scholarly journals Analysis of the Business Model of “Internet +” Intellectual Property Trading Platform—Based on Www.wtoip.com

Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Yan Li
2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1228-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Gehl

In Web 2.0, there is a social dichotomy at work based upon and reflecting the underlying Von Neumann Architecture of computers. In the hegemonic Web 2.0 business model, users are encouraged to process digital ephemera by sharing content, making connections, ranking cultural artifacts, and producing digital content, a mode of computing I call ‘affective processing.’ The Web 2.0 business model imagines users to be a potential superprocessor. In contrast, the memory possibilities of computers are typically commanded by Web 2.0 site owners. They seek to surveil every user action, store the resulting data, protect that data via intellectual property, and mine it for profit. Users are less likely to wield control over these archives. These archives are comprised of the products of affective processing; they are archives of affect, sites of decontextualized data which can be rearranged by the site owners to construct knowledge about Web 2.0 users.


Author(s):  
Rosalina Corrêa de Araújo ◽  
Patrícia Peralta ◽  
Bárbara Aime

This introductory study aims to assess the personality rights as a distinctive sign and also the constructionof its protection in the intellectual property scope. It has been pursued to demonstrate that the merchandisingof personality rights has been evolving to become a usual business model based on the commercial exploitationof fame that its holders have, therefore, reorienting the engagement of names related to luxury fashion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Jordan

This article notes that startup companies are temporary organizations in search of a repeatable and scalable business model that provides the organization with the ability to scale and grow while minimizing or preferably eliminating competition. This goal is achieved thru use of our Intellectual Property Pyramid TM (IPP) which is an analysis technique that accounts for both the market and the patent landscape to determine if the company’s IP (portfolio) creates a position that is “impervious to competitive advancement’s”.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Heitzmann

The pharmaceutical industry has been revolutionized by the new biotechnology companies during the last years. Facing patent expirations, lack of innovation and depleting product pipelines, the important structures turned to the funding of small biotechnology companies aimed at research and intellectual property securization. Alliances are primordial in the current economic climate. The market growth was questioned for years, but biotechnology companies shifted to product-driven strategies and the market performance has been verified during the last decade. Researchers still face challenges in transforming their science into businesses. They need to be fully equipped, and accompanied towards the right objectives to ensure the sustainability of the market as a whole.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B Klusas ◽  
Raymond H. Cypess ◽  
Seth Rosenfield ◽  
Adam Gerstein

This paper is an examination of the economics, organizational dynamics and structural factors inhibiting an electronic market for intellectual property.  Several intermediaries exist to facilitate the transition of intellectual property (IP) from sellers to buyers.  Over the past 20 years, a number of companies attempted to create an online “eBay for IP.”  These IP Exchanges (IPEs) failed to gain traction in competition with other mediums that provide channels to facilitate IP transactions.  Compounding the problem is the concentration of intellectual property assets amongst a small group of institutions and within those institutions as well as organizational hurdles inherent in academic technology transfer offices.  As a result, the business model for an online IPE market is fundamentally challenging, and no successful IPE exists to date.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell Robert Morgan ◽  
Owen Gwilym Roberts ◽  
Aled Morgan Edwards

M4K Pharma was incorporated to launch an open science drug discovery program that relies on regulatory exclusivity as its primary intellectual property and commercial asset, in lieu of patents.In many cases and in key markets, using regulatory exclusivity can provide equivalent commercial protection to patents, while also being compatible with open science. The model is proving attractive to government, foundation and individual funders, who collectively have different expectations for returns on investment compared with biotech, pharmaceutical companies, or venture capital investors.In the absence of these investor-driven requirements for returns, it should be possible to commercialize therapeutics at affordable prices.M4K is piloting this open science business model in a rare paediatric brain tumour, but there is no reason it should not be more widely applicable.


Author(s):  
Kathleen Mykytyn

The emergence of e-business as a viable business model is unquestioned and global in its involvement and impact. Further, the value that intellectual property (IP) in the form of trademarks, copyrights, and patents plays in that medium of doing business impacts businesses, information technology (IT) professionals, academics responsible for IT coursework and programs, and, of course, the legal community. This chapter reviews these IP types with particular emphasis on their relationship and impact on e-business. Relevant legal cases are cited and discussed to provide additional foundation to the e-business community. The chapter also provides appropriate recommendations for e-business in light of these IP issues, and identifies some possible future trends and research issues.


2009 ◽  
pp. 2245-2264
Author(s):  
Kathleen Mykytyn ◽  
Peter P. Mykytyn

The emergence of e-business as a viable business model is unquestioned and global in its involvement and impact. Further, the value that intellectual property (IP) in the form of trademarks, copyrights, and patents plays in that medium of doing business impacts businesses, information technology (IT) professionals, academics responsible for IT coursework and programs, and, of course, the legal community. This chapter reviews these IP types with particular emphasis on their relationship and impact on e-business. Relevant legal cases are cited and discussed to provide additional foundation to the e-business community. The chapter also provides appropriate recommendations for e-business in light of these IP issues, and identifies some possible future trends and research issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document