scholarly journals New Progress in Job Design Theory: Literature Review of Job Crafting

Author(s):  
Xiao Yuchun ◽  
Ke Junqun
2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Tims ◽  
Arnold B. Bakker

Orientation: For a long time, employees have been viewed as passive performers of their assigned job tasks. Recently, several scholars have argued that job design theory needs to address the influence of employees on their job designs.Research purpose: The purpose of the study was to fit job crafting in job design theory.Motivation for the study: The study was an attempt to shed more light on the types of proactive behaviours of individual employees at work. Moreover, we explored the concept of job crafting and its antecedents and consequences.Research design, approach and method: A literature study was conducted in which the focus was first on proactive behaviour of the employee and then on job crafting.Main findings: Job crafting can be seen as a specific form of proactive behaviour in which the employee initiates changes in the level of job demands and job resources. Job crafting may be facilitated by job and individual characteristics and may enable employees to fit their jobs to their personal knowledge, skills and abilities on the one hand and to their preferences and needs on the other hand.Practical/managerial implications: Job crafting may be a good way for employees to improve their work motivation and other positive work outcomes. Employees could be encouraged to exert more influence on their job characteristics.Contribution/value-add: This article describes a relatively new perspective on active job redesign by the individual, called job crafting, which has important implications for job design theories.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Chenhui Ouyang ◽  
Yongyue Zhu ◽  
Minyu Guo

We used empowerment theory and job design theory to build a mediated moderation model to examine the relationship between empowering leadership and the turnover intention of industrial workers. Participants were 272 industrial workers in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Results show that empowering leadership significantly reduced participants' turnover intention and that job crafting exerted a partial mediating effect on the negative correlation between empowering leadership and turnover intention. Participants' proactive personality positively moderated the effect of empowering leadership on their turnover intention, and part of the moderating effect was transmitted via job crafting. Our results have theoretical implications for related research and practical implications for human resource management practices in the manufacturing industry.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Yang ◽  
Pingqing Liu ◽  
Zunkang Cui

While argued to be fostering creativity, the effect of job crafting on creativity often turned out to be less effective than expected. The reason is that most existing studies focused on the top-down job design interventions. We proposed an elaborated theoretical model to explain the influence of strengths-based job crafting (SJC) on employee creativity (EC). Specifically, we examined the mediating effect of job self-efficacy (JSE) and the moderating effect of workplace status (WP) based on self-affirmation theory. A sample of 480 employees and their supervisors completed a battery of questionnaires. The results revealed that strengths-based job crafting was positively related to employee creativity, with job self-efficacy acting as a mediator for this relationship. Workplace status moderated both the direct and the indirect effects of job self-efficacy. For employees with a higher workplace status, strengths-based job crafting may generate more forces to promote employee creativity. The results suggest that strengths-based job crafting and workplace status can inspire employee creativity through a self-affirmation process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  

Organizations usually implement technological innovations with the aim of improving and optimizing the efficiency of services and work processes. However, it appears that a technological transition does not always lead to the intended result and may even result in poorer performance and reduced well-being of employees. This is also referred to as the technology paradox. The central question that is addressed in this extensive adaptation of my inaugural address is how employees can continue to perform sustainable under the rapidly changing circumstances of digitalization. Four factors are discussed that are important for sustainable work performance, also in times of digitalization: (1) a healthy job design; (2) a good work-life balance; (3) attention for diversity of personnel; (4) opportunities for job crafting. In addition, it is explored how digitalization influences these factors. Finally, some ideas for research are discussed to better understand how sustainable performance in times of digitalization can be assured so that we can reduce the technology paradox and optimize the potentials of technology.


Author(s):  
Katherine Sanders ◽  
Patrick V. Farrell ◽  
Sarah K.A. Pfatteicher

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Tims ◽  
Sharon K. Parker

Job crafting, or proactive changes that individuals make in their job design, can influence and be influenced by coworkers. Although considerable research has emerged on this topic, overall, the way job crafting is responded to by coworkers has received little theoretical attention. The goal of this article is to develop a model that allows for a better understanding of job crafting in interdependent contexts. Drawing on attribution and social information theories, we propose that when job crafting has a negative or positive impact on coworkers, coworkers will make an attribution about the crafter’s prosocial motive. This attribution in turn influences whether coworkers respond in an antagonistic or a supportive way toward job crafters. Ultimately, coworkers’ reactions shape the experienced affective work outcomes of job crafters. We also theorize the factors that moderate coworkers’ reactions to job crafting behaviors and the job crafter’s susceptibility to coworker influence.


2019 ◽  
pp. 0734371X1986285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris van der Voet ◽  
Bram Steijn

This study examines how changes in relational job characteristics relate to the prosocial motivation of public professionals. Drawing on relational job design theory, changes in job contact and job impact are hypothesized to covary with prosocial motivation. With a unique longitudinal design, we study youth care professionals in The Netherlands, who are embedded in a reform aimed at decentralizing youth care to bring professionals closer to their clients. Quantitative data were collected through a three-wave survey prior to the reform implementation and at, respectively, 1 and 2 years after its implementation. The results indicate that changing levels of job contact and job impact are related to changes in prosocial motivation. The study contributes to academic debates regarding the dynamic nature of prosocial motivation and our findings provide longitudinal evidence for relational job design theory.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Chandrani Sen ◽  
Ruchi Khandelwal

At workplace, managers have adopted practices to increase the well-being of the staff. Job crafting has been recently recognized as something that organizations can stimulate them to do so themselves by making them think about job design that puts employees “ in the driver’s seat” in cultivating meaningfulness in their work. Along with job crafting, perceived organizational support, perceived autonomy support can also play a lot of role in the well-being of employees. The present paper results revealed a significant positive relationship between all the variables and regression also predicted Perceived organizational Support as the most contributing factor to Workplace Well-being.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document