scholarly journals Investor Responses Towards Corporate Action

Author(s):  
Juniarti Juniarti ◽  
Alicia Putri Kharisma Candra Dewi ◽  
Catherine Catherine
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 215
Author(s):  
Arvi Alvianda

One of the most important elements in the framework of the business development strategy of public companies (issuers) is the addition of capital. The addition of capital can be done in two ways, namely Capital Increase by providing Pre-emptive Rights and Capital Additions without Giving Pre-emptive Rights. Providing Rights is the same as Rights Issue, while without giving Rights can be equated with Private Placement. However, generally people are more familiar with calling private placement with the term Right Issue without Preemptive Rights. Arrangements regarding Preemptive Rights are regulated in POJK No.32/POJK.04/2015 concerning Addition of Company Capital By Providing Pre-emptive Rights, while without providing Preemptive Rights is regulated in POJK No.38/POJK.04/2014 concerning Capital Increase of Public Companies without Giving Pre-emptive Rights. The research method is used a normative juridical method. The research specifications are used descriptive-analytical. From the results of the study it can be concluded that the Capital Increase without Giving Preemptive Rights is carried out by PT. SLJ GLOBAL Tbk, by issuing new shares to creditors as a form of debt payment is one of the best ways for the Company. This method proved to be able to reduce debt and increase the paid up capital of the Company, as well as making the Creditor as a new shareholder. However, corporate action through the issuance of new shares without giving HMETD, so that there are additional new investors, resulting in a percentage share ownership of each of the existing shareholders has decreased. (Dilution).


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-47
Author(s):  
Indra Saputra ◽  
Etty Murwaningsari

Objective – The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of environmental performance and environmental disclosure on economic performance of the Indonesian listed manufacturing companies by using corporate action as a moderating variable.  Design/methodology – This study used secondary data obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Indonesia. The sample consisted of manufacturing companies that are listed and follow the Company Performance Rating Assessment Program (Program Penilaian Peringkat Kinerja Perusahaan/PROPER) issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry for the period of 2011-2016. The study employed a purposive sampling approach, which includes 22 companies with 132 observations. The multiple linear regression method was used for data analysis. Results – The results indicated that environmental performance has a significant positive effect while environmental disclosure has a significant negative effect on economic performance. The testing of corporate action as a moderating variable demonstrated that it could not strengthen the effect of environmental performance on economic performance. However, it could enhance the effect of environmental disclosure on economic performance.


2019 ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Immanuele Firstiany ◽  
Dewa Gede Wirama

Right issue merupakan salah satu corporate action yang dapat memengaruhi jumlah dan harga saham yang berada di pasar. Kandungan informasi dari pengumuman right issue menjadi penting, karena dapat membuat pasar bereaksi terhadap pengumuman tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji kandungan informasi pada peristiwa pengumuman right issue di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan periode penelitian selama 10 tahun yaitu dari tahun 2008 sampai dengan 2017. Pengujian kandungan informasi suatu peristiwa seperti peristiwa pengumuman right issue umumnya menggunakan event study. Jendela peristiwa yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah selama 5 hari dengan menggunakan market-adjusted model dalam menghitung abnormal return. Sampel penelitian ini berjumlah 146 perusahaan yang ditentukan dengan metode purposive sampling. Berbeda dari yang dihipotesiskan, hasil pengujian one sample t-test menunjukkan bahwa pasar tidak bereaksi atas pengumuman right issue. Kata Kunci: Right issue, reaksi pasar, event study, market-adjusted model, abnormal return


