scholarly journals HEPATITIS-C GENOTYPE-3A INFECTION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 670-674
Author(s):  
Nizamuddin - ◽  
Abdul Hameed Khan ◽  
Ayesha Jamil ◽  
Fazal Rahim ◽  
Muhammad Riaz

Objectives: In last decade, “treatment of chronic hepatitis-C revolved frominterferon based therapy to most effective interferon free therapy with new direct antiviraldrugs like Sofosbuvir and ribavirin” which is recommended for all genotypes of HCV infection.Treatment response in Chronic Hepatitis-C is affected both by viral and human factors. Weconducted this study “to evaluate the effect of human factor like (IL28B-rs12979860 non-CC)genotyping in response to Sofosbuvir based dual therapy in Hepatitis-C Genotype-3a infection”in population of Khyber PukhtoonKhwa (KPK). Setting: This open labeled, multi-center studywas conducted in Peshawar-Khyber PukhtoonKhwa (KPK). Period: March-2016 to August-2016.Method: Total of 70patients were enrolled. After doing “PCR for HCV-RNA-Viral level, Viral-Genotyping and Human genotyping for IL-28B, patients were put on Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for24-weeks”. Patients were assigned into two groups (1:1), “having 35 in each, including group-Aas those having favorable CC (IL28B- rs12979860-CC) genotyping and group-B as thosehaving unfavorable non-CC (IL28B-rs12979860-non-CC) genotyping”. The primary end pointwas “Sustained Virological response12 (SVR12), which is HCV-RNA level<40IU/ml at 12-weeksafter completion of therapy in these two groups”. Results: Among 70-patients, male-femaleratio was 57.15% (n=40) and 42.85% (n=30) respectively. Each group has 35-cases. Rate ofSVR12 was 88.57% (n=31/35) in group-A, 91.42% (n=32/35) in group-B, having P-value<05.Conclusion: This study confirm that “unlike interferon, unfavorable non-CC (IL28B-rs12979860-non-CC) genotyping have no or minimal role in treatment response to Sofosbuvir in Hepatitis-Cgenotype-3a infections”.

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 355-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mosaburo Kainuma ◽  
Jun Hayashi ◽  
Shinya Sakai ◽  
Kazuaki Imai ◽  
Naoki Mantani ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to determine if the adverse effects of interferon (IFN) in hepatitis C patients could be reduced by treatment with Japanese Oriental (Kampo) medicine. Twelve patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with a combination of IFN-β and either Mao-to or Dai-seiryu-to (groups A and B), and 16 patients were treated with IFN-β alone (group C). Mao-to was administered to eight patients and Dai-seiryu-to was administered to four in groups A and B, respectively. Adverse effects were evaluated by clinical and laboratory examinations. The severity of symptoms was daily self-classified into four categories (1: none, 2: very slight, 3: moderate, and 4: serious), using a questionnaire consisting of 29 items. Scores of symptom such as discomfort and fever in group A, and discomfort, general malaise, paresthesia and arthralgia in group B were significantly lower than those in group C (p > 0.05). In all patients, HCV-RNA was negative at the end of the treatment, and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels had normalized transiently in all group A and B patients with genotype 1b by 2 weeks after cessation of IFN treatment. This study indicates that Kampo medicines are useful for reducing the adverse effects accompanying IFN treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C without reducing the antiviral effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 483
Author(s):  
Michele Fabrazzo ◽  
Rosa Zampino ◽  
Martina Vitrone ◽  
Gaia Sampogna ◽  
Lucia Del Gaudio ◽  
...  

In chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, interferon-based treatments showed toxicity, limited efficacy, and psychiatric manifestations. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents appeared safer, though it remains unclear if they may exacerbate or foster mood symptoms in drug-naïve CHC patients. We evaluated 62 CHC patients’ mental status, before and 12 weeks after DAA therapy, by assessment scales and psychometric instruments. We subdivided patients into two groups, CHC patients with (Group A) or without (Group B) a current and/or past psychiatric history. After DAA treatment, Group A patients showed low anxiety and improved depression, no variation in self-report distress, but worse general health perceptions. No significant difference emerged from coping strategies. Depression and anxiety improved in Group B, and no change emerged from total self-reported distress, except for somatization. Moreover, Group B increased problem-focused strategies for suppression of competing activities, and decreased strategies of instrumental social support. Contrarily, Group B reduced significantly emotion-focused strategies, such as acceptance and mental disengagement, and improved vitality, physical and social role functioning. DAA therapy is safe and free of hepatological and psychiatric side effects in CHC patients, regardless of current and/or past psychiatric history. In particular, patients without a psychiatric history also remarkably improved their quality of life.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4075-4075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Pileri ◽  
Alberto Vegetti ◽  
Luca De Pietri ◽  
Gianluca Abbati ◽  
Paolo Ventura ◽  
...  

