scholarly journals A Theory of Satisfiability-Preserving Proofs in SAT Solving

10.29007/tc7q ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrián Rebola-Pardo ◽  
Martin Suda
Keyword(s):  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Logical Truth ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Traditional View ◽  
Satisfiability Problem ◽  
Sat Solving ◽  
Sat Solvers ◽  
Proof Systems ◽  
Meta Level

We study the semantics of propositional interference-based proof systems such as DRAT and DPR. These are characterized by modifying a CNF formula in ways that preserve satisfiability but not necessarily logical truth. We propose an extension of propositional logic called overwrite logic with a new construct which captures the meta-level reasoning behind interferences. We analyze this new logic from the point of view of expressivity and complexity, showing that while greater expressivity is achieved, the satisfiability problem for overwrite logic is essentially as hard as SAT, and can be reduced in a way that is well-behaved for modern SAT solvers. We also show that DRAT and DPR proofs can be seen as overwrite logic proofs which preserve logical truth. This much stronger invariant than the mere satisfiability preservation maintained by the traditional view gives us better understanding on these practically important proof systems. Finally, we showcase this better understanding by finding intrinsic limitations in interference-based proof systems.

Chapter 3. Complete Algorithms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Darwiche ◽  
Knot Pipatsrisawat
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Sat Solving ◽  
Practical Point ◽  
Sat Solvers ◽  
Proof Systems ◽  
Real World Applications ◽  
Clause Learning

Complete SAT algorithms form an important part of the SAT literature. From a theoretical perspective, complete algorithms can be used as tools for studying the complexities of different proof systems. From a practical point of view, these algorithms form the basis for tackling SAT problems arising from real-world applications. The practicality of modern, complete SAT solvers undoubtedly contributes to the growing interest in the class of complete SAT algorithms. We review these algorithms in this chapter, including Davis-Putnum resolution, Stalmarck’s algorithm, symbolic SAT solving, the DPLL algorithm, and modern clause-learning SAT solvers. We also discuss the issue of certifying the answers of modern complete SAT solvers.

scholarly journals Simulating Strong Practical Proof Systems with Extended Resolution

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 1247-1267
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kiesl ◽  
Adrián Rebola-Pardo ◽  
Marijn J. H. Heule ◽  
Armin Biere
Keyword(s):  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Proof Complexity ◽  
Proof System ◽  
Compact Representation ◽  
Sat Solving ◽  
Proof Systems ◽  
The Sixties ◽  
New Variables ◽  
Resolution Proof ◽  
Do So

Abstract Proof systems for propositional logic provide the basis for decision procedures that determine the satisfiability status of logical formulas. While the well-known proof system of extended resolution—introduced by Tseitin in the sixties—allows for the compact representation of proofs, modern SAT solvers (i.e., tools for deciding propositional logic) are based on different proof systems that capture practical solving techniques in an elegant way. The most popular of these proof systems is likely DRAT, which is considered the de-facto standard in SAT solving. Moreover, just recently, the proof system DPR has been proposed as a generalization of DRAT that allows for short proofs without the need of new variables. Since every extended-resolution proof can be regarded as a DRAT proof and since every DRAT proof is also a DPR proof, it was clear that both DRAT and DPR generalize extended resolution. In this paper, we show that—from the viewpoint of proof complexity—these two systems are no stronger than extended resolution. We do so by showing that (1) extended resolution polynomially simulates DRAT and (2) DRAT polynomially simulates DPR. We implemented our simulations as proof-transformation tools and evaluated them to observe their behavior in practice. Finally, as a side note, we show how Kullmann’s proof system based on blocked clauses (another generalization of extended resolution) is related to the other systems.

scholarly journals The Method of Socratic Proofs Meets Correspondence Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-116
Author(s):  
Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion ◽  
Yaroslav Petrukhin ◽  
Vasilyi Shangin
Keyword(s):  
Correspondence Analysis ◽  
Boolean Functions ◽  
Propositional Logic ◽  
Sequent Calculus ◽  
Sequent Calculi ◽  
Classical Propositional Logic ◽  
Logic Of Questions ◽  
Proof Systems

The goal of this paper is to propose correspondence analysis as a technique for generating the so-called erotetic (i.e. pertaining to the logic of questions) calculi which constitute the method of Socratic proofs by Andrzej Wiśniewski. As we explain in the paper, in order to successfully design an erotetic calculus one needs invertible sequent-calculus-style rules. For this reason, the proposed correspondence analysis resulting in invertible rules can constitute a new foundation for the method of Socratic proofs. Correspondence analysis is Kooi and Tamminga's technique for designing proof systems. In this paper it is used to consider sequent calculi with non-branching (the only exception being the rule of cut), invertible rules for the negation fragment of classical propositional logic and its extensions by binary Boolean functions.

scholarly journals Dolius: A Distributed Parallel SAT Solving Framework

10.29007/hvqt ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Audemard ◽  
Benoît Hoessen ◽  
Saïd Jabbour ◽  
Cédric Piette
Keyword(s):  
Shared Memory ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Divide And Conquer ◽  
Sat Solving ◽  
Sat Solvers ◽  
Sat Solver

