Moderne Philosophiedidaktik

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Peters ◽  
Jörg Peters
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

Dieses Buch zeigt in umfassender Weise das ganze Spektrum an Ansätzen in der modernen Philosophie-Didaktik. Neben den beiden »klassischen« Texten von Immanuel Kant (›selber denken‹) und Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (›nach-denken‹) sind (nahezu) alle Ansätze versammelt, die seit der berühmten Martens-Rehfus-Debatte in den Siebzigerjahren das Feld der Didaktik der Philosophie bereichert haben. Insgesamt werden 16 neue Ansätze vorgestellt: der konstitutive Ansatz von Ekkehard Martens, der bildungstheoretisch-identitätstheoretische von Wulf D. Rehfus, der lerntheoretische von Karl Leeuw und Pieter Mostert, der transformative von Johannes Rohbeck, der dialektische von Roland Henke, der sokratische von Gisela Raupach-Strey, der kulturtechnische von Ekkehard Martens, der literarische von Johannes Rohbeck, der narrative von René Torkler, der kompetenzorientierte von Anita Rösch, der kulturphilosophische von Volker Steenblock, der kanonische von Vanessa Albus, der problemorientierte von Markus Tiedemann, der wissenschaftstheoretische von Bettina Bussmann sowie der experimentelle von Markus Bohlmann. Die Herausgeber, Martina und Jörg Peters, führen in die unterschiedlichen Ansätze ein und zeigen deren Bedeutung für das unterrichtliche Geschehen auf. Das Buch schließt mit einem Literaturverzeichnis, in dem eine Übersicht über die aktuelle didaktische Landschaft gegeben wird.

Hegel

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Ferrone
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel ◽  
The Self ◽  
Philosophical Issue ◽  
The Enlightenment ◽  
The Subject

This chapter examines how Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel addressed the major philosophical issue of the Enlightenment—the dilemma of man— in terms of the “dialectical moment,” linking it to the theme of the self-foundation and sublation of the crisis opened by modernity. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Hegel laid the foundations of what is known as the philosophers' Enlightenment in the name of a concept of philosophy entirely different from that of Immanuel Kant and other Enlightenment figures: he shifed the focus from the primacy of the subject to that of the spirit. Hegel placed the emphasis on the organic union of man and universe, within which eternal nature operates, rather than on an abstractly determined individual tending towards his own happiness. The chapter also considers Hegel's philosophy of unification and “conciliation.”

scholarly journals Philosophia fundamentalis Friedricha Adolfa Trendelenburga

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-155
Author(s):  
Wojciech Hanuszkiewicz
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel ◽  
Wilhelm Dilthey ◽  
Main Work ◽  
Logical Investigations ◽  
Franz Brentano ◽  
Late Nineteenth ◽  
The One ◽  
Hermann Cohen

Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg’s philosophia fundamentalis: Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg (1802–1872) is an author who connects two periods. On the one hand, he attended the lectures of one of the first followers of Immanuel Kant — Karl Leonhard Reinhold, he knew personally and was influenced by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling. On the other hand, Trendelenburg has educated a very large group of important figures within the German philosophy of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century (e.g., Wilhelm Dilthey, Franz Brentano and Hermann Cohen). His main work, Logische Untersuchungen (Logical investigations), was to see its release in three editions during his life. In the second edition Trendelenburg adds an introductory chapter, entitled Logik und Metaphysik als grundlegende Wissenschaft [Logic and metaphysics as a basic science]. It presents the idea of philosophy as a science and, like a lens, focuses on the most influential metaphilosophical solutions of the second half of the nineteenth century. The article in its first part presents the academic biography of Trendelenburg, while in the second it discusses the most important meta‑philosophical problems raised in Logische Untersuchungen.

scholarly journals One’s Own vs. Other / Another / Alien in the Conceptual and Aesthetic Paradigm of Modernism

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-245
Author(s):  
Roman Mnich ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel ◽  
The Body ◽  
The Other ◽  
Conceptual System ◽  
Theoretical Concepts ◽  
European Culture ◽  
Philosophy Of Dialogue ◽  
Poetic Texts ◽  
The One

