (earnings), leverage and reputation of the public accounting firm of the admission trends going concern audit opinion. The sample used in this study consisted of 32 financial statements of listed manufacturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2007-2010. The sample was selected by using the purposive sampling method. In this research, data analysis using SPSS by binary logistic regression analysis to test the hypothesis. From the analysis in this study suggests that the use of bankruptcy prediction model (Altman revised model) positive effect on revenue trends going concern audit opinion, while the company’s growth, leverage and reputable CPA firm negatively affect revenue trends going concern audit opinion.<br />Keywords : Bankruptcy Prediction Model (Altman revised model), Corporate<br />Growth (income), Leverage, Reputation Public Accountant and Going Concern Audit Opinion.</p>



2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
Febrian Kwarto

Perusahaan yang mendapatkan opini going concern dari auditor di sebabkan karena kondisi dan peristiwa yang menimbulkan keraguan akan kelangsungan hidup suatu perusahaan. Opini audit going concern merupakan peringatan awal (early warning) bagi para pengguna laporan keuangan guna menghindari kesalahan pengambilan keputusan. Penerimaan opini audit going concern dapat di pengaruhi oleh opinion shopping dan pengalaman Auditor. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis opinion shopping dan pengalaman Auditor terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern pada perusahaan auditan. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah purposive sampling yaitu pimpinan perusahaan atau kepala keuangan (kepala accounting/manajer keuangan) yang sudah diaudit oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Tangerang, yang memiliki Pengalaman minimal 2 tahun. Jumlah kuesioner yang dianalisis adalah 50 kuesioner. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis regresi berganda. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa opinion shopping berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern. Sedangkan pengalaman Auditor tidak berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern.Companies that get the of the auditor's going concern opinionwas caused of conditions and events that give rise to doubts about the viability of a company. Going concern audit opinion is an early warning for the users of the financial statements in order to avoid decision-making errors. Going concern audit opinion can be influenced by the opinion shopping and Auditorexperience. This study aimed to analyze the opinion shoppingand Auditor experienceon going concern audit opinion on the company's audited. The sampling technique in this research was purposive sampling, there arethe director of the company or chief financial officer (chief accounting/finance managers) that have been audited by Public Accountant in Tangerang, which has a minimum of 2 years experience. The number of questionnaires analyzed were 50 questionnaires. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple regression analysis. Based on the results of this study indicate that opinion shopping have positive and significant impact on going-concern audit opinion. While there is no positif and significant impact on the going-concern audit opinion



2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Gina Septiana ◽  
Eka Khausnul Khatimah

Going concern audit opinion is an opinion issued by a company regarding the feasibility of its company's financial statements to see the future. This study aims to examine company growth, bankruptcy predictions and previous year's going concern audit opinion on the provision of Going Concern audit opinion on manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. This study uses a sample of manufacturing companies listed on the IDX in 2015-2019. Based on positive sampling, the number of manufacturing companies used in this study were 57 companies. Hypothesis testing uses logistic regression using the Spss 23 program. The results of this study indicate that company growthas going concern audit opinion, bankruptcy prdition has a significant negative effect going concern audit opinion and previous year”s going concern audit opinion has a significant positive effect on going concern audit opinion



2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Maria Dini Yanuariska ◽  
Aloysia Yanti Ardiati

<em>Going concern audit opinion is the survival of a company. A company that is considered unable to maintain its survival will receive going concern audit opinion. This opinion is bad news for users of financial statements (Astuti and Darsono, 2012). This research was conducted at manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2012 until 2016. Based on the criteria of research sample, it was obtained 400 research samples. The purpose of this research was to discover the effect of financial condition, audit tenure, and the size of public accountant office on going concern audit opinion. The results of this study indicated that the financial condition had a positive effect on going concern audit opinion, audit tenure had negative effect on going concern audit opinion, and the size of public accountant office had no effect on going concern audit opinion.</em>



2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-194
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fadhill Lizaldy ◽  
Yulinda Yulinda

Audit report with modification of going concern indicates that in auditor’s opinion there is a risk that companies could not survive.  This study is aimed to investigate the effect of bankruptcy prediction model and auditor reputation on going concern audit opinion. Moreover, this going concern modification is not expected by companies due to decrease public trust of image company.  In addition, some of companies  received unqualified opinion stop operating and not in accordance with the auditor's assessment.  Thus, this study used object includes manufacturer listed on  Indonesia  Stock  Exchange  during  2013 -2015  with  134 observations obtained using purposive  sampling method.  Furthermore, this  data are analyzed used logistic regression analysis. The conclusion of this  study,  the  result  has  showed  that  the  financial condition proxied by bankruptcy prediction model affect going concern auditor opinion positively.  The  auditors  reputation which is proxied by audit firm size do not positively affect the opinion.Keywords: going concern opinion, bankruptcy prediction model, auditor reputation



2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-299
Author(s):  
Kimberli Kimberli ◽  
Budi Kurniawan

Abstract The problems that will be discussed in this journal are regarding the relationship between Profitability Ratios, Liquidity Ratios and Company Growth on Audit Delay. The research method used in this study uses secondary data. The population in this study is all Real Estate companies and the Property sub-sector registered on the BEI which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020. The sampling method in this study is purposive sampling. The criteria for companies that are sampled are companies that publish audited financial statements for four consecutive years and use the rupiah currency, so that the total number of samples in this study is 165 data. The independent variables in this study are Profitability Ratios, Liquidity Ratios and Company Growth. The dependent variable in this study is audit delay. The data analysis technique used is the Logistics Regression Test with the use of Software Eviews 10. The results of the analysis show that profitability has no significant effect on going concern audit opinion. Meanwhile, company growth and liquidity have no effect on going concern audit opinion. Keywords: Going Concern Opinion, Profitability, Liquidity, and Company Growth



Author(s):  
Matthew Grosse ◽  
Tom Scott

This paper examines the information content of interim review assurance in the Australian mandatory disclosure setting. First, we find a strong negative market reaction to interim going concern conclusions (IGCC) contained in the review of interim financial statements. Second, we find no significant difference between the market reaction to IGCCs and annual going concern opinions (AGCO) received at the annual report audit. Finally, we show IGCCs are significant predictors of subsequent AGCOs, and provide incremental information from the previous annual report audit opinion. Overall, these results contribute to the literature on the benefits of mandatory interim assurance by showing that going concern conclusions contained in interim financial statements provide investors with new and relevant information.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document