Over the years, parallel SAT solving becomes more and more important. However, most of state-of-the-art parallel SAT solvers are portfolio-based ones. They aim at running several times the same solver with different parameters. In this paper, we propose a tool called Dolius, mainly based on the divide and conquer paradigm. In contrast to most current parallel efficient engines, Dolius does not need shared memory, can be distributed, and scales well when a large number of computing units is available. Furthermore, our tool contains an API allowing to plug any SAT solver in a simple way.

scholarly journals The Supererogatory, and How to Accommodate It

Utilitas ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
DALE DORSEY
Keyword(s):  
Moral Theory ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Traditional View ◽  
Moral Obligations ◽  
First Order ◽  
Moral Point ◽  
Moral Point Of View ◽  
Act Consequentialism

Many find it plausible to posit a category of supererogatory actions. But the supererogatory resists easy analysis. Traditionally, supererogatory actions are characterized as actions that are morally good, but not morally required; actions that go ‘beyond’ the call of our moral obligations. As I shall argue in this article, however, the traditional analysis can be accepted only by a view with troubling consequences concerning the structure of the moral point of view. I propose a different analysis that is extensionally correct, avoids the problems of the traditional view, and, incidentally, also defuses any objection to act-consequentialism, or any other first-order moral theory, on grounds that it cannot accommodate the supererogatory.

scholarly journals On the Computational Complexity of the Numerically Definite Syllogistic and Related Logics

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Pratt-Hartmann
Keyword(s):  
Computational Complexity ◽  
Related Problem ◽  
Satisfiability Problem ◽  
Propositional Satisfiability ◽  
Proof Systems ◽  
Transitive Verbs ◽  
Np Complete

AbstractThe numerically definite syllogistic is the fragment of English obtained by extending the language of the classical syllogism with numerical quantifiers. The numerically definite relational syllogistic is the fragment of English obtained by extending the numerically definite syllogistic with predicates involving transitive verbs. This paper investigates the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem for these fragments. We show that the satisfiability problem (= finite satisfiability problem) for the numerically definite syllogistic is strongly NP-complete, and that the satisfiability problem (= finite satisfiability problem) for the numerically definite relational syllogistic is NEXPTIME-complete, but perhaps not strongly so. We discuss the related problem of probabilistic (propositional) satisfiability, and thereby demonstrate the incompleteness of some proof-systems that have been proposed for the numerically definite syllogistic.

scholarly journals Problems of search for collisions of cryptographic hash functions of the MD family as variants of Boolean satisfiability problem

2015 ◽  
pp. 61-77
Author(s):  
И.А. Богачкова ◽  
О.С. Заикин ◽  
С.Е. Кочемазов ◽  
И.В. Отпущенников ◽  
А.А. Семенов ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Experiments ◽  
Hash Functions ◽  
Boolean Satisfiability ◽  
Satisfiability Problem ◽  
Sat Solvers ◽  
Boolean Satisfiability Problem ◽  
Single Block ◽  
Message Digest ◽  
Differential Attacks ◽  
Cryptographic Hash Functions

Рассмотрена реализация разностной атаки на криптографические хеш-функции MD4 (Message Digest 4) и MD5 (Message Digest 5) через сведение задачи поиска коллизий для этих хеш-функций к задаче о булевой выполнимости (SAT, SATisfiability). Новизна полученных результатов заключается в том, что предложены существенно более экономные (в сравнении с известными) SAT-кодировки рассматриваемых алгоритмов, а также в использовании для решения полученных SAT-задач современных многопоточных и параллельных SAT-решателей. Задачи поиска одноблоковых коллизий для MD4 в данной постановке оказались чрезвычайно простыми. Кроме того, найдены несколько десятков двухблоковых коллизий для MD5. В процессе соответствующих вычислительных экспериментов определен некоторый класс сообщений, дающих коллизии: построено множество пар дающих коллизии сообщений, у которых первые 10 байтов нулевые. An implementation of the differential attacks on cryptographic hash functions MD4 (Message Digest 4) and MD5 (Message Digest 5) by reducing the problems of search for collisions of these hash functions to the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) is considered. The novelty of the results obtained consists in a more compact (compared to already known) SAT encodings for the algorithms considered and in the use of modern parallel and distributed SAT solvers in applications to the formulated SAT problems. Searching for single block collisions of MD4 in this approach turned out to be very simple. In addition, several dozens of double block collisions of MD5 are found. In the process of the corresponding numerical experiments, a certain class of messages that produce the collisions is found: in particular, a set of pairs of such messages with first 10 zero bytes is constructed.

SAT and Planning

2010 ◽  
pp. 27-40
Author(s):  
Carlos Camarão ◽  
Mateus Galvão ◽  
Newton Vieira
Keyword(s):  
Operation Management ◽  
Significant Problem ◽  
Satisfiability Problem ◽  
Sat Solvers ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Blocks World

This chapter firstly reviews the importance of the Satisfiability Problem (SAT) for a wide range of applications, including applications in Operation Management such as planning. A review of methods nowadays employed by modern SAT-solvers is then presented. The authors then use Classical Planning as an illustrative example of how a significant problem can be translated into SAT. They point out important results and studies concerning reductions of planning into SAT, and explain how to construct a SAT instance which is satisfiable if and only if an instance of a bounded version of the classic blocks-world problem is solvable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document