Abstract The use of direct acting antivirals (DAA) vs. standard antiviral therapy (Peg-interferon and Ribavirin)(SAT) is changing the therapeutic approach to chronic hepatitis C (CHC). However, special populations, such as patients with hereditary chronic transfusion-dependent anemias (TDA) on chelation therapy may not have immediate access to DAA because of safety issues. According to recently published guidelines (Di Marco et al., Blood 2010) in patients with TDA and CHC on chelation therapy a switch to deferoxamine (DFO) is recommended when starting SAT, since deferiprone is contraindicated due to the risk of neutropenia and no data are available on safety of deferasirox (DFX). Due to low patient compliance to DFO and greater acceptability of oral chelation in TDA, we designed two randomized, open label, single arm, phase IIa controlled trials to study the safety of DFX in combination with SAT in CHC naïve, genotype 1 patients. We first performed a safety and pharmacokinetc study in 60 patients with CHC without TDA treated with DFX for the first 4 weeks of SAT, when the risk for anemia due to the peak of ribavirin-induced hemolysis is maximum. Patients were randomly assigned to receive SAT (Group A) or SAT and DFX at 10 mg / kg / day (Group B) or at 15 mg / kg / day (Group C). This was an exploratory study and the sample size of 20 patients per group was chosen without testing a formal efficacy or safety effect hypothesis. The number of adverse events (AE) was similar in all groups, except for gastrointestinal AE that occurred more frequently in patients who received chelation therapy, as expected for a drug administered orally. One severe AE was reported In group A and 1 in group C. 3 patients discontinued therapy due to AE in group A and 4 in group C largely due to SAT. All symptoms in group B and C regressed after DFX discontinuation. 9 % of patients in group A, 20% in group B and 31 % of patients in group C had an increase in GOT greater than 20% vs. basal level. None had a transaminase increase above 10 times normal value, or developed liver failure.A progressive dose-dependent increase in creatinine (which remained within normal limits), a reduction of creatinine clearance, and a modest increase of the proteinuria / creatinine ratio (which remained within normal limits) occurred in groups B and C; none developed acute renal failure.All abnormal biochemical data reported above returned to normal after DFX discontinuation. Plasma pharmacokinetic analysis performed in all patients treated with DFX showed absence of significant drug interaction. Overall the data indicated that treatment with DFX in combination with SAT was safe, especially considering that this trial involved patients without obvious iron overload, a population potentially more prone to AE due to over-chelation effects. Based on these promising results we planned a second phase IIa open-label, single arm, multi-center trial on the safety of DFX plus SAT (up to 24 or 48 weeks according to viral genotype), in 40 thalassemia patients with TDA and CHC. The study has been based on a two stages Optimal Simon design. So far 8 patients have been enrolled and six have completed the study. No severe AE have been reported and only one patient has discontinued therapy for toxicity related to peg-interferon. In conclusion, based on an exploratory trial in patients with CHC and preliminary data in a multicentre trial in patients with TDA and CHC, DFX appears to be safe in patients with hereditary chronic TDA who need to be treated with SAT for chronic hepatitis C. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (05) ◽  
pp. 451-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Bernhard ◽  
Felix Stickel

Abstract Background Relapses after therapy with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are rare due to high efficacy of interferon-free therapy regimens. The presence of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) in proteins targeted by therapy can lead to lower rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients receiving DAA-therapy, and little evidence exists as to how to treat these patients. Case Summary We present a case of a multi-drug-resistant HCV-genotype-3a-infection in a 50-year-old female without confirmed cirrhosis but with advanced fibrosis (liver stiffness 11.6 kPa) and low viral load. Resistance testing revealed a Y93H mutation in the NS5A gene. Therapies using sofosbuvir and daclatasvir (1st), sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and ribavirin (2nd), and subsequently with sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir (3st) did not achieve SVR. Compliance was good with rapid negativity of HCV RNA at 4 weeks of treatment on all 3 occasions. No virological breakthrough was recorded with all regimens. As a rescue attempt, the patient received 24 weeks of sofosbuvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and weight-based ribavirin at 1000 mg. With this approach, she achieved SVR but developed hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion The combination of sofosbuvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and ribavirin could be a rescue therapy after previous relapses on DAA-therapy, especially in patients with relapse after therapy with sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir.