This article focuses on the issue of the Other/Alien within the conceptual and aesthetic paradigm of modernism. In the context of modernistic ideas, the author analyses the philosophy of dialogue and phenomenological views on the Other as represented in the intellectual heritage of the twentieth century. Taking into consideration these ideas, the author discusses three mainstream aspects of the Other/Alien in Russian modernist literature: 1) mythological tradition, which provokes the image of the enemy through the image of the Other; 2) Romantic tradition of the double (doppelganger), and 3) philosophical / phenomenological notion of the body, which views personality as “me/Self” and “my body”. Conceptual analysis of these aspects is provided with reference to poetic texts by Alexander Blok, Innokenty Annensky, and Osip Mandelstam. The author stresses the conventionality of such a division, on the one hand, and the influence of the analysed aspects of the Other/Alien onto the conceptual system of Postmodernism. Modernism in European culture, in contrast to other historical periods, is characterised primarily by the fact that many of its ideas and concepts were only proclaimed, but not presented in the form of complete theoretical concepts/systems. In this sense, modernism turned out to be open to the future, which allows us to call it an “uncompleted project” (Jürgen Habermas). Previous eras offered solutions to important existential problems in the form of complete philosophical systems (Immanuel Kant or Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel), ideas or concepts (Kant’s concept of “eternal peace” and a moral imperative, Hegel’s idea of state and law). Modernism, influenced by the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, destroyed the systematic nature of thinking, doubted traditional morality, and offered paradoxical solutions to many problems in the form of conceptual questions, which are discussed to this day. One of these uncompleted modernist projects was the concept of the Other/Alien, discussions about which have been going on for over a century.

Immanuel Kant

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Henry Allison ◽  
Peter Heath ◽  
Gary Hatfield ◽  
Michael Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant

Who's Afraid of Immanuel Kant?

1982 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 431-432
Author(s):  
John C. Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant

Introduction: Plato’s Nightmare

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Marmysz
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Friedrich Nietzsche ◽  
Objective Reality

This introductory chapter examines the “problem” of nihilism, beginning with its philosophical origins in the ideas of Plato, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. It is argued that film is an inherently nihilistic medium involving the evocation of illusory worlds cut loose from objective reality. This nihilism of film is distinguished from nihilism in film; the nihilistic content also present in some (but not all) movies. Criticisms of media nihilism by authors such as Thomas Hibbs and Darren Ambrose are examined. It is then argued, contrary to such critics, that cinematic nihilism is not necessarily degrading or destructive. Because the nihilism of film encourages audiences to linger in the presence of nihilism in film, cinematic nihilism potentially trains audiences to learn the positive lessons of nihilism while remaining safely detached from the sorts of dangers depicted on screen.

Immanuel Kant

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Brophy
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Scientific Discovery ◽  
State Of Exception ◽  
Western Philosophy ◽  
Industrial Capitalism ◽  
Individual Freedom ◽  
Philosophical Foundation ◽  
Advanced Capitalism ◽  
Moral Feeling ◽  
Transcendental Idealist

Agamben’s complicated engagement with Immanuel Kant celebrates the brilliance of the German idealist’s thought by disclosing its condemnatory weight in Western philosophy. Kant was writing in the midst of burgeoning industrial capitalism, when each new scientific discovery seemed to push back the fog of religion in favour of science and reason; meanwhile Agamben’s work develops in concert with the crises of advanced capitalism and borrows significantly from those philosophers who endured the most demoralising upheavals of the first half of the twentieth century. Whatever lanugo Kant was eager for us to shed in the name of individual freedom,1 Agamben sees in this crusade for civic maturity a surprising prescience: ‘[I]t is truly astounding how Kant, almost two centuries ago and under the heading of a sublime “moral feeling,” was able to describe the very condition that was to become familiar to the mass societies and great totalitarian states of our time’ (HS 52). To a remarkable extent, Agamben finds that Kant’s transcendental idealist frame of thought lays the philosophical foundation for the state of exception.

RACIAL STEREOTYPING OF HOMO SAPIENS AFRICANUS: A REVIEW OF ITS MYTH AND IMPACT ON DEVELOPMENTAL CAPACITY

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth Oppong
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
David Hume ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Homo Sapiens ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
White People ◽  
Negative Stereotypes ◽  
Initial Errors ◽  
Developmental Capacity ◽  
Lower Intelligence

Generally, negatives stereotypes have been shown to have negative impact on performance members of a social group that is the target of the stereotype (Schmader, Johns and Forbes 2008; Steele and Aronson, 1995). It is against the background of this evidence that this paper argues that the negative stereotypes of perceived lower intelligence held against Africans has similar impact on the general development of the continent. This paper seeks to challenge this stereotype by tracing the source of this negative stereotype to David Hume and Immanuel Kant and showing the initial errors they committed which have influenced social science knowledge about race relations. Hume and Kant argue that Africans are naturally inferior to white or are less intelligent and support their thesis with their contrived evidence that there has never been any civilized nation other than those developed by white people nor any African scholars of eminence. Drawing on Anton Wilhelm Amo’s negligence-ignorance thesis, this paper shows the Hume-Kantian argument and the supporting evidence to be fallacious. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document