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Lita Paromita Siregar

<em>In accordance with Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Competition Law, every corporate action that causes monopoly must be notified to the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in less than 30 (thirty) days. However, not all entrepreneurs are aware of this provision. As consequence of the delay, entrepreneurs are potentially subject to wide range of sanctions starting from warning letter, fines, to the worst scenario which is the cancellation of the corporate action. Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Company Law governs that all corporate action including mergers, acquisition and consolidation should be drawn in form of notarial deed and the Notary has an access to report such action to the Minister of Law and Human Rights if necessary. While the entrepreneurs appear before the Notary to make merger, acquisition or consolidation deed, the Notary may advise the entrepreneurs to notify KPPU if such merger is potentially fulfill certain condition under Law No.5 of 1999. However, Notary must also be aware that his role is limited by his responsibility to keep private information disclosed by the party before him. In connection with those conditions, this research provides elaboration on how Notary should take a role in merger action and his limitation in it.</em><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: </strong>Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Persaingan Usaha mengatur bahwa dalam hal terjadi aksi korporasi yang menyebabkan monopoli, maka pelaku usaha wajib untuk memberikan pemberitahuan atas peristiwa tersebut dalam jangka waktu 30 (tiga puluh) hari kepada Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). Akan tetapi, tidak semua pelaku usaha memahami ketentuan ini. Oleh sebab itu, pada beberapa kasus pelaku usaha dikenai sanksi yang bervariasi, mulai dari surat teguran, denda dalam jumlah besar, hingga pembatalan<em> </em>aksi korporasi tersebut. Sehubungan dengan kondisi ini, Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas mengatur bahwa setiap aksi korporasi yang meliputi penggabungan, peleburan dan pengambilalihan akuisisi harus dituangkan persetujuannya oleh para pemegang saham dalam suatu akta notariil dan dilaporkan oleh Notaris kepada Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia apabila diperlukan. Sehubungan dengan pengaturan tersebut, maka setiap kali para pelaku usaha hadir di hadapan Notaris untuk membuat akta<em> </em>atas aksi korporasi, Notaris dapat mengambil peran untuk mencegah terjadinya keterlambatan pemberitahuan tersebut melalui pemberian penyuluhan kepada para penghadap. Akan tetapi, Notaris juga harus tahu bahwa perannya tersebut juga terbatas pada kewajibannya untuk menjaga informasi dari para pihak yang menghadapnya. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, penelitian ini mencoba untuk mengelaborasi peran Notaris dalam mencegah keterlambatan pemberitahuan tersebut sejauh mana peran yang dapat diambil Notaris sehubungan dengan hal tersebut.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Dede Soenaryo ◽  
Indra Gunawan Siregar

This research aims to assess and analyze audit opinions, audit delays and corporate actions against auditor switching. The design of this study uses explanatory causality design. The population used in this study is companies listed on the IDX, especially the pharmaceutical sector for the period 2011-2017. The analytical method uses logistic regression and data analysis. The sample selection technique uses purposive sampling.The results of this study partially indicate that the audit delay variable and Public Accounting firm have no effect on auditor switching. whereas corporate action has a significant positive effect on auditor switching. The findings of this research are companies that make management changes or additions to branches and so on will have an impact on replacing the old auditor to become a new auditor. This can not be separated from the growing condition of the company which will certainly have increasingly complex problems.Keywords: Audit Delay, Corporate Action, Public Accounting firm and AuditorSwitching.ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis opini audit, audit delay dan aksi korporasi terhadap auditor switching.Desain penelitian ini menggunakan desain kausalitas eksplanatoris.Populasi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI khususnya sektor farmasi periode 2011-2017.Metode analisis menggunakan regregsi logistik, dan analisis data.Teknik pemilihan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling.Hasil dari penelitian ini secara parsial menunjukkan bahwa variabel audit delay dan ukuran KAP tidak berpengaruh terhadap auditor switching. sedangkan aksi korporasi berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap auditor switching. Temuan peneltian ini adalah perusahaan yang melakukan pergantian manajemen atau penambahan cabang dan sebagainya akan berimbas pada digantinya auditor lama menjadi auditor yang baru. Hal ini tidak lepas dari kondisi perusahaan yang semakin besar tentu akan memiliki masalah yang semakin kompleks.Kata Kunci :Audit Delay, Aksi Korporasi, Ukuran KAP dan Auditor Switching.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document