2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Jasmina Simonovic-Babic ◽  
Ksenija Bojovic ◽  
Milotka Fabri ◽  
Velimir Kostic ◽  
Maja Jovanovic ◽  
...  

Introduction. The triple therapy which consists of one of the protease inhibitor plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin (P/R) is the standard of care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1(G1) infection both in treatment-na?ve and experienced patients. Objective. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and tolerability of this regime in hospital practice in Serbia. Methods. From July 2012 to October 2012, 20 previously treated patients with advanced fibrosis and HCV G1 infection were included in the triple antiviral regimen in six referral centers in Serbia. All patients were treated with response guide therapy (RGT) regime according to the boceprevir treatment protocol. During the 4-week lead-in period all patients received peginterferon plus ribavirin. After the lead-in period boceprevir was added in the dosage of 800 mg three times a day orally. The subsequent treatment varied according to virologic response and fibrosis. During the therapy HCV RNA level was measured at week 4, 8, 12, 24 of the treatment for the assessment of virologic response profile. All patients who completed therapy were assessed at the end of the treatment and at the end of an additional 24-week treatment-free period for a sustained virologic response (SVR). Results. The total of 20 patients with advanced fibrosis was treated. Among patients with an undetectable HCV RNA level at week 8 the rate of SVR was 100%. No patient with decrease in the HCV RNA level <1 log 10 IU/ml at treatment week 4 achieved SVR. The overall rate of SVR was 55%. The safety profile of the treatment regimen was good. Anemia was reported in 25% of patients. There was no life-threatening treatment adverse event. Conclusion. Boceprevir in combination with P/R achieved fairly good SVR rates in patients that were ?most difficult to treat? who failed on dual therapy and was effective among patients with cirrhosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-353
Author(s):  
Yasemin Derya Gülseren ◽  
Fatma Esenkaya Taşbent ◽  
Mehmet Özdemir ◽  
Bahadır Feyzioğlu

Introduction: In case of chronic hepatitis C infection, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma may progress. HCV genotypes and subtypes have been found to vary according to geographical regions. In addition to its epidemiological importance, HCV genotype is an important factor in determining the response and duration of treatment. In this study, it was aimed to determine the genotype distribution in our region. Materials and Methods: The results of 241 patients with HCV RNA positivity detected in our laboratory Molecular unit between 2016 and 2018 were retrospectively screened. HCV-RNA extraction for genotyping was performed by automated system (EZ1 Virus Mini Kit v.2.0, Germany), and ‘’line probe assay’’ (LIPA) based on reverse hybridization method was applied. HCV-RNA levels were determined by real-time PCR method (Artus HCV QS-RGQ kit, Qiagen, Germany). Results: Two hundred and forty-one patients were included in the study, and 116 (48%) were females and 125 (52%) were males. Mean age was 56.1 ± 19.4 (range: 16-90) years. Mean logarithmic viral load value was 5.7 ± 0.9 IU/ml (range; 2.71 x 102-17 x 106), mean value of AST was 50.5 ± 43.7 IU/ml and mean ALT value was 63.4 ± 63.5 IU/ml. Genotype 1b was detected in 58.9% of the patients, genotype 3a in 14.1%, genotype 1a in 13.27%, genotype 2b in 4.1%, genotype 4a in 1.2%. The subtypes could not be determined for 4.9%, 1.2%, 1.6% and 0.4% of infected patient in genotype 1,2,4 and 5 respectively. Conclusion: In our study, genotype 1b (58.9%) was found as the dominant genotype. This was followed by genotype 3a (14.1%). In patients infected with genotype 1, viral load value was found to be significantly higher than other genotypes. Monitoring genotype change is important for determining treatment protocols and duration.


Author(s):  
Michele Fabrazzo ◽  
Rosa Zampino ◽  
Martina Vitrone ◽  
Gaia Sampogna ◽  
Lucia Del Gaudio ◽  
...  

In chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, interferon-based treatments showed toxicity, limited efficacy, and psychiatric manifestations. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents appeared safer, though it remains unclear if they may exacerbate or foster mood symptoms in drug-na&iuml;ve CHC patients. We evaluated 62 CHC patients&rsquo; mental status, before and 12 weeks after DAA therapy, by assessment scales and psychometric instruments. We subdivided patients into two groups, CHC patients with (Group A) or without (Group B) a current and/or past psychiatric history. After DAA treatment, Group A patients showed low anxiety and improved depression, no variation in self-report distress, but worse general health perceptions. No significant difference emerged from coping strategies. Depression and anxiety improved in Group B, and no change emerged from total self-reported distress, except for somatization. Moreover, Group B increased problem-focused strategies for suppression of competing activities, and decreased strategies of instrumental social support. Contrarily, Group B reduced significantly emotion-focused strategies, such as acceptance and mental disengagement, and improved vitality, physical and social role functioning. DAA therapy is safe and free of hepatological and psychiatric side effects in CHC patients, regardless of current and/or past psychiatric history. In particular, patients without a psychiatric history also remarkably improved their quality of life.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1876-1881
Author(s):  
Nizamud Din ◽  
Jamalud Din ◽  
Abid Shah ◽  
Waheed Iqbal

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the 16-weeks versus 24-weeks efficacy of sofosbuvir and ribavirin in HCV genotype-3a infection. Study Design: Open labeled, single center, longitudinal study. Setting: Khyber Medical College and Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. Period: The total duration of study was 6-months, starting from January 2017 to July 2017. Methods: Eighty patients with HCV genotype-3a infection wereenrolled. Patients were assigned into 4-groups (20 patients in each group), including group-A as treatment naïve non-cirrhotic, group-B as treatment naïve with liver cirrhosis, group-C as non-cirrhotic but non-responder to peg-interferon and ribavirin and group-D as non-respondercirrhotic cases. Sofosbuvir plus ribavirin was given for 16-weeks and then extended to 24-weeks. The primary end point was end of treatment response with 16-weeks or 24-weeks therapy (EOT-16 or EOT-24), which is defined as HCV RNA level<40IU/ml after 16-weeks or 24-weeks oftherapy. Results: Out of all 80-patients, 50% (n=40) were male and 50% (n=40) were female, with mean age of 49±2 years. In all 80 cases, 67.5% (n=54/80) of patients have responded at 16 weeks, while 82.5% (n=66/80) of patients have responded to 24-weeks of therapy. In all 40 treatment naïve patients (group A and group B), 72.5% (n=29/40) have responded at 16 weeks, while 85% (n=34/40) of patients have responded to 24-weeks of therapy. Similarly, in all 40-previously non-responder cases (group C and group D), 62.5% (n=25/40) of patients have responded at 16 weeks, while 77.5% (n=31/40) of patients have responded to 24-weeks of therapy. Conclusion: Results of this study confirm that dual therapy given for 24-weeks is more effective compare to 16-weeks therapy in both treatment naïve and previously non-responder cases, which may be either cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic, with chronic hepatitis-C genotype-3a infections.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 597
Author(s):  
Bianca Cerbu ◽  
Stelian Pantea ◽  
Felix Bratosin ◽  
Iulia Vidican ◽  
Mirela Turaiche ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic is an ongoing public health emergency. Patients with chronic diseases are at greater risk for complications and poor outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the liver function abnormalities and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and chronic hepatitis C. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted on a cohort of 126 patients with a history of hepatitis C, confirmed with COVID-19 between 01 April 2020 and 30 December 2020. Several clinical outcomes were compared between patients with active and non-active HCV infection, and the risks of liver impairment and all-cause mortality in active HCV patients were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: Among 1057 patients under follow-up for chronic HCV infection, 126 (11.9%) were confirmed with COVID-19; of these, 95 (75.4%) were under treatment or achieved SVR, while in the other 31 (24.6%), we found active HCV replication. There was a significantly higher proportion of severe COVID-19 cases in the active HCV group as compared to the non-active HCV group (32.2 vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age, sex, alanine aminotransferase, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and HCV viral load were significant independent risk factors for liver impairment and all-cause mortality. The length of stay in hospital and intensive care unit for COVID-19 was significantly higher in patients with active HCV infection (p-value < 0.001), and a higher proportion of these patients required mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: Active HCV infection is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document